Are we ready for neoevolution Harvey Fineberg

[Music]

how would you like to be better than you

are suppose I said that with just a few

changes in your genes you could get a

better memory more precise more accurate

and quicker or maybe you’d like to be

more fit stronger with more stamina

would you like to be more attractive and

self-confident how about living longer

with good health or perhaps you’re one

of those who’s always yearned for more

creativity which one would you like the

most which would you like if you could

have just one creativity how many people

would choose creativity raise your hands

let me see a few probably about as many

as there are creative people here that’s

very good

how many would opt for memory quite a

few more how about Fitness few less what

about longevity ah the majority that

makes me feel very good as a doctor if

you could have any one of these it would

be a very different world is it just

imaginary or is it perhaps possible

evolution has been a perennial topic

here at the TED conference but I want to

give you today one doctor’s take on the

subject the great 20th century

geneticist TG dodging ski who was also a

communicant in the Russian Orthodox

Church once wrote an essay that he

titled nothing in biology makes sense

except in the light of evolution now if

you are one of those who does not accept

the evidence for biological evolution

this would be a very good time to turn

off your hearing aid take out your

personal communications device I give

you permission and perhaps take another

look at Catherine Schultz’s book on

being wrong because nothing in the rest

of this talk is going to make any sense

whatsoever to you

but if you do accept biological

evolution consider this is it just about

the past or is it about the future does

it apply to others or does it apply to

us this is another look at the tree of

life in this picture I’ve put a bush

with a centre branching out in all

directions because if you look at the

edges of the Tree of Life every existing

species at the tips of those branches

has succeeded in evolutionary terms it

has survived it has demonstrated a

fitness to its environment the human

part of this branch way out on one end

is of course the one that we are most

interested in we branched off of a

common ancestor to modern chimpanzees

about 6 or 8 million years ago in the

interval there have been perhaps 20 or

25 different species of hominids some

have come and gone we have been here for

about a hundred and thirty thousand

years it may seem like we’re quite

remote from other parts of this tree of

life but actually for the most part the

basic machinery of ourselves is pretty

much the same do you realize that we can

take advantage and commandeer the

machinery of a common bacterium to

produce the protein of human insulin

used to treat diabetics this is not like

human insulin this is the same protein

that is chemically indistinguishable

from what comes out of your pancreas and

speaking of bacteria do you realize that

each of us carries in our gut more

bacteria than there are cells in the

rest of our body maybe 10 times more

I mean think of it when Anthony Damacio

asks about your self-image do you think

about the bacteria our gut is a

wonderfully hospitable environment for

those bacteria it’s war

it’s dark its moist it’s very cozy and

you’re going to provide all the

nutrition that they could possibly want

with no effort on their part it’s really

like an easy Street for bacteria with

the occasional interruption of the

unintended force rush to the exit but

otherwise you are a wonderful

environment for those bacteria just as

they are essential to your life they

help in the digestion of essential

nutrients and they protect you against

certain diseases but what will come in

the future are we at some kind of

evolutionary equipoise as a species or

are we destined to become something

different something perhaps even better

adapted to the environment now let’s

take a step back in time to the Big Bang

fourteen billion years ago the earth the

solar system about four-and-a-half

billion years the first signs of proto

life maybe three to four billion years

ago on earth the first multi-celled

organisms perhaps as much as 800 or a

billion years ago and then the human

