Does racism affect how you vote Nate Silver

[Music]

I want to talk about the election for

the first time the United States a

predominantly white group of voters

voted for an african-american candidate

for president and in fact brock obama

did quite well he went 375 electoral

votes and he won about 70 million

popular votes more than any other

presidential candidate of any race of

any party in history if you compare how

Obama did against how John Kerry had

done four years earlier Democrats really

liked seeing this transition here where

almost every state becomes bluer becomes

more democratic even states upon the

loss like out west those states became

more blue in the South in the Northeast

almost everywhere but with a couple of

exceptions here and there one exception

is in Massachusetts that was John

Kerry’s home state no big surprise mama

couldn’t do better than Kerry there or

in Arizona which is John McCain’s home

Obama didn’t have much improvement but

there’s also this part of the country

kind of in the middle region here this

kind of Arkansas Tennessee Oklahoma West

Virginia region now if you look at 96

Bill Clinton the last Democrat to

actually win how he did in 96 you see

real big differences in this part of the

country right here the kind of

Appalachians Ozarks Highlands region as

I call it 20 or 30 points swings from

how Bill Clinton did in 96 to how Obama

did in 2008 yes Bill Clinton was from

Arkansas these are very very profound

differences so when we think about parts

of the country like Arkansas you know

and there’s a book written called what’s

the matter with Kansas but really the

question here Obama did relatively well

in Kansas he lost badly but every

Democrat does he lost no worse and most

people do

but yeah what’s the matter with Arkansas

and when we think of Arkansas we tend to

have pretty negative connotations we

think of a bunch of rednecks

quote/unquote with guns and we think

people like this probably don’t want to

vote first people who look like this and

are named Barack Obama we think it’s a

matter of race and is this fair are we

kind of stigmatizing people from

Arkansas in this part of the country and

the answer is it is at least partially

fair and we know that race was a factor

and the reason why we know that is

because we asked those people

I’m rectally we didn’t ask him but when

they conducted exit polls in every state

and 37 states out of the

they ask the question that was pretty

direct about race they asked this

question in deciding your vote for

president today was the race of the

candidate a factor we’re looking people

that said yes race was a factor moreover

it was an important factor in my

decision and people who voted for John

McCain as a result of that factor maybe

in combination with other factors maybe

alone and we’re looking for this

behavior among white voters are really

non black voters so you see big

differences in different parts of the

country on this question in Louisiana

about one in five white voters said yes

one of the big reasons why I vote

against Barack Obama is because he was

an African American if those people had

voted for Obama even half of them Obama

would have won Louisiana safely same is

true with I think all of these states

you see on the top of the list meanwhile

California New York we can say oh we’re

enlightened but you know certainly much

lower incidence of this admitted I

suppose manifestation of racially based

voting here’s the same data on a map and

you kind of see the relationship between

the redder states and where more people

responded and said yes Barack Obama’s

race was a problem for me and you see

comparing the map to 96 you see an

overlap here this really seems to

explain why Barack Obama did worse in

this one part of the country so we have

to ask why is racism predictable in some

way is there something driving this is

it just about some weird stuff that goes

on in Arkansas that we don’t understand

in Kentucky or are there more systemic

factors at work and so we can look at a

bunch of different variables these are

the things that economists and political

scientists look at all the time things

like income and religion education which

of these seem to drive this

manifestation of racism in this big

natural experiment we had on November

4th and there are a couple of these that

that have strong predictive

relationships one of which is education

where you see the states with the fewest

years of schooling per adult are in red

and you see this part of the country the

kind of Appalachians region is less

educated it’s just a fact and you see

the relationship there with the racially

based voting patterns the other variable

that’s important is the type of

neighborhood that you live in states

that are more rural even to some extent

states like New

charmagne they exhibited a little bit of

this kind of racially based voting

against Barack Obama so it’s the

combination of these two things it’s

education and the type of neighbors that

you have to talk about more in a moment

and the thing about states like Arkansas

