How collaboration can enhance public support of renewable energy

it’s

2021 and we are watching our world

burn literally

our fossil fuel intensive lifestyles

increasing global temperatures

which is leading to changes in our

hydrologic systems

and atmospheric circulation the altar

conditions will continue to amplify

temperature extremes drought flooding

and storms and the consequences of

climate change

are not only detrimental to ecosystems

but also jeopardize

infrastructure agricultural production

clean water access

energy access and human health

disproportionately affecting low-income

communities

and people of color this is the future

that my generation and generations to

come have been dealt

and if actions aren’t taken now to

change the course that we’re headed

we will have to live with the

irreversible damage

and that’s not a fate i’m ready to

accept

fortunately there is hope on the horizon

renewable technologies such as onshore

wind turbines and photovoltaic solar

arrays are well

established solutions that can

decarbonize our energy sector

and work toward mitigating climate

change

so far hundreds of local governments and

almost 15

states have committed to powering their

communities with 100 renewable energy

the aspiration for a zero emission grid

has even been discussed at the national

level

unfortunately there are many challenges

that still need to be

understood and addressed to bring this

goal to fruition

one of increasing importance that i’m

going to shed light on today

is a lack of support from host needs

research has shown that wind and solar

energy

are accepted by the public in theory but

encounter

project impeding resistance during

development

states all over the u.s have experienced

postponements or cancellations of

renewable energy projects due to public

opposition

this discrepancy between high support

for renewable energy in a general sense

and a low support for renewable energy

on the ground

is described as the social gap

evidence that suggests that the social

gap results from project proposal

proposals failing to meet people’s

conditions for acceptable development

which usually entail context-specific

measures that limit

impacts on the local residents and

environment

incompatible project proposals can be

linked back to the reliance on

conventional public processes

that tend to put the community members

in the backseat of decision making

not allowing them to tailor the project

to meet their qualifications

instead the process typically involves

government officials working on the

sidelines with renewable energy

developers

to make a decision announce it to the

public

and then defend any criticisms that come

forth

community members can get frustrated by

this approach because there’s no real

opportunity to contribute

by the time they are invited to get

involved the decision has already been

made

and more often than not it’s an outcome

that is best suited

for the officials and developers and

less so for the public

this decide announced defend model is a

manifestation of hierarchical decision

making that

superficially permits public input

citizens that are unable to meaningfully

participate in the public process

may take drastic measures such as

protests petitions or even

legal actions to get their voice heard

not only

is this unproductive because it can

derail

progress towards a clean energy future

but it can also cause

community division and distrust in

leaders

the thing is it doesn’t have to be this

way

most decision makers just follow this

format because it’s the minimum they

have to do

to involve the public according to the

law

but they can and should do more

the public process needs to be revamped

to put the community members in the

driver’s seat so that they

can set the bar for the type of

renewable development that they prefer

or at least willing to live with gratia

county michigan

has turned this idea into reality

in the summer of 2012 133 wind turbines

went online in the county

spain over 30 000 acres of agricultural

land

though the gratiot county wind firm is

the largest wind farm in michigan to

date

it is also one of the most highly

supported projects in the state

the story of gratiot county starts and

ends in collaboration

ever since the 1970s gratiot county has

