What if you could help decide how the government spends public funds Shari Davis

My name is Shari Davis,

and let’s be honest,

I’m a recovering government employee.

And I say that with a huge shout-out
to the folks that work in government

and on systems change.

It’s hard.

It can be isolating.

And the work can feel impossible.

But government is the people that show up.

Really, it’s the people that can show up

and are committed to the promise
that public service offers:

service to people,

democracy

and fixing the problems
that community members face.

Seventeen years ago,

I walked through city hall
for the first time as a staff member.

And that walk revealed something to me.

I was a unicorn.

There weren’t many people
who looked like me

that worked in the building.

And yet, there were folks committed
to addressing hundreds of years

of systemic inequity

that left some behind and many ignored.

Where there was promise,

there was a huge problem.

You see, democracy,
as it was originally designed,

had a fatal flaw.

It only laid pipeline
for rich white men to progress.

And now, if you’re a smart rich white man,

you understand why I say that’s a problem.

Massive talent has been left
off the field.

Our moral imaginations have grown anemic.

Our highest offices
are plagued by corruption.

We’re on the brink
of a sort of apathetic apocalypse,

and it’s not OK.

We’ve got to open the doors

to city halls and schools

so wide that people
can’t help but walk in.

We’ve got to throw out
the old top-down processes

that got us into this mess,

and start over,

with new faces around the table,

new voices in the mix,

and we have to welcome new perspectives
every step of the way.

Not because it’s the right thing to do –

although it is –

but because that’s the only way
for us to all succeed together.

And here’s the best news of all.

I know how to do it.

The answer – well, an answer,

is participatory budgeting.

That’s right.

Participatory budgeting,
or “PB” for short.

PB is a process that brings
community and government together

to ideate, develop concrete proposals

and vote on projects
that solve real problems in community.

Now I realize that people
don’t get up and dance

when I start talking about public budgets.

But participatory budgeting

is actually about collective,
radical imagination.

Everyone has a role to play in PB,

and it works,

because it allows community members
to craft real solutions

to real problems

and provides the infrastructure
for the promise of government.

And honestly,

it’s how I saw a democracy
actually work for the first time.

I remember it like it was yesterday.

It was 2014 in Boston, Massachusetts,

and mayor Menino asked me

to launch the country’s first
youth-focused PB effort

with one million dollars of city funds.

Now, we didn’t start
with line items and limits

or spreadsheets and formulas.

We started with people.

We wanted to make sure
that everyone was listened to.

So we brought in young people

from historically and traditionally
marginalized neighborhoods,

members of the queer community

and youth that were formerly incarcerated,

and together, often with pizza
and a sugar-free beverage,

we talked about how to make Boston better.

And we designed a process that we called
“Youth Lead the Change.”

We imagined a Boston

where young people
could access the information

that they need to thrive.

Where they could feel safe
in their communities,

and where they can transform public spaces
into real hubs of life

for all people.

And that’s exactly what they did.

In the first year,

young people allocated 90,000 dollars
to increase technology access

for Boston public high school students,

by delivering laptops
right to Boston public high schools,

so that students could thrive
inside and outside of the classroom.

They allocated 60,000 dollars
to creating art walls

that literally and figuratively
brightened up public spaces.

But they addressed
a more important problem.

Young people were being criminalized
and pulled into the justice system

for putting their art on walls.

So this gave them a safe space
to practice their craft.

They allocated 400,000 dollars
to renovating parks,

to make them more accessible
for all people of all bodies.

Now, admittedly,

this didn’t go as smoothly
as we had planned.

Right before we broke ground on the park,

we actually found out that it was on top
of an archaeological site

and had to halt construction.

I thought I broke PB.

But because the city
was so committed to the project,

that’s not what happened.

They invited community in to do a dig,

protected the site,

found artifacts,

extended Boston’s history

and then moved forward
with the renovation.

If that isn’t a reflection
of radical imagination in government,

I don’t know what is.

What sounds simple

is actually transformational
for the people and communities involved.

I’m seeing community members
shape transportation access,

improve their schools

and even transform government buildings,

so that there is space
inside of them for them.

Before we had PB,

I would see people who look like me

and come from where I come from

walk in to government buildings
for this new initiative

or that new working group,

and then I’d watch them
walk right back out.

Sometimes I wouldn’t see them again.

It’s because their expertise
was being unvalued.

They weren’t truly
being engaged in the process.

Put PB is different.

When we started doing PB,

I met amazing young leaders
across the city.

One in particular, a rock star,
Malachi Hernandez,

15 years old,

came into a community meeting –

shy, curious, a little quiet.

Stuck around

and became one of the young people
hoping to lead the project.

Now fast-forward a couple of years.

Malachi was the first in his family
to attend college.

