Luvvie Ajayi Jones How to be a professional troublemaker TED

Transcriber:

Whitney Pennington Rodgers:
Each of us, no matter who we are,

have dreams for ourselves.

and all of us also have fears.

Luvvie Ajayi Jones has spent lots of time

thinking about the intersection
of these two things,

namely, how you can overcome your fears
to accomplish your dreams.

Here to break this all down for us
is Luvvie Ajayi Jones.

Welcome, Luvvie.

Luvvie Ajayi Jones: Hi!

WPR: Hi, Luvvie. How are you doing?

LAJ: Doing well. Doing well.

WPR: Why do you use the term
“professional troublemaker”

to describe yourself?

Why is that sort of the term
that you’ve landed on

to define what you are, who you are?

LAJ: Yeah. You know, some of us have been
called troublemakers growing up.

When you are too loud
in the class or, you know,

your mom tells you to eat vegetables
and you say no, and you’re like,

you’re a troublemaker.

I want to reclaim what that means.

I think about the late, great John Lewis,

who said we have to be ready to make
necessary trouble, good trouble,

and really was the lens of:
we are going to have to do things

that are going to disrupt
the status quo in this world.

If we’re going to do anything
of impact and of note

and make any type of positive change,

we are going to have to “make trouble.”

And making trouble is not about
being a contrarian randomly.

It’s not about being a troll.

It’s not just simply because you want
to make people uncomfortable.

It’s that, often,

when you are the person who thinks
different from everybody else in the room,

it does feel like trouble.

You know, when you are not going along
with the group, it feels like trouble.

But sometimes, it’s actually what you need
to do to not just honor yourself,

but honor the world
and honor who you want to be.

So if making trouble looks like we
actually end up being better off for it,

then we have to make trouble.

I think it’s an obligation
for us to make trouble,

the type that leaves our kids better,

that leaves the rooms
that we are in elevated,

the types that lets us
be proud of ourselves.

Now, making trouble will not
always go well, right?

Let’s keep – I’m going to say that.

It’s not that when you speak the truth,

somebody’s going to always
receive it properly.

But you go to bed knowing
that you at least tried,

as opposed to saying,
“What if I had tried?”

It’s a life of, “Oh, well,”
then “What if?”

So I think that’s why

professional troublemaking is something
that we should be proud of.

WPR: So I know everyone is dying to know:

How how do I become
a professional troublemaker?

You outlined this in your book.

You talk a little bit
about it in your talk.

But I know there are three big things
that you think you need to do

to approach this idea
of becoming a troublemaker.

Will you share a little bit
about that with us?

LAJ: Yes. So when you are in the room,

and somebody says something
that is not a great idea –

we’ve all been in meetings like that,

where a campaign idea was brought forth
or a slogan or just something,

and you’re just like, “Oof,”

but everybody else in the room
is like, “This is a great idea!

We love it! Yes, let’s do it!”

And usually you feel like
you’re standing on an island by yourself,

because you’re like, “If I’m the only
person that has a problem with it,

am I the problem?”

So then oftentimes, we’ll be quiet,
the room will dissipate,

we walk out, and we keep thinking
about that moment,

and we keep saying,
“Should I have said something?”

I don’t like the feeling of thinking,
“Should I have said something?”

Because I’ll sit on it,
and I’ll overthink it,

and I’ll think about it the day after,

and I’ll be like,
“I should have said something.”

So for those tough moments
where you want to say something

that feels like it’s contrary
to what everybody else is saying

but you know you deeply believe it,

I say ask yourself three questions.

And if the answer is yes to all three,
you say the thing.

OK, so the three questions are:

Do I mean it?

This question is important

because you’re not just talking
to hear your own voice.

Do you actually mean
what you’re about to say?

Can I defend it?

OK, if somebody challenges you

on this thing that you
are also challenging,

do you have a way to justify
and back it up?

Do you have a clear way to say,

“These are the receipts I’m coming with”?

And then: Can I say it thoughtfully?

Because how you say it does matter.

