How to turn protest into powerful change Eric Liu

We live in an age of protest.

On campuses and public squares,

on streets and social media,

protesters around the world
are challenging the status quo.

Protest can thrust issues
onto the national or global agenda,

it can force out tyrants,

it can activate people who have
long been on the sidelines of civic life.

While protest is often necessary,
is it sufficient?

Consider the Arab Spring.

All across the Middle East,

citizen protesters
were able to topple dictators.

Afterwards, though,

the vacuum was too often filled
by the most militant and violent.

Protest can generate
lasting positive change

when it’s followed by an equally
passionate effort

to mobilize voters,

to cast ballots,

to understand government,

and to make it more inclusive.

So here are three core strategies for
peacefully turning awareness into action

and protest into durable political power.

First, expand the frame of the possible,

second, choose a defining fight,

and third, find an early win.

Let’s start with expanding the frame
of the possible.

How often have you heard
in response to a policy idea,

“That’s just never going to happen”?

When you hear someone say that,

they’re trying to define the boundaries
of your civic imagination.

The powerful citizen works to push
those boundaries outward,

to ask what if -

what if it were possible?

What if enough forms of power -

people power, ideas, money, social norms -

were aligned to make it happen?

Simply asking that question

and not taken as given all the givens
of conventional politics

is the first step in converting
protest to power.

But this requires concreteness about what
it would look like to have, say,

a radically smaller national government,

or, by contrast, a big single-payer
healthcare system,

a way to hold corporations accountable
for their misdeeds,

or, instead, a way to free them
from onerous regulations.

This brings us to the second strategy,
choosing a defining fight.

All politics is about contrasts.

Few of us think about civic life
in the abstract.

We think about things in relief
compared to something else.

Powerful citizens set the terms
of that contrast.

This doesn’t mean being uncivil.

It simply means thinking about a debate
you want to have on your terms

over an issue that captures the essence
of the change you want.

This is what the activists pushing for
a $15 minimum wage in the U.S. have done.

They don’t pretend that $15 by itself
can fix inequality,

but with this ambitious
and contentious goal,

which they achieved first in Seattle
and then beyond,

they have forced a bigger debate
about economic justice and prosperity.

They’ve expanded the frame
of the possible, strategy one,

and created a sharp emblematic contrast,
strategy two.

The third key strategy, then,
is to seek and achieve an early win.

An early win, even if it’s not
as ambitious as the ultimate goal,

creates momentum,

which changes
what people think is possible.

The solidarity movement,

which organized workers in Cold War Poland
emerged just this way,

first, with local shipyard strikes in 1980
that forced concessions,

then, over the next decade,

a nationwide effort
that ultimately helped topple

Poland’s communist government.

Getting early wins sets in motion
a positive feedback loop,

a contagion, a belief, a motivation.

It requires pressuring policymakers,

using the media to change narrative,

making arguments in public,

persuading skeptical neighbors
one by one by one.

None of this is as sexy as a protest,

but this is the history
of the U.S. Civil Rights Movement,

of Indian Independence,

of Czech self-determination.

Not the single sudden triumph,

but the long, slow slog.

You don’t have to be anyone special
to be part of this grind,

to expand the frame of the possible,

to pick a defining fight,

or to secure an early win.

You just have to be a participant
and to live like a citizen.

The spirit of protest is powerful.

So is showing up after the protest.

You can be the co-creator
of what comes next.

我们生活在一个抗议的时代。

在校园和公共广场,

在街道和社交媒体上,

世界各地的抗议者都在
挑战现状。

抗议可以将问题
推到国家或全球议程上,

它可以驱逐暴君,

它可以激活
长期处于公民生活边缘的人们。

虽然抗议通常是必要的,
但这是否足够?

想想阿拉伯之春。

在整个中东,

公民
抗议者能够推翻独裁者。

然而,之后

,真空往往
被最激进和最暴力的人所填补。

当抗议

之后伴随着同样
热情的努力

来动员选民

、投票

、理解政府

并使其更具包容性时,抗议可以产生持久的积极变化。

因此,这里有三个核心战略,可以
和平地将意识转化为行动

,将抗议转化为持久的政治力量。

首先,扩大可能的框架,

第二,选择一场决定性的战斗

,第三,找到早期的胜利。

让我们从扩展可能的框架开始

您有多少次听到
对政策理念的回应,

“这永远不会发生”?

当你听到有人这么说时,

他们正试图界定
你的公民想象力的界限。

有权势的公民努力将
这些界限向外推

,问如果——

如果可能会怎样?

如果足够多的权力形式——

人的权力、思想、金钱、社会规范

——联合起来实现它会怎样?

简单地提出这个问题,

而不是将传统政治的所有既定条件视为既定因素

是将
抗议转化为权力的第一步。

但这
需要具体说明它

会是什么样子 将他们
从繁重的法规中解放出来。

这将我们带到第二个策略,
选择一场决定性的战斗。

所有的政治都是关于对比的。

我们中很少有人
抽象地思考公民生活。 与其他

事物相比,我们会轻松地考虑
事物。

有权势的公民设定
了这种对比的条件。

这并不意味着不文明。

它只是意味着考虑一个
你想要就你想要

的改变的本质问题进行的辩论

这就是
在美国推动 15 美元最低工资的活动人士所做的。

他们并不假装 15 美元本身
就可以解决不平等问题,

但有了这个雄心勃勃
且有争议的目标

,他们首先在西雅图实现了这个目标
,然后在其他地方实现了这一目标,

他们已经引发了一场
关于经济正义和繁荣的更大辩论。

他们扩展
了可能的框架,策略一,

并创造了鲜明的标志性对比,
策略二。

那么,第三个关键策略
是寻求并取得早期胜利。

早期的胜利,即使它
不像最终目标那样雄心勃勃,也会

创造动力,

从而改变
人们认为可能的事情。

在冷战时期波兰组织工人的团结运动
就是以这种方式出现的,

首先是 1980 年当地造船厂的罢工
迫使他们做出让步,

然后在接下来的十年中,

一场全国性的
努力最终帮助推翻了

波兰的共产主义政府。

获得早期胜利会启动
一个积极的反馈循环、

一种传染、一种信念和一种动力。

它需要向政策制定者施压,

利用媒体改变叙事,

在公开场合发表论点,一一

说服持怀疑态度的邻居

这一切都不像抗议那样性感,但这

是美国民权运动

、印度独立

和捷克自决的历史。

不是一次突然的胜利,

而是漫长而缓慢的跋涉。

您不必成为特别的人
,也可以参与这种磨练

,扩展可能的框架

,选择一场决定性的战斗,

或者确保早日获胜。

您只需要成为参与者
并像公民一样生活。

抗议的精神是强大的。

抗议后也出现了。

你可以成为
接下来发生的事情的共同创造者。