The punishable perils of plagiarism Melissa Huseman DAnnunzio

Transcriber: Andrea McDonough
Reviewer: Jessica Ruby

Welcome to the Department of Plagiarism Investigation.

The D.P.I. has dealt with numerous complex cases

in their effort to bring plagiarists to justice

and to rescue purloined texts.

The first form of plagiarism

that the D.P.I. regularly encounters

is known as brain child snatching,

in honor of the Latin word, plagiarius,

from which plagiarism originates.

Brain child snatchers sneak up on innocent papers

and copy and paste them

without citing any sources,

putting quotation marks around direct quotes

or changing a word.

They’ve also been known to steal and hold

particularly eloquent essays for ransom.

When brain child snatchers get together,

they form a kidnapping ring,

which involves brain child snatching

from multiple sources.

Some perpetrators have even been known

to commit self-plagiarism,

one of the laziest crimes in the annals of the D.P.I.

Also known as one-sided collaborators,

these odd balls snatch up entire texts

or small passages that they’ve written before

and present them as brand-new material.

Brain child snatchers and kidnapping rings

are easy for the D.P.I. to catch.

Just paste a few passages into a search engine,

and BAM!

They’re caught red-handed.

The more covert forms of plagiarism

include the wild goose chase technique,

in which plagiarists create fake authors,

book titles,

page numbers,

or other information

in order to cover up plagiarism.

And the old synonym switcheroo

in which plagiarists utilize a thesaurus

as their main weapon.

By substituting a synonym

for nearly every word in the document

and leaving the sentence structure

and order of the ideas the same,

plagiarists give legitimate paraphrasing

a very bad name.

Shoddy paraphrasing is also a key part

of variations on a smokescreen,

a technique in which multiple passages

are paraphrased,

then pasted together into one.

The thorniest issue that the D.P.I. deals with

is the misconception

that you can never be accused of plagiarism

if you use quotes and cite your sources.

This is most certainly not the case

because a paper that is made up

of passage upon passage of other people’s ideas

is known as a wholly quotable document.

This is considered plagiarism

since there are no original thoughts in the work.

Similarly, passage after passage

of too closely paraphrased text from multiple cited sources

is also plagiarism of the pervasively paraphrased kind

because the ideas still aren’t one’s own.

And lastly, the technique of revealing while concealing

is plagiarism because it involves selective amnesia

regarding one’s sources

in an attempt to cover up wholly quotable

and pervasively paraphrased issues in a text.

Some passages are meticulously documented,

quoted,

or paraphrased,

while others are presented entirely as one’s own.

As you can see, the D.P.I. has its hands full,

tackling all sorts of academic mischief and mayhem,

ranging from the petty to the outrageous.

Given the gravity of these transgressions,

you might be wondering why you’ve never heard

of the Department of Plagiarism Investigation’s victories.

That’s because it doesn’t technically exist.

But people, like you and me, can be our own D.P.I. agents

to fight plagiarism

and uphold the values of original thinking.

We know that the best defense against plagiarism

consists of writers who save themselves

time, worry, and effort

by taking the far easier road

of just doing the work themselves.

抄写员:Andrea McDonough
审稿人:Jessica Ruby

欢迎来到抄袭调查部。

D.P.I.

在努力将抄袭者绳之以法

并拯救被盗文本的过程中,他处理了许多复杂的案件。 D.P.I.

的第一种抄袭形式。

经常遇到

被称为脑儿童抢夺,

以纪念剽窃的拉丁词

plagiarius。

聪明的孩子抢夺者偷偷摸摸无辜的论文

并复制并粘贴它们

而不引用任何来源,

在直接引用周围加上引号

或更改单词。

他们还以窃取和持有

特别雄辩的论文以勒索赎金而闻名。

脑儿抢夺者聚在一起

,形成绑架圈,

从多个来源抢夺脑儿。

一些肇事者甚至被

称为自我剽窃,

这是 D.P.I. 史上最懒惰的罪行之一。

也被称为单方面的合作者,

这些奇怪的球抢走了

他们以前写过的整个文本或小段落,

并将它们作为全新的材料呈现。 对于

D.P.I. 来说,脑儿童抢夺者和绑架团伙

很容易。 去抓。

只需将一些段落粘贴到搜索引擎中,

然后 BAM!

他们被当场抓获。

更隐蔽的剽窃形式

包括野鹅追逐技术,

在这种技术中,剽窃者创建虚假的作者、

书名、

页码

或其他信息

以掩盖剽窃。

以及

抄袭者利用同义词库

作为主要武器的旧同义词切换。

通过用同义词代替

文档中的几乎每个单词

并保持句子结构

和想法的顺序相同,

剽窃者给合法的释义

一个非常糟糕的名字。

粗制滥造的释义也是

烟幕变体的关键部分,烟幕

是一种将多个

段落释义,

然后粘贴在一起的技术。

D.P.I. 最棘手的问题。 处理的

是一种误解

,即

如果您使用引号并引用您的来源,就永远不会被指控抄袭。

肯定不是这种情况,

因为一篇由

其他人的想法的段落组成的论文

被称为完全可引用的文件。

这被认为是抄袭,

因为作品中没有原创思想。

类似地,

从多个引用的来源中转述过于紧密的文本的段落

也属于普遍转述类型的剽窃,

因为这些想法仍然不是自己的。

最后,在隐瞒的同时揭示的技术

是剽窃,因为它涉及

对一个人的来源

的选择性健忘,以试图掩盖文本中完全可引用

和普遍转述的问题。

有些段落被精心记录、

引用

或解释,

而另一些则完全是自己的。

如您所见,D.P.I. 忙得不可开交,

处理各种学术上的恶作剧和混乱,

从琐碎的到令人发指的。

鉴于这些违规行为的严重性,

您可能想知道为什么您从未

听说过剽窃调查部的胜利。

那是因为它在技术上不存在。

但是,像你我这样的人,可以成为我们自己的 D.P.I.

代理商打击抄袭

并维护原创思维的价值观。

我们知道,防止抄袭的最佳方法

是让作家

通过采取更容易

的方式自己完成工作来节省自己的时间、担忧和精力。