My failed mission to find God and what I found instead Anjali Kumar

A few years ago,

I set out on a mission to find God.

Now, I’m going to tell you
right up front that I failed,

which, as a lawyer,

is a really hard thing for me to admit.

But on that failed journey,

a lot of what I found was enlightening.

And one thing in particular
gave me a lot of hope.

It has to do with the magnitude
and significance of our differences.

So, I was raised in America
by Indian parents – culturally Hindu,

but practicing a strict and relatively
unknown religion outside of India

called Jainism.

To give you an idea
of just how minority that makes me:

people from India represent
roughly one percent of the US population;

Hindus, about 0.7 percent;

Jains, at most .00046 percent.

To put that in context:

more people visit the Vermont
Teddy Bear Factory each year

than are followers
of the Jain religion in America.

To add to my minority mix,
my parents then decided,

“What a great idea!
Let’s send her to Catholic school” –

(Laughter)

where my sister and I
were the only non-white,

non-Catholic students
in the entire school.

At the Infant Jesus of Prague School
in Flossmoor, Illinois –

yes, that’s really what it was called –

we were taught to believe
that there is a single Supreme Being

who is responsible for everything,

the whole shebang,

from the creation of the Universe
to moral shepherding to eternal life.

But at home,

I was being taught something
entirely different.

Followers of the Jain religion

don’t believe in a single Supreme Being

or even a team of Supreme Beings.

Instead, we’re taught that God manifests

as the perfection of each of us
as individuals,

and that we’re actually
spending our entire lives

striving to remove the bad karmas

that stand in the way of us
becoming our own godlike, perfect selves.

On top of that, one of the core
principles of Jainism

is something called “non-absolutism.”

Non-absolutists believe
that no single person

can hold ownership or knowledge
of absolute truth,

even when it comes to religious beliefs.

Good luck testing that concept out

on the priests and nuns
in your Catholic school.

(Laughter)

No wonder I was confused

and hyperaware of how different
I was from my peers.

Cut to 20-something years later,

and I found myself to be
a highly spiritual person,

but I was floundering.

I was spiritually homeless.

I came to learn that I was a “None,”

which isn’t an acronym
or a clever play on words,

nor is it one of these.

It’s simply the painfully uninspired name

given to everyone
who checks off the box “none”

when Pew Research asks them
about their religious affiliation.

(Laughter)

Now, a couple of interesting
things about Nones are:

there are a lot of us,

and we skew young.

In 2014, there were over 56 million
religiously unaffiliated Nones

in the United States.

And Nones account
for over one-third of adults

between the ages of 18 to 33.

But the most interesting thing
to me about Nones

is that we’re often spiritual.

In fact, 68 percent of us believe,
with some degree of certainty,

that there is a God.

We’re just not sure who it is.

(Laughter)

So the first takeaway for me

when I realized I was a None
and had found that information out

was that I wasn’t alone.

I was finally part of a group in America

that had a lot of members,

which felt really reassuring.

But then the second,
not-so-reassuring takeaway

was that, oh, man, there are a lot of us.

That can’t be good,

because if a lot of highly spiritual
people are currently godless,

maybe finding God is not going to be
as easy as I had originally hoped.

So that is when I decided
that on my spiritual journey,

I was going to avoid the obvious places

and skip the big-box religions altogether

and instead venture out
into the spiritual fringe

of mediums

and faith healers

and godmen.

But remember, I’m a non-absolutist,

which means I was pretty inclined
to keep a fairly open mind,

which turned out to be a good thing,

because I went to a witch’s potluck dinner

at the LGBT Center in New York City,

where I befriended two witches;

drank a five-gallon jerrican
full of volcanic water

with a shaman in Peru;

got a hug from a saint
in the convention center –

she smelled really nice –

(Laughter)

chanted for hours in a smoke-filled,
heat-infused sweat lodge

on the beaches of Mexico;

worked with a tequila-drinking medium
to convene with the dead,

who oddly included both
my deceased mother-in-law

and the deceased manager
of the hip-hop group The Roots.