and Tennessee is that they’re both very

rural and they’re educationally

impoverished

so yes racism is predictable these

things among maybe other variables but

these things seem to predict it we’re

going to like drill down a little bit

more now into something called the

General Social Survey this is conducted

by the University of Chicago every other

year and they ask a series of really

interesting questions in 2000 they had

particularly interesting questions about

racial attitudes and one simple question

they asked is does any one of the

opposite race live in your neighborhood

and we can see in different types of

communities that the results are quite

different in cities about 80 percent of

people have someone whom they consider a

neighbor of another race but in rural

communities only about 30 percent

probably because if you live on a farm

you might not have a lot of neighbors

period but nevertheless you’re not

having a lot of interaction with people

who are unlike you so what we’re going

to do now is take the white people in

the survey and split them between those

who have black neighbors a really some

neighbor of another race people who have

only white neighbors and we see in some

variables in terms of political

attitudes not a lot of difference this

was eight years ago people were more

Republican back then but you see

Democrats first Republican not a big

difference based on who your neighbors

are and even some questions about race

for example affirmative action which is

kind of a political question a policy

question about race if you will not much

difference here furtive actions not very

popular frankly with white voters period

but people with black neighbors and

people in mana racial neighborhoods feel

no differently about it really but if

you Probab it deeper and get a bit more

kind of personal if you will do you

favor a law banning interracial marriage

there’s a big difference people who

don’t have neighbors of a different race

or about twice as likely to oppose

interracial marriage as people who do

just based on who lives in your

immediate neighborhood around you and

likewise they ask 9 mm but in the same

survey 1996 would you not vote for a

qualified black president and you see

people without neighbors who are

african-american were

much more likely to say that would give

me a problem so it’s really not even

about urban versus rural it’s about kind

of who you live with and racism is

predictable it’s predicted by an

interaction or lack thereof with people

unlike you people of other races so if

we want to address that the goal is to

facilitate interaction with people of

other races and I have a couple of very

obvious I suppose ideas for maybe how to

do that I’m a big fan of cities

especially if we have cities that are

diverse and sustainable and can support

people of different ethnicities and

different income groups I think cities

facilitate more of the kind of

networking and kind of casual

interaction that you might have on a

daily basis but also not everyone wants

to live in a city certainly not a city

like New York so we can think more about

things like straight grids this is the

neighborhood where I grew up in East

Lansing Michigan

it’s a traditional Midwestern community

which means you have a real grid you

have real neighborhoods and real trees

and real streets you can walk on and you

interact a lot with your neighbors

people you like people you might not

know and as a result a very tolerant

community which is different I think

than something like this which is in

Schaumburg Illinois where kind of every

little set of house has their own

cul-de-sac and kind of drive through

Starbucks and stuff like that I think

that actually this type of urban design

which became more prevalent in the 1970s

and 1980s I think there’s a relationship

between that and the country becoming

more conservative under Ronald Reagan

but also here’s another idea we have is

an intercollegiate exchange program

where you have students going from New

York abroad but frankly there are enough

differences within the country now or

maybe you can take a bunch of kids from

my you have them go study for a semester

the University of Arkansas and vice

versa are do we have the high school

level literally there are people who

might be in school in Arkansas or

Tennessee it might never interact in a

positive affirmative way with someone

from another part of the country or of

another racial group and I think part of

the education vary but we talked about

before is the networking experience you

get when you go to college where you do

kind of get a mix of people that you

might not interact with otherwise but

the point is this is all good news

because when something is predictable

it’s what I call design a book we can

start thinking about solutions to

solving that problem even a problem is

pernicious and as intractable as racism

if we understand the root causes of the

behavior and where manifests itself and

where it doesn’t we can start to design

solutions to

so that’s all I have to say thank you

very much

[音乐]

