What if a US presidential candidate refuses to concede after an election Van Jones

Transcriber: Ivana Korom
Reviewer: Joanna Pietrulewicz

OK, as an attorney,
as a political commentator,

and frankly, as a former
White House official,

I used to think I knew a lot

about how America picks a president.

I was wrong, I did not know.

And this year,

I’ve been doing some research
into some of the fine print

and all the different things
in our constitution

that we never talk about,

and I’ve discovered some legal loopholes

that shocked me,

I guarantee will shock you,

and could determine the way

that the presidential election
of 2020 turns out.

For instance, did you know
that under our constitution

a presidential candidate
could actually lose the popular vote,

fail to get a majority
in the electoral college,

refuse to concede,

manipulate hidden mechanisms
in our government

and still get sworn in as the president
of the United States of America?

That’s a true fact.

I know it sounds like some crazy
“House of Cards” episode,

and I wish it was,

because then we could just
change the channel,

but I just described to you
a real-world, real-life possibility

that could occur this year,
the year I’m talking, in 2020,

or in some other year,

if we don’t fix some of these
glitches in our system.

So if you think, though,

that the American people’s choice
in a US presidential election

should actually be sworn in
to become president of the United States,

please pay attention to this talk.

I’m going to teach you
how to stop a coup, OK?

Now, where to begin?

Alright, how about this:

It turns out that one of the main
safeguards of US democracy

is not in the constitution at all.

It’s not in the law at all.

It’s actually just a little tradition,
it’s a little custom.

And yet, this one voluntary gesture

is one of the main reasons

that you almost never have riots
and bloodshed and strife

after a US election.

What I’m talking about
is a concession speech.

OK, it’s ironic,

it’s the one speech no presidential
candidate ever wants to give,

and yet, it is that public address

that is most important for the health

and the well-being of our nation.

It’s that speech, you know,
when a presidential contender gives,

it’s after the advisers come
and the media tells them,

“Look, you’re not going
to get enough votes

to be able to hit that magic number
of 270 electoral college votes.

You’re just not going to get there.”

At that moment –

you don’t think about this,

but the fate of the entire republic

is in the hands of a single politician

and their willingness to walk out there

and stand in front of their family
and stand in front of the cameras

and stand in front of the whole nation

and say, “I am conceding
the race, voluntarily.

Thank you to my supporters.

The other person has won now,
congratulations to them,

let’s unite behind them,
let’s move on, let’s be one country.

God bless America.”

You’ve seen it a thousand times.

Make no mistake,

this is a remarkable tradition
in our country.

Because at that moment,

that candidate still has at her command

a nationwide army of campaign activists,

of die-hard partisans,

tens of thousands of people.

They could just as easily take up arms,

take to the streets,

they could do whatever they want to.

But that concession speech
instantly demobilizes all of them.

It says, “Hey, guys, stand down.

Folks, it’s over.”

Moreover, that concession speech

helps the tens of millions of people
who voted for that person

to accept the outcome.

Acknowledge the winner,
however begrudgingly,

and then just get up the next morning,

go to work, go to school,

maybe disappointed

but not disloyal to America’s government.

And even more importantly,

that concession speech
has a technical function

in that it kind of allows
all the other stuff

that our constitution requires
after the voting,

and there are a bunch of steps like,

you’ve got the electoral college
that has got to meet,

you’ve got Congress
who’s got to ratify this thing,

you’ve got an inauguration to be had,

all that stuff can just move ahead
on automatic pilot

because after the concession speech,

every subsequent step

to either reinstate the president
or elevate a new president

just happens on a rubber-stamp basis.

The constitution requires it,
but it’s a rubber stamp.

But we sometimes forget,
candidates do not have to concede.

There’s nothing that makes them concede.

It’s just a norm in a year
in which nothing is normal.

So what if a losing candidate
simply refuses to concede?

What if there is no concession speech?

Well, what could happen might terrify you.

I think it should.

First, to give you
the background,

let’s make sure
we’re on the same page,

let me give you this analogy.

Think about a presidential election
as a baseball game.

The end of the ninth inning,

whoever is ahead wins,
whoever is behind loses.

That’s baseball.

But could you imagine
a different world

in which, in baseball,

there were actually 13 innings,
or 14 innings, not just nine.

But we just had a weird tradition.

If you are behind in the ninth inning,

you just come out and concede.

Alright?

So all those other innings don’t matter.

That’s really how the presidential
elections work in America.