(Laughter)

Yeah, my mother-in-law told me
she was really happy

her son had chosen me for his wife.

Duh! But –

(Laughter)

Yeah.

But the manager of The Roots

said that maybe I should cut back
on all the pasta I was eating.

I think we can all agree

that it was lucky for my husband
that it wasn’t his dead mother

who suggested I lay off carbs.

(Laughter)

I also joined a laughing yoga group
out of South Africa;

witnessed a woman have
a 45-minute orgasm –

I am not making this up –

as she tapped into
the energy of the universe –

I think I’m going to go back there –

(Laughter)

called God from a phone booth
in the Nevada desert at Burning Man,

wearing a unitard and ski goggles;

and I had an old Indian guy
lie on top of me,

and no, he wasn’t my husband.

This was a perfect stranger named Paramji,

and he was chanting into my chakras

as he tapped into the energy forces
of the Universe to heal my “yoni,”

which is a Sanskrit word for “vagina.”

(Laughter)

I was going to have a slide here,

but a few people suggested

that a slide of my yoni
at TED – even TEDWomen –

not the best idea.

(Laughter)

Very early in my quest,

I also went to see the Brazilian
faith healer John of God

at his compound down in Brazil.

Now, John of God is considered
a full-trance medium,

which basically means
he can talk to dead people.

But in his case, he claims
to channel a very specific group

of dead saints and doctors

in order to heal
whatever’s wrong with you.

And although John of God does
not have a medical degree

or even a high school diploma,

he actually performs surgery –

the real kind, with a scalpel,

but no anesthesia.

Yeah, I don’t know.

He also offers invisible surgery,
where there is no cutting,

and surrogate surgery,

where he supposedly can treat somebody
who is thousands of miles away

by performing a procedure on a loved one.

Now, when you go to visit John of God,

there are all kinds
of rules and regulations.

It’s a whole complicated thing,

but the bottom line is that
you can visit John of God

and present him with three things
that you would like fixed,

and he will set the dead saints
and doctors to work on your behalf

to get the job done.

(Laughter)

Now, before you snicker,

consider

that, at least according to his website,

over eight million people –

including Oprah,

the Goddess of Daytime TV –

have gone to see John of God,

and I was pre-wired to keep an open mind.

But to be honest, the whole thing for me
was kind of weird and inconclusive,

and in the end, I flew home,

even more confused
than I already started out.

But that doesn’t mean
I came home empty-handed.

In the weeks leading up
to my trip to Brazil,

I mentioned my upcoming plans
to some friends

and to a couple of colleagues at Google,

where I was a lawyer at the time.

And I might have mentioned it
to a couple more people

because I’m chatty,

including my neighbor,

the guy who works at the local
coffee shop I go to each morning,

the checkout lady at Whole Foods

and a stranger who sat
next to me on the subway.

I told each of them where I was going

and why,

and I offered to carry three wishes
of theirs down to Brazil,

explaining that anyone going
to see John of God

could act as a proxy for others

and save them the trip.

And to my surprise, my in-box overflowed.

Friends told friends who told friends,

and those friends
apparently told more friends,

other strangers
and the guys at their coffee shops,

until it seemed that days
before I left for Brazil

that there was no one who did not
have my email address.

And at the time, all I could conclude
was that I had offered too much

to too many.

But when I actually reread
those messages a few years later,

I noticed something completely different.

Those emails actually shared
three commonalities,

the first of which was rather curious.

Almost everyone sent me meticulous details
about how they could be reached.

I had told them,
or their friends had told them,

that along with the list
of the three things they wanted fixed,

I needed their photo, their name
and their date of birth.

But they gave me full addresses, with,
like, apartment numbers and zip codes,

as if John of God was going
to stop by their house

and see them in person
or send along a package.

It was as if, in the highly unlikely event
that their wishes were granted

by John of God,

they just wanted to make sure
that they weren’t delivered

to the wrong person or the wrong address.

Even if they didn’t believe,

they were hedging their bets.