engaged residents

businesses and municipalities to come

together and efficiently plan strategies

to promote economic development

the 2008 recession hit the area

particularly hard which had the

county scrambling to find ways to

improve the local economy

at the same time the wind industry in

the u.s was booming

seeing a potential opportunity county

officials reverted to their

collaborative routes

to start a conversation with the greater

community to see if

and how wind energy could fit in ratchet

as this idea was considered consultants

were brought in to provide people with

as

much information as possible to clarify

unknowns

or resolve misunderstandings about wind

energy the community

expressed interest in potentially having

a wind farm in the area

but not unconditionally the government

officials were cognizant of this as they

move forward in creating a win zoning

ordinance

making the process fully transparent to

identify

and accommodate any public concerns

widespread notices for the ordinance

meetings were made through newspapers

radio and the internet plus the county

leveraged its connections with the

townships and chamber of commerce to

further spread the word

this widely disseminated information

grabbed people’s attention

and resulted in 300 or more citizens

showing up at any one of the 20-plus

meetings

each one of these individuals was given

the opportunity to help craft the wind

ornaments

participants self-organized into groups

on topics that they cared about

and were responsible for coming up with

recommendations

the products of this were the driving

influence for what the executive

committee of planning

turned into a legitimate zoning

ordinance and not long after the

ordinance was finalized

the aforementioned gracious county wind

farm was proposed and unanimously

approved

by the four townships it spanned

in the spirit of community engagement

every resident in the project area was

presented the chance to partake in a

pooling easement

which pretty much granted participants a

lease payment even if they did not host

a wind turbine on their property

this initiative was well received with

250 families volunteering to sign up

needless to say the launching of gracie

county’s

first wind farm was a huge success wind

energy has become a part of the

community’s pride

ever since so much so that there has

been a welcome

expansion of even more wind farms over

time

currently gratiot county has 345 wind

turbines and counting

now the actions of this rural michigan

community

offer three key lessons about how to

implement an effective

public process first

is start early in this case people were

encouraged to actively participate in

the creation of the win zoning ordinance

setting the regulations for wind

development is the earliest part of the

decision making process

and this is where citizens need to be

heavily involved

because at this stage citizens can

affect change

allowing the community to essentially

reflect their conditions for renewable

energy development into the rule of the

land

is the best way to send a clear message

to developers

about exactly what kind of projects the

community will accept

not only does this practice safeguard

the community from ill-suited projects

but it also prevents developers from

wasting time and resources

on a proposal that may be a lost cause

second is get participants

in gratia county there were hundreds of

people that were engaged early on

the more voices at the table the more

perspectives that can be considered in

the decision-making which can lead to

better outcomes

the high volume of participants was a

result of government officials doing

more than just the legal requirements

for public notice

they broadcast opportunities for

involvement through every avenue that

they knew had

this increased awareness raising helped

increase attendance

government officials that are willing to

get creative and go beyond the business

as usual methods will likely have a

better

turnout and third empower

the community ratchet county leaders put

the public in charge from

the get-go citizens had decision-making

roles of their choosing that allowed

them to shape elements of the wind

ornaments

not only did they have ownership of

those decisions but they also had a

physical sense of ownership

