How to find the person who can help you get ahead at work Carla Harris

It was the spring of 1988

when I had the aha moment.

I was at my first roundtable,

and for those of you who don’t know,

the roundtable was a very
commonly used phrase on Wall Street

to describe the year-end
evaluative process

for analysts, associates, vice presidents,
all the way up to managing directors.

That was the process where they
were discussed behind closed doors

around a table, i.e. the round table,

and everyone was put into a category –

the top bucket, the middle bucket,
the lower bucket –

and then that was translated
into a bonus range

that would be assigned
to each professional.

This was my first time there,
and as I observed,

I saw that there was one person
that was responsible

for recording the outcome
of a conversation.

There were other people in the room
that had the responsibility

of presenting the cases
of all the candidates.

And there were other invited guests
who were supposed to comment

as a candidate’s position was presented.

It was interesting to me
that those other people

were folks who were more senior
than the folks that were being discussed

and they theoretically had had
some interaction with those candidates.

Now, I was really excited to be
at this roundtable for the first time,

because I knew that my own process
would go through this same way,

and that my bonus would be
decided in the same way,

so I wanted to know how it worked,

but more importantly,

I wanted to understand
how this concept of a meritocracy

that every company that I talked to
walking out of business school

was selling.

Every time I talked to a company,

they would say, “Our culture,
our process, is a meritocracy.

The way you get ahead in this organization
is that you’re smart,

you put your head down
and you work really hard,

and you’ll go right to the top.

So here was my opportunity to see
exactly how that worked.

So as the process began,

I heard the recorder
call the first person’s name.

“Joe Smith.”

The person responsible
for presenting Joe’s case did just that.

Three quarters of the way through,
someone interrupted and said,

“This is a great candidate, outstanding,

has great analytical
and quantitative skills.

This is a superstar.”

The recorder then said,

“Sounds like Joe
should go in the top bucket.”

Second person, Mary Smith.

Halfway through that presentation,
someone said, “Solid candidate.

Nothing really special,
but a good pair of hands.”

The recorder said,

“Sounds like Mary
should go in the middle bucket.”

And then someone said, “Arnold Smith.”

Before the person
could present Arnold’s case,

somebody said, “Disaster. Disaster.
This kid doesn’t have a clue.

Can’t do a model.”

And before the case was presented,

the recorder said,

“Sounds like Arnold
should go in the bottom bucket.”

It was at that moment
that I clutched my pearls –

(Laughter)

and said, “Who is going to speak for me?”

Who is going to speak for me?

It was that moment that I realized
that this idea of a meritocracy

that every organizations sells
is really just a myth.

You cannot have a 100 percent
meritocratic environment

when there is a human element
involved in the evaluative equation,

because by definition,

that makes it subjective.

I knew at that moment that somebody
would have to be behind closed doors

arguing on my behalf,

presenting content in such a way

that other decision makers
around that table

would answer in my best favor.

That was a really interesting lesson,

and then I said to myself,
“Well, who is that person?

What do you call this person?”

And as I thought about
the popular business terms at the time,

I said, wow, this person
can’t be a mentor,

because a mentor’s job
is to give you tailored advice,

tailored specifically to you
and to your career aspirations.

They’re the ones who give you
the good, the bad and the ugly

in a no-holds-barred way.

OK. Person can’t be
a champion or an advocate,

because you don’t necessarily
have to spend any currency

to be someone’s champion.

You don’t necessarily
get invited to the room

behind closed doors if you’re an advocate.

It was almost two years later

when I realized what
this person should be called.

I was speaking
at the University of Michigan

to the MBA candidates,

talking about the lessons
that I had learned

after my three short years on Wall Street,

and then it came to me.

I said, “Oh, this person
that is carrying your interest,

or as I like to say,
carrying your paper into the room,

this person who is spending

their valuable political
and social capital on you,

this person who is going
to pound the table on your behalf,

this is a sponsor.

This is a sponsor.”

And then I said to myself,

“Well, how do you get a sponsor?

And frankly, why do you need one?”

Well, you need a sponsor, frankly,

because as you can see,

there’s not one evaluative process
that I can think of,

whether it’s in academia,
health care, financial services,

not one that does not have
a human element.

So that means it has
that measure of subjectivity.

There is a measure of subjectivity
in who is presenting your case.

There is a measure of subjectivity

in what they say

and how they interpret
any objective data that you might have.

There is a measure of subjectivity
in how they say what they’re going to say

to influence the outcome.

So therefore, you need to make sure
that that person who is speaking,

that sponsor,

has your best interests at heart

and has the power to get it,
whatever it is for you,

to get it done behind closed doors.

Now, I’m asked all the time,

“How do you get one?”