The second commonality
was just as curious,

but far more humbling.

Virtually everyone –

the stranger on the subway,

the guy at the coffee shop,

the lawyer down the hall,

the Jew, the atheist,
the Muslim, the devout Catholic –

all asked for essentially
the same three things.

OK, there were a couple of outliers,
and yes, a few people asked for cash.

But when I eliminated what were
ultimately a handful of anomalies,

the similarities were staggering.

Almost every single person

first asked for good health
for themselves and their families.

Almost universally,

they next asked for happiness

and then love,

in that order:

health, happiness, love.

Sometimes they asked for a specific
health issue to be fixed,

but more often than not, they just
asked for good health in general.

When it came to happiness,

they each phrased it slightly differently,

but they all asked for the same
specific subtype of happiness, too –

the kind of happiness that sinks in

and sets down roots in your soul;

the kind of happiness
that could sustain us,

even if we were to lose
absolutely everything else.

And for love,

they all asked for the kind
of romantic love,

the soul mate that we read about
in epic romantic novels,

the kind of love that will stay with us
till the end of our days.

Sorry, that’s my husband.

Crap! Now I forgot my place.

(Laughter)

(Applause)

So by and large,

all of these friends and strangers,

regardless of their background,
race or religion,

all asked for the same things,

and they were the same things
that I really wanted,

the simplified version
of the basic human needs

identified by social scientists
like Abraham Maslow and Manfred Max-Neef.

No one asked for answers
to the big existential questions

or for proof of God or the meaning of life
like I had set out to find.

They didn’t even ask for an end
to war or global hunger.

Even when they could have asked
for absolutely anything,

they all asked for health,
happiness and love.

So now those emails had
a third commonality as well.

Each of them ended in the exact same way.

Instead of thanking me for carting
their wishes all the way to Brazil,

everyone said,

“Please don’t tell anyone.”

So I decided to tell everyone –

(Laughter)

right here on this stage,

not because I’m untrustworthy,

but because the fact
that we have so much in common

feels especially important for us
all to hear, especially now,

when so many of the world’s problems

seem to be because we keep focusing
on the things that make us different,

not on what binds us together.

And look – I am the first to admit
that I am not a statistician,

and that the data I presented to you
that I just accumulated in my in-box

is more anecdotal than scientific,
more qualitative than quantitative.

It is, as anyone who works
with data would tell you,

hardly a statistically significant
or demographically balanced sample.

But nonetheless, I find myself
thinking about those emails

every time I reflect back
on the bias and prejudice

that I’ve faced in my life,

or when there’s another hate crime
or a senseless tragedy

that underscores the disheartening sense

that our differences
might be insurmountable.

I then remind myself that I have evidence

that the humbling, unifying commonality

of our humanity

is that, even when presented
with the opportunity

to ask for anything at all,

most of us want the same things,

and that this is true
no matter who we are,

what name we call our god,

or which religion, if any, we call home.

I then also note

that apparently some of us
want these things so badly

that we would email a None,

a spiritually confused None like me –

some might say otherwise
confused as well –

and that we would seek out this stranger
and email her our deepest wishes,

just in case there is
the remote possibility

that they might be granted
by someone who is not a god,

much less our god,

someone who is not even
a member of our chosen religion,

someone who, when you
look at him on paper,

seems like an unlikely
candidate to deliver.

And so now,

when I reflect back on my spiritual quest,

even though I did not find God,

I found a home in this:

even today, in a world
fractured by religious,

ethnic, political, philosophical,
and racial divides,

even with all of our obvious differences,

at the end of the day,

and the most fundamental level,

we are all the same.

Thank you.

