Moral Questions are Easily Answered but Harder to Practice

i don’t know how many of you know what

happened to me in 2007

but long story short i’m from australia

and i was on holidays in bulgaria

visiting my friends when i witnessed

about 15 drunken neuro nazis shout

racist slurs

chased down and attack a boy with darker

skin the victim was most probably of

roman ethnicity

after i successfully protected the

victim from death or serious bodily

injury

the gang attacked me i was knocked out

and i don’t remember what happened

but suffice it to say i had a knife to

protect myself and one of the gang

members had died

the parents of the deceased as well as

the parents of the other gang members

were extremely connected people

they referred to themselves as the elite

of bulgaria the investigation

and the subsequent trials became heavily

corrupted because of

that despite overwhelming evidence that

i intervened to save somebody’s life

i was convicted for something like

premeditated murder and sentenced to 20

years

maximum security prison last year i was

lucky to get a panel of judges who were

above corruption

and i was released early from prison

after having served 12 years of my

sentence

however the corrupt bulgarian government

has continued holding me here illegally

in bulgaria

now for almost a year with my own inside

they are simply refusing to take my name

off a ban list of people

who cannot leave the country many times

i have been asked how had i

stayed staying for 12 years of prison

and almost a year now

being held illegally by the bulgarian

government i think it all boils down

to moral choice i had to make on the

night in 2007

i think of it as something similar to

asking children hypothetical moral

questions in a classroom or around the

family barbecue

brain diseases that are designed to test

people’s morality

often between an evil solution and less

evil solution

some moral conundrums are easier than

others to answer and of course morality

is subjective

but generally across different cultures

becomes the same conclusions

as to what is right the right action in

a difficult situation

now when presented with this situation

as a hypothetical moral conundrum

most people would say well the correct

thing is to help the boy being attacked

by the neo-nazis

but when that happened to me in real

life people were less united in their

responses

this is where the hypothetical moral

dilemma becomes more complicated

when it meets reality people are not so

quick to answer

when there is a possibility of yourself

or the attacker dying

if you chose the morally correct option

hypothetical questions

are easy to answer but harder to

practice especially so when there is a

possibility of great sacrifice

often these gangs murder their victims

with many witnesses and bystanders

on the following morning in various tv

news shows there are always lots of

friends and family of the deceased

and the first question everybody asks is

why didn’t anyone do anything

although there were people shouting at

the police in america

still not a single person stopped the

police from murdering mr floyd george

when i watched the video a murder of mr

george the only question that was going

through my mind was

why are people just watching why is no

one stopping them

probably if just one person had pushed

the policeman off mr george he wouldn’t

have been murdered

when i saw the neo-nazis attack the boy

i thought about how i would feel if the

new nazi gang murdered this boy

and they had murdered him in front of me

because of the color of his skin

what would his parents say what if this

boy was one of the friends

one of my friends and someone was

attacking my friend for nothing less

disgusting than racism

how could i live with myself knowing for

the rest of my life

that i had an opportunity to save the

life of this boy and i didn’t use it

it was an existential question and i’m a

big believer in the saying

bad things happen when good people do

nothing if i didn’t help this boy

in his moment of need what right would i

have to expect or to ask for help in my

moment of need

too often people renounce their personal

responsibility

that we have for one another i was not

the only one who watched the gang

attacked the long way there were maybe

another 30 people also watching

none of them chose to intervene to save

the life of the people to me it was a

question also of freedom

because i believe there is no freedom

without responsibility

so if i am to be free then i must be

responsible to myself

but also to those around me i made my

decision

in what now feels like the blink of an

eye i was successful in the sense that i

saved the boy

being attacked by the game but

unfortunately one of the attackers was

killed i was arrested and despite the

gang also having attacked the police

not one of them was even ever detained

immediately the entire media apparatus

in bulgaria clipped into action to

exonerate the gang

and demonize me there was every possible

crazy story

for me being a terrorist to being a drug

addict intent on stabbing random people

whilst looking for drugs

these lies were repeated in every

newspaper on every tv

channel every radio station hourly for

the first

five years of what i call proceedings it

was tremendous psychological pressure

that i think would have driven most

people mad it is surreal to know

what really happened but the entire

world is saying that you’re lying

i guess my my my word of caution here

is that we rely almost completely on the

media to inform our opinions of people

and events

but this only works with free and

pluralistic media that engage in

responsible journalism

in bulgaria however the barrage of lies

and the same lie

was being copied and pasted from one

video source to another without a single

journalist bothering to check if the

information

is correct or not this brainwashed an

entire generation

of people in bulgaria about me and what

happened in 2007.

