A clean energy proposal race to the top Jennifer Granholm

well I was introduced as the former

governor of Michigan but actually I’m a

scientist all right a political

scientist it doesn’t really count but my

laboratory was the laboratory of

democracy that is Michigan and like any

good scientist I was experimenting with

policy about what would achieve the

greatest good for the greatest number

but there were three problems three

enigmas that I could not solve and I

want to share with you those problems

but most importantly I think I figured

out a proposal for a solution the first

problem that not just Michigan but every

state faces is how do you create good

jobs in America in a global economy so

let me share with you some empirical

data from my lab I was elected in 2002

and at the end of my first year in

office in 2003 I got a call from one of

my staff members who said gov we have a

big problem we have a little tiny

community called Greenville Michigan

population 8,000 and they are about to

lose their major employer which is a

refrigerator factory that’s operated by

Electrolux and I said well how many

people at work at electrolux and he said

3,000 of the eight thousand people in

Greenville so it is a one company town

and Electrolux was going to go to Mexico

so I said forget that we’re I’m a new

governor we can fix this we’re going to

go to Greenville with my whole cabinet

and we will just make Electrolux an

offer they can’t refuse so I brought my

whole pet cabinet and we met with all of

the pooh-bahs of little Greenville the

mayor the city manager the head of the

community college and we basically sort

of emptied our pockets and put all of

our chips on the table incentives you

name it to convince Electrolux to stay

and as we made our pile of chips we slid

them across the table to the management

of

electrolux and in the pile were things

like zero taxes for 20 years or that

we’d help to build a new factory for the

company would help to finance it the UIW

who represented the workers said they

would offer unprecedented concession

sacrifices to just keep those jobs in

Greenville so the management of

Electrolux took our pile our list of

incentives and they went outside the

room for 17 minutes and they came back

in and they said wow this is the most

generous any community has ever been to

try to keep jobs here but there’s

nothing you can do to compensate for the

fact that we can pay a dollar fifty

seven an hour in Juarez Mexico so we’re

leaving and they did and when they did

it was like a nuclear bomb went off in

little greenville in fact they did

implode the factory that’s a guy that is

walking on his last day of work and on

the month that the last refrigerator

rolled off the assembly line the

employees of Electrolux in Greenville

Michigan had a gathering that for

themselves that they called the Last

Supper it was in a big pavilion in

Greenville and indoor pavilion and I

went to it because I was so frustrated

as governor that I couldn’t stop the

outflow of these jobs and I wanted to

grieve with them and as I went to the

end of the room ourselves and the people

there it was just a big thing people

were eating box lunches with round town

round top tables and there was a sad

band playing music or there was a band

playing sad music probably both um and

this guy comes up to me and he’s got

tattoos and his ponytail and his

baseball cap on and he had his two

daughters with him and he said gov these

