Dayananda Saraswati The profound journey of compassion

A human child is born,

and for quite a long time

is a consumer.

It cannot be consciously a contributor.

It is helpless.

It doesn’t know how to survive,

even though it is endowed with an instinct to survive.

It needs the help of mother, or a foster mother, to survive.

It can’t afford to doubt the person who tends the child.

It has to totally surrender,

as one surrenders to an anesthesiologist.

It has to totally surrender.

That implies a lot of trust.

That implies the trusted person

won’t violate the trust.

As the child grows,

it begins to discover

that the person trusted is violating the trust.

It doesn’t know even the word “violation.”

Therefore, it has to blame itself,

a wordless blame,

which is more difficult to really resolve –

the wordless self-blame.

As the child grows to become an adult:

so far, it has been a consumer,

but the growth of a human being

lies in his or her capacity to contribute,

to be a contributor.

One cannot contribute unless one feels secure,

one feels big,

one feels: I have enough.

To be compassionate is not a joke.

It’s not that simple.

One has to discover a certain bigness in oneself.

That bigness should be centered on oneself,

not in terms of money,

not in terms of power you wield,

not in terms of any status that you can command in the society,

but it should be centered on oneself.

The self: you are self-aware.

On that self, it should be centered – a bigness, a wholeness.

Otherwise, compassion is just a word and a dream.

You can be compassionate occasionally,

more moved by empathy

than by compassion.

Thank God we are empathetic.

When somebody’s in pain, we pick up the pain.

In a Wimbledon final match,

these two guys fight it out.

Each one has got two games.

It can be anybody’s game.

What they have sweated so far has no meaning.

One person wins.

The tennis etiquette is, both the players have to come to the net

and shake hands.

The winner boxes the air

and kisses the ground,

throws his shirt as though somebody is waiting for it.

(Laughter)

And this guy has to come to the net.

When he comes to the net,

you see, his whole face changes.

It looks as though he’s wishing that he didn’t win.

Why? Empathy.

That’s human heart.

No human heart is denied of that empathy.

No religion can demolish that by indoctrination.

No culture, no nation and nationalism –

nothing can touch it

because it is empathy.

And that capacity to empathize

is the window through which you reach out to people,

you do something that makes a difference in somebody’s life –

even words, even time.

Compassion is not defined in one form.

There’s no Indian compassion.

There’s no American compassion.

It transcends nation, the gender, the age.

Why? Because it is there in everybody.

It’s experienced by people occasionally.

Then this occasional compassion,

we are not talking about –

it will never remain occasional.

By mandate, you cannot make a person compassionate.

You can’t say, “Please love me.”

Love is something you discover.

It’s not an action,

but in the English language, it is also an action.

I will come to it later.

So one has got to discover a certain wholeness.

I am going to cite the possibility of being whole,

which is within our experience, everybody’s experience.

In spite of a very tragic life,

one is happy in moments which are very few and far between.

And the one who is happy,

even for a slapstick joke,

accepts himself and also the scheme of things in which one finds oneself.

That means the whole universe,

known things and unknown things.

All of them are totally accepted

because you discover your wholeness in yourself.

The subject – “me” –

and the object – the scheme of things –

fuse into oneness,

an experience nobody can say, “I am denied of,”

an experience common to all and sundry.

That experience confirms that, in spite of all your limitations –

all your wants, desires, unfulfilled, and the credit cards

and layoffs

and, finally, baldness –

you can be happy.

But the extension of the logic is

that you don’t need to fulfill your desire to be happy.

You are the very happiness, the wholeness that you want to be.

There’s no choice in this:

that only confirms the reality

that the wholeness cannot be different from you,

cannot be minus you.

It has got to be you.

You cannot be a part of wholeness

and still be whole.

Your moment of happiness reveals that reality,

that realization, that recognition:

“Maybe I am the whole.

Maybe the swami is right.

Maybe the swami is right.” You start your new life.

Then everything becomes meaningful.

I have no more reason to blame myself.

If one has to blame oneself, one has a million reasons plus many.

But if I say, in spite of my body being limited –

if it is black it is not white, if it is white it is not black:

body is limited any which way you look at it. Limited.

