The Faults of Poetry in This Day and Age

Transcriber: Hendel Shimizu
Reviewer: Amanda Zhu

“I pace around trying to remember
that last line, that poem I wrote,

but then the memories begin to drown
and nonchalant cases begin to float.

Forget me, for I am
but a figment of your memory,

conflicted to trade a daring person.

I will not admit this but the memories.

I am the vault
that holds things so sacred.

But my brain was
like the guard with reverie.

Forget me, for I am
but a figment of your memory.

Resisting is only
a regretful word for remorse.

Again, my friend, we must make amends,
but I the wind cannot speak,

so I ask the trees
for a warning to be sent.

Forget me, for I am
but a figment of your memory.

I am the history of tomorrow.

But the history of mine was yesterday.

How oft do I lose a memory of mine?

Washed on shore, a seashell yells my name.

Forget me, for I am
but a figment of your memory.”

These are the first
four stanzas that I wrote

shortly after my mom arrived
from her pilgrimage to Mecca.

She told me that while she was there,

she was so entranced by the purity
and holiness of the place

that she blurted out a four-line stanza
and kept on repeating it.

When she had arrived home,

she had only remembered two,
and a week later she had forgotten it all.

It wouldn’t have hurt her
to write it down.

But oh well.

Now, I could go on and explain
what this poem truly means.

But I think the beauty of poetry is found
when trying to analyze it yourself.

I could, however,
go through the literary elements,

such as the personification
of seashell yelling my name,

and so on and so forth.

Yet with all of these literary elements,

I would not call this a good poem
unless it invoked something bigger.

Poetry isn’t good because it’s complex.

It isn’t good because it’s simple.

Take Dr. Seuss’s poetry.

He makes poetry that is aimed
specifically for kids.

But why would I call his work poetry

and not any other work
that I find on the Internet?

It’s because despite
the crazy words he comes up with,

like the “thingamajig”
or the abstract ideas that he makes,

like The Cat in the Hat,

he still gives some leeway

for children to explore
what these things actually mean

or how they act like.

And in the case of The Cat in the Hat,
it could even symbolize something bigger,

such as disobedience.

But what does modern poetry
look like today?

It’s very noticeable

that our medium for exchanging poetry
has drastically changed.

Back then,

if you wanted to publish a poem,

you would get rejected
from every editor every single time.

And on the bright chance
that one editor accepts you,

the best case scenario
is that you’re going to have your poem

in a small column in the newspaper

or in one page of a poetry book.

Nowadays you can publish poems
with one click of a button

and so people can post
what they want right away

without giving it a second thought.

And on the other hand,

the users of these social media platforms

are mindlessly scrolling
through this platform.

And so, when they go there,

they go there for a place
of entertainment,

a place of escape.

And if they see something too complex,

they will most likely skip it.

So poets naturally
have to accommodate to this.

And what they do

is that they make their poetry
short, concise and straight forward.

Let me give you this example.

“I sat by the curb as it rained,
thinking about all my pain.”

Here, it has rhyme,
it has rhythm, it has imagery,

it has good literary elements.

Yet it is too straightforward
yet too vague at the same time.

And I know those two sound
like antonyms, right?

But the straightforwardness
comes in the essence of the situation

where it is as simple
as somebody sitting by the curb

as it rain

thinking about all of their pain.

The vagueness comes in the word “pain.”

The poets might have written this poem

with the intention of speaking
about the pain of grieving a loved one.

But you, on the other hand,

might be interpreting it as the pain
of losing maybe half a mark on a test.

And so this vagueness
allows a factor of relatability

and the relatability
makes this poem seem more appealing.

In fact, it is something
as simple as it could ever be.

And here, it isn’t that unique,
it isn’t that original,

and it makes you feel like the poem
is deeper than what it already is.

And when a poem looks deeper
than what it actually is,

we call this phenomena “fake deep poetry.”

What is fake deep poetry?

It is, as the name suggests,
something that looks deep,

but once you take a closer look,

it really isn’t.

And so it has been popping up
a lot recently

with the constant namedropping
of serious issues.

Some poets think
that if they namedrop issues,

it will look more brave,

but in fact,

it just makes their poems weaker.