are my two daughters he said I’m 48

years old and I’ve worked at this

factory for 30 years my I went from high

school to factory my father worked at

this factory he said my grandfather

worked at this factory all I know

all I know is how to make refrigerators

and he looked at his daughters and he

puts his hand on his chest and he says

so gov tell me who is ever going to hire

me who is ever gonna hire me and that

was asked not just by that guy but by

everybody in the pavilion and frankly by

every worker at one of the fifty

thousand factories that closed in the

first decade of this century enigma

number one how do you create jobs in

America in a global economy number two

very quickly how do you solve global

climate change when we don’t even have a

national energy policy in this country

and when gridlock in Congress seems to

be the norm in fact there was a poll

that was done recently and the pollster

compared Congress’s approval ratings to

a number of other unpleasant things and

it was found in fact that Congress’s

approval rating is worse than

cockroaches lice Nickelback the band

root canals and Donald Trump but by the

weight the good news is it’s at least

better than meth labs and gonorrhea we

got a problem folks so it got me

thinking what is it what in the

laboratory that I that I see out there

their laboratories of democracy what has

happened what policy prescriptions have

happened that actually caused changes to

occur and that have been accepted in a

bipartisan way so if I asked you for

example what was the Obama

administration policy that caused

massive changes across the country what

would you say you might say Obamacare

except for those were not voluntary

changes as we know only half the states

have opted in you might say the Recovery

Act but those didn’t require a policy

changes the thing that caused massive

policy changes to occur was race to the

top for education why the government put

a 4.5 billion dollar

hot and said to the governor’s across

the country compete for it 48 governors

competed convincing 48th state

legislators to essentially raise

standards for high schoolers so that

they all take a college prep curriculum

48 states opted in creating a national

energy policy from the bottom up so I

thought well why can’t we do something

like that and create a clean energy jobs

race to the top because after all if you

look at the context 1.6 trillion dollars

has been invested in the past eight

years from the private sector globally

and where and every dollar represents a

job and where are those jobs going but

they’re going to places that have policy

like China in fact I was in China to see

what they were doing and they were

putting on a dog and pony show for the

group that I was with and I was standing

in the back of the room during one of

the demonstrations and standing next to

one of the Chinese officials where we

were watching he says so gov when do you

think the u.s. is going to get national

energy policy and I said oh my god

Congress gridlock who knows and this is

what he did he goes he says take your

time because they see our passivity as

their opportunity so what if we decided

to create a challenge to the governors

of the country and the price to entry

into this competition use the same

amount that the bipartisan group

approved in Congress for the race to the

top for education 4.5 billion which

sounds like a lot but actually it’s less

than one-tenth of one percent of federal

