Theory and Theology The Overdue Collaboration

[Music]

when faced with two choices

how do you come to a decision what

factors you consider important

maybe you get a gut feeling or make a

pro con list

or maybe you use logic or listen to your

emotions

my first significant decision dates back

to 2005

when i was a year old in traditional

korean culture

a baby’s first birthday is celebrated

with a big party

the main event is when the baby picks an

item from a selection

that represents different

characteristics or achievements for the

future

so there might be a ball for athleticism

a long string for a long life

or even a pencil for intellect so you

can imagine the commotion as people

tried to get me to pick a certain item

they favored

every time i would reach out to grab

something there’d be an uproar

and i’d get scared and pull back

eventually i did end up choosing the

stack of cash so i’m waiting a couple

years for that wealth to kick in

but even as a baby i struggled to make a

choice

every time i would make up my mind

something would disrupt that thought and

turn me another direction

this is precisely how i felt approaching

science as a catholic

about three years ago i heard a sermon

on the holiness of the human person

i found this really compelling the bible

teaches that all human beings are made

in the image of god

this makes us perfect and holy and

different from the rest of god’s

creation

a couple months later my biology teacher

introduced me to the concept of genetic

engineering

this is the practice of altering an

organism’s genetic makeup

this technology can make humans

healthier and even more

stronger faster and fitter i thought

that’s really cool and then i paused

hold on if we’re so perfect and so holy

made in the image of god what’s holding

us

back from making changes why are we at

liberty to create these changes

but at the same time if we have the

means to make humans lives

healthier or easier what’s holding us

back from doing so

growing up catholic i learned about many

principles that would guide me in

everyday life

when i say catholic i mean that pretty

seriously baptism at four

first commune at seven confirmation at

14 which is

by far the worst age to have any extra

oil on your forehead

but that’s an issue for another time

so i began my faith journey very early

on one of the first things i remember

learning about

is the book of genesis this book teaches

that

god created the entire universe in six

days i didn’t question this

at all i took it as fact but can you

expect otherwise from

an eight-year-old however as a kid i was

also a big reader

i read a lot all the time and wherever i

could

and eventually i came across this

concept known as the big bang theory

this theory states that the universe

began as a single point that expanded

with immense force

again i was puzzled how could there be

two explanations for one event

was the big bang a work of god maybe

if so why wasn’t it in the bible story

since then i’ve had many science versus

religion moments

i thought i’d have to choose or

prioritize one worldview over the other

however i came to a realization when i

had this epiphany

science deals with the natural world the

physical and religion deals with the

supernatural

and the spiritual now neither fit

perfectly into these boxes

but recognizing that they play different

roles is a good starting point

there are issues that arise when one

discipline makes claims over events

outside of its usual sphere for example

that genesis story about the creation of

the universe

when taken literally as it’s often

taught this

bible passage goes against many proven

theories in

astronomy or ecology but now we’re

talking about more than light

or water or plants things only become

more complicated when human beings get

involved the bible teaches that the

first humans adam and eve

were present at the beginning of the

earth but darwin’s theory of evolution

teaches that all living things

including humans undergo changes through

natural selection

in fourth grade i got hooked in this

documentary tv series called walking

with dinosaurs

there are a lot of weird-looking

creatures in this show and i enjoyed

watching them

until i realized that the narrator kept

