What Makes People Laugh

Transcriber: Mayse Alves Jordão Santana
Reviewer: lisa thompson

What makes people laugh?

Well, generally speaking,
jokes make people laugh.

Oxford Languages describes a joke
as something someone says

to cause laughter or amusement,

particularly a story
with a funny punch line.

Now,

I always thought I was
a quite funny guy, to be honest.

When I was leaving my old school

and my friends asked me if I was worried
about going somewhere new,

I said, “Worried?
Of course I’m not worried.

I’m a funny guy. People always
get on with funny guys.”

So I got to my new school,
and I did what I always do: I made jokes.

The only difference
is the jokes I were making

were being received like this …

(Laughter)

Just a long, painful, awkward silence.

And when your defining
personality trait falls away,

you have an internal crisis.

You try and understand
why it’s not working.

So I kid you not:

I was writing down things I was saying,
that weren’t being received well,

telling them to my old friends
who would find them hilarious.

(Laughter)

And that got me thinking,
what makes something funny?

Generally, a joke involves
a setup and a punch line.

The setup would be,
“Why does the chicken cross the road?”

The punch line would be,
“To get to the other side.”

Then I started thinking
of more complex jokes.

A friend of mine got a bit of flak
for a joke he told.

He was with some friends,
and somebody said,

“I don’t think you should ever
make a joke about 9/11.”

And my friend said, “I agree.
My cousin died in 9/11.”

The other person went, “Really?”

My friend said, “Yeah, he was
the best pilot Al-Qaeda had ever seen.”

(Laughter)

The setup of that joke
is that his cousin died in 9/11,

and the punch line
is that he was the pilot.

What’s meant to make it funny
is the suspension of disbelief.

You have the listener
think he’s going one way

when in reality he goes another.

But why was that joke so divisive?

Why did some people
find it horribly offensive,

while others found it utterly hilarious?

I think it’s because
of the premise of the joke.

It’s about an international tragedy,

and some people think there are
certain topics you can never joke about,

whereas others think
you can joke about most things,

as long as it’s done in the right way.

Others try and split it up further:

Only gay people
can joke about gay people,

only black people
can joke about black people,

only Muslims
can joke about Muslims.

And I feel that as a society,

we’re becoming more and more socially
and politically divided

than we ever have been,

and that when people try and split up
who can make these jokes,

they lose sight of why they’re doing it.

They try to restrict jokes
to try and stop people getting upset.

Whether you think that is
an unachievable or achievable goal,

it’s what they’re trying to do.

If a joke is genuinely designed to harm
or oppress another group of people,

maybe that joke shouldn’t be said.

But if people are just trying
to have a laugh, why cut them down?

Shouldn’t the goal
be to maximize human joy?

We’ve all done it.

Whether it’s make a joke about a bomb
at an airport, or make light of death,

just because something’s inappropriate
doesn’t necessarily mean it’s wrong.

Under regimes like the Nazis
and the Soviet Union,

the population were oppressed,

they were told what they could
and couldn’t joke about.

Do we really want a system like that?

Of course not.

We want to spread as much joy as possible.

So, what is the point?

What am I trying to get at?

My point is, if you hear a joke

and you write it off
as offensive immediately

just because about
the controversial topic,

maybe stop and think:

is the joke offensive,
or is it just the topic?

Likewise, if you keep making
jokes and no one’s laughing,

maybe stop making those jokes.

At the end of the day, isn’t the point
of making jokes to make people laugh?

(Applause)

抄写员:Mayse Alves Jordão Santana
审稿人:lisa thompson

是什么让人们发笑?

嗯,一般来说,
笑话会让人发笑。

Oxford Languages 将笑话描述
为某人

为了引起笑声或娱乐而说的话,

尤其是一个
带有有趣妙语的故事。

现在,老实说,

我一直认为我是
一个很有趣的人。

当我离开原来的学校时

,我的朋友问我是否
担心去新的地方,

我说:“担心吗?
我当然不担心。

我是个有趣的人。 人们总是
和有趣的人相处。”

所以我到了我的新学校
,我做了我一直做的事:我开玩笑。

唯一不同的
是,我开的玩笑

是这样被接受的……

(笑声)

只是长时间的、痛苦的、尴尬的沉默。

当你的
个性特征消失时,

你就会陷入内部危机。

您尝试并了解
它为什么不起作用。

所以我没有骗你:

我把我说的话写下来
,但没有得到很好的接受,

告诉我的老朋友
,他们会觉得他们很搞笑。

(笑声)

这让我开始思考,
是什么让事情变得有趣?

一般来说,一个笑话涉及
一个设置和一个妙语。

设置将是,
“为什么鸡要过马路?”

妙语是
“到达另一边”。

然后我开始
想更复杂的笑话。

我的一个朋友
因为他讲的一个笑话而受到了抨击。

他和一些朋友在一起
,有人说,

“我认为你不
应该拿 9/11 开玩笑。”

我的朋友说:“我同意。
我的表弟于 9/11 去世。”

另一个人说:“真的吗?”

我的朋友说:“是的,他是
基地组织见过的最好的飞行员。”

(笑声)

那个笑话的设定
是他的表弟在 9/11 去世了

,妙语
是他是飞行员。

让它变得有趣的
是暂停怀疑。

你让听众
认为他走的是一条路

,而实际上他走的是另一条路。

但为什么这个笑话如此分裂?

为什么有些人
觉得它非常冒犯,

而另一些人觉得它非常搞笑?

我想这是因为
这个笑话的前提。

这是关于一场国际悲剧

,有些人认为
有些话题你永远不能开玩笑,

而另一些人则认为
你可以拿大多数事情开玩笑,

只要方法正确。

其他人试图进一步分裂:

只有同性恋者
可以拿同性恋者开玩笑,

只有黑人
可以拿黑人开玩笑,

只有
穆斯林可以拿穆斯林开玩笑。

而且我觉得作为一个社会,

我们在社会
和政治上的分裂

比以往任何时候都

多,当人们试图分裂
谁可以开这些玩笑时,

他们会忘记他们为什么要这样做。

他们试图限制笑话
,试图阻止人们生气。

无论您认为这是
一个无法实现还是可以实现的目标,

这都是他们正在努力做的事情。

如果一个笑话真的是为了伤害
或压迫另一群人,

也许这个笑话不应该说。

但是,如果人们只是
想开怀大笑,为什么要砍掉他们呢?

目标不
应该是最大化人类的快乐吗?

我们都做到了。

无论是在机场开炸弹的玩笑
,还是轻视死亡,

仅仅因为某些事情不合适
并不一定意味着它是错误的。

在纳粹和苏联这样的政权下

,民众受到压迫,

他们被告知什么
可以开玩笑,什么不能开玩笑。

我们真的想要这样的系统吗?

当然不是。

我们希望传播尽可能多的快乐。

那么,重点是什么?

我想达到什么目的?

我的观点是,如果你听到一个笑话

仅仅因为
这个有争议的话题而立即把它写成冒犯,

也许停下来想一想

:这个笑话是冒犯性的,
还是只是这个话题?

同样,如果你一直在
开玩笑而没有人在笑,

也许就不要再开玩笑了。

说到底,
开个玩笑不就是为了让人发笑吗?

(掌声)