我想谈谈

美国第一次以

白人为主的选民

投票给非裔美国

总统候选人的选举,事实上布洛克奥巴马

做得很好,他获得了 375 张选举人

票,他赢得了大约 70 张选举人票

如果您将

奥巴马的做法与四年前约翰·

克里的做法进行比较,则比历史上

任何政党的任何种族的任何其他总统候选人都要多 100 万

张普选票 在

像西部这样的损失之后,这些州

在东南部的南部

几乎在所有地方都变得更蓝了,但

这里和那里有几个

例外,马萨诸塞州是一个例外,这是

约翰克里的家乡,这并不奇怪妈妈

不能比克里做得更好 在那里或

在亚利桑那州,这是约翰麦凯恩的家,

奥巴马并没有太大的改善,但

这个国家的这一

部分也在 这里

的中部地区 现在是阿肯色州 田纳西州 俄克拉荷马州 西

弗吉尼亚州 如果你看看 96

比尔克林顿最后一个

真正赢得胜利的民主党人,他在 96 年的表现你会看到

这个地区的真正巨大差异就在这里

阿巴拉契亚奥扎克 高地地区,

我称之为 20 或 30 点,

从比尔克林顿在 96 年的表现到

奥巴马在 2008 年的表现,是的,比尔克林顿来自

阿肯色州,这些差异非常巨大,

所以当我们考虑

像阿肯色州这样的国家部分地区时,你知道

和 有一本书叫

堪萨斯州怎么了,但实际上

这里的问题奥巴马

在堪萨斯州做得相对较好,他输得很惨,但每个

民主党人都没有输得更糟,大多数

人都这样做,

但是是的,阿肯色州怎么了

,当我们想到阿肯色州时,我们 往往

有相当负面的含义我们

想到一堆

乡巴佬用枪引用/取消引用,我们认为

像这样的人可能不想先投票给那些喜欢的

人 像这样,

被命名为巴拉克奥巴马,我们认为这

是种族问题,这是公平

的吗?我们

在这个国家的这个地区对来自阿肯色州的人进行污名化吗?