Because the constitution
actually spells out

two different sets of innings.

You’ve got the popular election process
that everybody pays attention to.

And then you’ve got
the elite selection process

that everybody essentially ignores.

But in a close election,

if nobody concedes,

the second invisible process,

these extra innings if you will,

they actually matter a whole lot.

Let me explain.

That first set of innings,
popular election,

it’s what you think about

when you think about
the presidential election.

It’s the primaries,
the caucuses, the debates,

the conventions, it’s election night,

it’s all that stuff.

Most of the time,
the loser on election night

at that point just concedes.

Why? “The American people have spoken.”

All that.

But according to the constitution,
the game is technically not over.

After the cameras go away,

after the confetti’s swept away,

the constitution requires
this whole other set of innings.

This elite selection process stuff,

and this is all behind closed doors,

it’s among government officials.

And this process goes from the end
of the vote counting in November,

through December all the way
and then January.

You just never think about it,

because for so many generations,

these extra innings haven’t mattered much

because the election-night
loser just concedes.

So this other stuff is just a formality.

Even in 2000,

vice president Al Gore gave up

as soon as the Supreme Court
ordered an end to the vote counting.

Gore did not continue the fight
into the state legislatures,

into the electoral college,

into Congress,

he didn’t try to discredit
the results in the press.

Frankly, he didn’t send his supporters
out into the streets

with protest signs

or pitchforks or long guns.

As soon as the court said
the vote count is done,

he just conceded to George W. Bush.

Because that’s what we do,

that’s just kind of how
we do things around here.

You don’t fight in the extra innings.

Until maybe 2020,

when one major candidate is already saying

he may not accept the results
of the vote counting.

Curse you 2020.

So what can happen instead?

Instead of conceding,

a losing candidate could launch
a ferocious fight to grab power anyway.

Or to hold onto power anyway.

In the courts, yes.

But also in the state houses,
electoral college, even in Congress.

They could file, for instance,
dozens of lawsuits

attempting to block the counting
of millions of, like, mail-in ballots,

saying they should all be thrown out,
they’re all fraudulent.

Then, they could demand

that the states refuse
to certify the election

because of all this alleged fraud,

or interference from a foreign power.

Or the loser’s party could send
a rival slate of electors

to the electoral college or to Congress,

and say, “We’re the real electors,”

and create a whole situation with that.

Any of this stuff could create such a mess

in the electoral college and the Congress,

that the whole matter just winds up
in front of the House of Representatives

for the first time since the 1800s.

Now, here’s where it gets totally crazy.

If the presidential election
winds up in the House of Representatives,

they don’t have to pay any attention
at all to the popular vote

or the electoral vote.

It’s like the election never happened.

And then it gets even crazier.

The final tally in the House
is taken not by delegates

but by delegation.

In other words,

individual congresspeople
don’t get to vote.

It’s done by states.

Now, get your head wrapped around this.

In 2020, the majority of Americans
live in blue states,

but there are more red states.

So there’s a possibility

that the Republicans
in the House of Representatives

could just anoint
their candidate to be president,

even without the popular vote,

or a majority in electoral college.

That could happen.

Now some people would call that outcome

a perfectly legal,

perfectly constitutional coup

against the very idea
of majority rule in the United States.

That is possible under our constitution,

and it can happen this year.

So what can you do about it?

OK now, keep in mind,

if the margin of the victory
is so massive,

it’s truly massive,

the losing candidate’s political party
is going to walk away

and just let their leader go down.

Nobody is going to risk
a constitutional crisis

to save somebody who is super unpopular.

But if the race is close,

all bets are off.

And then the fight could continue
long past election night.

You could be, you know,
trying to deal impact

this whole other process
you never heard of before.

You’re going to have to be lobbying,

protesting, speaking out,
contacting lawmakers,

a whole other process
you’ve never done before.

So landing in this completely
unfamiliar scenario,

what can you do?

How are we supposed to act?

What are we supposed to do
in this situation?

There’s basically
three things that matter.

Number one, get informed.

A number of progressive organizations
are already working hard

to warn Americans about this
growing threat to our democracy.

Some organizations you could look into
and research for yourself:

choosedemocracy.us,

electiontaskforce.org,

protectdemocracy.org,

mobilize.us,

allamericans.org,

civicalliance.com

and the Fight Back table at demos.org.

All these groups are working on this.

Now, on the right,
if that’s your cup of tea,

you could also check out
The Heritage Foundation

or the Government
Accountability Institute.

