What Aristotle and Joshua Bell can teach us about persuasion Conor Neill

Transcriber: Andrea McDonough
Reviewer: Bedirhan Cinar

9th of January, 2007

Joshua Bell, one of the greatest violinist in the world,

played to a packed audience

at Boston’s stately Symphony Hall of 1,000 people

where most seats went for more than $100.

He was used to full, sell-out shows.

He was at the peak of his abilities and fame.

Three days later,

Joshua Bell played to an audience of

nobody!

Well, maybe six people paused for a moment,

and one child stopped for a while looking,

as if he understood that something special was happening.

Joshua said of the experience,

“It was a strange feeling that people were actually ignoring me.”

Joshua Bell was playing violin in a subway station.

“At a music hall, I’ll get upset if someone coughs

or if someone’s cell phone goes off,

but here my expectations quickly diminished.

I was oddly grateful when somebody threw in a dollar.”

What changed?

Same music,

on the same violin,

played with the same passion

and by the same man.

Why did people listen and then not listen?

Aristotle would be able to explain.

What does it take to persuade people?

2,300 years ago,

Aristotle wrote the single most important work on persuasion,

Rhetoric,

the 3 means of persuasion:

logos,

ethos,

and pathos.

Logos is that the idea makes sense from the audience’s point of view.

This is usually different from the speaker’s point of view,

so work needs to be done

to make the idea relevant to the world view,

the pains and the challenges of the listeners.

A good argument is like good music.

Good music follows some rules of composition;

good arguments follow some rules of logic.

It makes sense to the audience.

Ethos is reputation, what are you known for;

credibility, do you look and act professional;

trustworthy, are your motives clear,

do you show the listener that you care about them as much as yourself?

Authority is confidence plus a concise message,

a clear, strong voice.

Pathos is the emotional connection.

Stories are an effective human tool for creating an emotional connection.

There are moments where an audience is not ready

to hear the message.

A speaker must create the right emotional environment for their message.

What changed?

Why did people travel for miles to hear him play one night,

and not even pause for moment to listen the next morning?

The answer is that ethos and pathos were missing.

Ethos

The fact that the great concert hall hosts Joshua’s concert

transfers its trust to Joshua.

We trust the institution, we now trust Joshua.

The subway does not have our trust for musical talent,

we do not expect to find great art,

great music,

or great ideas,

so it confers no trust to Joshua.

Pathos

The concert hall is designed for an emotional bond

between an audience and an artist,

a subway platform is not.

The hustle and movement and stress is just not conducive

to the emotional connection needed between performer and listener.

Logos,

ethos,

pathos,

the idea is nothing without the rest.

This is what Joshua Bell learned

on that cold, January day in 2007.

If you have a great idea,

how do you build credibility and emotional connection?

抄写员:Andrea McDonough
审稿人:Bedirhan Cinar

2007 年 1 月 9 日

Joshua Bell,世界上最伟大的小提琴家之一,

在波士顿庄严的 1,000 人的交响音乐厅为座无虚席的观众演奏

,大多数座位的价格都超过 100 美元。

他已经习惯了完整的、售罄的演出。

他正处于能力和名望的顶峰。

三天后,

约书亚·贝尔在没有人的观众面前演奏

嗯,大概有六个人停顿了一下

,一个孩子停下来看了一会,

好像明白有什么特别的事情发生了。

约书亚谈到这段经历时说:

“人们实际上无视我,这是一种奇怪的感觉。”

约书亚贝尔在地铁站拉小提琴。

“在音乐厅,如果有人咳嗽

或有人的手机响了,我会感到不安,

但在这里我的期望很快就降低了。

当有人投入一美元时,我奇怪地感激不尽。”

发生了什么变化?

同样的音乐

,同样的小提琴,

同样的激情

,由同一个人演奏。

为什么人们听然后不听?

亚里士多德将能够解释。

说服人们需要什么?

2300 年前,

亚里士多德写了关于说服的最重要的一部著作,

Rhetoric

,三种说服方式:

logos、

ethos

和 pathos。

徽标是从观众的角度来看,这个想法是有意义的。

这通常与说话者的观点不同,

因此需要

努力使这个想法与世界观、

听众的痛苦和挑战相关。

好的论据就像好听的音乐。

好的音乐遵循一些作曲规则;

好的论据遵循一些逻辑规则。

这对观众来说是有意义的。

Ethos 就是声誉,你以什么着称;

信誉,你的外表和行为是否专业;

值得信赖,您的动机是否明确,

您是否向听众表明您像关心自己一样关心他们?

权威是信心加上简洁的信息

、清晰、有力的声音。

悲情是情感联系。

故事是建立情感联系的有效人类工具。

有时听众还没有准备

好听到信息。

演讲者必须为他们的信息创造正确的情感环境。

发生了什么变化?

为什么人们不远千里去听他一晚上的演奏

,第二天早上甚至连片刻都没有停下来听?

答案是精神和悲怆都不见了。

Ethos

伟大的音乐厅举办 Joshua 的音乐会这一事实

转移了对 Joshua 的信任。

我们信任这个机构,我们现在信任约书亚。

地铁对音乐人才没有我们的信任,

我们不期望找到伟大的艺术、

伟大的音乐

或伟大的想法,

所以它不信任约书亚。

Pathos 音乐厅是为观众和艺术家之间的情感纽带而设计的

,地铁站台不是。

喧嚣、运动和压力不利于

表演者和听众之间所需的情感联系。

标志,

精神,

悲怆,

没有其余的想法就什么都不是。

这是 Joshua Bell

在 2007 年 1 月那个寒冷的日子里学到的。

如果你有一个好主意,

你如何建立可信度和情感联系?