The new political story that could change everything George Monbiot

Do you feel trapped

in a broken economic model?

A model that’s trashing the living world

and threatens the lives
of our descendants?

A model that excludes billions of people

while making a handful unimaginably rich?

That sorts us into winners and losers,

and then blames the losers
for their misfortune?

Welcome to neoliberalism,

the zombie doctrine
that never seems to die,

however comprehensively it is discredited.

Now you might have imagined
that the financial crisis of 2008

would have led to the collapse
of neoliberalism.

After all, it exposed
its central features,

which were deregulating
business and finance,

tearing down public protections,

throwing us into extreme
competition with each other,

as, well, just a little bit flawed.

And intellectually, it did collapse.

But still, it dominates our lives.

Why?

Well, I believe the answer
is that we have not yet produced

a new story with which to replace it.

Stories are the means
by which we navigate the world.

They allow us to interpret
its complex and contradictory signals.

When we want to make sense of something,

the sense we seek is not scientific sense

but narrative fidelity.

Does what we are hearing reflect the way

that we expect humans
and the world to behave?

Does it hang together?

Does it progress

as a story should progress?

Now, we are creatures of narrative,

and a string of facts and figures,
however important facts and figures are –

and, you know, I’m an empiricist,
I believe in facts and figures –

but those facts and figures have no power
to displace a persuasive story.

The only thing that can replace a story

is a story.

You cannot take away someone’s story

without giving them a new one.

And it’s not just stories in general
that we are attuned to,

but particular narrative structures.

There are a number of basic plots
that we use again and again,

and in politics there is one basic plot

which turns out to be
tremendously powerful,

and I call this “the restoration story.”

It goes as follows.

Disorder afflicts the land,

caused by powerful and nefarious forces

working against the interests of humanity.

But the hero will revolt
against this disorder,

fight those powerful forces,

against the odds overthrow them

and restore harmony to the land.

You’ve heard this story before.

It’s the Bible story.

It’s the “Harry Potter” story.

It’s the “Lord of the Rings” story.

It’s the “Narnia” story.

But it’s also the story

that has accompanied almost every
political and religious transformation

going back millennia.

In fact, we could go as far as to say

that without a powerful
new restoration story,

a political and religious transformation

might not be able to happen.

It’s that important.

After laissez-faire economics
triggered the Great Depression,

John Maynard Keynes
sat down to write a new economics,

and what he did was to tell
a restoration story,

and it went something like this.

Disorder afflicts the land!

(Laughter)

Caused by the powerful and nefarious
forces of the economic elite,

which have captured the world’s wealth.

But the hero of the story,

the enabling state, supported
by working class and middle class people,

will contest that disorder,

will fight those powerful forces
by redistributing wealth,

and through spending
public money on public goods

will generate income and jobs,

restoring harmony to the land.

Now like all good restoration stories,

this one resonated
across the political spectrum.

Democrats and Republicans,
labor and conservatives,

left and right all became,
broadly, Keynesian.

Then, when Keynesianism ran into trouble

in the 1970s,

the neoliberals, people like
Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman,

came forward with
their new restoration story,

and it went something like this.

You’ll never guess what’s coming.

(Laughter)

Disorder afflicts the land!

Caused by the powerful
and nefarious forces

of the overmighty state,

whose collectivizing tendencies
crush freedom and individualism

and opportunity.

But the hero of the story,
the entrepreneur,

will fight those powerful forces,

roll back the state,

and through creating
wealth and opportunity,

restore harmony to the land.

And that story also resonated
across the political spectrum.

Republicans and Democrats,
conservatives and labor,

they all became, broadly, neoliberal.

Opposite stories

with an identical narrative structure.

Then, in 2008,

the neoliberal story fell apart,

and its opponents came forward with …

nothing.

No new restoration story!

The best they had to offer
was a watered-down neoliberalism

or a microwaved Keynesianism.

And that is why we’re stuck.

Without that new story,

we are stuck with the old failed story

that keeps on failing.

Despair is the state we fall into

when our imagination fails.

When we have no story
that explains the present

and describes the future,

hope evaporates.

Political failure is at heart

a failure of imagination.

Without a restoration story

that can tell us where we need to go,

nothing is going to change,

but with such a restoration story,

almost everything can change.

The story we need to tell

is a story which will appeal
to as wide a range of people as possible,

crossing political fault lines.

It should resonate
with deep needs and desires.

It should be simple and intelligible,

and it should be grounded in reality.

Now, I admit that all of this sounds
like a bit of a tall order.