They are focused on voter fraud.

But you’ve got to get informed,
no matter what side you’re on.

Also, number two,

you’ve got to get loud.

You’ve got to get loud.

Situation like this, these days,
everybody is a media channel.

You are the media.

So use your own voice.

And when you do, my advice:

speak to universal American values,
not the partisan stuff, OK?

Speak to the American values
that every American should be down with,

no matter what party they’re in.

The idea that every voter counts

and that every vote should be counted,

that’s an American value, period.

The notion that the majority
should rule in America,

that’s an American value.

The idea that an incumbent president

should concede honorably and graciously

and ensure a peaceful transfer of power,

rather than trying to use
every trick in the book

to hang on to power,

that’s an American value too.

If you stick with those values,

you’re going to be heard
by a lot more people

and help bring the country together.

And lastly, sorry folks,
voting is not enough,

You’re going to have to get
active, get involved.

You could join and support
with your money.

Some existing organizations,
powerful groups,

like the Leadership Conference
on Civil Rights,

the ACLU,

NAACP, Legal Defense Fund,

Indivisible, ColorOfChange.org,

these groups are going to be
fighting in the courts,

fighting in Congress,

to try to make sure
that we have a fair outcome.

Those groups could use
your help and your donations.

But if it gets to the point

where you feel

that you have to take it to the streets,

that you’re going to have to go outside

and demonstrate and march and protest,

please do it peacefully.

This is not just philosophy or morality.

A lot of studies have shown

that it’s the peaceful protests

that are more successful
at challenging these would-be dictators

and reversing coup attempts.

It’s the peaceful ones, why?

Because when the protests turn violent,

all that chaos and carnage
actually chases away supporters.

So rather than demonstrations
getting bigger,

and the protests getting bigger,

they start to shrink.

Then the government looks reasonable
when it cracks down.

So it’s actually a lot better

to follow the guidance
of the late great Gene Sharp.

Now he has written beautifully and well

about how strategically
you can roll back a coup

just using very smart,
very disciplined, very nonviolent protest.

And a lot of his best ideas,
and people have been influenced by that,

are available in a new guidebook called,

“Hold the Line.”

You can look it up,

it’s called “Hold the Line,
The Guide to Defending Democracy.”

You can get that at holdthelineguide.com.

And that can give you
a real good framework

to move forward in a smart, peaceful way

if you feel that you’ve got
to take it to the streets.

Now look,

I know all this stuff is overwhelming,

and I’ve got to admit,
some of these steps may not be enough.

A truly rogue president

could call on private armed militia

to try to intimidate lawmakers
into keeping him or her in power.

Or they could just abuse
their emergency powers

and try to stay in office indefinitely.

So we’ve got some real
problems in our system.

The best way to stop a coup

is to update and strengthen
our democratic system

as soon as this election is over.

Maybe we need to rethink,
reimagine or just get rid of

this whole electoral college,
extra inning thing in the first place.

I know for sure

we’ve got to do a better job
of protecting voter rights,

of prosecuting voter intimidation

and also making sure
we’ve got the technology

that nobody needs to be afraid
of voter fraud.

These are the steps
that we’re going to have to take

to make sure that we have a democracy
and the democracy endures.

Because never forget this:

in the long sweep of human history,

a democratic republic

is the rarest form of government on earth.

Democracies are fragile.

Democracies can fail.

And what citizens do or fail to do
in a moment of crisis

can determine the final fate

of government of, by and for the people.

So let’s do our best, vote, but this time,

we’ve got to stay vigilant and active,

even after the ballots have been counted.

We’ve got to stay active
all the way through

to inauguration day.

But I want to say to you,

I will support the winner
of a free and fair election

no matter which candidate wins,

and I will oppose any so-called winner

who prevails by twisting the process
beyond recognition.

Because any American should be willing
to concede an election,

but no American should concede

the core principles of democracy itself.

Thank you.

抄写员:Ivana Korom
审稿人:Joanna Pietrulewicz

好吧,作为一名律师,
作为一名政治评论员

,坦率地说,作为一名前
白宫官员,

我曾经认为我对

美国如何挑选总统了解很多。

我错了,我不知道。

今年,

我一直在研究

我们宪法

中的一些细则以及我们从未谈论过的所有不同内容

,我发现了一些

令我震惊的法律漏洞,

我保证会让你震惊,

并且 可以决定

2020 年总统选举的结果。

例如,您是否知道
,根据我们的

宪法,总统候选人
实际上可能会失去普选票,

无法
在选举团中获得多数席位,

拒绝让步,

操纵
我们政府的隐藏机制

,但仍然可以宣誓就任
总统 美国?

