Canceling cancel culture with compassion

[Music]

[Applause]

i

am unabashedly a daddy’s girl

my daddy is the first person to have

told me that i was beautiful

he often told me that he loved me and he

was one of my favorite people in the

entire world

which was why it was really challenging

to discover that we had a deep

ideological divide

that was so sincere and so deep

that caused me to not talk to him for 10

years

before the term was coined

i cancelled my father

in the last few years cancel culture has

of course come into great prominence

it’s existed throughout time

but cancel culture in the bigger society

is when a person

in prominence says or does something

that we the people disagree with

and the decision is made to make them

persona non grata

they are done they are not to be revered

they are not to be

a part of our world anymore and that is

in the public

realm i’m going to talk to you today

about the private realm when we choose

to cancel the people

in our circle the people in our core

the people who love us and who we love

and it has been mutually beneficial but

due to a deep and sincere

ideological divide we make the decision

to cancel them out of our lives

i want to suggest that cancel

culture needs to change

and instead we need to move to

compassion culture

but before i go there let me tell you

two of the premises that exist when we

indulge in cancel culture

one we have to believe that we’re right

a hundred percent no possibility of

being wrong

and two the other person the person

we’re going to cancel

clearly does not have the ability to

change

to grow to develop

obviously both of these are problematic

because

sometimes we’re not right i don’t know

about you but there have been times in

my life when i knew beyond a shadow of a

doubt that i was right

only to discover that i was

wrong badly wrong

completely missed the mark so if it

could happen to me

and perhaps it’s happened to you perhaps

it could happen to others

the second is a little even more

challenging because

i know that i’ve changed over the years

haven’t we all though the core parts of

betty have pretty much stayed the same

there have been key elements that have

changed drastically

the betty of eight years old was not the

same as the betty of 18

which was not the same as 28 which was

not the same as 38.