species finally emerging in the last

hundred and thirty thousand years in

this vast unfinished symphony of the

universe life on Earth is like a brief

measure the animal kingdom like a single

single measure and human life

a small grace note that was us that also

constitutes the entertainment portion of

this talk so I hope you enjoyed it

now when I was a freshman in college I

took my first biology class I was

fascinated by the elegance and beauty of

biology I became enamored of the power

of evolution and I realized something

very fundamental in most of the

existence of life in single-celled

organisms each cell simply divides and

all of the genetic energy of that cell

is carried on in both daughter cells

but at the time multi-celled organisms

come online things start to change

sexual reproduction enters the picture

and very importantly with the

introduction of sexual reproduction that

passes on the genome the rest of the

body becomes expendable

in fact you could say that the

inevitability of the death of our bodies

enters in evolutionary time at the same

moment as sexual reproduction now I have

to confess when I was a college

undergraduate I thought okay sex death

sex death death for sex

seemed pretty reasonable at the time but

with each passing years I’ve come to

have increasing doubts I’ve come to

understand the sentiments of George

Burns who was performing still in Las

Vegas well into his 90s and one night

there’s a knock at his hotel room door

he answers the door standing before him

is a gorgeous scantily clad showgirl she

looks at him and says I’m here for super

sex

that’s fine says George I’ll take the

soup

I came to realize as a physician that I

was working toward a goal which was

different from the goal of evolution not

necessarily contradictory just different

I was trying to preserve the body I

wanted to keep us healthy

I wanted to restore health from disease

I wanted us to live long and healthy

lives evolution is all about passing on

the genome to the next generation

adapting and surviving through

generation after generation from an

evolutionary point of view you and I are

like the booster rockets designed to

send the genetic payload into the next

level of orbit and then drop off into

the sea I think we would all understand

the sentiment that Woody Allen expressed

when he said I don’t want to achieve

immortality through my work I want to

achieve it through not dying evolution

does not necessarily favor the

longest-lived

it doesn’t necessarily favor the biggest

or the strongest or the fastest and not

even the smartest evolution favors those

creatures best adapted to their

environment that is the sole test of

survival and success at the bottom of

the ocean bacteria that are thermophilic

and can survive at the steam vent heat

that would otherwise produce if fish

were there sous-vide cooked fish

nevertheless have managed to make that a

hospitable environment for them so what

does this mean as we look back at what

has happened in evolution and as we

think about the place again of humans in

evolution and particularly as we look

ahead to the next phase I would say that

there are a number of possibilities the

first is that we will not evolve we have

reached a kind of equipoise and the

reasoning behind that would be first

we have through medicine managed to

preserve a lot of genes that would

otherwise be selected out and be removed

from the population and secondly we as a

species have so configured our

environment that we have managed to make

it adapt to us as well as we adapt to it

and by the way we immigrate and

circulate and intermix so much that you

can’t any longer have the isolation that

is necessary for evolution to take place

a second possibility is that there will

be evolution of the traditional kind

natural imposed by the forces of nature

and the argument here would be that the

wheels of evolution grind slowly but

they are inexorable and as far as

isolation goes when we as a species do

colonize distant planets there will be

the isolation and the environmental

changes that could produce evolution in

the natural way but there’s a third

possibility an enticing intriguing and

frightening possibility

I call it neo evolution the new

evolution that is not simply natural but

guided and chosen by us as individuals