in the court of public opinion i was the

sociopathic foreigner

who needlessly attacked a peaceful group

of youngsters and brought about the

death of one of them

while the media was making slanderous

claims about me and my case

they didn’t spell my name correctly for

the entire 12 years of my incarceration

they didn’t even check basic facts it

was a very conscious propaganda campaign

and the people reading it knew that they

couldn’t control non-bulgarian language

media

so the people connected the people

connected with the nazi gang

and their parents never once spoke to

independent or objective media

never once spoke of international news

journalism

eventually as more people outside the

bulgaria started asking questions there

were two versions of the story that

emerged

one version recorded in bulgarian

language where i was still a monster

and a completely different one reported

in english or any other language other

than bulgaria

where it was acknowledged that i came to

the rescue of an innocent person in

great danger it wasn’t until 2019

when after years of asking my lawyer and

friend kalin angelos

was finally able to obtain security

camry footage of the area where the 2007

incident took place that people in

bulgaria started realizing

that my side of the story was the true

one

up until that point the psychological

pressure was so great it was difficult

to explain

sometimes it felt like the lies were

designed to manipulate the general

public

but other times it felt like the mass

propaganda was actually made to try and

convince me

that i was the person they said i was

this is known as gaslighting

this brings me back to the question i

often get how did i stay sane

and it all goes back to the fundamental

question of morality

is it correct to beat and kill people

because they have darker skin than

yourself

the answer of course was simple that

this was unacceptable

to allow new nazi gangs to attack and

murder people in front of your very eyes

sanity for me for the next 12 years

after i intervened and even still today

became intrinsically connected to the

basic morality

that people shouldn’t be attacked

because of their skin color

it is hard for me to be talking about

these things because i feel stupid

having to say that we shouldn’t be

attacking people because they have

different

colors in than us but what a lot of

people need to know

is that this is not a universally

accepted moral principle

it isn’t even a question of subconscious

racism

it is open over and normalized for many

people and not just in bulgaria but of

course around the world

unfortunately many people like to leave

morality in the realm of the theoretical

but for me it had very practical

implications

and how i spent my time in prison always

went back to what got me there in the

first place

if i was going to oppose racism on the

street i had to defend that principle by

the way i lived in the place where i was

being judged for it

the way i saw it anything i did or

didn’t do in prison would reflect back

on the moral choices i made back in 2007

and the prison environment reflected

pretty much the same street environment

of the attack in 2007.