referring to them as our ancestors

our ancestors what did he mean our

the creatures in the screen looked

nothing like me or adam or eve

so i came up with some wild berries

was the biblical adam a carbon atom

maybe

or was eve bacteria thankfully i’ve

learned a couple things since

fourth grade in my sophomore year here

at saint francis i learned that the old

testament often uses metaphors

to convey a message or a theme we cannot

take

everything literally so maybe the

prophet jonah did spend

three days and three nights inside of a

whale but the major takeaway of that

story

is not lung capacity but unconditional

faith

we must learn to interpret what we read

the bible does not always seek to inform

us about the workings of the universe

it is also meant to guide your

spirituality

so we know that science and religion are

not at odds they play different roles

dictating different areas of our world

but i’m going to go further and say that

there is potential for collaboration

here

at a basic level there’s a great deal of

common ground both seek to provide a

better understanding of our world and

how it came to be

moving forward they both want to improve

humanity and its impact

so why is it so hard to create this

partnership

the crucial difference between science

and religion lie in their

modes of thinking this is where my

lifelong internal conflict began

with the fundamental differences between

the ways that science and religion

taught me how to think

the scientific method teaches us to test

ideas over and over again

and collect hard data the thought of

believing something without direct

of evidence is a sin in the scientific

world

but as a catholic that’s precisely what

i do

i put my trust in a higher power and i

take faith in miracles that i’ve never

actually witnessed another important

difference between science and religion

are the timelines that they occur on

while religion has remained consistent

for thousands and thousands of years

centuries ago scientific ideas were

explained very differently

for example the earth was the center of

the universe

if there was a storm it meant the gods

were angry

so while science has progressed

exponentially since then

religion has persisted and while we’ve

come

a long way since sundials i do have to

give ancient civilizations some kudos

they placed science and religion in the

same context for them there was no

divide

and here at saint francis this catholic

school our religion and scientific

education come hand in hand

maybe you begin biology class with

intentions

or walk from physics to moral issues or

maybe you find these prayer hands coming

out before a chem test

i find the duality really enriching and

evidently thought provoking

so partnering science and religion in

the real world could very well be

worthwhile

and effective because in truth neither

holds all the answers science can give

us the what

and the how but it can’t give us the why

and that why is crucial while knowledge

certainly is

power by itself it’s not quite enough we

need meaning and we need purpose for the

things that we put our energy into

and religion can give us that as can

philosophy or ethics

my point is science and religion alone

cannot stand as strong as they could

together

i don’t deny that this partnership will

be difficult religious views

and scientific advances are becoming

increasingly politicized

in the current cobit 19 pandemic

protocols such as wearing a mask

or getting the vaccine are polarizing

people

often the reasoning against

science-backed safety measures is

religious

whether it’s about complete dependence

in a higher power or

questioning of the vaccine is ethical

these views take religion to an extreme

without considering the overarching

principles of empathy or safety

science offers things that religion

cannot the facts the figures

and the constant revision and vice versa

religion can offer us deeper meaning why

are we putting our time and our energy

into these endeavors

and should we be

using both principles of science and

religion lets us have a greater impact

on our constantly changing worlds

if we recognize truth in both we can

finally create

this long overdue collaboration thank

you

you

[音乐]