in the choices that we will make now how

could this come about how could it be

possible that we would do this consider

first the reality that people today in

some cultures are making choices about

their offspring there in some cultures

choosing to have more males than females

it’s not necessarily good for the

society but it’s what the individual and

the family are choosing think also if it

were possible ever for you not simply to

choose the sex of your child but for you

in your body to make the genetic

adjustments that would cure or prevent

diseases what if you could make the

genetic changes to eliminate diabetes or

Alzheimer’s or reduce the risk of cancer

or eliminate stroke

wouldn’t you want to make those changes

in your genes

if we look ahead these kinds of changes

are going to be increasingly possible

the human genome project started in 1990

and it took 13 years it costs 2.7

billion dollars the year after it was

finished in 2004 you could do the same

job for 20 million dollars in 3 to 4

months today you can have a complete

sequence of the 3 billion base pairs in

the human genome at a cost of about

$20,000 and in the space of about a week

it won’t be very long before the reality

will be the $1,000 human genome and it

will be increasingly available for

everyone just a week ago the National

Academy of Engineering awarded its

Draper prize to francis arnold and

willem stemmer two scientists who

independently developed techniques to

encourage the natural process of

evolution to work faster and to lead to

desirable proteins in a more efficient

way what Francis Arnold calls directed

evolution a couple of years ago the

Lasker prize was awarded to the

scientists Shinya Yamanaka for his

research in which he took an adult skin

cell a fibroblast and by manipulating

just four genes he induced that cell to

revert to a flurry potential stem cell a

cell potentially capable of becoming any

cell in your body these changes are

coming the same technology that has

produced the human insulin in bacteria

can make viruses that will not only

protect you against themselves but

induce immunity against other viruses

believe it or not there’s an

experimental trial going on with vaccine

against influenza that has been grown in

the cells of a tobacco plant

can you imagine something good coming

out of tobacco these are all reality

today and the future will be evermore

possible imagine then just two other

little changes you can change the cells

in your body but what if you could

change the cells in your offspring what

if you could change the sperm in the OVA

or change the newly fertilized egg and

give your offspring a better chance at a

healthier life eliminate the diabetes

eliminate the hemophilia reduce the risk

of cancer

who doesn’t want healthier children and

then that same analytic technology that

same engine of science that can produce

the changes to prevent disease will also

enable us to adopt super attributes

hyper capacities that better memory why

not have the quick wit of a Ken Jennings

especially if you can augment it with

the next generation of the Watson

machine why not have the quick twitch

muscle that will enable you to run

faster and longer why not live longer

these will be irresistible and when we

are at a position where we can pass it

on to the next generation and we can

adopt the attributes we want we will

have converted old-style

evolution into neo evolution will take a

process that normally might require a

hundred thousand years and we can

compress it down to a thousand years and

maybe even in the next 100 years these

are choices that your grandchildren or

their grandchildren are going to have

before them will we use these choices to

make a society that is better that is

more successful that is kinder or will

we selectively choose different

attributes that we want for some of us

and not for others of us will we make a

society that is more boring

and more uniform or more robust and more

versatile these are the kinds of

questions that we will have to face and

most profoundly of all will we ever be

able to develop the wisdom and to

inherit the wisdom that we’ll need to

make these choices wisely for better or

worse and sooner than you may think

these choices will be up to us thank you

[Applause]

[音乐]