Now, it does not mean
that you should be tone-policed,

nor does it mean that everybody
will think you’re saying it thoughtfully.

But if you at least try
to run it through your own,

“Am I trying to be
as thoughtful as possible?”

it’s risk mitigation.

So you’re saying, “OK, I’m not going
to be hateful about this.

I’m not going to say this
to demean somebody.

And I’m not just saying it
to blow the room up

or make the room feel like
a rocky place to be in.”

When the answer is yes to all three –

Do I mean it? Can I defend it?
Can I say thoughtfully? –

say it, and then deal with whatever comes.

Now, again – I say risk mitigation.

I’m not saying everybody
will receive what you’re going to say

with the intention you meant, OK?

But it is a way to check yourself,

check in with yourself,

check what you’re about to say,

check your tone a little bit

so it doesn’t come out
as unthoughtful as it could.

Because there are moments
when things might be heated

and you might want to speak
really quickly.

It slows you down just a little bit

to say, all right, all right, you do
want to say this thing, it is valid,

but don’t come at this person’s neck.

So I think it’s important for me.

It’s a checkpoint that I’ve used
for years that I kind of lead with.

And most of the time it goes well.

WPR: That is part
of the tenets you outline.

This is part of the “be” part.

You have “be, say, do” –
Is that right? – for tenets.

LAJ: Yes. Be, say, do.

WPR: Be, say, do.

And Ahmed, he asks,

“How do you recognize professional trouble
rather than regular trouble?”

LAJ: I think it just really comes down to
the heart from which you’re doing it.

You know, I really do think
professional troublemaking,

what it means is to disrupt
for the greater good.

You’re not just disrupting
because you don’t like the person

that’s sitting across from you.

You’re disrupting because you know
what you’re saying or doing

is going to be better for somebody else

or somebody who looks like you

or somebody who doesn’t even
look like you, right?

It is … it’s mission-driven.

And it is sometimes brave,

because a lot of troublemaking
is going to be scary.

If it’s not scary, it’s probably
not troublemaking,

right?

If it does not give you a little
bit of, “Uhh … I’m about to do this,”

it’s probably not troublemaking.

Because if it was easy,
everybody would do it.

If something was easy to say or do,

everybody would do it,
so it wouldn’t be special.

So I think a lot of times
about troublemaking

the thing to really understand is:
it’s going to be scary.

But what we sometimes will think
is that if it’s scary,

that means I need to not do it.

That’s not true.

That’s how we end up not living
the lives that we want to live.

That’s how we end up
passing on opportunities

that are meant to transform our lives.

That’s how we end up
regretting our silence in rooms.

One of the things that I actually ask
myself whenever I’m in a room

and I feel like I need to say
something that feels tough

is, I also ask myself, “Will
my silence make me proud?

This thing that feels like trouble, if I
don’t do it, will I be proud of myself?”

Because ultimately, we are all
our own biggest critics.

Like, I could disappoint other people
and still be able to deal with it.

But when I disappoint myself,
it’s really tough.

So I’m always like,

“I’m making trouble
so I don’t disappoint myself.

I’m making trouble so my silence
is not something that will convict me.”

Because if I was there, I have
to justify what I did in any room.

And I want to be able to say,
“At least I tried.”

WPR: And to this point, Dennis asks,

“How do you pick your battles
to maintain your energy every day?

How do you decide
which trouble’s worth making?”

LAJ: Great question.

Sometimes, I just …

don’t have the energy to make
trouble on that day.

What that means is, if I am in a meeting,
and on that day, I’m wiped,

and I’m just like, “I don’t
have the energy

to even be the one that’s challenging,”

on that day, I might be quiet.

So I just need more people
to feel the obligation

to also make the good trouble,

so the one person who’s always
doing it can take a rest.

WPR: I mean, it sounds like
a big part of this

is understanding yourself, right?

Is understanding the sorts of things
you want to go after.

And we have an anonymous question
where somebody asks,

“I think being a troublemaker
also requires us

to identify what we truly want.

What’s your advice on
finding out what you want?”