(Applause)

几年前,

我开始了寻找上帝的使命。

现在,我要直接告诉你
我失败了

,作为一名律师

,我很难承认这一点。

但在那次失败的旅程中

,我发现很多东西很有启发性。

特别是一件事
给了我很大的希望。

这与我们差异的大小
和重要性有关。

所以,我是
由印度父母在美国长大的——在文化上是印度教,

但在印度以外实行一种严格且相对
不为人知的宗教,

称为耆那教。

为了让您了解
我是多么的少数派:

印度人
约占美国人口的 1%;

印度教徒,约 0.7%;

耆那教徒,最多 0.00046%。

把它放在上下文中:

每年参观佛蒙特
泰迪熊工厂的人


美国耆那教的追随者还要多。

再加上我的少数族裔群体,
我的父母随后决定,

“真是个好主意!
让我们送她去天主教学校”——

(笑声

)我姐姐和我
是全校唯一的非白人、


天主教学生 .

在伊利诺伊州弗洛斯莫尔的布拉格婴儿耶稣学校
——

是的,这就是它的名字——

我们被教导
相信有一个至高无上

的存在负责一切,

从创造 宇宙
到道德牧养到永生。

但在家里,

我被教导的是
完全不同的东西。

耆那教的追随者

不相信一个至高无上的存在

,甚至不相信一个至高无上的团队。

相反,我们被教导说,上帝表现

为我们每个人作为个体的完美

而我们实际上是
在用一生的时间来

努力消除

阻碍
我们成为完美自我的恶业。

最重要的是,
耆那教的核心原则之一

是所谓的“非绝对主义”。

非绝对主义者
认为,即使涉及宗教信仰,任何人

都无法拥有
绝对真理的所有权或知识

祝你在天主教学校

的牧师和修女身上测试这个概念好运

(笑声)

难怪我很困惑

,也很清楚
自己与同龄人的不同。

20 多年后

,我发现自己是
一个高度灵性的人,

但我一直在挣扎。

我在精神上无家可归。

我开始了解到我是一个“无”

,这不是首字母缩略词
或巧妙的文字游戏,

也不是其中之一。 当皮尤研究中心询问他们的宗教信仰时,

这只是


所有勾选“无”框的人一个令人痛苦的平淡无奇的名字

(笑声)

现在,关于 Nones 的一些有趣的
事情是:

我们有很多人,

而且我们偏年轻。

2014 年,美国有超过 5600 万
无宗教信仰的

无党派人士。

在 18 岁到 33 岁之间的成年人中,超过三分之一的成年人都没有。

但对我来说,最有趣的
关于 Nones

的事情是我们经常是精神上的。

事实上,我们中有 68% 的人
在一定程度上

相信有一位上帝。

我们只是不确定它是谁。

(笑声)

所以

当我意识到我是个无名小卒
并发现信息

是我并不孤单时,我的第一个收获是。

我终于成为了美国

一个有很多成员的团体的一员,

这让我感到非常放心。

但是第二个,
不太令人放心的外卖

是,哦,伙计,我们有很多人。

那可不好,

因为如果现在很多高度灵性的
人都不信神,

也许找到神就不会
像我原先希望的那么容易了。

所以那是当我
决定在我的精神之旅中,

我要避开明显的地方

,完全跳过大盒宗教

,而是冒险
进入灵

、信仰治疗师

和神人的精神边缘。

但请记住,我是一个非绝对主义者,

这意味着我很
倾向于保持相当开放的心态

,结果证明这是一件好事,

因为我去了

纽约市 LGBT 中心的女巫聚餐晚宴,

在那里我结识了两个女巫; 在秘鲁和萨满一起

喝了五加仑
装满火山水

的罐子; 在会议中心

得到了一位圣人的拥抱
——

她闻起来真香——

(笑声)

在墨西哥海滩上一个充满烟雾、热气腾腾的汗水小屋里吟唱了几个小时

与一个喝龙舌兰酒的媒体
一起召集死者

,奇怪的是,
死者包括我已故的岳母


嘻哈乐队 The Roots 的已故经理。

(笑声)

是的,我婆婆告诉我
她很高兴

她儿子选择了我做他的妻子。

呸! 但是——

(笑声)

是的。

但是 The Roots 的经理

说也许我应该减少
我吃的所有意大利面。

我想我们都同意

,我丈夫很幸运,
不是他死去的

母亲建议我减少碳水化合物。

(笑声)