你想变得比现在更好

吗 假设我说只要

你的基因发生一些变化,你就能获得

更好的记忆 更精确 更

准确 更快 或者你想变得

更健康 更强壮 耐力

你想变得更有吸引力和

自信

吗? 健康长寿吗? 或者你

是那些一直渴望更多

创造力的人

之一 创造力 有多少人

会选择 创造力 举手

让我看看 几个 大概

和这里有创造力的人一样多

很好 有多少人会选择 记忆力

多一点 健身 少一点 长寿怎么样

啊 多数

如果你能拥有其中任何一个,作为一名医生,我会感觉非常好,

那将

是一个非常不同的世界,它只是

想象的,还是有可能

进化

是 TED 的一个长期话题 会议,但今天我想

给你一个医生对这个

主题的看法 20 世纪伟大的

遗传学家 TG 躲避滑雪,他

也是俄罗斯东正教

教堂的一名传道人,他曾经写过一篇文章,他的

标题是生物学没有任何意义,

除非从进化的角度来看 现在,如果

您是不接受生物进化证据的人之一,

这将是关闭助听器的好时机,

取出您的

个人通讯设备,我

允许您,也许再

看看凯瑟琳舒尔茨关于

存在的书 错了,因为

本次演讲的其余部分

对您来说没有任何意义,

但是如果您确实接受生物

进化,请考虑这

只是过去还是未来,

它适用于其他人还是适用于

我们 这

是这张照片中生命之树

的另一种

看法 如果

这些分支尖端的每个现有物种

都在进化方面取得了成功,它

已经幸存下来,它已经证明了

对环境的适应性,那么

这个分支的

人类部分当然是我们最

感兴趣的那个我们分支了

大约在 6 或 800 万年前,现代黑猩猩的共同祖先在此

期间可能有 20 或

25 种不同种类的原始人,其中

一些来去匆匆,我们在这里已经存在了

大约 13

万年 我们

与这棵生命之树的其他部分相距甚远,

但实际上

,我们自己的基本机制

几乎是一样

用于治疗糖尿病患者的

人胰岛素 这与人胰岛素不同 这是同一种蛋白质

,在化学上与

来自胰腺和

说话的蛋白质无法区分 你是否意识到

我们每个人的肠道中携带的

细菌比

我们身体其他部位的细胞多10倍

我的意思是当安东尼·达马西奥

询问你的自我形象时你会

想到细菌吗 我们的肠道对于这些细菌来说是一个

非常好客的环境

它是战争 它是战争

它是黑暗 它是潮湿 它非常舒适并且

你将

提供他们可能需要的所有营养而不需要他们

的任何努力 它真的

就像一条轻松的

细菌街 意外的力量偶尔会被打断,

冲向出口,

但除此之外,你

是这些细菌的绝佳环境,就像

它们对你的生活至关重要一样,它们

有助于消化必需的

营养物质,保护你免受

某些疾病的侵害,但未来会发生什么

作为一个物种,我们是否处于某种

进化平衡状态,

或者我们注定要成为

不同的东西,甚至可能更好地

适应环境 现在让

我们回到

140 亿年前的宇宙大爆炸 地球

太阳系 大约 45

亿年 原始生命的最初迹象

可能是 3 到 40 亿

年前 地球上第一个多 - 细胞

生物可能在 800 或

10 亿年前,然后人类

物种在过去

33 万年中终于出现在

这首巨大的未完成的宇宙交响乐中

地球上的生命就像一个简短的

测量动物王国就像一个

单一尺度和人类生活

是我们的一个小小的优雅音符,它也

构成了这次谈话的娱乐部分,

所以我希望你现在喜欢它

当我还是大学一年级的时候 我上

了我的第一堂生物课 我被

它的优雅和美丽迷住了

生物学 我开始迷恋

进化的力量,我意识到

在单细胞生物的大部分生命存在中一些非常基本的东西,

每个细胞只是简单地分裂,

所有的遗传 该细胞的能量

在两个子细胞中进行,

但当多细胞生物上

线时,事情开始发生变化,

有性生殖进入画面

,非常重要的

,随着基因组的有性生殖的引入,身体的其余部分

变得 消耗

性 事实上你可以说

我们身体死亡的必然性

与有性生殖同时进入进化时间现在我

不得不承认,当我还是一名大学

本科生时,我认为可以性死亡

性死亡性死亡

似乎很合理 当时,但

随着时间的流逝,

我越来越怀疑我开始

理解乔治伯恩斯的情绪,

他一直在拉斯维加斯演出,

直到他 90 多岁,有一天

晚上他的酒店房间门被敲响了,

他 回答门站在他面前的

是一个穿着暴露的华丽歌舞女郎她

看着他说我来这里是为了超级

性爱很好说乔治我会接受

作为一名医生,我开始意识到我

正在朝着一个

与进化目标不同的目标而努力,这

不一定是矛盾的,只是不同

我试图保护身体我

想让我们保持健康

我想从疾病中恢复健康

我希望我们长寿和健康

进化就是

将基因组传递给

下一代 从

进化的角度来看,你和我

就像是设计用来

将基因有效载荷送入太空的助推火箭 下

一层轨道然后

掉入大海 我想我们都会理解

伍迪艾伦所说的我不想

通过我的工作实现不朽 我想通过不死来

实现它 进化

不一定赞成

寿命最长的

不一定有利于最大

、最强或最快的,

即使是最聪明的进化也不一定有利于那些

生物 res 最适合他们的

环境,这是

在海底生存和成功的唯一测试

细菌是嗜热的

,可以在蒸汽排放口的热量下生存

为他们创造一个好客的环境那么

当我们回顾

进化中发生的事情时,当我们

再次思考人类在进化中的位置时

,特别是当我们

展望下一阶段时,这意味着什么?