这是一个真实的事实。

我知道这听起来像是一些疯狂的
“纸牌屋”插曲

,我希望是这样,

因为那样我们就可以
改变频道,

但我只是向你描述了今年可能发生
的现实世界,现实生活中的可能性


我说的那一年,2020 年,

或者其他年份,

如果我们不修复系统中的一些
故障。

所以,如果你认为

,美国人民
在美国总统选举中的选择

实际上应该
宣誓成为美国总统,

请关注这个谈话。

我要教你
如何阻止政变,好吗?

现在,从哪里开始?

好吧,这个怎么样:

事实证明,
美国民主的主要保障之一

根本不在宪法中。

这根本不在法律上。

这实际上只是一个小传统,
它是一个小习惯。

然而,这一自愿姿态

是美国大选后

几乎从未发生过骚乱
、流血和冲突的主要原因之一

我说的
是让步演说。

好吧,具有讽刺意味的是,

这是任何总统
候选人都不想发表的演讲

,然而,对于我们国家

的健康和福祉来说,最重要的是公开演讲

就是那个演讲,你知道,
当一位总统候选人发表演讲时

,是在顾问们来
了之后,媒体告诉他们,

“看,你
不会获得足够的选票


达到 270 票的神奇数字。

你只是不会到达那里。”

在那一刻——

你不去想这个,

但整个共和国的命运

掌握在一个政客的手中

,他们愿意走出去

,站在他们的家人
面前,站在镜头前

, 站在全国人民

面前说:“我是
自愿认输的。

感谢我的支持者

。另一个人现在赢了,
祝贺他们,

让我们团结在他们身后,
让我们继续前进,让我们成为一个国家。”

上帝保佑美国。”

你已经看过一千遍了。

毫无疑问,

这在我们国家是一个了不起的传统

因为在那一刻,

这位候选人仍然指挥着

一支全国性的竞选活动家

、顽固的游击队、

成千上万的人。

他们可以轻松拿起武器,

走上街头,

可以为所欲为。

但那次让步演讲
立即让他们所有人复员。

它说,“嘿,伙计们,站起来。

伙计们,一切都结束了。”

此外,该让步演讲

帮助数以千万计
投票支持该人的人

接受结果。

承认胜利者,
无论多么不情愿,

然后第二天早上起床,

上班,上学,

也许会失望,

但不会对美国政府不忠。

更重要的是,

那个让步演说
有一个技术

功能,它允许

我们的宪法
在投票后要求的所有其他东西,

并且有很多步骤,比如,

你有选举
团必须 见面,

你有
国会必须批准这件事,

你有一个就职典礼,

所有这些东西都可以
在自动驾驶仪上继续前进,

因为在让步演讲之后,

每一个后续

步骤要么恢复总统,
要么提升 一位新总统

只是在橡皮图章的基础上发生。

宪法要求它,
但它是一个橡皮图章。

但我们有时会忘记,
候选人不必让步。

没有什么可以让他们认输。

这只是一年中的常态
,没有什么是正常的。

那么,如果失败的候选人
只是拒绝承认呢?

如果没有让步演讲怎么办?

好吧,可能发生的事情可能会吓到你。

我认为应该。

首先,给
你背景,

让我们确保
我们在同一页上,

让我给你这个类比。

把总统选举想象
成一场棒球比赛。

第九局结束,

谁领先谁赢,
谁落后谁输。

那是棒球。

但是你能想象
一个不同的

世界,在棒球

比赛中,实际上有 13 局,
或 14 局,而不仅仅是 9 局。

但我们只是有一个奇怪的传统。

如果你在第九局落后,

你就出来认输。

好吧?