So let me give you this example.

This poet has troubles with their father.

So this poet writes,

“My father, he is never proud.

To this day, he has not said it aloud.”

And here, yeah, again,
it’s rhymed and it has rhythm,

but it is almost the complete opposite
of my previous example.

It is too straightforward.

But what if I reword it?

What if I said,

“I want to give you the satisfaction
of a million critiques.

I want to rise from the lowest low

and reach the standard
that you call the peak”?

Here, not only is it
more open to interpretation

but it keeps the initial goal of the poet

while also making others
empathize with the situation.

Back then, in the previous example,

it was only narrow
to a certain group of people

who have went through the circumstance.

But the beauty of language
is to make people empathize,

to make people feel something
that they have never experienced.

This begs an even bigger question:

How did we get to poetry today?

It is as simple as it could ever be -

labeling.

Poetry is such an open form of art

that anything can constitute
for a poem these days.

In fact, there’s a type of poetry
called contemporary poetry

in which it asks you to make poetry
that does not sound like poetry.

Try saying that 10 times fast.

And so nowadays anything
will be labeled as a poem.

Some people will write advice,
dialogue or experiences

and label them as poetry

when they could be channeling
this energy into making memoirs,

advice books, or even young adult novels.

I mean, celebrities come out
with more poetry books

than Martha Stewart
comes out with cookbooks.

And trust me, she makes a lot.

Let me tell you this good poem
that I heard recently.

Listen to this.

“Actual poetry.

Listen to my story.

Stay to watch the way.

Let the ages play.

We to the young men

speak these words again.”

It sounds so beautiful,
so raw, so original.

Want to know who the author is?

Artificial intelligence.

Is it so original anymore?

I don’t think so.

Poetry is so unique that it is considered
as another Turing test.

And the Turing test is basically a test

to see if artificial intelligenc
has reached human intelligence.

And so if poetry is brought upon a person

and a person cannot identify
that an AI wrote this,

then artificial intelligence
will be deemed as intelligent as us.

If we keep mislabeling things,

then we might as well say
that AI is as intelligent as us.

But you may be asking,

“Zahraa, who are you to critique poetry?

Isn’t poetry subjective? ”

Well, brace yourselves.

I’m about to hit you with a hard truth.

It is not.

Poetry is not subjective.

Think about it.

If poetry was subjective,

why would we go to school every day
and learn and read literature from before?

Why do we take upon ourselves
English majors that criticize

and tell us the elements of literature

that tell us what’s good
and tell us what’s bad?

It’s so that we can channel
all this energy into our own work

and make our work that much better.

It’s OK, I won’t judge
your taste of poetry.

You may like bad poetry
and hates good poetry.

I am not here to judge you,

but your preference does not change
the fact of whether this poem is good

or whether this poem is bad.

And here I will complete the final stanza
of that poem I wrote earlier.

“And I too frail to answer the call,

look into my head for a rejoiced symphony.

And although the record player

may be broken,

I’ll hear new sounds blissfully.

Forgive me, for I, the poem
and this last line are …”

Ellipses.

Incomplete.

I left the poem open
to insert you into my narrative.

That’s the beauty of poetry.

It truly is.

Let me tell you one of the greatest poems

I’ve actually heard,

and trust me, it’s not written by AI,

I’m not tricking you again.

It was as simple as it could ever be -

four letters, two words, one space -

recited by the greatest Muhammad Ali.

It was “Me we”.

Now what does “Me we” mean?

It has no meaning,

because you are the one
that will input meaning into it.

You will identify what it means.

Muhammad Ali, he never
told us what it meant.

He left it open for us.

This change starts with “me”
and then it ends with “we.”

Should I forget about “me”
and focus on the “we.”

The opportunities are endless.

What is so great about poetry
and this magnificent art

is that it invokes -

better yet, it incites - emotion

and it instills thought.

And poetry might not have
a definitive meaning.

But one thing is true.

Poetry is a form of art that involves you.

Thank you for listening to my TEDxTalk.

