How police and the public can create safer neighborhoods together Tracie Keesee

You know, my friends,
I look at this photograph

and I have to ask myself,

you know, I think I’ve seen this
somewhere before.

People marching in the street for justice.

But I know it’s not the same photograph
that I would have seen,

because I wouldn’t take my oath
to be a police officer until 1989.

And I’ve been in the business
for over 25 years.

And identifying
as an African-American woman,

I know things have gotten better.

But even as I learned about public safety,

I wondered if what
I was doing on the street

was hurting or harming the community.

And I often wondered if, you know,
how did they perceive me,

this woman in uniform?

But there is one thing that I knew.

I knew there was a way that we could
do this, probably, different or better.

A way that preserved dignity
and guaranteed justice.

But I also knew that police
could not do it alone.

It’s the coproduction of public safety.

There is a lot of history with us.

You know, we know loss.

The relationship between

the African American community
and the police is a painful one.

Often filled with mistrust.

It has been studied by social scientists,

it has been studied by government,

all both promising, you know,
hopeful new ways and long-term fixes.

But all we want is to be safe.

And our safety is intertwined.

And that we know,
in order to have great relationships

and relationships built on trust,

that we’re going to have
to have communication.

And in this advent and this text
of the world that we’ve got going on,

trying to do this with social media,

it’s a very difficult thing to do.

We also have to examine
our current policing practices,

and we have to set those things aside
that no longer serve us.

So, in New York, that meant
“stop, question and frisk.”

That meant really holding up
the numbers as opposed to relationships.

And it really didn’t allow
the officers the opportunity

to get to know the community
in which they serve.

But you see, there is a better way.

And we know – it’s called coproduction.

So in the 1970s, Elinor Ostrom
came up with this theory,

really called coproduction,
and this is how it works.

You bring people into the space
that come with separate expertise,

and you also come with new ideas
and lived experience,

and you produce a new knowledge.

And when you produce that new knowledge,

and you apply this theory
to public safety,

you produce a new type of public safety.

And so, in New York, it feels like this.

It is called building relationships,
literally one block at a time.

And it’s “Build the Block.”

So this is how it works.

You go to buildtheblock.nyc,
you put in your address.

And up pops location, date and time
of your neighborhood meeting.

The important part of this
is you’ve got to go to the meeting.

And once you go to that meeting,

there, of course, will be NYPD,

along with officers
and other community members.

What’s important about bringing, now,
the lived experience into this space

to produce new knowledge

is that we have to have
a new way of delivering it.

So the new way of delivering it

is through what we call neighborhood
coordinating officers, or NCOs.

And so, also in this meeting are the NCOs,

the what we call 911 response cars,

sector cars, detectives,

all of us working together
to collaborate in this new way

to reduce crime.

And what’s interesting about this
is that we know that it works.

So, for example, in Washington Heights.

At a community meeting, there was a bar,
up in Washington Heights,

and the neighbors were complaining
about outcry and noises.

So in their conversations with their NCO,

they talked about, you know,
sound barriers,

different ways to sort of approach this.

Is there a different way
we can direct traffic?

And of course now they have
relatively quieter bar nights.

So, another issue that always
comes up in neighborhoods is speeding.

How many of you in here
have ever had a speeding ticket?

Raise your hand.

Oh, higher, come on!

There’s more than that, this is New York.

So those are other issues
that brought to the NCO.

Speeding – what the NCOs do

is they collaborate
with the Department of Transportation,

they look at issues such as speed bumps
and signage and all types of things.

And when we come together to create
this different type of policing,

it also feels different.

The coproduction
of public safety also means

that officers need to understand

the history and the power
of their uniforms.

They’re going to have to set aside
old historical narratives

that do not serve them well.

And that means they have to learn
about implicit bias.

Implicit biases are shortcuts
the brain makes

without us really knowing it.

They’re stereotypes
that often influence our decision making.

And so, you can imagine,

for police officers who have to make
split-second decisions

can be a very detrimental
decision-making point.

That’s why the NYPD, along with other
departments throughout the United States,

are training all of their officers
in implicit bias.

They have to understand
that learning about their implicit biases,

having good training, tactics
and deescalation

and understanding how it impacts
your decision making

makes us all safer.

We also know how officers
are treated inside the organization

impacts how they’re going to behave
with the community at large.

This is critical.

Especially if you want to have
a new way forward.

And we know that we have to care
for those folks that are on the frontline.

And they have to recognize
their own trauma.

And in order to do that,
us as leaders have to lift them up

and let them know that the narratives
of being strong men and women –

you can set those aside,
and it’s OK to say you need help.

And we do that by providing peer support,

employee assistance,
mental health services.

