First person vs. Second person vs. Third person Rebekah Bergman

“I am an invisible man.”

“Mrs. Dalloway said she would
buy the flowers herself.”

“You are about to begin reading
Italo Calvino’s new novel.”

These three opening lines,
from Ralph Ellison’s “Invisible Man,”

Virginia Woolf’s “Mrs. Dalloway,”

and Italo Calvino’s
“If on a winter’s night a traveler,”

each establish a different point of view.

Who is telling a story,
and from what perspective,

are some of the most important choices
an author makes.

Told from a different point of view,
a story can transform completely.

Take this fairytale:

“Rapunzel, Rapunzel,”
the Prince called, “let down your hair.”

Rapunzel unbraided her hair
and slung it out the window.

The prince climbed her tresses
into the tower.

Rapunzel is typically told like this,
with the narrator outside the story.

This point of view is called third person.

But Rapunzel can also be told
by a character in the story—

a first person narrator.

The tail end of Rapunzel’s locks
plopped down at my feet.

I grabbed on and began to climb… ugh!

I couldn’t untangle myself.

Strands came off all over me,
sticking to my sweat.

In a first person narrative, the story
can change dramatically

depending on which character
is the narrator.

Say Rapunzel was narrating
instead of the prince:

I hope he appreciates how long it takes
to unbraid 25 feet of hair, I thought.

OUCH! I’ll be honest; I thought my scalp
would stretch off of my skull.

“Can you climb any faster?” I yelled.

In second person, the narrator addresses
the story to the reader:

He calls your name. He wants you
to let your hair down.

You just finished braiding it, but hey–
you don’t get a lot of visitors.

Third person, first person,
and second person perspectives

each have unique possibilities
and constraints.

So how do you choose a point
of view for your story?

Constraints aren’t necessarily
a bad thing—

they can help focus a story
or highlight certain elements.

For example,

a third person narrator is necessarily
a bit removed from the characters.

But that can be good for stories
where a feeling of distance is important.

A third person narrator
can be either limited,

meaning they stick close to one
character’s thoughts and feelings,

or they can be omniscient,
able to flit between characters’ minds

and give the reader more information.

A first person story creates closeness
between the reader and the narrator.

It’s also restricted
by the narrator’s knowledge.

This can create suspense

as the reader finds out information
along with the character.

A first person narrator
doesn’t necessarily

have to represent the character’s
experience faithfully—

they can be delusional or dishonest.

In Kazuo Ishiguro’s novel
“The Remains of the Day,”

Stevens, an aging British butler in 1956,
recounts his many years of service,

but fails to acknowledge the flaws
of the man he serves.

The cracks in his narrative eventually
draw the reader’s attention

to the under-acknowledged failings
of the culture and class system

he inhabits.

Justin Torres’s novel, “We the Animals,”

begins with a plural
first person narrator:

“We were six snatching hands,
six stomping feet;

we were brothers, boys, three little kings
locked in a feud for more.”

Partway through the story,
the point of view shifts

to first person singular,
from we to I, as the boys come of age

and one brother feels alienated
from the others.

Second person is a less common choice.

It requires the writer to make the reader
suspend disbelief to become another “you.”

Placing the reader
in a character’s perspective

can build urgency and suspense.

Sometimes, though,

second person is intended to distance
the narrator from their own story,

rather than bring the reader closer
to the story.

In these cases,

second person narrators refer
to themselves as “you” rather than “I.”

Writers are constantly experimenting
with fresh variations on point of view.

New virtual and augmented
reality technologies

may expand the possibilities
for this experimentation.

By placing people at a particular
vantage point in virtual space,

how might we change the way
we tell and experience stories?

“我是一个隐形人。”

“太太。 达洛维说她会
自己买花。”

“你即将开始阅读
伊塔洛·卡尔维诺的新小说。”

这三个开场白,
来自拉尔夫·埃里森的“隐形人”、

弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的“达洛维夫人”

和伊塔洛·卡尔维诺的
“如果在冬夜一个旅行者”,

每一个都建立了不同的观点。

谁在讲故事
,从什么角度讲故事,

是作者做出的一些最重要的选择

从不同的角度讲,
一个故事可以完全转变。

以这个童话故事为例:

“长发公主,长发公主,
”王子喊道,“放下你的头发。”

长发公主解开她的头发
,把它扔到窗外。

王子把她的头发
爬上了塔。

长发公主通常是这样
讲述的,叙述者在故事之外。

这种观点称为第三人称。

但是长发公主也可以
由故事中的一个角色来讲述——

第一人称叙述者。

长发公主的发尾
垂落在我的脚边。

我抓住并开始攀爬……呃!

我无法解开自己。

股线从我身上脱落,
粘在我的汗水上。

在第一人称叙述中,故事
可能会

根据
叙述者的角色而发生巨大变化。

假设长发公主是在叙述
而不是王子:

我想,我希望他能理解
解开 25 英尺长的头发需要多长时间。

哎哟! 我会诚实的; 我以为我的头皮
会从头骨上伸出。

“你能爬得更快吗?” 我大喊。

叙述者以第二人称
向读者讲述故事:

他叫你的名字。 他
要你把头发放下来。

你刚刚编织完它,但是,嘿——
你没有很多访客。

第三人称、第一人称
和第二人称视角

各有独特的可能性
和限制。

那么你如何
为你的故事选择一个观点呢?

约束不一定
是坏事——

它们可以帮助聚焦故事
或突出某些元素。

例如

,第三人称叙述者
必须从角色中移除一点。

但这对于距离感很重要的故事来说可能是件好事

第三人称叙述者
可以是有限的,

这意味着他们贴近一个
角色的思想和感受,

或者他们可以是无所不知的,
能够在角色的思想之间穿梭

,为读者提供更多信息。

第一人称故事
在读者和叙述者之间建立了亲密关系。

它也
受到叙述者知识的限制。

当读者
与角色一起发现信息时,这可以产生悬念。

第一人称叙述者
不一定

要忠实地表现角色的
经历——

他们可能是妄想的或不诚实的。

在石黑一雄的小说
《今日遗迹》

中,1956 年年迈的英国管家史蒂文斯
讲述了他多年的服务,

但没有承认
他所服务的人的缺陷。

他叙述中的裂痕最终
将读者的注意力吸引

到他所居住
的文化和阶级体系中

未被充分承认的缺陷上。

贾斯汀·托雷斯(Justin Torres)的小说《我们动物》

以复数
第一人称叙述者开头:

“我们是六只抢手,
六只脚;

我们是兄弟,男孩,三个小国王
,为了更多的争执而陷入困境。”

在故事的中途,随着男孩们长大成人,一个兄弟感到与其他兄弟疏远
,视角

转向第一人称单数,
从我们到我

第二人称是不太常见的选择。

它要求作者让读者
暂停怀疑,成为另一个“你”。

将读者
置于角色的角度

可以建立紧迫感和悬念。

但有时,

第二人称的目的是
让叙述者远离他们自己的故事,

而不是让读者更
接近故事。

在这些情况下,

第二人称叙述者
称自己为“你”而不是“我”。

作家们一直在
尝试新的观点变化。

新的虚拟和增强
现实技术

可能会扩大
这种实验的可能性。

通过将人们置于虚拟空间中的特定
有利位置,

我们如何改变
我们讲述和体验故事的方式?