even the most sympathetic prison staff

still thought of me as an idiot

for having gone to the rescue of someone

especially a roma person

they thought even if i was morally

correct in terms of opposing racism

the act of actually doing it came with

such a high price that it wasn’t worth

it

or even worse there were races prison

management who before i was naive

to help someone of one fbc and yet

others called me a race trader

but if i gave up on my beliefs now then

really it would have made all the

suffering through nothing which i

suppose would have been the biggest

punishment of all

despite the stereotypical portrayal of

prisons in the media

and cinema where prisoners sit around

fighting crimes and violence

the public still has a general idea that

people are supposed to be changing for

the better

and thus leaving prisons more socialized

than when they had entered prison

this however is based on the premise

that those running the prisons

are morally superior or more socialized

than those being sent there

what people don’t understand about

prisons is that very often the staff who

run the prisons are more morally corrupt

than any of the people sent there never

before in my life have i seen people

deprived of given the most basics of

morality

many listening now might think i’m

speaking about the other prisoners but

i’m not

i’m speaking about the stuff the best

way i can explain

ism is to describe it as a living death

it is like being at your own funeral

friends and family and society as a

whole

have some period of grieving but then

move on and the prisoner is forgotten

but that didn’t mean those of us in

prison had to forgive ourselves or each

other

this is what motivated me to start the

bulgarian business association

the first and so far early organization

to take the rights specifically

of being incarcerated in bulgaria during

my 12 years in prison

every day my moral values were tested

for example when a prisoner was tortured

by gods

he asked me for help after i was

reluctant

because i knew it would mean the gods

with exact revenge on me

it took me about 30 seconds to tell

myself you’re not yourself

when things are going good you show your

true colors only when you are afraid

in a way it was exactly because i was

afraid

that i knew that i had to help this

person because if i didn’t

it would mean that the terror inflicted

by these types of people

had been successful it had achieved its

goal

the goal of breaking solidarity between

people that extends back thousands of

years

even to the story of a good samaritan it

was a similar feeling and thought

process

to the fight in 2007 that through fear

and intimidation

they want people to turn their backs on

the most basics of morality

to not help this prisoner who had been

tortured put me to renounce the very

person i believed i was

it meant to announce my very existence

if i didn’t help this man after he was

tortured i wouldn’t know who i was

anymore

i used this particular man’s case as one

example but obviously as part of the

bulgarian business association

i have had to deal with many similar