spend it’s a rounding error on the

federal side but price to entry into

that competition would be when you could

just say use the president’s goal he

wants Congress to adopt a clean energy

standard of eighty percent by 2030 in

other words that you’d have to get

eighty percent of your energy from clean

sources by the year twenty thirty why

not ask all of the states to do that

instead and imagine what might happen

because every region has something to

offer you might take states like iowa

and ohio two very important political

states by the way those two governors

and they would say we’re going to lead

the nation in producing the wind

turbines and the wind energy you might

say the solar

the Sunbelt we’re going to be the states

that produce solar energy for the

country and maybe Jerry Brown says well

I’m going to create an industry cluster

in California to be able to produce the

solar panels so that we’re not buying

them from China but we’re buying them

from the US in fact every region of the

country could do this you see you’ve got

solar and wind opportunity all across

the nation in fact if you look just at

the upper northern states in the West

they could do geothermal or you could

look at Texas and say we could lead the

nation in the solutions to smart grid in

the middle eastern states which have

access to forests and to agricultural

waste they might say we’re going to lead

the nation in biofuels in the upper

northeast we’re going to lead the nation

in in energy efficiency solutions along

the eastern seaboard we’re going to lead

the nation in offshore wind you might

look at Michigan and say we’re going to

lead the nation in producing the guts

for the electric vehicle like the

lithium-ion battery every region has

something to offer and if you created a

competition it respects the states and

it respects federalism it’s opt-in you

might even get Texas and South Carolina

didn’t opt into the education race to

the top you might even get them to opt

in why because Republican and Democratic

Governors love to cut ribbons we want to

bring jobs I’m just saying and it

fosters innovation at the state level in

these laboratories of democracy now any

of you who are watching anything about

politics lately might say okay great

idea but really Congress putting four

and a half billion dollars on the table

they can’t agree to anything so you

could wait and go through Congress

although you should be very impatient or

are you renegades we could go around

Congress go around Congress what if what

if we created a private sector challenge

to the governor’s what if several of the

high net-worth companies and individuals

who are here at Ted

decided that they would create band

together just a couple of them and

create a national competition to the

governor’s to have a race to the top and

see how the governor’s respond what if

what if it all started here at Ted what

if you were here when we figured out how

to crack the code to create good-paying

jobs in America and get national energy

policy and we created a national energy

strategy from the bottom up because dear

tedsters if you are impatient like I am

you know that our economic competitors

are other nations are in the game and

are eating us for lunch and we can get

in the game or not we can be at the

table or we can be on the table and I

don’t know about you but I prefer to

dine thank you all so much

you

好吧,我被介绍

为密歇根州的前州长,但实际上我是一名

科学家 什么会