i’ve changed and if i’m able to change

shouldn’t i extend grace to believe that

others can change too so

what should we do instead of canceling

people we should use the tool

called compassion i find the definition

of compassion

is a fascinating one and it’s not one

that i hear people talk about

compassion means to suffer

with someone to suffer

alongside them imagine

when someone say grandpa says that thing

that’s caused you to decide he’s no

longer invited to thanksgiving

what if instead we chose to suffer

alongside him we decided that our love

was so big so deep

so strong that we were willing to

suffer even when it could be potentially

painful

now let’s be clear i am not denying

anyone’s right

to cancel anyone else what i’m

suggesting

is that maybe that’s not the best way

when we think about the situation with

grandpa thanksgiving

if we choose to cancel him we are no

longer in proximity to him

not only do we not to get to hear his

point of view

we don’t get to share ours what if

we’re the only person because of our

deep connection

and love and affection for our

grandfather

and substitute anyone you choose what if

we’re the ones to plant seeds of change

seeds of influence seeds of difference

now to be fair i cannot promise you that

just because you plant the seed

that it will get water that it’ll get

any sunlight

or even a little fertilizer but what i

can tell you

is that if you don’t plant it who

will i find it interesting

this idea of suffering alongside someone

it means that we are choosing to value

the totality of the person

rather than one particular aspect

like a framework or a mindset or a

belief system

we’re choosing to believe that the

entire person is more valuable

than any of the individual parts

and i found an amazing duo who

demonstrated this

beautifully perhaps you’ve heard of them

the late justices ruth bader ginsburg

and antonine scalia were close

close friends and they

were completely divided in terms of

belief systems

in fact antonin scalia once said

what’s not to like other than her

thoughts on the law

he believed she was wrong she believed

he was wrong

they did not shift in that point of view

whatsoever

and yet they had tea together every week

and every new year’s eve they spent it

together with their families

they went on family vacations together

they chose to suffer with

each other rather than to cancel each

other

their love and respect for each other

continued to grow

even though they never saw eye to eye

i imagine that curiosity might be a part

of that

that if we choose to be curious about

that which is different

we might discover something along the

way

after all if we are who we are because

of our lived experiences

isn’t that true for someone else and

have we ever decided to use that tool of

empathy

of walking a mile or so in someone

else’s shoes

to really discover the context for why

they believe what they believe

now by now you’re probably saying yeah

okay betty this sounds good but what

about you

what about you and your dad

it’s a fair question after 10 years

of not talking to my dad i picked up the

phone one day

called him and said i bet

if it were up to you you’d probably go

back in time

and change some things i know i would

but since we can’t how about we start

again

and he said yes because i love you

i always have and i always will

i am so grateful that i made that call

because there was no way for me to know

that a few years later

my dad would develop alzheimer’s

and a few years after that he would die

and we never saw eye to eye

about the thing that divided us

ever but our love

continued it continued through those ten

years when we didn’t speak

and it continued in the six years after

so i am encouraging us to become a

society of people

that choose compassion over canceling

i’m asking us to consider that curiosity

might be a better practice that we might

choose

empathy that we might choose to have a

love that is so

deep so wide so strong

that it can surpass differences

why are we so scared of differences

anyway

i also want us to be a people that plant

seeds seeds of change seeds of

influence seeds of diversity

again i cannot promise to you

or anyone else that planting that seed

is going to make a difference but

what if it does i am the sum of who i

am because of everything that i’ve been

exposed to

my mind has changed over the years and

grown because of the people

in my life who planted seeds in me

some that i saw and some that i didn’t

so wouldn’t it be great if instead of

having a cancel culture

we create a compassion culture where we

are willing to suffer

alongside the ones we love because

we love them and can’t we become

a community that plants seeds

after all if we don’t

who will

thank you

[Music]

you

[音乐]

[掌声]