Your knowledge is limited, health is limited,

and power is therefore limited,

and the cheerfulness is going to be limited.

Compassion is going to be limited.

Everything is going to be limitless.

You cannot command compassion

unless you become limitless, and nobody can become limitless,

either you are or you are not. Period.

And there is no way of your being not limitless too.

Your own experience reveals, in spite of all limitations, you are the whole.

And the wholeness is the reality of you

when you relate to the world.

It is love first.

When you relate to the world,

the dynamic manifestation of the wholeness

is, what we say, love.

And itself becomes compassion

if the object that you relate to evokes that emotion.

Then that again transforms into giving, into sharing.

You express yourself because you have compassion.

To discover compassion, you need to be compassionate.

To discover the capacity to give and share,

you need to be giving and sharing.

There is no shortcut: it is like swimming by swimming.

You learn swimming by swimming.

You cannot learn swimming on a foam mattress and enter into water.

(Laughter)

You learn swimming by swimming. You learn cycling by cycling.

You learn cooking by cooking,

having some sympathetic people around you

to eat what you cook.

(Laughter)

And, therefore, what I say,

you have to fake it and make it.

(Laughter)

You need to.

My predecessor meant that.

You have to act it out.

You have to act compassionately.

There is no verb for compassion,

but you have an adverb for compassion.

That’s interesting to me.

You act compassionately.

But then, how to act compassionately if you don’t have compassion?

That is where you fake.

You fake it and make it. This is the mantra of the United States of America.

(Laughter)

You fake it and make it.

You act compassionately as though you have compassion:

grind your teeth,

take all the support system.

If you know how to pray, pray.

Ask for compassion.

Let me act compassionately.

Do it.

You’ll discover compassion

and also slowly a relative compassion,

and slowly, perhaps if you get the right teaching,

you’ll discover compassion is a dynamic manifestation

of the reality of yourself, which is oneness, wholeness,

and that’s what you are.

With these words, thank you very much.

(Applause)

一个人类的孩子出生了

,很长一段时间

都是消费者。

它不能有意识地成为贡献者。

这是无助的。

它不知道如何生存,

尽管它被赋予了生存的本能。

它需要母亲或养母的帮助才能生存。

不能怀疑照顾孩子的人。

它必须完全投降,

就像向麻醉师投降一样。

它必须完全投降。

这意味着很多信任。

这意味着受信任的人

不会违反信任。

随着孩子的成长,

它开始

发现信任的人正在违反信任。

它连“违规”这个词都不认识。

所以,它不得不自责

,无言的自责

,更难真正解决

——无言的自责。

随着孩子长大成人:

到目前为止,它一直是消费者,

但一个人的成长

在于他或她的贡献能力

,成为贡献者。

一个人不能做出贡献,除非一个人感到安全,

一个人觉得自己很大,

一个人觉得:我有足够的。

有同情心不是开玩笑。

没那么简单。

一个人必须发现自己的某种伟大。

那个大应该以自己为中心,

不是以金钱为中心,

不是以你掌握的权力,

不是以你在社会上可以支配的任何地位,

而是以自己为中心。

自我:你有自我意识。

它应该以那个自我为中心——一个大,一个整体。

否则,同情只是一个词和一个梦想。

你偶尔会富有同情心,

更多的是同情而

不是同情。

感谢上帝,我们是善解人意的。

当有人痛苦时,我们会承受痛苦。

在温布尔登决赛中,

这两个家伙打了起来。

每个人都有两场比赛。

它可以是任何人的游戏。

他们到目前为止所流的汗已经没有任何意义。

一人获胜。

网球礼仪是,双方球员都必须来到网前

握手。

获胜者将空气

包裹起来,亲吻地面,

扔掉他的衬衫,好像有人在等待它。

(笑声

) 这家伙必须上网。

当他来到网前,

你看,他的整个脸都变了。

看起来他希望自己没有赢。

为什么? 同情。

那是人心。

没有人会否认这种同理心。

没有任何宗教可以通过灌输来摧毁它。

没有文化,没有民族和民族主义——

没有什么可以触及它,

因为它是同理心。

同理心的能力

是你接触他人的窗口,

你做一些改变某人生活的事情——

甚至是言语,甚至是时间。

同情不是以一种形式定义的。

没有印度人的同情心。

没有美国人的同情心。

它超越了民族、性别、年龄。

为什么? 因为它存在于每个人身上。

人们偶尔会经历。

那么这种偶尔的同情,

我们不是在谈论——

它永远不会是偶尔的。

通过授权,你不能让一个人富有同情心。

你不能说,“请爱我”。

爱是你发现的东西。

这不是一个动作,

但在英语中,它也是一个动作。

我稍后会谈到它。

因此,人们必须发现某种完整性。

我将引用完整的可能性,

这是我们的经验,每个人的经验。

尽管生活非常悲惨,

但在极少数且相隔甚远的时刻,人们还是会感到幸福。

一个快乐的人,

即使是为了一个闹剧,

也会接受自己,也接受自己发现的事物的计划。

这意味着整个宇宙,

已知的事物和未知的事物。

所有这些都被完全接受,

因为你发现了你自己的完整性。

主体——“我”——

和客体——事物的体系——

融合为一体,

一种没有人可以说“我被否定”

的体验,一种所有人共有的、各种各样的体验。

那次经历证实,尽管你有所有的限制——

你所有的愿望、愿望、未实现的、信用卡

和裁员

,最后是秃顶——

你还是可以快乐的。

但逻辑的延伸是

,你不需要满足你想要快乐的愿望。

你就是你想要成为的那个幸福,那个完整的人。

没有选择的余地:

那只能

证实整体性不能和你不同,

不能减去你。

一定是你。

你不能成为整体的一部分

,但仍然是整体。

你的幸福时刻揭示了那个实相、

那个觉悟、那个认知:

“也许我就是整体。

也许那个斯瓦米是对的。

也许那个斯瓦米是对的。” 你开始你的新生活。

然后一切都变得有意义。

我没有更多的理由责怪自己了。

如果一个人必须责备自己,一个人有一百万个理由加上很多。

但是如果我说,尽管我的身体是有限的——

如果它是黑色的,它就不是白色的,如果它是白色的,它就不是黑色的:

无论你怎么看,身体都是有限的。 有限的。

你的知识是有限的,健康是有限的,

因此力量是有限的

,快乐也将是有限的。

同情心是有限的。

一切都将是无限的。

除非你变得无限,否则你无法命令慈悲,没有人可以变得无限,

无论你是或不是。 时期。

你也没有办法是无限的。

你自己的经验表明,尽管有种种限制,你是整体。 当你

与世界联系时,整体性就是你的现实

首先是爱。

当你与世界建立联系时,

整体性的动态表现

就是我们所说的爱。

如果你所涉及的对象唤起了那种情感,它本身就会变成同情。

然后这又变成了给予,变成了分享。

你表达自己是因为你有同情心。

要发现同情心,你需要富有同情心。

要发现给予和分享的能力,

你需要给予和分享。

没有捷径可走:它就像一个接一个地游泳。

你通过游泳学习游泳。

您无法在泡沫床垫上学习游泳并进入水中。

(笑声)

你通过游泳学习游泳。 你通过骑自行车学习骑自行车。

你通过烹饪学习烹饪,

周围有一些有同情心的人

吃你做的东西。

(笑声)

因此,我所说的,

你必须伪造它并制造它。

(笑声)

你需要。

我的前任就是这个意思。

你必须表现出来。

你必须慈悲地行动。

没有同情的动词,

但您有同情的副词。

这对我来说很有趣。

你表现得富有同情心。

但是,如果你没有慈悲心,如何表现慈悲心呢?

那是你造假的地方。

你伪造它并制造它。 这是美利坚合众国的口头禅。

(笑声)

你伪造它并制造它。

你慈悲地行事,就好像你有慈悲心:

磨牙,

接受所有的支持系统。

如果你知道如何祈祷,请祈祷。

求慈悲。

让我慈悲地行动。

去做吧。

你会发现慈悲

,慢慢地也会发现一种相对的慈悲

,慢慢地,也许如果你得到正确的教导,

你会发现慈悲是

你自己实相的动态表现,它是一体性、整体性

,这就是你。

用这些话,非常感谢你。

(掌声)