But I believe that in Western nations,

there is actually a story like this

waiting to be told.

Over the past few years,

there’s been a fascinating
convergence of findings

in several different sciences,

in psychology and anthropology
and neuroscience and evolutionary biology,

and they all tell us
something pretty amazing:

that human beings have got
this massive capacity for altruism.

Sure, we all have a bit of selfishness
and greed inside us,

but in most people,
those are not our dominant values.

And we also turn out to be
the supreme cooperators.

We survived the African savannas,

despite being weaker and slower
than our predators and most of our prey,

by an amazing ability
to engage in mutual aid,

and that urge to cooperate
has been hardwired into our minds

through natural selection.

These are the central,
crucial facts about humankind:

our amazing altruism and cooperation.

But something has gone horribly wrong.

Disorder afflicts the land.

(Laughter)

Our good nature has been thwarted
by several forces,

but I think the most powerful of them
is the dominant political narrative

of our times,

which tells us that we should live
in extreme individualism

and competition with each other.

It pushes us to fight each other,
to fear and mistrust each other.

It atomizes society.

It weakens the social bonds
that make our lives worth living.

And into that vacuum

grow these violent, intolerant forces.

We are a society of altruists,

but we are governed by psychopaths.

(Applause)

But it doesn’t have to be like this.

It really doesn’t,

because we have this incredible capacity
for togetherness and belonging,

and by invoking that capacity,

we can recover those amazing
components of our humanity:

our altruism and cooperation.

Where there is atomization,
we can build a thriving civic life

with a rich participatory culture.

Where we find ourselves crushed
between market and state,

we can build an economics
that respects both people and planet.

And we can create this economics
around that great neglected sphere,

the commons.

The commons is neither market nor state,
capitalism nor communism,

but it consists of three main elements:

a particular resource;

a particular community
that manages that resource;

and the rules and negotiations
the community develops to manage it.

Think of community broadband
or community energy cooperatives

or the shared land
for growing fruit and vegetables

that in Britain we call allotments.

A common can’t be sold,
it can’t be given away,

and its benefits are shared equally
among the members of the community.

Where we have been ignored and exploited,

we can revive our politics.

We can recover democracy
from the people who have captured it.

We can use new rules
and methods of elections

to ensure that financial power
never trumps democratic power again.

(Applause)

Representative democracy should
be tempered by participatory democracy

so that we can refine
our political choices,

and that choice should be exercised
as much as possible at the local level.

If something can be decided locally,
it shouldn’t be determined nationally.

And I call all this
the politics of belonging.

Now, I think this has got
the potential to appeal

across quite a wide range of people,

and the reason for this
is that among the very few values

that both left and right share

are belonging and community.

And we might mean
slightly different things by them,

but at least we start
with some language in common.

In fact, you can see a lot of politics
as being a search for belonging.

Even fascists seek community,

albeit a frighteningly
homogenous community

where everyone looks the same
and wears the same uniform

and chants the same slogans.

What we need to create
is a community based on bridging networks,

not bonding networks.

Now a bonding network brings together
people from a homogenous group,

whereas a bridging network brings together
people from different groups.

And my belief is that if we create

sufficiently rich and vibrant
bridging communities,

we can thwart the urge
for people to burrow into the security

of a homogenous bonding community

defending themselves against the other.

So in summary,

our new story could go
something like this.

Disorder afflicts the land!

(Laughter)

Caused by the powerful
and nefarious forces

of people who say
there’s no such thing as society,

who tell us that
our highest purpose in life

is to fight like stray dogs
over a dustbin.

But the heroes of the story, us,

we’ll revolt against this disorder.

We will fight those nefarious forces
by building rich, engaging,

inclusive and generous communities,

and, in doing so,

we will restore harmony to the land.

(Applause)

Now whether or not
you feel this is the right story,

I hope you’ll agree that we need one.

We need a new restoration story,

which is going to guide us
out of the mess we’re in,

which tells us why we’re in the mess
and tells us how to get out of that mess.

And that story, if we tell it right,

will infect the minds of people
across the political spectrum.

Our task is to tell the story
that lights the path to a better world.

Thank you.

(Applause)

你是否觉得被困

在一个破碎的经济模式中?

一个破坏生活世界

并威胁
我们后代生命的模型?

一个将数十亿人排除在外,

同时让少数人变得难以想象的模式吗?

这将我们分为赢家和输家,

然后将
他们的不幸归咎于失败者?