by signing up for the pulling easement

people who have some sort of personal

tie to a project are more likely to want

to see it succeed

not to mention that the main critique of

the standard public meeting format

is that the public can provide input but

nothing

is immediately done with it so instead

giving people a voice and acting on it

can make all the difference for how the

community perceives the project outcomes

as well as the local leaders

now just to be clear the use of

collaborative public processes may have

little effect on those who are

ideologically opposed to renewable

energy

instead these processes can help

proactively identify people’s

pre-existing notions of good energy

projects

and avoid finding out the hard way what

people won’t tolerate

grass accounting demonstrates a shining

example of how to make the most out of

the public process

by shifting away from the mindset of

what do i have to do toward

what is going to work and what works for

community engagement and renewable

energy siding

must be explored and taught by academics

supported by politicians implemented by

practitioners

and demanded by the public

in doing so we will no longer be just

spectators of climate change

but rather we’ll be the ones putting out

the fire

thank you

现在是

2021 年,我们正在目睹我们的世界

燃烧

我们的化石燃料密集型生活方式,

全球气温升高

,这导致我们的

水文系统

和大气环流发生变化,祭坛

条件将继续加剧

极端温度,干旱洪水

和风暴以及气候变化的后果

是 不仅对生态系统有害,

而且危及

基础设施 农业生产

清洁水的获取

能源获取和人类健康

严重影响低收入

社区

和有色人种 如果不采取行动

,这就是我们这一代和未来

几代人的未来

现在要

改变我们前进的方向,

我们将不得不忍受

不可逆转的损害

,这不是命运我已经准备好

接受

幸运的是,希望在地平线上

可再生技术,如陆上

风力涡轮机和光伏太阳能电池

阵列都很好

既定的解决方案,可以

加强我们的能源部门

并努力缓解气候

变化

迄今为止,数百个地方政府和

近 15

个州已承诺

用 100 种可再生能源为其社区供电

甚至在国家层面上讨论了零排放电网的愿望

不幸的是,存在许多挑战

仍然需要

了解和解决这一

目标以实现

这一目标 我今天要阐明的一个日益重要的问题

是缺乏东道主需求的支持

研究表明,风能和太阳能

已被公众接受 理论,但

在发展过程中遇到项目阻碍

美国各地的

可再生能源项目都因公众

反对

而推迟或取消

作为社会差距的

证据表明, 社会

差距是由于项目

建议书未能满足人们

可接受的发展条件

而导致的,这通常需要

针对当地居民和

环境

不相容的项目建议书限制对当地居民的影响的特定环境措施,这可能

与对传统公共程序的依赖联系起来,这些

程序往往会将 处于决策后座的社区成员

不允许他们调整项目

以满足他们的资格,

而是该过程通常涉及

政府官员

与可再生能源开发商一起在场边工作,

以做出决定向公众宣布

,然后为任何批评进行辩护

社区成员可能会对这种方法感到沮丧,

因为在他们被邀请参与时没有真正的

机会做出贡献

决定已经

做出

,而且通常

这是最

适合官员和开发人员的结果,并且

不太适合 公众

这个决定宣布的捍卫模式

是分级决策的一种表现形式

表面上允许公众输入

无法有意义地

参与公共过程的公民

可能会采取激烈的措施,例如

抗议请愿甚至

法律行动来让他们的声音被听到。

这是徒劳的,因为它可能会

破坏

向清洁能源未来发展的进程,

但它也可能导致

社区分裂和对

领导者

的不信任问题是它不一定要这样

大多数决策者只需遵循这种

格式,因为这是他们必须做的最低限度

让公众依法参与,

但他们可以而且应该做更多

的公共程序需要改进

,让社区成员

坐在驾驶座上,这样他们

就可

以为他们喜欢或至少为他们喜欢的可再生发展类型设定标准

愿意和 gratia 一起生活

密歇根州

2012 年夏天将这个想法变成了现实 133 风 t

urbines 在西班牙县上线

超过 30,000 英亩的农业

用地

虽然 gratiot 县风电公司是密歇根州

迄今为止最大的风电场,

但它也是

该州最受支持的项目

之一 gratiot 县的故事开始和

结束

自 1970 年代以来,格拉蒂奥特县一直在合作,

让居民

企业和市政当局

齐心协力,有效地规划

促进经济发展

的战略 2008 年的经济衰退对该地区的打击

尤为严重,

该县正忙于寻找

改善当地经济

的方法 美国的风能

行业正在蓬勃发展,

看到一个潜在的机会县

官员恢复了他们的

合作路线

,开始与更大的社区进行对话,

看看

风能是否以及如何适应棘轮,

因为这个想法被认为是聘请顾问

来为人们提供

尽可能多的信息来澄清

未知数

或解决 对风能的误解

社区

表示有兴趣

在该地区建立风电场,

但并非无条件地政府

官员意识到这一点,因为

他们正在制定一个双赢分区

条例,

使该过程完全透明,以

识别

和解决任何公众关注的问题

通过报纸

广播和网络广泛宣传政令会议,该县

利用与

乡镇和商会的联系

进一步

传播信息,这一广泛传播的信息

引起了人们的关注

,导致300多名市民

到场。 在 20

多次会议中的

一次,这些人中的每一个人

都有机会帮助制作风

饰品

参与者

根据他们关心的主题自行组织成小组,

并负责

提出建议

其产品是推动

影响 执行什么

规划委员会

变成了一个合法的分区

条例,在

条例

定稿后不久,上述仁慈县风

电场被提出并

得到了四个乡镇的一致批准,

本着社区参与的精神,

项目区的每一位居民都被

提交了 有机会参与

集体地役权

即使他们没有

在他们的财产上安装风力涡轮机,也几乎可以向参与者支付租金

这一倡议受到了

250 个家庭的好评,他们自愿报名,

不用说格雷西

县的

第一个风电场的启动 风能取得了巨大的成功,从那时起,

风能就成为社区骄傲的一部分,

以至于

随着时间的推移,更多的风电场得到了可喜的扩展,

目前格拉蒂奥特县有 345 台风

力涡轮机,

现在正在计算这个密歇根州农村社区的行动

提供有关如何

实施有效的

公共专业人士的三个关键课程 cess first

是在这种情况下尽早开始,

鼓励人们积极

参与制定Win zoning条例

,制定风能

发展法规是决策过程的最早部分

,这是公民需要

积极参与的地方,

因为在此 阶段公民可以

影响变化

允许社区从本质

上将他们的可再生

能源开发条件反映到土地规则中

是向开发商发出明确信息的最佳方式,

即社区将接受什么样的项目,

这种做法不仅可以保障

社区免受不适合的项目的影响,

但它也可以防止开发商

在可能失败的提案上浪费时间和资源

第二个是

在 gratia 县获得参与者 有数百

人在早期参与

了更多的声音

在决策中可以考虑的更多观点

可以带来更好的

结果 r

结果 参与人数众多是

因为政府官员所做的

不仅仅是法律要求

的公告,

他们

通过他们知道的每一种途径传播参与机会,

提高认识有助于

增加出席率

愿意发挥创造力的政府官员

超越常规方法 可能会有

更好的

投票率 第三

赋予社区权力 棘轮县领导人

从一开始就让公众负责

装饰品

他们不仅拥有

这些决定的所有权,而且通过签署拉动地役权他们也有一种

身体上的所有权感 与

项目有某种个人联系的人更有可能

希望看到它成功

更不用说

对标准公开会议形式的主要批评

是公众可以提供我 输入,

但没有立即采取任何行动,因此

让人们发表意见并采取行动

可以对

社区如何看待项目成果

以及当地领导人

现在产生重大影响,只是为了清楚使用

协作公共流程可能有

对那些在

意识形态上反对可再生

能源的人影响不大,

相反,这些过程可以帮助

主动识别人们

预先存在的良好能源项目的概念,

并避免找出人们不能容忍的艰难方式

草会计展示

了如何制作的光辉榜样 必须由学者探索和教授,由从业者实施的政治家支持的学者探索和教授,

我必须做什么转变

为将要做什么以及什么对

社区参与和可再生

能源壁板有效的思维方式,从而最大限度地利用公共过程

公众要求

我们这样做,我们将不再只是

气候变化的旁观者,

而是 那么我们将

成为灭火的人,

谢谢