Well, frankly, nirvana is when
someone sees you in an environment

and decides, “I’m going
to make it happen for you.

I’m going to make sure
that you are successful.”

But for many of us in this room,
we know it doesn’t really happen that way.

So let me introduce
this concept of currency

and talk to you about how it impacts
your ability to get a sponsor.

There are two types of currency
in any environment:

performance currency
and relationship currency.

And performance currency
is the currency that is generated

by your delivering that
which was asked of you

and a little bit extra.

Every time you deliver upon an assignment
above people’s expectations,

you generate performance currency.

It works exactly like the stock market.

Any time a company says to the street

that they will deliver 25 cents a share

and that company delivers
40 cents a share,

that stock goes up, and so will yours.

Performance currency
is valuable for three reasons.

Number one, it will get you noticed.

It will create a reputation for you.

Number two, it will also
get you paid and promoted

very early on in your career

and very early on in any environment.

And number three,
it may attract a sponsor.

Why? Because strong performance currency

raises your level of visibility
in the environment, as I said earlier,

such that a sponsor
may be attracted to you.

Why? Because everybody loves a star.

But if you find yourself in a situation

where you don’t have a sponsor,

here’s the good news.

Remember that you can exercise
your power and ask for one.

But here’s where the other currency
is now most important.

That is the relationship currency,

and relationship currency
is the currency that is generated

by the investments that you make
in the people in your environment,

the investments that you make
in the people in your environment.

You cannot ask someone
to use their hard-earned

personal influential
currency on your behalf

if you’ve never had
any interaction with them.

It is not going to happen.

So it is important that you invest
the time to connect, to engage

and to get to know the people
that are in your environment,

and more importantly to give them
the opportunity to know you.

Because once they know you,

there’s a higher probability
that when you approach them

to ask them to be your sponsor,

they will in fact answer
in the affirmative.

Now, if you’re with me and you agree
that you have to have a sponsor,

let’s talk about how
you identify a sponsor.

Well, if you’re looking for a sponsor,

they need to have
three primary characteristics.

Number one, they need to have
a seat at the decision-making table,

they need to have exposure to your work

in order to have credibility
behind closed doors,

and they need to have some juice,

or let me say it differently,
they’d better have some power.

It’s really important
that they have those three things.

And then once you have
identified the person,

how do you ask for one?

The script goes like this.

“Jim, I’m really interested
in getting promoted this year.

I’ve had an amazing year

and I cannot show this organization
anything else to prove my worthiness

or my readiness for this promotion,

but I am aware that somebody
has to be behind closed doors

arguing on my behalf
and pounding the table.

You know me, you know my work
and you are aware of the client feedback,

and I hope that you will feel comfortable
arguing on my behalf.”

If Jim knows you

and you have any kind of a relationship,

there’s a very high probability
that he will answer yes,

and if he says yes,

he will endeavor to get it done for you.

But there’s also a shot
that Jim might say no,

and if he says no, in my opinion,

there’s only three reasons
that he would tell you no.

The first is he doesn’t think
that he has enough exposure to your work

to have real credibility
behind closed doors

to be impactful and effective
on your behalf.

The second reason he may tell you no

is that you think
he has the juice to get it done,

but he knows that he does not
have the power to do it

and he is not going to admit that
in that conversation with you.

(Laughter)

And the third reason
that he would tell you no,

he doesn’t like you.

He doesn’t like you.

(Laughter)

And that’s something that could happen.

But even that will be
valuable information for you

that will help to inform
your next conversation with a sponsor

that might make it
a little bit more impactful.

I cannot tell you how important
it is to have a sponsor.

It is the critical relationship
in your career.

A mentor, frankly, is a nice to have,

but you can survive a long time
in your career without a mentor,

but you are not going to ascend
in any organization without a sponsor.

It is so critical that you
should ask yourself regularly,

“Who’s carrying my paper into the room?

Who is carrying my paper into the room?”

And if you can’t answer
who is carrying your paper into the room,

then I will tell you to divert
some of your hardworking energies

into investing in a sponsor relationship,

because it will be critical
to your success.

And as I close, let me give a word

to the would-be sponsors
that are in the room.

If you have been invited into the room,

know that you have a seat at that table,

and if you have a seat at the table,

you have a responsibility to speak.

Don’t waste your power worrying
about what people are going to say

and whether or not they think
you might be supporting someone

just because they look like you.

If somebody is worthy of your currency,

spend it.

One thing I have learned
after several decades on Wall Street

is the way to grow your power
is to give it away,

and your voice is at the heart.

(Applause)

And your voice
is at the heart of your power.

Use it.

Thank you very much.