cases of injustice being down to the

disadvantage involving

prisons i have witnessed fellow

prisoners being misled or outright lied

to about their basic rights

with often dramatic consequences i was

put in prison for helping a person

persecuted by the elite

the elite and the idea was to not only

terrorize me

into check into not challenging the

hegemony of this elite

the message was clearly made to

bulgarian to bulgarian people as well

that these people from the ruling elite

could not be opposed

they were and are allowed to anything

they want

even to the point of attacking anyone

they choose this message was repeated in

prison

that for any disagreements with the

prison management no matter if they were

legitimate or not

then that prisoner would be persecuted

to the fullest extent possible

the problem i had was that if i was

standing on morality to get to prison

the point i was making against racism

would be lost if i was to renounce

morality in the name of

selfishness and self-protective

individuality in prison

in the prison i was told regularly by

the staff to think only about myself

it was even like a slogan in bulgarian

prisons

we are only responsible for ourselves i

was told it was a mantra that the staff

used to break social responsibility

both with regards to interpreters and

solidarity but also to renounce the

responsibility the prison staff

had to each other and to the prisoners

it was a constant temptation to give up

helping or caring about other people and

to think only about myself

almost a daily struggle in my mind

and the pressure was incredible you see

prison is an artificial

despotic surreal world where very little

of what happens makes much sense

but passing through the prison gates and

entering prison did not make me a

different person

there wasn’t a magical barrier that i

passed that changed the person

i was or how i acted there were people

who justified directions to me by saying

here is prison to me this was like

childish school playground psychology

a type of mass psychosis and so i tried

to be

conscious and vigilant not just succumb

to pure pressure

or to the very low standard of social

pressure if something is morally correct

just because you’re being bullied

doesn’t change the fact that it is still

moral

correct others no matter how constrained

still allow for a moral choice to act or

to not act

if you are on the street confronted with

a person needing help from a mob

or in a prison the choices and

responsibilities always remain in yours

originally i hadn’t planned on

mentioning the current pandemic but it

occurred to me

having listened to other people that for

some people self-isolating in their

homes is really difficult for them

for me and for prison activists i think

this is a good time to remind everyone

that this is what prison is like for an

estimated 10.35

million prisoners around the world

another thing i’d like to mention on the

topic

is the incorrect use of the term social

distance team

i have no idea how this term became so

popular internationally

because what we are doing with regards

to the global pandemic isn’t social