We make sure all
of those things are in place,

because without it –

it’s a critical component
to the coproduction of public safety.

Equally as important
is that we also have social issues

that are often laid at the feet
of law enforcement.

So, for example,
mental health and education.

Historically, we’ve been
pulled into those spaces

where we have not necessarily
provided public safety

but have enforced long, historical
legislative racial desegregation.

We have to own our part in history.

But we also have to have
those folks at the table

when we’re talking about
how do we move forward with coproduction.

But understanding this,

we also have to understand
that we need to have voices come to us

in a different way.

We also have to recognize

that the community
may not be willing or ready

to come to the table
to have the conversation.

And that’s OK.

We have to be able to accept that.

By acknowledging it, it also means
that we care for the community’s health

and for their resiliency as well.

That’s another key component.

We also have to acknowledge

that there are those folks
that are in our community that are here –

they do want to do us harm.

We also have to recognize
that we have community members

who did not get the benefits
of a long-ago dream.

We also have to acknowledge

that we have put faith in a system
that sometimes is broken,

hoping that it would give us
solutions for better.

But we cannot walk away.

Because there is a better way.

And we know this because the NYPD’s
neighborhood policing philosophy

is grounded in the coproduction
of public safety.

And in order for us
to move forward together,

with our family, our friends
and for our health,

we have to make sure
that we focus this way.

And in order to do that,

there are three fundamental ideologies
that we must all agree to.

Are you ready?

Oh, I’m sorry, one more time –
are you ready?

Audience: Yes!

Tracie Keesee:
Now, that’s better, alright.

The first one: There’s no more
wallowing in the why.

We know why.

We must move forward together.
There’s no more us versus them.

Number two:

We must embrace the lived experience
and our histories,

and we must make sure we never go back
to a place where we cannot move forward.

And number three:

We must also make sure

that truth and telling facts is painful.

But we also know that no action
is no longer acceptable.

And agree?

Audience: Yes.

TK: Oh, I’m sorry, I can’t hear you,
do you agree?

Audience: Yes!

TK: So we do know there is a better way.

And the better way
is the coproduction of public safety.

Thank you.

(Applause)

你知道,我的朋友们,
我看着这张照片

,我不得不问自己,

你知道,我想我以前在什么
地方见过这个。

人们在街上为正义游行。

但我知道这不是我看到的那张照片

因为
直到 1989 年我才会宣誓成为一名警察。

而且我从事这项工作
已经超过 25 年了。

作为一名非裔美国女性,

我知道事情已经变得更好了。

但即使我了解了公共安全,

我也想知道
我在街上所做的事情

是否会伤害或伤害社区。

我经常想知道,你知道,
他们是如何看待我

这个穿制服的女人的?

但我知道一件事。

我知道有一种方法可以
做到这一点,可能不同或更好。

一种维护尊严
和保证正义的方式。

但我也知道,
单靠警察是做不到的。

这是公共安全的共同生产。

我们有很多历史。

你知道,我们知道损失。

非裔美国人社区
和警察之间的关系是一种痛苦的关系。

常常充满不信任。

它已经被社会科学家研究过,

它已经被政府研究过,

所有这些都有希望,你知道,
有希望的新方法和长期修复。

但我们想要的只是安全。

我们的安全是相互交织的。

我们知道
,为了建立良好的

关系和建立在信任基础上的关系

,我们
必须进行沟通。

在这个
世界的来临和这个世界的文本中,我们已经开始

尝试通过社交媒体来做到这一点,

这是一件非常困难的事情。

我们还必须检查
我们目前的警务做法

,我们必须把
那些不再为我们服务的事情放在一边。

所以,在纽约,这意味着
“停下来,提问和搜身”。

这意味着真正
保持数字而不是关系。

它确实没有
让官员有

机会了解
他们所服务的社区。

但是你看,有更好的方法。

我们知道——这叫做联合制作。

所以在 1970 年代,埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆(Elinor Ostrom)
提出了这个理论,