欢迎来到新自由主义,

这种
看似永不消亡的僵尸学说,

无论其名誉有多么全面。

现在你可能已经想到
,2008 年的金融危机

会导致
新自由主义的崩溃。

毕竟,它暴露了
它的核心特征,

即放松对
商业和金融的管制,

撕毁公共保护,

使我们陷入
彼此之间的极端竞争

,只是有点缺陷。

在智力上,它确实崩溃了。

但是,它仍然主宰着我们的生活。

为什么?

好吧,我相信答案
是我们还没有制作

一个新的故事来取代它。

故事
是我们驾驭世界的手段。

它们使我们能够解释
其复杂而矛盾的信号。

当我们想要理解某件事时

,我们寻求的不是科学意义,

而是叙述的真实性。

我们所听到的是否反映

了我们期望人类
和世界的行为方式?

它挂在一起吗?

它是否会

随着故事的发展而发展?

现在,我们是叙事的生物

,是一连串的事实和数据,
不管事实和数据多么重要——

而且,你知道,我是一个经验主义者,
我相信事实和数据——

但那些事实和数据并没有
取代有说服力的故事的能力。

唯一能代替故事的

就是故事。

如果不给他们一个新的故事,你就不能拿走他们的故事

我们所适应的不仅仅是一般的故事

还有特定的叙事结构。

有许多基本
情节我们会反复使用,

而在政治上,有一个基本

情节证明是
非常强大的

,我称之为“恢复故事”。

它如下。

混乱折磨着这片土地,这

是由违背人类利益的强大而邪恶的力量造成的

但英雄将
反抗这种混乱,

与那些强大的力量作战,

克服困难推翻他们

并恢复土地的和谐。

你以前听过这个故事。

这是圣经故事。

这是“哈利波特”的故事。

这是《指环王》的故事。

这是“纳尼亚”的故事。

但这也是几千年来

几乎每一次
政治和宗教变革

都伴随着的故事。

事实上,我们甚至可以说

,如果没有强有力的
新修复故事

,政治和宗教转变

可能无法发生。

这很重要。

在自由放任经济学
引发了大萧条之后,

约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯
坐下来写了一部新经济学

,他所做的就是讲述
一个复兴的故事,结果

是这样的。

混乱折磨着这片土地!

(笑声)

由经济精英强大而邪恶的
力量引起的

,他们攫取了世界的财富。

但是这个故事的主人公,一个

得到工人阶级和中产阶级人民支持的赋权国家,

将对抗这种混乱,

将通过重新分配财富来对抗那些强大的力量

,通过将
公共资金用于公共产品

将产生收入和就业机会,

恢复和谐 到土地。

现在就像所有好的修复故事一样,这个故事

在整个政治领域引起了共鸣。

民主党人和共和党人,
工党和保守派,

左翼和右翼都大体上变成了
凯恩斯主义。

然后,当凯恩斯主义

在 1970 年代遇到麻烦时

,像
弗里德里希·哈耶克和米尔顿·弗里德曼这样的新自由主义者

提出了
他们新的修复故事

,事情就这样发展了。

你永远猜不到会发生什么。

(笑声)

混乱折磨着大地!

由专横的国家强大
而邪恶的

力量造成,

其集体化趋势
粉碎了自由、个人主义

和机会。

但故事的主人公
,企业家,

将与那些强大的力量战斗,

推翻国家,

并通过创造
财富和机会,

恢复土地的和谐。

这个故事也引起了
整个政治领域的共鸣。

共和党人和民主党人、
保守派和工党

,他们都广泛地变成了新自由主义。

具有相同叙事结构的相反故事。

然后,在 2008 年

,新自由主义的故事分崩离析

,它的反对者挺身而出……

什么也没有。

没有新的修复故事!