我还加入了南非的一个笑瑜伽小组

目睹一个女人
有 45 分钟的高潮——

我不是编造的——

因为她
利用了宇宙的能量——

我想我会回到那里——

(笑声)

用电话给上帝打电话
内华达州沙漠火人节的展位,

穿着紧身衣和滑雪护目镜;

我有一个印度老男人
躺在我身上

,不,他不是我的丈夫。

这是一个完全陌生的人,名叫帕拉姆吉

,他在我的脉轮中吟唱,

同时他利用宇宙的能量
来治愈我的“yoni”

,这是梵语中“阴道”的意思。

(笑声)

我本来打算在这里放一张幻灯片,

但有几个人

建议我在 TED 上放一张我的 yoni 的幻灯片
——甚至是 TEDWomen——这

不是最好的主意。

(笑声)

在我探索的早期,

我还去了巴西的
信仰治疗师 John of God

在他位于巴西的院子里。

现在,上帝的约翰被认为
是一个完全恍惚的媒介,

这基本上意味着
他可以与死人交谈。

但就他而言,他声称
要引导一群非常特殊

的死去的圣徒和

医生来治愈
你的任何问题。

尽管上帝的约翰
没有医学学位

,甚至没有高中文凭,

但他实际上进行了手术

——真正的手术,用手术刀,

但没有麻醉。

是的,我不知道。

他还
提供无切口的隐形手术

和代孕手术,

据说他可以

通过对亲人进行手术来治疗数千英里外的人。

现在,当你去拜访神的约翰时,

有各种各样
的规章制度。

这是一件非常复杂的事情,

但最重要的是,
你可以拜访上帝的约翰

并向他展示
你想要修复的三件事

,他会让死去的圣徒
和医生

代表你完成工作。

(笑声)

现在,在你窃笑之前,

考虑

一下,至少根据他的网站,

超过八百万人——

包括

白天电视女神奥普拉——

已经去看了上帝的约翰

,我被预先连接到 保持开放的心态。

但老实说,整个事情对我
来说有点奇怪和不确定

,最后我飞回家了,

比开始时更加困惑。

但这并不意味着
我空手而归。


我去巴西旅行的前几周,我

向一些朋友

和谷歌的几位同事提到了我即将到来的计划,

当时我是一名律师。

而且我可能会
向更多的人提起这件事,

因为我很健谈,

包括我的邻居

、我每天早上去的当地咖啡店工作的

人、Whole Foods 的收银员

和坐在
我旁边的陌生人 在地铁上。

我告诉他们每个人我要去哪里

以及为什么

,我提出将
他们的三个愿望带到巴西,并

解释说任何要
去见上帝的约翰的人

都可以充当其他人的代理人

并节省他们的旅行。

令我惊讶的是,我的收件箱溢出了。

朋友告诉那些告诉朋友的朋友

,这些朋友
显然告诉了更多的朋友、

其他陌生人
和他们咖啡店里的人,

直到
在我去巴西的前几天,

似乎没有人不
知道我的电子邮件地址。

当时,我所能得出的结论
是,我向太多人提供了

太多。

但几年后,当我真正重读
这些信息时,

我注意到了一些完全不同的东西。

这些电子邮件实际上有
三个共同点

,其中第一个很奇怪。

几乎每个人都向我发送
了有关如何联系他们的详细信息。

我告诉他们,
或者他们的朋友告诉他们,

除了
他们想要修复的三件事的清单外,

我还需要他们的照片、姓名
和出生日期。

但他们给了我完整的地址,
比如公寓号码和邮政编码,

好像上帝的约翰会
在他们家

停下来亲自看他们
或寄一个包裹。

就好像,在极不可能的情况下
,他们的愿望得到

了上帝的约翰的认可,

他们只是想
确保他们没有被

送到错误的人或错误的地址。

即使他们不相信,

他们也在对冲他们的赌注。

第二个
共同点同样令人好奇,

但更加谦卑。

几乎每个人——

地铁上的陌生人、

咖啡店里的人、

大厅里的律师、

犹太人、无神论者
、穆斯林、虔诚的天主教徒——

都要求
基本相同的三件事。

好的,有几个异常值
,是的,有几个人要现金。

但是当我消除了
最终的少数异常时

,相似之处是惊人的。

几乎每个人

首先
要求自己和家人身体健康。

几乎普遍地,

他们接下来要求幸福

,然后是爱

,顺序是:

健康、幸福、爱。

有时他们要求解决特定的
健康问题,

但更多时候,他们只是
要求总体健康。

当谈到幸福时,

他们每个人的措辞都略有不同,

但他们都要求同样
特定的幸福亚型

——那种沉入

并在你的灵魂中扎根的幸福;

那种可以支撑我们的幸福,

即使我们将
完全失去其他一切。

而对于爱情,

他们都要求
那种浪漫的爱情,

我们
在史诗浪漫小说中读到的灵魂伴侣

,那种会一直陪伴
我们直到生命尽头的爱情。

对不起,那是我的丈夫。

废话! 现在我忘记了我的位置。

(笑声)

(掌声)

所以总的来说,

所有这些朋友和陌生人,

无论他们的背景、
种族或宗教,

都要求同样的

东西,他们都是
我真正想要的东西

,简化版


亚伯拉罕·马斯洛和曼弗雷德·马克斯-尼夫等社会科学家确定的基本人类需求。

没有人像我开始寻找的那样要求对
存在的重大问题

或对上帝或生命意义的证明的答案

他们甚至没有要求
结束战争或全球饥饿。

即使他们完全可以
要求任何东西,

但他们都要求健康、
幸福和爱。

所以现在这些电子邮件也
有了第三个共性。

他们每个人都以完全相同的方式结束。 大家都没有

感谢我把
他们的愿望一路带到巴西,而是

说:

“请不要告诉任何人。”

所以我决定在这个舞台上告诉所有人——

(笑声

),

不是因为我不值得信任,

而是
因为我们有这么多共同点

对我们所有人来说都感觉特别重要
,尤其是现在,

当有这么多 世界上的问题

似乎是因为我们一直
关注使我们与众不同的事物,

而不是把我们联系在一起的事物。

看 - 我是第一个
承认我不是统计学家的人,

而且我刚刚在收件箱中积累的数据

更多的是轶事而不是科学,
更多的是定性而不是定量。

正如任何
使用数据的人都会告诉你的那样,它

几乎不是一个具有统计意义
或人口平衡的样本。

但尽管如此,

每当我回

想起我在生活中所面临的偏见和偏见

时,或者当有另一起仇恨犯罪
或一场毫无意义的

悲剧突显

出我们之间的差异
可能无法克服的令人沮丧的感觉时,我都会发现自己在思考这些电子邮件 .

然后我提醒自己,我有证据

表明,我们人性的谦卑、统一的共同点

是,即使

机会要求任何东西

,我们大多数人都想要同样的东西,无论我们

是谁,这都是真的
是,

我们称之为我们的上帝的名字

,或者我们称之为家的宗教,如果有的话。

然后我还注意到

,显然我们中的一些人
非常想要这些东西,

以至于我们会通过电子邮件发送一个无,

一个像我这样的精神困惑的人——

有些人可能会说否则
也会感到困惑

——我们会找到这个陌生人
并给她发电子邮件 最深切的愿望,

以防万一

他们可能会
被一个不是上帝的人授予,

更不用说我们的上帝了,

一个甚至不是
我们选择的宗教成员的

人,一个当你
看着他时 纸,

似乎不太
可能交付。

所以现在,

当我回想我的精神追求时,

即使我没有找到上帝,

我也找到了一个家:

即使在今天,在一个
因宗教、

种族、政治、哲学
和种族分歧而分裂的世界里,

即使 我们所有明显的差异

,归根结底

,在最基本的层面上,

我们都是一样的。

谢谢你。

(掌声)