distancing at all

it’s physical distancing social

distancing is the purpose prison service

we are not socially distancing during

that pandemic because we still have

social interaction

even within our similar even either

within

our smaller group of friends or family

or online

prisoners are truly socially distant

especially here in bulgaria

where prisoners are only allowed two

40-minute visits behind

glass a month not only that but the

prison administration on purpose

keeps families and friends waiting

outside the prison

in the cold or the heat for up to three

hours

the government is currently building a

new prison that is hours away from any

city

and so the social distancing continues

if we consider that prisoners

are people who have been anti-social how

do people

politicians judges or prison staff think

that these people will be able to

reintegrate into society

by being in an environment that doesn’t

resemble either the general society

or a healthy environment we take people

who we say

are sick and then put them in a space an

experience that is even even

sicker and then we expect them to heal

we need to end social distancing and to

do the opposite by bringing back

offenders into society not by pushing

them further away

part of social distancing are the media

exaggerations and sometimes outright

lies

not only that but it is a cons it is

constant and probably

never ending making social intervention

harder or impossible

but i also believed and i still believe

that a large part of the hospital media

campaigns

and persecution against me personally in

the prison

was to push me to a breaking point where

i would lash out

and then those who had invested so much

time and effort in securing the decision

of the kangaroo court could say see

we told you so we told you john was a

bad guy and again

how i reacted to these tabloid

journalists would be my choice

so i had two important things to

remember what to renounce the person i

was

and also not to become the most i was

trying to defeat so i made a conscious

effort not to change whilst i was in

prison

i did my best at forgetting that i was

in prison and instead looked at the

world around me

as any other i was still a person and

the people around me were still people

it will sound like a cliche but an

extract from what is known as the prayer

of serenity

i believe is extremely important

philosophy grant me the spirituality to

accept the things i cannot change

the courage to change the things i can

no wisdom to know the difference

every time i was confronted with a

problem or dilemma i had two choices

to do something or to not do it not or

to do nothing

there is no third option this vision not

to do anything is also a conscious act

maybe most of us are afraid at times to

do the right thing

maybe only idiots are not afraid the

consequences could be drastic for

example i know of a similar situation in

australia

where a man protected someone being

attacked by a new unites and he himself

was killed by the attackers

but the way i cope with the fear is to

think of myself in the future

looking back at myself and judging