当面临两种选择时,

您如何做出决定

您认为重要的因素

可能是您有直觉或

列出利弊清单,

或者您使用逻辑或倾听您的

情绪

我的第一个重要决定可以

追溯到 2005 年

当我一岁的时候,在

韩国传统文化中

,婴儿的一岁生日会

举行一个盛大的派对来庆祝,

主要事件是当婴儿

代表未来不同

特征或成就的选择中挑选一件物品时,

可能会有一个运动球

一根长长的绳子代表长寿

,甚至是一根铅笔代表智力,所以你

可以想象人们

试图让我挑选他们喜欢的某件物品时的骚动,

每次我伸手去拿

东西时都会引起轩然大波

,我 我会害怕并最终退缩,

我最终确实选择了

一堆现金,所以我等了

几年才能获得这笔财富,

但即使是婴儿,我每次都会努力做出

选择

下定决心

某事会打乱我的想法

让我转向另一个方向

这正是我

以天主教徒的身份接近科学的感觉

大约三年前我听到了一篇

关于人类圣洁的布道

我发现这真的很有说服力 圣经

教导所有 人类是

按照上帝的形象造的

这使我们变得完美而神圣

几个月后我的生物老师

向我介绍了基因工程的概念

这是改变

生物体基因构成的实践

这项技术 可以使人类

更健康,更

强壮,更快,更健康 我认为

这真的很酷,然后我

暂停了,如果我们是按照上帝的形象如此完美和如此神圣

,是什么阻碍了

我们

做出改变 为什么我们可以

自由 创造这些变化,

但与此同时,如果我们有

办法让人类生活

更健康或更轻松,是什么阻碍了我们

成长 天主教我学到了许多

指导我日常生活的原则,

当我说天主教时,我的意思是非常

严肃的四点

洗礼,七点确认,

14

岁,这是迄今为止额头上多余油的最糟糕的年龄,

但那是 再发一次,

所以我很早就开始了我的信仰之旅

,我记得最早学到的东西之一

是创世记这本书教导

上帝在六天内创造了整个宇宙

我完全没有质疑

这个我接受了 事实上,但你能从

一个 8 岁的孩子那里得到不同的期望吗?然而,作为一个孩子,我

也是一个大

读者 说宇宙

开始时是一个单点,再次

以巨大的力量膨胀

我很困惑,为什么

对一个事件有两种解释,

大爆炸是上帝的杰作,

如果是这样,为什么圣经里没有

从那以后,我经历了许多科学与

宗教的

对比时刻 超自然

和精神现在都不

完全适合这些盒子,

但认识到它们扮演不同的

角色是一个很好的起点

从字面上看宇宙,因为它经常被

教导 这段

圣经经文违背了天文学或生态学中许多经过验证的

理论,

但现在我们

谈论的不仅仅是光

、水或植物,只有

当人类参与其中时,事情才会变得更加复杂

,圣经教导说,

第一个人类亚当和

夏娃出现在地球的开始,

但达尔文的

进化论告诉我们

包括人类在内的所有生物都会

在四年级时通过自然选择而发生变化我迷上了这部名为与恐龙同行的

纪录片电视连续剧

中有很多长相怪异的

生物,我很喜欢

看它们,

直到我意识到叙述者一直

将他们称为我们的祖先

我们的祖先 他是什么意思 我们

屏幕上的生物看起来

不像我或亚当或夏娃

所以我想出了一些野生

浆果 圣经中的亚当 可能是碳原子

或者是夏娃细菌 谢天谢地我已经

自从

我在圣弗朗西斯大学二年级的四年级以来学到了一些东西

我了解到

旧约经常使用隐喻

来传达一个信息或一个主题我们不能

从字面上理解一切所以也许

约拿先知确实在

里面度过了三天三夜 一条

鲸鱼,但这个故事的主要

内容不是肺活量,而是无条件的

信仰,

我们必须学会解释我们读到

的圣经所做的事情 并不总是试图告诉

我们宇宙的运作

它也意味着引导你的

灵性,

所以我们知道科学和宗教

并不矛盾,它们扮演着不同的角色,

决定着我们世界的不同领域,

但我会走得更远, 说

这里有基本的合作潜力

有很多

共同点 双方都在寻求

更好地了解我们的世界以及

它是如何

向前发展的 他们都想改善

人类及其影响 那

为什么 很难建立这种

伙伴

关系科学和宗教之间的关键区别

在于他们

的思维方式这是我

终生的内部冲突开始的地方

科学和宗教

教我如何

思考科学方法教我们测试的方式之间的根本差异

一遍又一遍的想法

并收集确凿的数据 在

没有直接证据的情况下相信某事的想法

是科学

工作中的罪过 ld

但作为一个天主教徒,这正是

我所做的,

我相信更高的权力,

我相信我从未

真正目睹过

的奇迹

几千年来,

科学思想的

解释非常不同

,例如地球是宇宙的中心,

如果有风暴,就意味着

众神生气了,

所以虽然科学

从那时起呈指数级

发展,但宗教一直存在,而我们

自从日晷以来,我已经取得了长足的

进步

带着意图开始生物课

或从物理走向道德问题,

或者你可能会发现这些祈祷之手

在化学测试之前,

我发现二元性真的很丰富,而且

显然发人深省,

因此在现实世界中合作科学和宗教

很可能是

值得

和有效的,因为事实上两者都没有

科学可以给

我们什么

和如何做的所有答案,但是 它不能告诉我们为什么

,为什么是至关重要的,而知识

本身就是力量,

我们需要意义和目的是不够的,我们需要为

我们投入精力的事情

和宗教可以给我们,

哲学或 伦理

我的观点是,单靠科学和宗教

不能像它们一样强大

疫苗

常常使人们两极分化反对

科学支持的安全措施的理由是

宗教性的,

是否完全取决于

获得更高权力或

质疑疫苗是合乎道德的

这些观点将宗教带到了极端,

而没有考虑

移情或安全的总体原则

这意味着

我们为什么要把时间和精力

投入到这些努力

中,我们是否应该同时

使用科学和宗教原则,

如果我们认识到两者中的真相,我们可以对我们不断变化的世界产生更大的影响,我们

最终可以创造

这个早就应该合作的合作谢谢

你你