真正称为联合生产
,这就是它的运作方式。

你将人们带入
具有不同专业知识的空间

,你也带来了新的想法
和生活经验

,你产生了新的知识。

当你产生新知识,

并将这个理论
应用于公共安全时,

你就会产生一种新型的公共安全。

所以,在纽约,感觉就是这样。

它被称为建立关系,
字面意思是一次一个块。

它是“构建块”。

这就是它的工作原理。

你去 buildtheblock.nyc,
输入你的地址。

并弹出邻里会议的地点、日期和
时间。

重要的
是你必须去参加会议。

一旦你参加了那次会议

,当然会有纽约警察局

以及官员
和其他社区成员参加。

现在,
将生活经验带入这个空间

以产生新知识的重要之处

在于,我们必须有
一种新的方式来传递它。

因此,提供它的新方式

是通过我们所说的邻里
协调员或 NCO。

因此,在这次会议上还有 NCO

,我们称之为 911 响应车、

部门车、侦探,

我们所有人都在共同努力
,以这种新的方式合作

以减少犯罪。

有趣的
是,我们知道它是有效的。

例如,在华盛顿高地。

在一次社区会议上,华盛顿高地有一家酒吧

,邻居们
抱怨抗议和噪音。

因此,在他们与 NCO 的对话中,

他们谈到了,你知道的,
声音障碍,

以及解决这个问题的不同方法。 我们可以

通过其他方式
引导流量吗?

当然,现在他们的
酒吧之夜相对安静。

因此,社区中经常
出现的另一个问题是超速。

你们有多少
人曾经有过超速罚单?

举手。

哦,更高,来吧!

不止于此,这就是纽约。

所以这些是
给 NCO 带来的其他问题。

超速 - NCO 所做的


与交通部合作,

他们研究诸如减速带
和标志以及所有类型的问题。

当我们聚在一起创建
这种不同类型的警务时,

感觉也不同。

公共安全的共同生产

意味着军官需要了解他们制服

的历史和
力量。

他们将不得不搁置

对他们没有好处的旧历史叙述。

这意味着他们必须
了解隐性偏见。

隐性偏见是
大脑在

我们真正不知道的情况下做出的捷径。

它们
是经常影响我们决策的刻板印象。

因此,您可以想象,

对于必须在瞬间做出决定的警察来说,这

可能是一个非常有害
的决策点。

这就是为什么纽约警察局以及
美国其他部门

正在对所有警官
进行隐性偏见培训的原因。

他们必须明白
,了解他们的隐性偏见,

接受良好的培训、战术
和降级,

并了解它如何影响
你的决策,这

会让我们都更安全。

我们也知道官员
在组织内部的待遇会

影响他们
与整个社区的行为方式。

这很关键。

特别是如果你想有
一条新的前进道路。

我们知道我们必须
关心那些在前线的人。

他们必须认识到
自己的创伤。

为了做到这一点,
我们作为领导者必须提升他们

,让他们知道
成为坚强男人和女人的故事——

你可以把它们放在一边
,说你需要帮助是可以的。

我们通过提供同伴支持、

员工帮助和
心理健康服务来做到这一点。

我们确保
所有这些事情都到位,

因为没有它 -

它是
公共安全共同生产的关键组成部分。

同样重要的
是,我们也有社会问题

,这些问题经常被
执法部门搁置。

例如,
心理健康和教育。

从历史上看,我们
被拉入了

那些我们不一定
提供公共安全

但已经执行了长期的历史
立法种族隔离的空间。

我们必须在历史中占有一席之地。

但是

当我们谈论
如何推进联合制作时,我们也必须让这些人参与进来。

但是理解这一点,

我们也必须明白
,我们需要以

不同的方式向我们发出声音。

我们还必须认识到

,社区
可能不愿意或不准备

来到谈判桌前
进行对话。

没关系。

我们必须能够接受这一点。

通过承认这一点,这也
意味着我们关心社区的健康

和他们的复原力。

这是另一个关键组成部分。

我们还必须

承认,我们社区中的一些人在这里——

他们确实想伤害我们。

我们还必须认识到
,我们的社区

成员没有从
很久以前的梦想中获得好处。

我们还必须承认

,我们相信一个
有时会被破坏的系统,

希望它能为我们
提供更好的解决方案。

但我们不能走开。

因为有更好的方法。

我们知道这一点,因为纽约警察局的
邻里警务理念

是基于公共安全的共同生产

为了让我们

与家人、朋友
和我们的健康一起前进,

我们必须
确保我们以这种方式专注。

为了做到这一点,

我们必须同意三种基本意识形态

你准备好了吗?

哦,对不起,再来一次
——你准备好了吗?

观众:对!

Tracie Keesee:
现在,这好多了,好吧。

第一个:不再
纠结于为什么。

我们知道为什么。

我们必须共同前进。
没有更多的我们与他们对抗。

第二:

我们必须接受生活经验
和我们的历史

,我们必须确保我们永远不会
回到我们无法前进的地方。

第三点:

我们还必须确保

说真话和讲事实是痛苦的。

但我们也知道,任何行动
都不再可接受。

同意吗?

观众:是的。

TK:哦,对不起,我听不见你的声音,
你同意吗?

观众:对!

TK:所以我们确实知道有更好的方法。

而更好的方式
是公共安全的共同生产。

谢谢你。

(掌声)