A couple of weeks ago,

he was the first
in his family to graduate.

Malachi has appeared

in the Obama White House several times

as part of the My Brother’s
Keeper initiative.

President Obama even quotes
Malachi in interviews.

It’s true, you can look it up.

Malachi got engaged, stayed engaged,

and is out here changing the way
we think about community leadership

and potential.

Or my friend Maria Hadden,

who was involved
in the first PB process in Chicago.

Then went on to become a founding

participatory budgeting
project board member,

eventually a staff member,

and then unseated a 28-year incumbent,

becoming the first queer Black alderperson

in Chicago’s history.

That’s real engagement.

That’s being taken seriously.

That’s building out and building on
community leadership.

That’s system change.

And it’s not just in the US either.

After starting 30 years ago in Brazil,

PB has spread to over 7,000 cities
across the globe.

In Paris, France,

the mayor puts up
five percent of her budget,

over 100 million euros,

for community members to decide on
and shape their city.

Globally, PB has been shown
to improve public health,

reduce corruption

and increase trust in government.

Now we know the challenges
that we face in today’s society.

How can we expect people
to feel motivated,

to show up to the polls

when they can’t trust that government
is run by and for the people.

I argue that we haven’t
actually experienced

true participatory democracy

in these United States
of America just yet.

But democracy is a living,
breathing thing.

And it’s still our birthright.

It’s time to renew trust,
and that’s not going to come easy.

We have to build new ways of thinking,

of talking, of working,
of dreaming, of planning

in its place.

What would America look like
if everyone had a seat at the table?

If we took the time to reimagine
what’s possible,

and then ask, “How do we get there?”

My favorite author,
Octavia Butler, says it best.

In “Parable of the Sower,”
basically my Bible, she says,

“All that you touch
You Change.

All that you Change
Changes you.

The only lasting truth
Is Change.

God
Is Change.”

It’s time for these 50 states to change.

What got us here sure as hell
won’t get us there.

We’ve got to kick the walls of power down

and plant gardens of genuine
democracy in their place.

That’s how we change systems.

By opening doors so wide

that people can’t help but walk in.

So what’s stopping you

from bringing participatory budgeting
to your community?

我的名字是 Shari Davis,

老实说,

我是一名正在康复的政府雇员。

我这样说是
为了向在政府和系统变革中工作的人们大声疾呼

这个很难(硬。

它可以是孤立的。

工作感觉不可能。

但政府是出现的人。

确实,是人们能够出现

并致力于
公共服务所提供的承诺:

为人民服务、

民主


解决社区成员面临的问题。

十七年前,


作为工作人员第一次走进市政厅。

那次散步向我揭示了一些东西。

我是独角兽。 在大楼

里工作的
和我一样的人并不多

然而,有些人
致力于解决数百年

的系统性不平等问题

,这些不平等现象使一些人落后,许多人被忽视。

哪里有承诺,哪里

就有大问题。

你看
,最初设计的民主

有一个致命的缺陷。

它只是
为富有的白人男性的进步奠定了基础。

现在,如果你是一个聪明的富有的白人,

你就会明白我为什么说这是个问题。

大量人才被
排除在外。

我们的道德想象力变得贫乏。

我们的最高职位
受到腐败的困扰。

我们正
处于一种冷漠的世界末日的边缘

,这是不行的。

我们必须打开

通往市政厅和

学校的大门,让
人们忍不住走进去。

我们必须抛弃让我们陷入困境
的旧自上而下的流程

重新开始,

新面孔,新声音

,我们必须在每一步都欢迎新的观点

不是因为这是正确的做法——

尽管它是正确的——

而是因为这是
我们共同成功的唯一途径。

这是最好的消息。

我知道该怎么做。

答案——嗯,答案

是参与式预算。

那就对了。

参与式预算,
简称“PB”。

PB 是一个将
社区和政府联合

起来构思、制定具体提案

并对
解决社区实际问题的项目进行投票的过程。

现在我意识到,

当我开始谈论公共预算时,人们不会起身跳舞。

但参与式

预算实际上是关于集体的、
激进的想象力。

每个人都可以在 PB 中发挥作用,

而且它很有效,

因为它允许社区成员
为实际问题制定真正的解决方案


为政府的承诺提供基础设施。

老实说,

这就是我
第一次看到民主实际运作的方式。

我记得就像昨天一样。

那是 2014 年在马萨诸塞州波士顿市

,市长梅尼诺让我

用 100 万美元的城市资金启动该国第一个以
青年为中心的 PB 项目

现在,我们没有
从行项目和限制

或电子表格和公式开始。

我们从人开始。

我们想
确保每个人都被倾听。

因此,我们邀请了

来自历史上和传统上被
边缘化

的社区的年轻人、酷儿社区的成员

和以前被监禁的年轻人,

并且经常与比萨饼
和无糖饮料一起,

我们讨论了如何让波士顿变得更好。

我们设计了一个流程,我们称之为
“青年引领变革”。

我们设想了一个波士顿

,在那里年轻人
可以

获取他们需要的信息以茁壮成长。

他们可以在社区中感到安全的

地方,以及他们可以将公共空间
变成真正的所有人生活中心的地方

这正是他们所做的。

第一年,

年轻人拨款 90,000 美元

通过
向波士顿公立高中提供笔记本电脑,增加波士顿公立高中学生的技术使用权,

让学生
在课堂内外都能茁壮成长。

他们拨出 60,000 美元
来创造艺术墙

,从字面上和形象上
照亮公共空间。

但他们解决
了一个更重要的问题。

年轻人

因为把他们的艺术挂在墙上而被定罪并被拉入司法系统。

所以这给了他们一个安全的空间
来练习他们的手艺。

他们拨出 400,000 美元
用于翻新公园,

让所有身体的人都更容易进入公园。

现在,诚然,

这并没有
我们计划的那么顺利。

就在我们在公园破土动工之前,

我们实际上发现它在
一个考古遗址的顶部

,不得不停止建设。

我以为我打破了PB。

但因为这座
城市对这个项目如此投入,

所以事情并没有发生。

他们邀请社区进行挖掘,

保护遗址,

发现文物,

扩展波士顿的历史

,然后继续
进行翻新。

如果这不是
政府激进想象力的反映,

我不知道是什么。

听起来很

简单,实际上
对所涉及的人和社区来说是变革性的。

我看到社区成员
塑造交通通道,

改善他们的学校

,甚至改造政府大楼,

以便他们内部有空间。

在我们有 PB 之前,

我会看到长得像我的人

,来自我的家乡,

为这项新倡议

或新工作组走进政府大楼,

然后我会看着他们
直接走出去。

有时我再也见不到他们了。

这是因为他们的专业知识
没有得到重视。

他们并没有
真正参与到这个过程中。

放PB不同。

当我们开始做 PB 时,

我遇到了全市令人惊叹的年轻领导人

特别是一位 15 岁的摇滚明星
Malachi Hernandez

参加了社区会议——

害羞、好奇、有点安静。

停留

并成为
希望领导该项目的年轻人之一。

现在快进几年。

玛拉基是他家里第一个
上大学的人。

几周前,

他是
家里第一个毕业的人。

作为“我兄弟的
守护者”倡议的一部分,玛拉基曾多次出现在奥巴马的白宫。

奥巴马总统甚至
在采访中引用了玛拉基语。

是真的,你可以查一下。

玛拉基参与,保持参与,

并在这里改变
我们对社区领导力

和潜力的看法。

或者我的朋友 Maria Hadden,

她参与
了芝加哥的第一个 PB 流程。

然后继续成为创始

参与式预算
项目委员会成员,

最终成为工作人员,

然后罢免了 28 年的现任,

成为芝加哥历史上第一位酷儿黑人市议员

这才是真正的参与。

这正在被认真对待。

这是建立并建立在
社区领导力的基础上。

那是系统变化。

它也不只是在美国。

自 30 年前在巴西起步后,

PB 已遍布全球 7,000 多个城市

在法国巴黎

,市长拿出
5% 的预算,

超过 1 亿欧元,

供社区成员决定
和塑造他们的城市。

在全球范围内,PB 已被证明
可以改善公共卫生、

减少腐败

并增加对政府的信任。

现在我们
知道我们在当今社会面临的挑战。 当人们不能相信政府是由人民管理并为人民服务时,

我们怎么能期望
人们感到有动力,

去参加民意调查呢

我认为我们还没有在这些美利坚合众国
真正体验过

真正的参与式民主

但民主是一个活生生的、会
呼吸的东西。

它仍然是我们与生俱来的权利。

是时候重新建立信任了
,这并不容易。

我们必须建立新的思维方式

、谈话方式、工作方式
、梦想方式和计划

方式。

如果每个人都坐在桌子旁,美国会是什么样子?

如果我们花时间重新想象
什么是可能的,

然后问,“我们如何到达那里?”

我最喜欢的作家
Octavia Butler 说得最好。

在“播种者的寓言”中,
基本上是我的圣经,她说,

“你接触到的
一切都会改变。你改变的

一切都会
改变你

。唯一永恒的真理
是改变。

上帝
就是改变。”

是时候改变这 50 个州了。

让我们来到这里的东西肯定
不会让我们到达那里。

我们必须推倒权力的墙,

在他们的位置上种下真正民主的花园。

这就是我们改变系统的方式。

通过敞开大门

,人们忍不住走进来。

那么是什么阻止

您将参与式预算
引入您的社区?