myself judging the actions i took

or didn’t take when confronted with a

dilemma the fear of doing what is right

will have long been forgotten

but the regret of having the opportunity

to have help someone in their time of

need

and not having active would be with me

for the rest of my life

again there are only two choices to do

something or to do nothing

there is no third option thank you very

much for listening to me

you

我不知道你们中有多少人知道

我在 2007 年发生了什么事,

但长话短说,我来自澳大利亚

,我在保加利亚度假时

拜访了我的朋友,当时我目睹了

大约 15 名醉酒的神经纳粹分子大喊

种族主义诽谤

被追捕和攻击 一个肤色较深的男孩,

在我成功保护

受害者免于死亡或严重身体

伤害之后,受害者很可能是罗马种族。

该团伙袭击了我我被击倒

,我不记得发生了什么,

但只要说我有一把刀就够了 为了

保护我自己和其中一名帮派

成员已经死亡

,死者

的父母以及其他帮派成员的父母

是非常有联系的人,

他们称自己

为保加利亚的精英,调查

和随后的审判变得严重

腐败,因为

尽管有压倒性的证据表明

我进行干预是为了挽救某人的生命,但

我仍因

蓄意谋杀等罪名被定罪,并被判处 20

最高刑罚 去年的 rity 监狱我很

幸运地得到了一个超越腐败的法官小组

,我在服满 12 年刑期后提前获释,

但是腐败的保加利亚政府

现在继续在保加利亚非法关押我

近一年 有我自己的内心,

他们只是拒绝将我的名字

从不能离开该国的人的禁令名单中

删除很多次

我被问到我是如何在

监狱中呆了 12 年,

现在

被保加利亚人非法关押了将近一年

政府 我认为这一切都归结

为我必须

在 2007 年晚上

做出的道德选择

在邪恶的解决方案和不太

邪恶的解决方案之间,

一些道德难题比其他难题更

容易回答,当然道德

是主观的,

但通常是 罗斯不同的文化

对于什么是正确的得出相同的结论现在在困难的情况下采取正确的行动

当将这种情况

作为一个假设的道德难题提出时,

大多数人会说好正确的

事情是帮助受到新纳粹分子袭击的男孩

但是当这种情况在现实生活中发生在我身上时,

人们的

反应

就不那么

团结了

选择了道德上正确的选项

假设性问题

很容易回答,但很难

实践,尤其是当有

可能做出巨大牺牲时,

这些团伙通常会

在第二天早上在各种电视

新闻节目中与许多证人和旁观者一起谋杀受害者

死者的朋友和家人,

每个人问的第一个问题是

为什么没有人做 尽管

在美国

有人对

警察大喊大叫,

但当我观看视频时,仍然没有一个人阻止警察谋杀弗洛伊德·

乔治先生

没有

人阻止他们

吗?如果只有一个人

把警察从乔治先生身上推开,他就

不会被谋杀了。

当我看到新纳粹袭击这个男孩时,

我想如果

新纳粹团伙谋杀了这个男孩

,我会有什么感觉 他们在我面前谋杀了他,

因为他的肤色

他的父母会怎么说如果这个

男孩是我的一个朋友

之一的朋友,并且有人

攻击我的朋友,因为

种族主义比种族主义更令人作呕

,我怎么能忍受 我自己知道

在我的余生

中我有机会拯救

这个男孩的生命并且我没有使用它

这是一个存在的问题,我

非常相信说

坏事会发生

如果我不在这个男孩需要帮助的时候帮助

他,

好人什么都不做

不是唯一一个目睹该团伙

长期攻击的人,也许还有

另外 30 个人也在注视

着他们中没有一个人选择干预以挽救

人民的生命对我来说这也是一个

自由的问题,

因为我相信没有自由就没有自由

责任,

所以如果我要自由,那么我必须

对自己负责,

也对周围的

人负责 游戏,但

不幸的是其中一名袭击者

被杀,我被捕了,尽管该

团伙也袭击了警察,

但没有一个人被

立即拘留,保加利亚的整个媒体机构

都采取

行动 赦免帮派

并妖魔化我,从

我成为恐怖分子到成为

吸毒者,

在寻找毒品的同时意图刺伤随机人,

这些谎言在每份报纸上重复出现

,每个电视

频道每个广播电台

每小时前

五次重复这些谎言 多年我所谓的诉讼程序这

是巨大的心理压力

,我认为这会让大多数

人发疯知道真正发生的事情是超现实的,

但整个

世界都在说你在撒谎,

我想我的警告

是 我们几乎完全依赖

媒体来告知我们对人和事件的看法,

但这仅适用于在保加利亚从事负责任新闻工作的自由和

多元化媒体,

然而,一连串的谎言

和同样的谎言

被从一个视频源复制并粘贴

到 另一个没有一个

记者费心去检查

信息

是否正确,这给

整整

一代人洗脑 在保加利亚,关于我和

2007 年发生的事情。

在舆论法庭上,我是一个

反社会的外国人

,在媒体对我和我的案件进行诽谤时,他不必要地攻击了一群和平

的年轻人并导致

其中一个人死亡

在我被监禁的整个 12 年里,

他们没有正确拼写我的名字,他们甚至没有检查基本事实,这

是一场非常有意识的宣传活动

,阅读它的人知道他们

无法控制非保加利亚语

媒体,

所以 人们

将与纳粹帮派及其父母有联系的人联系起来

从未与

独立或客观的媒体

交谈过 从未谈论过国际新闻

新闻 随着更多保加利亚以外的人

开始提问,出现

了两个版本的故事,

一个版本记录在

保加利亚语,我仍然是一个怪物,

而用

英语或任何其他语言报告的完全不同的语言o 除了

保加利亚承认我

来营救一个处于极大危险中的无辜者外,

直到 2019

年,经过多年询问我的律师和

朋友卡林·安杰洛斯

,终于能够获得

该地区的安全凯美瑞镜头。 2007 年的

事件发生了,

保加利亚人开始

意识到我的故事是真实的

,直到那时心理

压力如此之大,

难以解释,

有时感觉谎言是

为了操纵

公众,

但其他 有时感觉就像大众

宣传实际上是为了试图

说服我

,我就是他们所说的那个人,

这被称为煤气灯,

这让我回到了我经常得到的问题,我

是如何保持理智的

,这一切都可以追溯到 道德的基本

问题

是殴打和杀人是正确的,

因为他们的皮肤比自己黑

当然答案很简单,

这是不可接受的

允许新的纳粹帮派

在你的眼前袭击和谋杀人,

在我干预之后的 12 年里对我来说是理智的,直到今天仍然

人们不应该因为肤色而受到攻击的基本道德有内在联系

我很难谈论

这些事情,因为我觉得

不得不说我们不应该

攻击人是愚蠢的,因为他们的

颜色与我们不同,但很多

人需要知道的

是,这不是普遍的

公认的道德原则

它甚至不是潜意识

种族主义的问题

它对许多人开放和规范化,

不仅在保加利亚而且

当然在世界各地,

不幸的是,许多人喜欢将

道德留在理论领域,

但对我来说 有非常实际的

影响

,如果我要在街上反对种族主义,我如何在监狱里度过我的时间总是

回到最初让我到那里的原因,