一些可能性

第一个是我们不会进化 我们已经

达到了一种平衡,其

背后的原因是首先

我们通过医学设法

保存了许多基因,否则这些基因会

被挑选出来并从人群中移除

其次,我们作为一个

物种已经如此配置了我们的

环境,以至于我们设法

让它适应我们,以及我们适应它

以及我们移民的方式 并且

循环和混合如此之多,以至于你

不能再拥有

进化发生所必需

的隔离第二种可能性是

自然力量强加的传统种类的自然进化

,这里的论点是 进化的

车轮缓慢转动,但

它们是无情的,就

隔离而言,当我们作为一个物种确实

在遥远的星球上殖民时,将会

存在可能以自然方式产生进化的隔离和环境变化,

但还有第三种

可能性是诱人的 有趣和

可怕的可能性

我称之为新进化 新

进化不仅是自然的,而且是

由我们作为个人

在我们现在将要做出的选择中引导和选择的 怎么

会发生这种情况

我们怎么可能这样做 首先考虑一下

当今

某些文化中的人们正在对

他们的后代做出

选择的现实 男性多于女性

这不一定对社会有益,

但这是个人

和家庭选择的想法,

如果您有可能不仅可以

选择孩子的性别,还可以让

您的身体进行基因

调整 这将治愈或预防

疾病如果你能进行

基因改变以消除糖尿病或

阿尔茨海默氏症或降低患癌症的风险

或消除中风

如果我们展望未来,你是否不想在你的基因中进行这些改变这些类型的改变

正在发生

人类基因组计划从 1990 年开始

,耗时 13 年,在 2004

年完成后的第二年花费 27 亿美元,

你可以

在 3 到 4 个月内完成同样的工作,花费 2000 万美元

,今天你可以拥有一个完整的

人类基因组中 30 亿个碱基对的序列,成本

约为 20,000 美元,在大约

一周的时间里,不久之后,

1000 美元的人类基因将成为现实 ome,

它将越来越多地提供给

每个人,就在一周前,美国国家

工程院将其

Draper 奖授予了 francis Arnold 和

willem Stemmer 两位科学家,他们

独立开发了技术,以

鼓励自然

进化过程更快地工作并产生

理想的蛋白质 几年前,以一种更有效的

方式,弗朗西斯·阿诺德(Francis Arnold)称之为定向

进化,

拉斯克奖授予了

科学家山中伸弥(Shinya Yamanaka),以表彰他的

研究,他将成人皮肤

细胞作为成纤维细胞,并通过

操纵四个基因诱导该细胞

恢复为快速的潜在干细胞 一种

可能成为

你体内任何细胞的细胞 这些变化

即将到来 与

在细菌中产生人类胰岛素的技术相同

信不信由你

,疫苗 aga 正在进行一项实验性试验

在烟草植物的细胞中生长的流感病毒

你能想象

从烟草中产生的好东西吗?这些都是

今天的现实,未来将永远是

可能

的 如果你

能改变你后代的细胞

如果你能改变卵子里的精子

或改变新受精的卵子会怎么样

让你的后代有更好的机会过上

更健康的生活 消除糖尿病

消除血友病 降低患癌症的风险

谁不 不想要更健康的孩子,

然后同样的分析技术,

同样的科学引擎,可以

产生改变以预防疾病,也

将使我们能够采用超级属性

超能力,更好的记忆为什么

不拥有肯詹宁斯的机智,

特别是如果你 可以

用下一代 Watson

机器来增强它 为什么不拥有

可以让你跑得

更快的快速抽搐肌肉 d 更久为什么不活得更久

这些将是不可抗拒的,

当我们处于可以将其

传递给下一代并且可以

采用我们想要的属性时,我们

将把旧式

进化转变为新式进化将需要一个

过程 通常可能需要 10

万年,我们可以

将其压缩到 1000 年,

甚至可能在接下来的 100 年内,这些

是您的孙子或

他们的孙子将

在他们面前做出的选择,我们将使用这些选择来建立

一个社会 更好

更成功 更友善 或者我们是否会

选择性地

为我们中的一些人选择不同的属性,

而不是为我们中的其他人选择 我们是否会创造一个

更无聊

、更统一或更强大、更

多样化的社会?

我们将不得不面对

的各种问题,最深刻的是,我们是否

能够发展智慧并

继承我们需要

做出这些选择的智慧 明智地选择更好或

更坏,并且比您想象的要早

这些选择将取决于我们,谢谢

[掌声]