(Applause)

那是 1988 年春天,

我有一个恍然大悟的时刻。

我参加了我的第一次圆桌会议

,对于那些不知道的人来说

,圆桌会议是华尔街一个非常
常用的词组,

用来描述

分析师、合伙人、副总裁的年终评估过程,
一直到 董事总经理。

那是他们

在一张桌子(即圆桌)闭门讨论的过程中

,每个人都被归入一个类别

  • 顶部桶,中间桶
    ,下部桶 -

然后
转化为奖金

将分配
给每个专业人员的范围。

这是我第一次去那里
,正如我所观察到的,

我看到有一个人

负责记录
谈话的结果。

房间里还有其他人

负责介绍
所有候选人的案件。

还有其他被邀请的
客人应该在

候选人的位置上发表评论。

对我来说很有趣的是
,其他

人比正在讨论的人更资深,

理论上他们
与这些候选人有过一些互动。

现在,
第一次参加这个圆桌会议,我真的很兴奋,

因为我知道我自己的过程
会以同样的方式

进行,我的奖金也会
以同样的方式决定,

所以我想知道它是如何运作的 ,

但更重要的是,

我想了解

与我交谈过的每家
从商学院毕业的公司都

在推销这种精英管理的概念。

每次我与一家公司交谈时,

他们都会说,“我们的文化,
我们的流程,是一种精英管理。

你在这个组织中取得成功的方式
是你很聪明,

你低下头
,你真的很努力,

而且 你会直接到顶部。

所以这是我的机会来看看它
是如何工作的。

所以当这个过程开始时,

我听到录音机
叫第一个人的名字。

“乔史密斯。”

负责介绍乔案件的人做了 就这样。进行到

四分之三的时候,
有人打断说:

“这是一个很好的候选人,很出色,

有很好的分析
和量化能力。

这是一位超级巨星。

”录音机接着说,

“听起来乔
应该排在最前面。”

第二个人,玛丽·史密斯。

演讲进行到一半时,
有人说,“可靠的候选人。

没什么特别的,
只是一双好手。

”录音机说,

“听起来玛丽
应该放在中间的桶里。

”然后有人说,“阿诺德史密斯。”

在这个
人提出阿诺德的案子之前,

有人说,“ 灾难。 灾难。
这孩子一点头绪都没有。

不能做模特。

”在提交案子之前

,录音机说,

“听起来阿诺德
应该放在最底层的桶里。

”就在那一刻
,我抓紧了我的珍珠——

(笑声

)说,“ 谁来为我说话?”

谁来为我说话?

就在那一刻,我

意识到每个组织都在
推销精英管理的想法实际上只是一个神话。

你不可能有一个 100% 的
精英管理

环境。 是
评估方程式中涉及的人为因素,

因为根据定义,

这使其具有主观性。

我当时就知道,必须有人
闭门

代表我争论,

以这样的方式呈现内容,


周围的其他决策者 桌子

会以最有利于我的方式回答。

那是一个非常有趣的教训,

然后我对自己说,
“那么,那个人是谁?

你怎么称呼这个人?

”当我想到
当时流行的商业术语时,

我说,哇,这个人
不能当导师,

因为导师的工作
是给你量身定制的建议,

专门为你量身定制
和你的职业抱负。

他们是那些以无限制的方式给
你好的、坏的和丑陋的

好吧。人不能
成为冠军或拥护者,

因为你不一定
必须花费任何货币

才能成为某人的拥护者。如果

您是倡导者,则不一定
会被邀请到闭门造车的房间

。差不多两年后

,我才意识到
应该称呼此人。


在 密歇根大学

的 MBA 候选人,

谈到

我在华尔街短短三年后学到的经验教训

,然后

我说,“哦,
这个引起你兴趣的人,

或者像我一样 喜欢说,
拿着你的论文进房间,

这个人正在花费

他们宝贵的政治
和社会利益 可怜你,

这个
要替你敲桌子的人,

这是赞助商。

这是赞助商。

”然后我对自己说,

“那么,你如何获得赞助商?

坦率地说,你为什么需要一个?”

好吧,坦率地说,你需要一个赞助商,

因为正如你所看到的,

我想不出一个评估过程

无论是在学术界、
医疗保健、金融服务领域,

而不是一个
没有人为因素。

所以这意味着它具有
主观性的度量。

在谁提出您的案例时

存在主观性的度量。

在他们所说的内容

以及他们如何
解释您可能会想到的任何客观数据方面存在一定的主观性 有。

他们如何说出他们将要说的话

来影响结果有一定的主观性。

因此,你需要确保
说话的那个人,

那个赞助商

,把你的最大利益放在心上,

并且有 得到它的力量,
不管它对你来说是什么,

关起门来完成它。

现在,我一直被问到,

“你怎么得到一个?”