(Applauses)

抄写员:Hendel Shimizu
审稿人:Amanda Zhu

忘记我,因为我
只是你记忆中的一个虚构人物,

为了交易一个大胆的人而发生冲突。

我不会承认这一点,而是回忆。


是保存如此神圣事物的保险库。

但我的大脑
就像一个充满遐想的警卫。

忘记我吧,因为我
只是你记忆中的一个虚构人物。

抗拒只是
悔恨的一个遗憾词。

再次,我的朋友,我们必须弥补,
但我风不能说话,

所以我要求
树发出警告。

忘记我吧,因为我
只是你记忆中的一个虚构人物。

我是明天的历史。

但我的历史是昨天。

我多久失去一次我的记忆?

在岸上冲刷,一个贝壳喊着我的名字。

忘记我吧,因为我
只是你记忆中的一个虚构人物。”


是我

妈妈从麦加朝圣回来后不久写的前四节。

她告诉我,当她在那里时,

她被
这个地方的纯洁和圣洁所吸引,

以至于她脱口而出一个四行诗节
并不断重复。

回到家时,

她只记得两个
,一周后她全忘了。

把它
写下来不会伤害她。

但是哦,好吧。

现在,我可以继续
解释这首诗的真正含义。

但我认为诗歌的美是
在尝试自己分析时发现的。

然而,我
可以通过文学元素,

例如贝壳的拟人化
呼喊我的名字,

等等。

然而,有了所有这些文学元素,

我不会称这是一首好诗,
除非它唤起了更大的东西。

诗歌不好,因为它很复杂。

这不好,因为它很简单。

以苏斯博士的诗歌为例。

他创作
专门针对儿童的诗歌。

但为什么我要称他的作品为诗歌,


不是我在互联网上找到的任何其他作品?

这是因为尽管
他想出了一些疯狂的词,

比如“thingamajig”
或他提出的抽象概念,

比如戴帽子的猫,

他仍然给孩子们一些回旋余地


探索这些东西的真正含义

或它们的行为方式 .

而在帽子里的猫,
它甚至可以象征更大的东西,

比如不服从。

但是今天的现代诗歌是什么
样子的呢?

很明显

,我们交换诗歌的媒介
发生了翻天覆地的变化。

那时候,

如果你想发表一首诗,

你每次都会被
每个编辑拒绝。

如果一位编辑接受你

的好机会,最好的情况
是你将把你的诗

放在报纸的一个小专栏

或一本诗集的一页中。

如今,您只需单击一个按钮即可发布诗歌

,因此人们可以立即发布
他们想要的内容,

而无需多加考虑。

另一方面,

这些社交媒体平台的用户

正在无意识地
浏览这个平台。

所以,当他们去那里时,

他们去那里是为了一个
娱乐

的地方,一个逃避的地方。

如果他们看到的东西太复杂,

他们很可能会跳过它。

所以诗人自然
要适应这一点。

他们所做的

就是让他们的诗歌
简短、简洁、直截了当。

让我给你这个例子。

“下雨时我坐在路边,
想着我所有的痛苦。”

在这里,它有韵,
它有节奏,它有意象,

它有很好的文学元素。

然而,它太简单
了,同时又太模糊了。

我知道这两个听起来
像反义词,对吧?


直截了当的本质是这样一种情况


就像有人坐在路边

,下雨时

想着他们所有的痛苦一样简单。

模糊性来自“痛苦”这个词。

诗人写这首诗

的目的可能是
讲述悲伤亲人的痛苦。

但另一方面,您

可能会将其解释为
考试中失去半分的痛苦。

因此,这种模糊性
允许了相关性因素,

而相关性
使这首诗看起来更有吸引力。

事实上,这是
最简单的事情。

在这里,它不是那么独特,
它不是那么原始

,它让你觉得这
首诗比它已经存在的更深刻。

当一首诗
看起来比实际更深时,

我们称这种现象为“假深诗”。

什么是假深诗?

顾名思义,
它看起来很深,

但一旦你仔细观察,

它真的不是。

因此,

随着严重问题的不断命名,它最近出现了很多

一些诗人认为
,如果他们命名问题,

看起来会更勇敢,

但实际上,

这只会让他们的诗歌变得更弱。

所以让我给你这个例子。

这位诗人与他们的父亲有矛盾。

所以这位诗人写道:

“我的父亲,他从不骄傲。

直到今天,他还没有大声说出来。”

在这里,是的,再一次,
它是押韵的,它有节奏,

但这几乎与
我之前的例子完全相反。

这太简单了。

但如果我改写它呢?