LAJ: Yeah, I think it’s important to know
what your core values are

and what the thing
that you will fight for is,

which is why I started the book
with a chapter called “Know Thyself.”

That was important because we have
to be doubly clear on who we are,

what we hold dear, why we are who we are,

because it’s what’s going to inform
what we want to speak up about.

It’s what’s going to inform
what drives us to fight.

It’s what’s going to inform
the why of it all.

It’s what pushes you past the fear
to say, “I have to do this anyway.”

So if you’re not clear about who you are
and what’s important to you,

you’re going to find it hard to know,

“What am I actually
going to be standing up for?”

WPR: You’ve gone back to these tenets,
then, in answering this question,

this idea of being the troublemaker
that you want to be.

And then what you shared earlier

is the saying of the asking
the three questions.

And then there’s a third part
of this, the doing element.

Could you talk a little bit about
what that looks like?

LAJ: Yeah, you know,
you can talk a good talk,

but if you’re not doing work,
then what’s the point of the talk?

Ultimately, we have to put action
to our beliefs, to our ideas,

to our convictions.

So you can be like, yes, you know,
Black lives matter.

But if you’re a boss who hasn’t promoted
your most senior Black staff,

and somebody who just started
got promoted over them,

then the words that you said
did not matter.

So the “do” of it all is important;
it’s an exclamation point,

because first you fix
your mindset with the “be,”

then you start putting words
to it with the “say,”

and then now you actually
put action to it with the “do.”

And we cannot have
the other two without the do.

I think what ends up happening a lot

is that people feel really good
about what they said,

but they haven’t made it actually
match with their action.

So be who you say you are, you know,

whether people are watching or not.

Be who you say you are
in private and in public,

in the rooms where it’s easy

and in the rooms where it’s tough
and you face opposition.

Because a lot of us are walking
with privilege that we’re not using.

So every day you’re trying to figure out
in what ways can you use your voice,

your access, your social currency

in service of people who don’t have it
as much as you do.

WPR: So, Anushka, she asks,

“As someone who’s young
and often seen as inexperienced,

how do I gain the space to speak
and have others realize my worth?”

LAJ: You won’t gain the space to speak.

People won’t let go of their power
that they perceive.

Basically, you have to take it.

Now, that means you might
have to interrupt and say, “Hi.

I’ve been trying to speak
for the last 20 minutes.

I have a point of view
that I’d love to offer up.”

It is being – it is taking up space even
when people don’t give it to you.

And it does not mean
you’re going to be rude.

It doesn’t mean
you’re going to be arrogant.

It means your voice is necessary,

just like everybody else’s.

In the places where your voice
is not given space,

sometimes, you either have to take it,

or you walk away, knowing
that’s not the space for you.

Because if you have to constantly
fight to be heard, that’s exhausting.

People might look at you
with all types of weird projections

of what they think you do or don’t know.

Do not let it shift
what you see as your own value.

That is also why
you cannot attach your value

to how other people are treating you

or how other people
are projecting things onto you.

If you do that, you will very quickly
be told that you don’t fit into spaces.

You’ll be very, very quickly told
that you’re not worthwhile

or that your ideas are terrible,

and then you will absorb it.

And then you’ll go, like, “Oh, I guess
I won’t use my voice.”

You got to fortify yourself

and know that your voice is just
as important as anybody else’s in the room

and that you as somebody
who’s learning, who’s growing,

who is already in the room,

you have already proven yourself
to be valuable.

And whether or not
people see it is not …

it’s not your fault,

but affirm yourself
and make yourself known.

You know, take up space,
even if they’re not giving it to you,

don’t wait for their permission to speak.

Be brilliant whether or not
they want you to be.

WPR: Well, thank you so much, Luvvie,

I know we’re all going to be waiting
with bated breath

for the news around this book.

LAJ: Thank you so much for having me.

TED has been so significant in my journey.