为最多的人带来最大的好处,

但是有三个问题,三个

我无法解决的谜,我

想与你分享这些问题,

但最重要的是,我想我想出

了一个解决方案的建议 第一个

问题不仅仅是 Michigan but every

state faces is how do you create good

jobs in America in a global economy so

let me share with you some empirical

data from my lab I was elected in 2002

and at the end of my first year in

office in 2003 I got a

我的一位员工打来电话说,政府有一个

大问题,我们有一个

名为格林维尔密歇根州

人口 8,000 的小社区,他们即将

失去他们的主要雇主 h 是一家

由伊莱克斯经营的冰箱工厂

,我说有多少

人在伊莱克斯工作,他说

格林维尔的八千人中有 3000 人,所以它是一个公司城镇

,伊莱克斯要去墨西哥

所以我说忘了 我们是新

州长,我们可以解决这个问题,我们将

带着我的整个橱柜去格林维尔

,我们只会向伊莱克斯

提出他们无法拒绝的提议,所以我带来了我的

整个宠物橱柜,我们遇到了

小格林维尔的所有嘘声,

市长,城市经理,社区学院的负责人

,我们基本上

都掏空了我们的口袋,把

我们所有的筹码都放在了桌面上,

你说出它来说服伊莱克斯留下来的激励措施

,正如我们所做的那样 我们把一堆筹码

从桌子上滑到伊莱克斯的管理层

,堆里有

20年零税之类的东西,或者

我们会帮助为公司建立一个新工厂,这

将有助于为代表UIW的人提供资金

世界 kers 说他们

会做出前所未有的

让步,只为保留格林维尔的这些工作,

所以伊莱克斯的管理层

拿走了我们的

激励清单,他们在

房间外面呆了 17 分钟,然后他们

回来,他们说哇,这是最

慷慨的 任何社区都曾

试图在这里保住工作,

但你无法弥补这样一个

事实,即我们可以

在墨西哥华雷斯每小时支付 57 美元,所以我们要

离开了,他们做到了,他们做到

了,就像 一枚核弹在

小格林维尔爆炸了事实上他们确实

炸毁了工厂,这是一个

在他工作的最后一天走路的人

,在最后一台冰箱

下线的那个月密歇根

格林维尔伊莱克斯的员工

举行了一次聚会 为

他们自己,他们称之为最后的

晚餐,是在格林维尔的一个大凉亭

和室内凉亭,我

去了那里,因为我作为州长感到非常沮丧

,以至于我不能 停止

这些工作的外流,我想

和他们一起悲伤,当我

自己和那里的人走到房间的尽头时,

人们

在圆镇的圆顶桌子上吃盒饭,这是一件大事

乐队演奏音乐,或者有乐队

演奏悲伤的音乐,嗯,

这家伙向我

走来,他有纹身,他的马尾辫和他的

棒球帽,他有他的两个

女儿和他在一起,他说这些

是我的两个女儿 他说我今年 48

岁,我在这家

工厂工作了 30 年 我从

高中到工厂 我父亲在

这家工厂工作 他说我祖父

在这家工厂工作 我只

知道我只知道如何 做冰箱

,他看着他的女儿们,

把手放在胸前,他

说,政府告诉我谁会雇用

我 谁会雇用我,这

不仅是那个人问的,而且是

所有人都问的 展馆和

每个工人坦率地说 本

世纪头十年关闭的 5 万家工厂之一

一号 你如何

在全球经济中快速为美国创造就业机会 第二号

在我们甚至没有

国家能源的情况下,你如何解决全球气候变化 这个国家的政策

,当国会的僵局似乎

是常态时,事实上最近进行了一项民意调查

,民意调查员

将国会的支持率

与其他一些不愉快的事情进行

了比较,发现事实上国会的

支持率更差 比

蟑螂虱子 Nickelback 乐队

根管和唐纳德特朗普,但从

重量上看,好消息是它至少

比冰毒实验室和淋病更好,我们

遇到了问题,所以这让我开始

思考

我在实验室看到的东西是什么 在那里

他们的民主实验室

发生了什么已经发生了什么政策处方

实际上导致了变化

发生并且已经被

两党接受 顺便说一句,如果我问你

例如奥巴马

政府的政策是什么导致

全国发生巨大变化,

你会说什么你可能会说奥巴马医改

除了那些不是自愿的

变化,因为我们知道只有一半的

州选择了你可能会说 复苏

法案,但那些不需要

改变政策导致大规模政策变化发生的事情是

争夺教育的最高层为什么政府投入

了 45 亿

美元并说全国各地的州长

竞争它 48 位州长

竞争说服第 48 个州

立法者从根本上提高

高中生的标准,以便

他们都参加大学预科课程

48 个州选择自下而上制定国家

能源政策,所以我

想为什么我们不能

这样做并创建一个 清洁能源工作

争相登上榜首,因为毕竟如果你

看一下上下文,从 p 开始

,过去八年已经投资了 1.6 万亿美元

全球的私营部门

,每一美元都代表一份

工作,这些工作要去哪里,但

他们会去像中国这样有政策的地方

,事实上我在中国

看看他们在做什么,他们

正在养狗和小马 为

我所在的团体展示,

在其中一次示威活动期间,我站在房间的后面,

站在我们

正在观看的一位中国官员旁边,他说,所以,你

认为我们什么时候 将获得国家

能源政策,我说,天哪,

国会僵局谁知道,这

就是他所做的,他说慢慢

来,因为他们认为我们的被动是

他们的机会,如果我们决定

向州长们发起挑战怎么办

国家和

参加这项比赛的价格使用了与国会批准

的两党团体相同的金额,

用于争夺

最高教育的 45 亿,这

听起来很多,但实际上它

不到联邦的百分之一的十分之一

花在联邦方面是一个四舍五入的错误,

但进入

该竞争的代价将是当你

可以说使用总统的目标时,他

希望国会到

2030 年采用 80% 的清洁能源标准,

换句话说,你必须 到

200 年从清洁能源中获得 80% 的能源

为什么

不要求所有州都这样做,

并想象会发生什么,

因为每个地区都有一些事情要做

提供你可能会认为像爱荷华州和俄亥俄州这样的州是

两个非常重要的政治

州,顺便说一下这两位州长

,他们会说我们将

领导国家生产风力

涡轮机和风能,你可能会

太阳能就是我们的阳光地带' 将成为为该国生产太阳能的州

,也许杰里布朗说得好,

我将在加利福尼亚创建一个

能够生产

太阳能电池板的产业集群,这样我们就不会

从中国购买它们,但 '

从美国购买,事实上全国每个地区

都可以做到这一点,你会看到全国各地都有

太阳能和风能机会

,事实上,如果你看看

西部北部的上州,

他们可以做地热或 你可以

看看德克萨斯州,然后说我们可以

在中东各州的智能电网解决方案中引领全国,

这些州可以

使用森林和农业

废料,他们可能会说我们将

在生物燃料方面引领全国 在

东北部,我们将在东部

沿海地区的能源效率解决方案

方面领先

全国 像锂离子电池这样的电动汽车,

每个地区都

可以提供一些东西,如果你创建了一个

竞赛,它尊重各州,

它尊重联邦制,它可以选择加入,你

甚至可能让德克萨斯州和南卡罗来纳州

没有选择参加教育竞赛

你甚至可以让他们

选择为什么因为共和党和民主党

州长喜欢剪彩我们想

带来工作我只是说它

这些民主实验室

中促进州一级的创新 最近关于政治的任何事情都

可能会说好的好

主意,但实际上国会将

45 亿美元摆在桌面上,

他们不能同意任何事情,所以你

可以等待并通过国会。

呃,你应该非常不耐烦,

或者你是叛徒,我们可以绕过

国会,绕过国会,

如果我们对州长提出私营部门挑战

,如果 Ted 的几家

高净值公司和个人

决定怎么办? 他们将

仅仅几个人一起创建乐队,并

为州长举办一场全国性的比赛,

以争夺最高层,

看看州长的反应

如果一切从 Ted 开始,

如果我们发现你在这里,你会怎么做?

如何破解密码以

在美国创造高薪工作并制定国家能源

政策,我们

从下到上制定了国家能源战略,因为亲爱的

测试人员,如果你像我一样不耐烦,

你知道我们的经济竞争对手

是其他国家在 比赛

,吃我们吃午饭,

我们可以参加比赛,也可以不参加

比赛 多