如果我说:

“我想给你
一百万条评论的满足感。

我要从最低点上升


达到你所说的高峰”?

在这里,它不仅
对解释更加开放,

而且保持了诗人的最初目标,

同时也让其他人
对这种情况产生了共鸣。

那时,在前面的例子中,

它只限于

经历过这种情况的特定人群。

但语言的美妙
在于让人产生共鸣

,让人
感受到从未体验过的东西。

这就引出了一个更大的问题:

我们今天是如何接触到诗歌的?

它尽可能简单——

贴标签。

诗歌是一种开放的艺术形式,如今

任何事物都可以
构成一首诗歌。

事实上,有一种诗歌
叫做当代诗歌

,它要求你创作
听起来不像诗歌的诗歌。

试着快说 10 倍。

所以现在任何东西
都会被贴上诗的标签。

有些人会写建议、
对话或经历,

并将其标记为诗歌,

因为他们可以将
这种能量用于制作回忆录、

建议书,甚至是年轻成人小说。

我的意思是,名人出
的诗集

比玛莎·
斯图尔特出的食谱还多。

相信我,她赚了很多。

让我告诉你
我最近听到的这首好诗。

听听这个。

“真正的诗歌。

听听我的故事。

留着看路。

让岁月玩。

我们对年轻人

再次说出这些话。”

它听起来如此美丽,
如此原始,如此原始。

想知道作者是谁?

人工智能。

现在还这么原始吗?

我不这么认为。

诗歌是如此独特,以至于它被认为
是另一个图灵测试。

而图灵测试基本上就是一个测试

,看看人工智能
是否已经达到了人类的智能。

因此,如果将诗歌带到一个人身上,

而一个人无法识别出
这是人工智能写的,

那么人工智能
将被视为与我们一样聪明。

如果我们一直给事物贴错标签,

那么我们还不
如说人工智能和我们一样聪明。

但你可能会问,

“Zahraa,你是谁来批评诗歌?

诗歌不是主观的吗? ”

嗯,振作起来。

我要告诉你一个残酷的事实。

它不是。

诗歌不是主观的。

想想看。

如果诗歌是主观的,

我们为什么要每天去学校
学习和阅读以前的文学作品?

为什么我们要接受
批评

并告诉我们文学

元素告诉我们什么是好的
和告诉我们什么是坏的英语专业?

这样我们就可以将
所有这些能量引导到我们自己的工作中

,并使我们的工作变得更好。

没关系,我不会评判
你的诗歌品味。

你可能喜欢坏诗
,讨厌好诗。

我不是来评判你的,

但你的喜好并不能改变
这首诗是

好是坏的事实。

在这里,我将完成
我之前写的那首诗的最后一节。

“而我太虚弱了,无法接听电话,

看着我的脑袋,寻找一首欢乐的交响乐。

尽管电唱机

可能坏了,但

我会很高兴地听到新的声音。

原谅我,因为我,这首诗
和最后一行是……”

省略号。

不完整。

我把这首诗打开,
把你插入我的叙述中。

这就是诗的魅力。

确实如此。

让我告诉你一首我真正听过的最伟大的诗

,相信我,这不是人工智能写的,

我不会再欺骗你了。

它尽可能简单——

四个字母,两个单词,一个空格——

由最伟大的穆罕默德·阿里背诵。

是“我我们”。

现在“我我们”是什么意思?

它没有意义,

因为你是
那个将意义输入其中的人。

您将确定它的含义。

穆罕默德·阿里,他从未
告诉我们这意味着什么。

他把它留给我们。

这种变化以“我”开始
,然后以“我们”结束。

我是否应该忘记“我”
而专注于“我们”。

机会是无穷无尽的。

诗歌
和这种壮丽艺术

的伟大之处在于它唤起了——

更好的是,它激发了——情感

并灌输了思想。

诗歌可能
没有明确的意义。

但有一件事是真的。

诗歌是一种涉及你的艺术形式。

感谢您收听我的 TEDxTalk。

(掌声)