抄写员:

Whitney Pennington Rodgers:
我们每个人,无论我们是谁,

都有自己的梦想。

我们所有人也都有恐惧。

Luvvie Ajayi Jones 花了很多时间

思考
这两件事的交集,

即如何克服恐惧
来实现梦想。

在这里为我们打破这一切的
是 Luvvie Ajayi Jones。

欢迎,卢维。

Luvvie Ajayi Jones:嗨!

WPR:嗨,Luvvie。 你好吗?

拉杰:做得很好。 做得好。

WPR:你为什么用
“职业捣蛋鬼”这个词

来形容自己?

为什么你用这种术语

来定义你是什么,你是谁?

拉杰:是的。 你知道,我们中的一些人在
成长过程中被称为麻烦制造者。

当你在课堂上大声喧哗
,或者你知道,

你妈妈告诉你要吃蔬菜
而你拒绝时,你就像

是个麻烦制造者。

我想恢复这意味着什么。

我想起了已故的伟大的约翰·刘易斯,

他说我们必须准备好制造
必要的麻烦,好的麻烦,

而且真的是这样的镜头:
我们将不得不做

一些会
破坏现状的事情 世界。

如果我们要做
任何有影响力和值得注意的事情

并做出任何类型的积极改变,

我们将不得不“制造麻烦”。

制造麻烦
并不是随机逆势而为。

这不是关于成为一个巨魔。

这不仅仅是因为你
想让人们感到不舒服。

就是这样,通常,

当你是一个
与房间里其他人想法不同的人时,

确实感觉很麻烦。

你知道,当你不
跟团走的时候,感觉就像麻烦。

但有时,实际上你
需要做的不仅仅是尊重自己,

而是尊重世界
,尊重你想成为的人。

因此,如果制造麻烦看起来我们
实际上最终会变得更好,

那么我们必须制造麻烦。

我认为
制造麻烦是我们的义务

,让我们的孩子变得更好的类型,让我们在高处

的房间

,让我们
为自己感到自豪的类型。

现在,制造麻烦不会
总是顺利的,对吧?

让我们继续——我会这么说。

并不是说当你说真话时,

总会
有人正确地接受它。

但是你上床睡觉时
知道你至少试过了,

而不是说,
“如果我试过了呢?”

这是一种“哦,好吧”
然后“如果?”的生活。

所以我认为这就是为什么

专业的麻烦制造
是我们应该感到自豪的事情。

WPR:所以我知道每个人都渴望知道:

我如何
成为专业的麻烦制造者?

你在你的书中概述了这一点。

你在谈话中谈了一点

但我
知道你认为你需要做三件大事才能实现

成为麻烦制造者的想法。


能和我们分享一下吗?

拉杰:是的。 所以当你在房间里

,有人说了
一些不是个好主意的话——

我们都参加过类似的会议

,提出竞选理念
或口号或其他东西

,你就像 ,“Oof”,

但房间里的其他人都说
,“这是个好主意!

我们喜欢它!是的,让我们开始吧!”

通常你觉得
你自己站在一个岛上,

因为你会说,“如果我是唯一
一个有问题的人,

我是问题吗?”

所以很多时候,我们会安静下来
,房间会消散,

我们走出去,我们一直在
想那一刻

,我们一直在说,
“我应该说点什么吗?”

我不喜欢这样想,
“我应该说点什么吗?”

因为我会坐在上面,

我会想得太多,我会在后天再想一想

,我会说,
“我应该说点什么。”

因此,对于
那些你想说一些

感觉与
其他人所说的相反

但你知道自己深信不疑的话的艰难时刻,

我说问自己三个问题。

如果三个人的答案都是肯定的,
那你就说吧。

好的,所以三个问题是:

我是认真的吗?

这个问题很重要,

因为你说话不仅仅是
为了听到自己的声音。

你真的是想说
你要说的吗?

我可以为它辩护吗?

好的,如果有人

在你也在挑战的事情上挑战你

你有办法证明
和支持它吗?

你有明确的说法,

“这些是我要来的收据”吗?

然后:我可以深思熟虑地说吗?