我毫不掩饰地是爸爸的女儿

我爸爸是第一个

告诉我我很漂亮的人,

他经常告诉我他爱我,他

是全世界我最喜欢的人之一,

这就是为什么 真的

很难发现我们之间存在

如此真诚和如此深刻的深刻意识形态分歧,

以至于我

在创造这个词之前的 10

年都没有和他

说话 声名鹊起,

它一直存在,

但在更大的社会中取消文化

是当一个

声名显赫的人说或做

了我们人民不同意的事情,

并决定让他们成为

不受欢迎的人,

他们已经完成了,他们不应该受到尊敬

他们

不再是我们世界的一部分,那就是

在公共

领域我今天要和你

谈谈私人领域,当我们

选择取消

我们圈子里的人时,我们核心的人

那些爱我们和我们所爱的人

,这是互惠互利的,但

由于深刻而真诚的

意识形态分歧,我们决定

将它们从我们的生活

中取消,我想建议取消

文化需要改变

,相反我们需要改变 转向

同情文化,

但在我去那里之前,让我告诉你

两个当我们沉迷于取消文化时存在的前提

一个我们必须相信我们是

百分百正确的,

没有错误的可能性

,两个另一个人就是那个人

我们要取消

显然没有能力

改变成长发展

显然这两者都是有问题的

因为

有时我们不对我

不了解你但在

我的生活中有些时候我知道超越

怀疑我是对的

只是发现我

错了严重错误

完全错过了标记所以如果它

可能发生在我

身上也许它发生在你身上也许

它可能发生在其他人身上

第二个是li 更具

挑战性,因为

我知道这些年来我已经发生了变化,

尽管贝蒂的核心部分

几乎保持不变

,但我们不是所有人都有一些关键元素

发生了巨大

的变化,八岁的贝蒂不是

与 18 岁的贝蒂相同,与 28 岁的贝蒂不同,

与 38 岁的不同。

我已经改变了,如果我能够改变,

我不应该相信

别人也可以改变,那么

我们应该怎么做 做而不是取消

人们,我们应该使用

名为同情的工具我发现同情的定义

是一个迷人的定义

,我不是听到人们谈论

同情意味着

与某人一起受苦,

与他们一起受苦想象

当有人说爷爷说那件事时

这导致你决定他

不再被邀请去感恩节

如果我们选择

和他一起受苦我们决定我们的爱

是如此之深

如此强烈以至于我们愿意

受苦即使它可能是 现在可能很

痛苦

让我们明确一点,我并没有否认

任何人

取消其他任何人的权利我的意思

是,

当我们考虑与爷爷感恩节的情况时,

如果我们选择取消他,我们

不再接近,也许这不是最好的方式 对他来说

,我们不仅不能听到他

的观点,

我们也

不能分享我们的观点

公平地说,我们是播下改变种子的人,现在我不能向你保证,

仅仅因为你种下了种子

,它就会得到水,它会得到

任何阳光

甚至一点肥料,但是什么 我

可以告诉你的

是,如果你不种植它,

谁会觉得有趣

这种与某人一起受苦的

想法意味着我们选择重视

人的整体

而不是

像框架这样的特定方面

我们选择相信

整个人比任何单个部分都更有价值的工作或心态或信仰体系

,我发现了一个了不起的二人组,他们

完美地展示了这一点,也许你听说过

他们已故的法官露丝·巴德·金斯堡

和安东尼·斯卡利亚是亲密的

朋友,他们

信仰体系

方面完全分裂事实上,安东尼·斯卡利亚曾经说过

,除了她

对法律的看法之外,还有什么不喜欢的,

他认为她错了,她认为

他错了,

他们并没有改变 不管是什么观点

但他们每周

和每个新年前夜都在一起喝茶

他们和家人一起度过

他们一起去家庭度假

他们选择了

彼此受苦而不是取消彼此

他们对彼此的爱和尊重

继续增长,

即使他们从未见过面

我想

如果我们选择对此感到好奇

,好奇心可能是其中的一部分 ich 是不同的,

我们可能会在此过程中发现一些东西

,毕竟如果我们是我们自己,

因为我们的生活经历

对其他人来说并非如此,

我们是否曾经决定使用

在某人身上走一英里左右的同理心工具

其他人的

鞋子真正发现

他们为什么相信他们

现在相信的背景现在你可能会说是的

好吧贝蒂这听起来不错但是

你呢你和你爸爸

呢这是一个公平的问题经过 10

年不和我说话 爸爸

有一天我拿起电话

给他打电话说我敢打赌

如果由你决定你可能会

及时回到过去

并改变一些我知道我会

但因为我们不能我们重新开始怎么样

他说 是的,因为我爱你,

我一直爱你,我永远都会

很感激我打了那个电话,

因为我无法

知道几年后

我父亲会患上老年痴呆症

,几年后他会

死 我们从来没有

意见一致 曾经使我们分裂的事情,

但我们的爱

仍在继续,

在我们没有说话的那十年里

一直在继续,在六年后继续,

所以我鼓励我们成为一个

选择同情而不是取消的人的社会

我在问 我们要考虑好奇心

可能是一种更好的做法我们可能会

选择

同理心我们可能会选择拥有

如此

深刻如此广泛如此强烈

以至于可以超越差异的爱

为什么无论如何我们都如此害怕差异

我也希望我们成为 一个

播下改变

种子的人 再次影响多样性的种子

我不能向你

或其他任何人保证,播下这颗

种子会有所作为,

但如果它确实发生了,我就是我是谁的总和,

因为一切

这些年来,我的想法发生了变化并

成长,因为我生命中的人们

在我身上种下了

一些我看到的和一些我没有看到的种子,

如果不是拥有一个,那不是很好吗?

约 非文化

我们创造了一种同情文化,

我们愿意

与我们所爱的人一起受苦,因为

我们爱他们,如果我们不这样做,我们就不能成为

一个播种种子的社区,

谁会

感谢你

[音乐]