我必须捍卫 这条原则

,我住在我被评判的地方,

我看到它的方式,我

在监狱里做过或没做过的任何事情都会反映

我在 2007 年做出的道德选择

,监狱环境也反映

得很好 与

2007 年袭击的街道环境大致相同。

即使是最有同情心的监狱工作人员

仍然认为我是个白痴

,因为我去营救了一个

他们认为的罗姆人,即使我

在反对种族主义方面在道德上是正确

的 实际这样做的行为

付出了如此高的代价,以至于不值得

甚至更糟糕的是

,在我天真

地帮助一个 fbc 的某个人之前,有种族监狱管理人员,而

其他人则称我为种族交易员,

但如果我放弃了 就我现在的信念而言,

这真的会让所有的

痛苦无所事事,我

认为这将是最大的

惩罚,

尽管

媒体

和电影中对监狱的刻板印象 围绕

打击犯罪和

暴力,公众仍然有一个普遍的想法,即

人们应该

变得更好

,从而使

监狱比他们入狱时更加社会化,

但是这是基于这样的前提

,即那些经营监狱的人

在道德上是优越的 或者

比那些被送到那里的

人更社会化 人们对

监狱的不了解的是,管理监狱的工作人员通常

比任何被送到那里的人

在道德上更腐败,我这辈子从未见过有人

被剥夺

许多人现在听的最基本的道德可能会认为我在

谈论其他囚犯,但

我不是

我在谈论这些东西

我能解释的最好的方式

就是把它描述为活死人

就像在你的 自己的葬礼

朋友、家人和整个社会

都有一段时间的悲痛,然后

继续前进,囚犯被遗忘了,

但这并不意味着我们这些在

监狱里的人必须原谅 我们自己或彼此

这就是促使我创办

保加利亚商业协会

的原因 囚犯被神折磨

他在我不情愿后向我寻求帮助,

因为我知道这意味着神

会对我进行精确的报复

我花了大约 30 秒的时间告诉

自己你不是你自己

当事情进展顺利时你表现出你的

真实 仅当您以某种方式害怕时才使用颜色

,这正是因为我

害怕我知道我必须帮助这个

人,因为如果我不

这样做,就意味着这些人造成的恐怖

已经成功了 它

的目标是打破人们之间团结的目标,这种团结

可以追溯到数千

年前,

甚至可以追溯到一个好心人的故事。它

的感觉和思维

过程

与 2 中的战斗相似 007 通过恐惧

和恐吓,

他们希望人们

背弃最基本的道德

,不帮助这个遭受酷刑的囚犯,这

让我放弃了那个

我相信我

应该宣布我的存在的人,

如果我不这样做' 在他遭受酷刑后无法帮助这个

人 我不再知道我是谁

我以这个人的案例

为例,但显然作为

保加利亚商业协会的

一员,我不得不处理许多类似

的不公正案件,原因是

涉及

监狱的劣势 我亲眼目睹了其他

囚犯在

他们的基本权利方面被误导或完全撒谎

,往往造成严重后果 我

因帮助

受精英迫害的人而被关

进监狱 挑战

这个精英的霸权,这个

信息清楚地传达

给保加利亚人民,以及

来自统治精英的这些人

不能反对 sed

他们曾经并且被允许做任何

他们想做的事,

甚至攻击

他们选择的任何人 这条信息在监狱中被重复,

如果与监狱管理人员发生任何分歧,无论他们是否

合法,

那么该囚犯将

受到最大程度的迫害

我可能遇到的问题是,如果我

站在道德上进监狱

那么如果我在监狱里以自私和自我保护个性的名义放弃道德,我反对种族主义的观点就会失去意义。

工作人员经常告诉我只考虑我自己

这甚至就像保加利亚监狱的口号

我们只对自己负责我

被告知这是工作人员

用来打破社会责任的口头禅,

无论是在口译员和

团结方面,还是 为了放弃

监狱工作

人员对彼此和对

囚犯的责任,放弃帮助或关怀是一种持续的诱惑

关于其他人,

只考虑自己,

几乎每天都在我的脑海中挣扎

,压力令人难以置信,你看到

监狱是一个人为的

专制超现实世界,

发生的事情很少有多大意义,

但穿过监狱大门并

进入监狱却没有 让我成为一个

不同的人

我没有通过任何魔法障碍

来改变

我的身份或我的

行为方式有人通过说

这里对我来说是监狱来为我辩解这就像

幼稚的学校操场心理学

一种 大规模精神病,所以我试着

保持

清醒和警惕,不要

屈服于纯粹的压力

或非常低标准的社会

压力,如果某件事在道德上是正确的,

仅仅因为你被欺负

并不会改变它仍然是

道德上

正确的事实

如果您在街上遇到

需要暴徒帮助的人

或 在监狱里,选择和

责任始终留在你的

身上,本来我并没有打算

提及当前的流行病,但

我听了其他人的意见后突然想到,对于

某些人来说,

在家中自我隔离对他们来说真的很难

,我和 对于监狱活动家,我认为

这是提醒大家的好时机

,这就是全世界

估计有 1035

万囚犯的监狱的

样子

我不知道这个词是如何在

国际上如此流行的,

因为我们在

应对全球大流行时所做的根本不是社交

距离,

而是身体距离社交

距离是监狱服务的目的,

在那次大流行期间我们没有保持社交距离

,因为我们仍然

即使在我们相似的人中,即使

我们较小的朋友或家人

或在线

囚犯中也有社交互动是真实的 y 社交距离较远,

特别是在保加利亚

这里,囚犯每月只允许两次

40 分钟的玻璃后探视,

不仅如此,

监狱管理部门还故意

让家人和朋友

在监狱外在

寒冷或炎热中等待长达三个

小时 政府目前正在建造一座

距离任何城市数小时路程的新监狱,

因此

如果我们认为

囚犯是反社会的人,那么社会隔离仍在继续

通过在一个

与一般社会

或健康环境都不相似的环境中进入社会 我们把

我们

说生病的人放在一个空间中

需要结束社会距离并

通过将

罪犯带回社会而不是将

他们推得更远来做相反的事情

是社会距离的一部分 g 是媒体

夸大其词,有时甚至是彻头彻尾的

谎言,

不仅如此,而且它是一个缺点,它是

恒定的,可能

永远不会结束,使社会干预

变得更加困难或不可能,

但我也相信并且我仍然

相信医院媒体

宣传

和迫害的很大一部分 我个人

在监狱里的目的

是把我推到一个爆发点,

我会猛烈抨击

,然后那些投入大量

时间和精力来确保

袋鼠法庭裁决的人可能会说,

我们告诉过你,所以我们告诉过你,约翰是一个

坏家伙,

我对这些小报

记者的反应将是我的选择,

所以我有两件重要的事情要

记住要放弃我是谁

,不要成为我最

想打败的人,所以我有意识地

努力不 在

监狱里的改变

我尽力忘记我

在监狱里,而是

像其他人一样看待周围的世界我仍然是一个人,

我周围的人都是sti 所有人,

这听起来像是陈词滥调,

但从所谓的宁静祈祷中摘录

我相信这是极其重要的

哲学赋予我

接受我无法改变的事物的灵性我

无法改变事物的勇气我

无法知道的智慧

每次遇到

问题或困境时的差异 我有两种

选择 做某事或不做某事

或不做任何事

没有第三种选择 这种

不做任何事情的愿景也是一种有意识的行为

也许我们大多数人都害怕 有时

做正确的事

也许只有白痴才不会害怕

后果可能会很严重,

例如我知道在澳大利亚也有类似的

情况,一个人保护了一个

被新部队袭击的人,而他自己

却被袭击者杀死了,

但是方式 我应对恐惧是

想想自己的

未来 是的,

早就被遗忘了,

但有机会

在需要帮助的人时帮助他们

而没有积极行动的遗憾将再次伴随

我余生

只有两种选择去

做某事或做某事 没什么

没有第三种选择 非常感谢你

听我