因为你怎么说它确实很重要。

现在,这并不
意味着你应该保持语气,

也不意味着每个人
都会认为你是在深思熟虑的。

但是,如果您至少尝试
通过自己的方式来运行它,

“我是否在尝试尽可能考虑
周到?”

这是降低风险。

所以你说,“好吧,我不会
对此感到憎恨。

我不会说这些
来贬低某人。

我说这不仅仅是
为了炸毁房间

或让房间感觉 就像
一个岩石的地方。”

当三个人的答案都是肯定的时候——

我是认真的吗? 我可以为它辩护吗?
我可以说仔细吗? ——

说出来,然后处理任何发生的事情。

现在,再说一遍——我说的是风险缓解。

我并不是说每个人
都会

按照你的意思接受你要说的话,好吗?

但这是一种检查自己的方式,检查自己,

检查你要说的话,

检查你的语气,

这样它就不会
像它可能的那样轻率。

因为有些
时候事情可能会很激烈

,你可能想要快速说话

它会让你慢

一点说,好吧,好吧,你确实
想说这件事,它是有效的,

但不要在这个人的脖子上。

所以我认为这对我很重要。

这是我多年来一直使用的检查点
,我有点领导。

而且大部分时间都很顺利。

WPR:这是
您概述的原则的一部分。

这是“是”部分的一部分。

你有“是,说,做”——
对吗? ——信条。

拉杰:是的。 做,说,做。

WPR:做,说,做。

他问艾哈迈德,

“你如何识别职业问题
而不是常规问题?”

LAJ:我认为这真的取决于
你做这件事的心。

你知道,我真的认为
专业的麻烦事,

这意味着
为了更大的利益而破坏。

你不只是
因为你不喜欢

坐在你对面的人而造成干扰。

你正在破坏,因为你
知道你在说或做

的事情会对其他

人或看起来像你的

人或甚至
看起来不像你的人更好,对吧?

它是……它是任务驱动的。

有时它是勇敢的,

因为很多
麻烦会让人害怕。

如果它不可怕,它可能
不会麻烦,

对吧?

如果它没有给你
一点,“呃……我要这样做,”

它可能不是麻烦。

因为如果这很容易,
每个人都会去做。

如果某件事说起来容易,做起来容易,

每个人都会去做,
所以它不会特别。

所以我认为很多时候

要真正理解的是:
它会很可怕。

但我们有时会
想,如果它很可怕,

那就意味着我不需要这样做。

这不是真的。

这就是我们最终无法
过上我们想要过的生活的方式。

这就是我们最终
传递

旨在改变我们生活的机会的方式。

这就是我们最终
后悔在房间里保持沉默的原因。

每当我在一个房间里时,我实际上会问自己一件事

,我觉得我需要说
一些让我感觉很艰难

的话,我也问自己,“
我的沉默会让我感到自豪吗?

这件事感觉就像麻烦, 如果我
不这样做,我会为自己感到骄傲吗?”

因为最终,我们都是
自己最大的批评者。

就像,我可以让其他人失望
,但仍然能够处理它。

但是当我让自己失望的时候,
真的很难。

所以我总是喜欢,

“我在制造麻烦,
所以我不会让自己失望。

我在制造麻烦,所以我的
沉默不会让我有罪。”

因为如果我在那里,我
必须证明我在任何房间所做的一切。

我希望能够说,
“至少我试过了。”

WPR:至此,丹尼斯问道,

“你如何选择你的战斗
来保持你每天的精力

?你如何决定
哪些麻烦值得制造?”

拉杰:好问题。

有时候,我只是……

没有精力
在那一天闹事。

这意味着,如果我在开会
,那一天,我被擦掉了

,我就像,“我什至
没有精力

成为挑战者,

”那一天, 我可能很安静。

所以我只是需要更多的
人来

承担起制造好麻烦的义务,

所以一直
在做的人可以休息一下。

WPR:我的意思是,这听起来
很重要的一部分

是了解自己,对吧?

了解
你想要追求的东西。

我们有一个匿名问题
,有人问,

“我认为作为一个麻烦制造者
也需要

我们确定我们真正想要

什么。你对
找出你想要什么有什么建议?”