答案是至少部分

公平,我们知道种族是一个 因素

以及我们之所以知道这一点的原因是

因为我们问了那些

直肠的人,我们没有问他,但是当

他们在每个州

和其中的 37 个州进行出口民意调查时,

他们提出了一个非常

直接的关于种族的问题,他们

在决定你今天投票给

总统时问这个问题是候选人的种族是

我们正在寻找的人

说是的人种族是一个因素而且

它是我决定的一个重要因素

以及投票给

约翰麦凯恩的人由于 该因素可能

与其他因素相结合,可能

单独存在,我们正在寻找

白人选民中的这种行为实际上

是非黑人选民,所以你

在路易斯安那州的这个问题上看到全国不同地区的巨大差异

大约五分之一的白人选民说是

的,我

投票反对巴拉克奥巴马的一个重要原因是

,如果这些人

投票给奥巴马,他是非裔美国人,即使他们中的一半奥巴马

会安全赢得路易斯安那州

,我认为所有人都是如此 在这些州中,

您在列表顶部看到同时

加利福尼亚州纽约我们可以说哦,我们是

开明的,但您肯定知道

这种情况的发生率要低得多,我

认为基于种族的

投票的表现在这里是地图上的相同数据,

你善良 看到

更红的州之间的关系以及更多人

回答说是的,巴拉克奥巴马的

种族对我来说是一个问题,你看到

将地图与 96 进行比较,你会看到

这里有重叠,这似乎真的

解释了为什么巴拉克奥巴马在

这一点上做得更糟 这个国家的一部分,所以我们

不得不问为什么种族主义在某种程度上是可以预测的,

是不是有什么东西在推动这只是

阿肯色州发生的一些我们不理解的奇怪事情

在肯塔基州还是有更多的系统性

因素在起作用,所以我们可以看看

一堆不同的变量,这些是

经济学家和政治

学家一直关注的东西,

比如收入和宗教教育

,这些似乎推动了这种

表现形式

我们在 11 月 4 日进行的这个大型自然实验中的种族主义

,其中有

几个具有很强的预测

关系,其中一个是教育

,你看到

每个成年人受教育年限最少的州是红色的

,你会看到这部分 该

国的阿巴拉契亚地区受教育程度较低,

这只是一个事实,您会看到

那里与

基于种族的投票模式的关系另一个

重要的变量

是您所居住的社区类型,

甚至在某种程度上更偏农村

像New Charmagne这样的州,

他们展示了一些针对巴拉克奥巴马的

这种基于种族的投票

,所以这是

组合 在这两件事中,

教育和邻居的类型,

你必须马上谈论更多

关于阿肯色州和田纳西州等州的事情

是它们都非常

农村而且他们在教育上都很

贫困,

所以是的,种族主义是可以预见的这些

可能是其他变量中的

一些东西,但这些东西似乎可以预测它,我们现在

深入研究一下所谓的

一般社会调查,这是

由芝加哥大学每隔

一年进行一次,他们询问了一系列真正的

2000 年有趣的问题 他们

提出了关于种族态度的特别有趣的问题,

他们提出的一个简单问题是,有没有任何一个

相反的种族住在你的社区

,我们可以看到在不同类型的

社区中,结果

在大约 80% 的城市中存在很大差异 的

人有一个他们认为

是另一个种族的邻居,但在农村

社区中只有大约 30%

可能是因为 e 如果您住在农场,

您可能没有很多

邻居,但您不会

与您不同的人进行很多互动,所以我们现在要做的

调查中的白人 把他们分成

那些有黑人邻居的人 一个真正

的另一个种族的

邻居 只有白人邻居的人 我们在一些

变量中看到政治

态度方面并没有太大的差异 这

是八年前人们更多的

共和党人但 你会看到

民主党首先是共和党,

根据你的邻居

是谁,甚至一些关于种族的问题

,例如平权行动,这是

一个政治问题,一个

关于种族的政策问题,如果你不会有太大

区别,那么偷偷摸摸的行动并不是很

受欢迎。 在白人选民时期,

但有黑人邻居的

人和法力种族社区的人

对此并没有什么不同,但如果

你更深入地了解它并得到

如果你愿意,你会更个人化一点,如果你

赞成禁止异族通婚的法律

,那就有很大的不同了

在你附近的邻居中,

同样他们问 9 毫米,但在

1996 年的同一项调查中,你会不会投票给一个

合格的黑人总统,你

看到没有邻居的

非裔美国人

更有可能说这会给

我带来问题 所以这甚至不是

关于城市与农村的问题,而是

关于你和谁住在一起的类型,种族主义是

可以预测的

其他种族的人在一起,我有一些非常

明显的想法,我想可能如何

做到这一点我是城市的忠实粉丝,

特别是如果我们有城市是

div 简洁且可持续,可以

支持不同种族和

不同收入群体的

像纽约这样的城市,所以我们可以更多地考虑

直线网格之类的东西 这

是我在密歇根州东兰辛长大

的社区 这是一个传统的中西部社区

,这意味着你有一个真正的网格 你

有真正的社区、真正的树木

和真正的街道 继续往前走,你

会和你的邻居、

你喜欢的人、你可能不

认识的人进行很多互动,结果是一个非常宽容的

社区,我

认为这与

伊利诺伊州绍姆堡的这种社区不同,那里的

每套小房子都有自己的 自己的

死胡同和开车穿过

星巴克之类的东西 我

认为实际上这种类型的城市

设计变得更加前卫 在 1970 年代

和 1980 年代,我认为

这与

罗纳德·里根领导下的国家变得更加保守之间存在某种关系,

但我们还有一个想法

是校际交流计划

,让学生从

纽约出国,但坦率地说,内部有足够的

差异 现在这个国家,

或者你可以从我那里带一群孩子

你让他们去

阿肯色大学学习一个学期,

反之亦然,我们是否有高中

水平,实际上有些人

可能在阿肯色州或

田纳西州上学 它可能永远不会以

积极肯定的方式与

来自该国另一个地区或

另一个种族群体的人互动,我认为

部分教育会有所不同,但我们之前谈到的

你上大学时获得的网络体验,你做的

很好 让你

可能不会与其他人互动,

但重点是这都是好消息,

因为当某些事情是可预测的

这就是我所说的设计一本书,我们可以

开始思考

解决问题的解决方案,即使问题

是有害的,

如果我们了解行为的根本原因,

以及在哪里表现出来,

在哪里不表现出来,我们就可以开始 设计

解决方案,

这就是我要说的,

非常感谢