他们所能提供的最好的东西
是淡化的新自由主义

或微波化的凯恩斯主义。

这就是我们陷入困境的原因。

如果没有那个新故事,

我们就会陷入不断失败的旧失败故事

中。

当我们的想象力失败时,绝望是我们陷入的状态。

当我们没有
解释现在

和描述未来的故事时,

希望就烟消云散了。

政治失败本质上

是想象力的失败。

如果没有一个

可以告诉我们需要去哪里的修复故事,

什么都不会改变,

但是有了这样一个修复故事,

几乎一切都会改变。

我们需要讲述

的故事是一个跨越政治断层线的故事,它将
吸引尽可能多的人

它应该
与深刻的需求和愿望产生共鸣。

它应该简单易懂,

并且应该立足于现实。

现在,我承认所有这些听起来都
有些艰巨。

但我相信,在西方国家,

其实有这样的故事

等着讲。

在过去的几年里

,心理学、人类学
、神经科学和进化生物学等几个不同科学领域的研究结果令人着迷

,它们都告诉我们
一些非常惊人的事情

:人类拥有
如此巨大的利他主义能力。

当然,我们内心都有一点自私
和贪婪,

但对大多数人来说,
这些并不是我们的主导价值观。

我们也变成
了最高的合作者。 尽管

我们比我们的掠食者和大多数猎物更弱、更慢,但我们在非洲大草原上幸存下来,


我们

拥有
惊人的互助能力,

而这种合作的冲动
已经通过自然选择根植于我们的脑海中

这些是关于人类的核心和
关键事实:

我们惊人的利他主义和合作。

但是有些事情发生了可怕的错误。

混乱折磨着这片土地。

(笑声)

我们善良的本性
被几股力量所阻挠,

但我认为其中最强大的
是我们这个时代占主导地位的政治叙事

它告诉我们应该生活
在极端的个人主义

和相互竞争中。

它促使我们互相争斗,
互相恐惧和不信任。

它使社会原子化。

它削弱了
使我们的生活变得有价值的社会纽带。

在那个真空中,

这些暴力的、不宽容的力量会增长。

我们是一个利他主义者的社会,

但我们受到精神病患者的支配。

(鼓掌)

但是不一定要这样。

事实并非如此,

因为我们拥有这种令人难以置信
的团结和归属感

,通过调用这种能力,

我们可以恢复人性中那些令人惊奇的
组成部分:

我们的利他主义和合作。

哪里有原子化,哪里就有丰富的参与性文化,
我们就可以建设繁荣的公民生活

当我们发现自己
在市场和国家之间徘徊时,

我们可以建立一种
既尊重人类又尊重地球的经济学。

我们可以
围绕这个被忽视的领域,

即公地创造这种经济学。

公地既不是市场也不是国家,既不是
资本主义也不是共产主义,

但它由三个主要要素组成:

特定资源;

管理该资源的特定社区;

以及
社区为管理它而制定的规则和谈判。

想想社区宽带
或社区能源合作社


种植水果和蔬菜的共享土地

,在英国我们称之为分配。

一个普通的不能出售
,不能赠送

,它的利益
在社区成员之间平等分享。

在我们被忽视和剥削的地方,

我们可以重振我们的政治。

我们可以
从夺取民主的人那里恢复民主。

我们可以使用新
的选举规则和方法

来确保金融权力
永远不会再次压倒民主权力。

(掌声)

代议制民主
应该与参与式民主相结合,

这样我们才能细化
我们的政治选择,

而且这种选择应该
尽可能地在地方层面上进行。

如果某件事可以在当地决定,
那不应该在全国范围内决定。

我把这一切称为
归属政治。

现在,我认为这
有可能吸引

相当广泛的人

,其原因
是左右共享的极少数价值观

是归属感和社区。

我们可能
对它们的含义略有不同,

但至少我们
从一些共同的语言开始。

事实上,你可以将很多政治
视为寻找归属感。

即使是法西斯分子也寻求社区,

尽管这是一个可怕的
同质社区

,每个人看起来都一样
,穿着一样的制服

,高呼着同样的口号。

我们需要创建的
是一个基于桥接网络的社区,

而不是绑定网络。

现在,联结网络将
来自同质群体的人聚集在一起,

而桥接网络将
来自不同群体的人聚集在一起。

我的信念是,如果我们创建

足够丰富和充满活力的
桥接社区,

我们就可以阻止
人们钻进

一个同质的联系社区的安全性来

保护自己免受他人侵害的冲动。

总而言之,

我们的新故事可能
是这样的。

混乱折磨着这片土地!

(笑声)

那些说
没有社会这回事的人的强大而邪恶的力量造成的,

他们告诉我们,
我们人生的最高目标

就是像流浪狗一样
为垃圾箱而战。

但是故事的英雄,我们,

我们将反抗这种混乱。

我们将
通过建立丰富、参与、

包容和慷慨的社区来打击这些邪恶势力,

以此恢复土地的和谐。

(掌声)

现在不管
你是否觉得这是一个正确的故事,

我希望你会同意我们需要一个。

我们需要一个新的修复故事,

它将引导我们
走出困境

,告诉我们为什么会陷入困境,
并告诉我们如何摆脱困境。

如果我们说得对,这个故事

将感染整个政治领域的人们的思想

我们的任务是
讲述照亮通往更美好世界的道路的故事。

谢谢你。

(掌声)