好吧,坦率地说,涅槃就是当
有人看到你在一个 环境

并决定,“我
会为你实现它。

我会
确保你成功。”

但是对于在座的许多人来说,
我们知道事情并没有真正发生。

所以让我介绍
一下货币的这个概念,

并和你谈谈它如何影响
你的 获得赞助商的能力。

在任何环境中都有两种货币:

绩效货币
和关系货币

。绩效货币
是您交付所要求的货币所产生的货币,

还有一点额外的货币。

每次交付时 当一项任务
超出人们的预期时,

您就会产生绩效货币。

它的运作方式与股票市场完全一样。

任何时候一家公司在街上

说他们将提供每股 25 美分,

而该公司将提供
每股 40 美分,

那只股票就会上涨, 你的也一样。

绩效
货币之所以有价值,有三个原因。

第一,它会让你受到关注。

它会为你创造声誉。

第二,它也
会让

你在职业生涯的

早期和早期获得报酬和晋升 在我 n 任何环境。

第三,
它可能会吸引赞助商。

为什么? 因为强大的绩效货币

会提高你
在环境中的知名度,正如我之前所说,

这样赞助商
可能会被你吸引。

为什么? 因为每个人都喜欢明星。

但是,如果您发现

自己没有赞助商,

这是个好消息。

请记住,您可以行使
自己的权力并要求获得权力。

但这是另一种货币
现在最重要的地方。

那就是关系货币,

而关系
货币是

由你对环境中的人进行的投资产生的货币,你对
环境中的人进行

的投资
。 如果您从未与

某人进行过任何互动,则您不能要求
某人代表您使用他们来之不易的

个人影响力
货币

它不会发生。

因此,重要的是你
要花时间联系、参与

和了解
你环境中的人

,更重要的是让他们
有机会认识你。

因为一旦他们认识了你,

当你接近

他们要求他们成为你的赞助商时,

他们实际上会给出
肯定的回答。

现在,如果你和我在一起并且你
同意你必须有一个赞助商,

让我们谈谈
你如何确定赞助商。

好吧,如果您正在寻找赞助商,

他们需要具备
三个主要特征。

第一,他们需要
在决策桌上占有一席之地,

他们需要接触你的

工作才能
在闭门造车后获得可信度

,他们需要喝点果汁,

或者让我换种说法,
他们 最好有一些权力。

他们拥有这三样东西真的很重要。

然后,一旦你
确定了这个人,

你如何要求一个?

脚本是这样的。

“吉姆,我真的
很想在今年升职。

我度过了美好的一年

,我无法向这个组织展示
任何其他东西来证明我的价值

或我准备升职,

但我知道必须
有人支持 “关起门来

代表我争论
并敲桌子。

你了解我,你了解我的工作,
并且你了解客户的反馈

,我希望你会
为我的争论感到自在。”

如果吉姆认识你

并且你有任何关系,他

很有可能
会回答是

,如果他说是,

他会努力为你完成。

但是吉姆也有
可能拒绝

,如果他拒绝,在我看来

,他只会告诉你不的三个原因。

首先是他不
认为他对你的工作有足够的曝光率,

无法在闭门造车后获得真正的可信度

,从而对你产生影响和有效

他可能会拒绝你的第二个原因

是你认为
他有能力完成它,

但他知道他
没有能力这样做,

而且他不会
在与你的谈话中承认这一点。

(笑声)

他会告诉你不的第三个原因,

他不喜欢你。

他不喜欢你。

(笑声)

那是可能发生的事情。

但即便如此,这
对您来说也是有价值的信息

,有助于为
您与赞助商的下一次对话提供信息

,这可能会
使其更具影响力。

我无法告诉你
有一个赞助商有多重要。


是你职业生涯中的关键关系。

坦率地说,有导师是件好事,

但如果
没有导师,你可以在职业生涯中生存很长时间,

但如果没有赞助商,你将无法
在任何组织中晋升。

这是非常重要的,你
应该经常问自己:

“谁把我的论文带进房间?

谁把我的论文带进房间?”

如果你不能回答
是谁把你的论文带进了房间,

那么我会告诉你把你的
一些辛勤工作的精力转移

到投资于赞助商关系上,

因为这
对你的成功至关重要。

在我结束的时候,让我对在场

的潜在赞助商
说几句话。

如果你被邀请进入房间,

知道你在那张桌子上

有一个座位,如果你在这张桌子上有一个座位,

你就有责任发言。

不要浪费你的力量去
担心人们会说什么,

以及他们是否认为
你可能

只是因为他们看起来像你而支持他们。

如果有人配得上你的货币,

那就花钱吧。

在华尔街工作了几十年后,我学到的一件事

是增强你的权力的方法
就是把它送出去

,你的声音是核心。

(掌声

)你的声音
是你力量的核心。

用它。

非常感谢你。

(掌声)