LAJ:是的,我认为
了解你的核心价值观

是什么
以及你将为之奋斗的目标是很重要的,

这就是为什么我
以“认识你自己”一章开始这本书的原因。

这很重要,因为我们
必须加倍清楚我们是谁,

我们珍视什么,为什么我们是我们自己,

因为它会告诉
我们我们想要谈论什么。

它会告诉
我们是什么驱使我们去战斗。

这将告知
这一切的原因。

这就是让你摆脱
恐惧说“无论如何我都必须这样做”的原因。

因此,如果你不清楚自己是谁
以及什么对你来说很重要,

你会发现很难知道

“我到底
要支持什么?”

WPR:你已经回到了这些原则,
然后,在回答这个问题时,

这个想法是你想成为的麻烦制造者

然后你之前分享的

就是
问三个问题的说法。

然后是第三
部分,做的元素。

你能
谈谈它的样子吗?

LAJ:是的,你知道,
你可以好好谈谈,

但如果你不工作,
那谈话的意义何在?

最终,我们必须
对我们的信念、想法和信念采取行动

所以你可以说,是的,你知道,
黑人的生命很重要。

但如果你是一个老板,没有提拔
你最高级的黑人员工,

而刚开始的
人比他们提拔,

那么你说的话
就无所谓了。

所以这一切的“做”很重要;
这是一个感叹号,

因为首先你
用“是”来固定你的心态,

然后你开始
用“说”来表达它

,然后你实际上
用“做”来付诸行动。

如果没有做,我们就不能
拥有另外两个。

我认为最终发生的很多事情

是人们
对他们所说的话感觉非常好,

但他们并没有让它真正
与他们的行动相匹配。

因此,无论人们是否在观看,都要成为你所说的那

个人。

在私人和公共场合,

容易的房间里,在困难的房间里
,你会面临反对,成为你所说的那个人。

因为我们很多人都
带着我们没有使用的特权行走。

因此,您每天都在试图弄清楚您可以通过
哪些方式使用您的声音、

您的访问权限、您的社交货币

来服务那些没有像您一样拥有它的人

WPR:所以,Anushka,她问道,

“作为一个年轻
且经常被视为缺乏经验的人,

我如何获得发言的空间
并让其他人意识到我的价值?”

LAJ:你不会有发言的空间。

人们不会放弃
他们所感知的力量。

基本上,你必须接受它。

现在,这意味着你可能
不得不打断并说:“嗨。


在过去的 20 分钟里一直在努力发言。

我有
一个我愿意提出的观点。”

它正在——
即使人们不给你它,它也在占用空间。

这并不意味着
你会变得粗鲁。

这并不意味着
你会傲慢。

这意味着你的声音是必要的,

就像其他人一样。

在你的
声音没有空间的地方,

有时,你要么不得不接受它,

要么走开,知道
那不是你的空间。

因为如果你必须不断地
争取被听到,那就太累了。

人们可能会
用各种奇怪的预测

来看待你,他们认为你知道什么或不知道什么。

不要让它改变
你认为自己的价值。

这也是为什么
你不能将你的价值附加

到其他人如何对待你

或其他人
如何将事情投射到你身上的原因。

如果你这样做,你很快就会
被告知你不适合空间。

你会很快被
告知你不值得,

或者你的想法很糟糕,

然后你就会吸收它。

然后你会说,“哦,我想
我不会用我的声音。”

你必须强化自己

,知道你的声音和
房间里的其他人一样重要

,你作为一个
正在学习、正在成长

、已经在房间里的人,

你已经证明
自己是有价值的。

而不管
人们是否看到它不是……

这不是你的错,

而是肯定自己
并让自己知道。

你知道,占用空间,
即使他们没有给你,

也不要等待他们的许可发言。

无论他们是否希望你成为出色的人
,都要出色。

WPR:嗯,非常感谢你,Luvvie,

我知道我们都会
屏住呼吸

等待关于这本书的消息。

LAJ:非常感谢你邀请我。

TED 在我的旅程中非常重要。