所以所有其他的局都不重要。

这就是美国总统选举的真正运作方式

因为宪法
实际上阐明了

两组不同的局。


有每个人都关注的普选过程。

然后你就有

了每个人基本上都忽略的精英选拔过程。

但在一场势均力敌的选举中,

如果没有人让步

,第二个无形的过程,

如果你愿意的话,这些额外的一局,

它们实际上非常重要。

让我解释。

第一局,
普选,

这是

你想到总统选举时的想法

这是初选
,预选会议,辩论

,大会,这是选举之夜

,就是这样。

大多数时候,
选举之夜的失败者

在这一点上只是认输。

为什么? “美国人民已经发声了。”

所有这些。

但根据宪法
,比赛在技术上还没有结束。

在摄像机离开

之后,在五彩纸屑被扫走之后

,宪法需要
这整套其他的一局。

这个精英选拔过程的东西

,这都是闭门造车的,

它在政府官员之间。

这个过程从
11 月的计票结束一直持续

到 12 月
,然后是 1 月。

你永远不会去想它,

因为对于这么多代人来说,

这些额外的一局并不重要,

因为选举之夜的
失败者只是承认。

所以这其他的东西只是一种形式。

即使在 2000 年,当最高法院下令停止计票时,

副总统阿尔·戈尔就放弃了

戈尔没有继续
在州立法机构

、选举团

和国会中进行斗争,

他也没有试图
在媒体上抹黑结果。

坦率地说,他没有让他的支持者

带着抗议标语

、干草叉或长枪走上街头。

法院一宣布
计票结束,

他就向乔治·W·布什让步了。

因为这就是我们所做的,

这就是
我们在这里做事的方式。

你不会在加时赛中战斗。

直到 2020 年

,一位主要候选人已经表示

他可能不会接受
计票结果。

诅咒你 2020。

那么会发生什么呢? 无论如何

一个失败的候选人可能会发动
一场激烈的斗争来夺取权力,而不是让步。

或者无论如何要保持权力。

在法庭上,是的。

但也在州议会、
选举团,甚至在国会。

例如,他们可以
提起数十起诉讼,

试图阻止数
以百万计的邮寄选票的计票,

并说它们都应该被扔掉,
它们都是欺诈性的。

然后,他们可以

要求各州
拒绝批准选举,

因为所有这些所谓的欺诈行为

或外国势力的干涉。

或者失败者的政党可以
将竞争对手的选民名单

派往选举团或国会,

并说,“我们是真正的选民”,

并以此创造一个整体局面。

这些事情中的任何一个都可能

在选举团和国会中造成如此混乱,

以至于整件事情

自 1800 年代以来第一次在众议院面前结束。

现在,这就是它变得完全疯狂的地方。

如果总统
选举在众议院结束,

他们根本不需要关注
普选

或选举人票。

就像选举从未发生过一样。

然后它变得更加疯狂。

众议院的最终计票
不是由代表

而是由代表团进行的。

换句话说,

个别国会议员
没有投票权。

这是由各州完成的。

现在,把你的头缠在这个上面。

2020 年,大多数美国人
生活在蓝色州,

但红色州更多。

因此,即使没有普选票或选举团

中的多数票,众议院的共和党人

也有可能直接
任命他们的候选人为总统

那可能会发生。

现在有些人会称这种结果

是完全合法的、

完全符合宪法的政变,

反对
美国的多数统治理念。

根据我们的宪法,这是可能的,

今年可能会发生。

所以你对此能做些什么?

好吧,请记住,

如果胜利的差距
如此之大,

那真的是巨大的

,落选候选人的
政党将走开

,让他们的领袖下台。

没有人会
冒着宪法危机

来拯救一个超级不受欢迎的人。

但如果比赛接近尾声,

所有赌注都将取消。

然后,这场斗争可能会持续
到选举之夜很久之后。

你可能会,你知道,
试图影响

你以前从未听说过的整个其他过程。

你将不得不游说、

抗议、大声疾呼、
联系立法者,这


你以前从未做过的整个其他过程。

那么登陆这个完全
陌生的场景,

你能做什么呢?

我们应该如何行动? 在这种情况

下我们应该怎么做

基本上有
三件事很重要。

第一,了解情况。

许多进步
组织已经在

努力警告美国人这种
对我们民主的日益严重的威胁。

您可以
自己研究和研究的一些组织:

choosedemocracy.us、

electiontaskforce.org、

protecteddemocracy.org

mobilize.us、allamericans.org、civicaliance.com

和 demos.org 上的反击表。

所有这些小组都在为此努力。

现在,在右边,
如果那是您的一杯茶,

您还可以
查看传统基金会

或政府
问责研究所。

他们专注于选民欺诈。


无论你站在哪一边,你都必须了解情况。

另外,第二,

你必须大声一点。

你得大声点。

像这样的情况,这年头,
大家都是媒体渠道。

你是媒体。

所以用你自己的声音。

当你这样做时,我的建议是:

谈论美国的普遍价值观,
而不是党派的东西,好吗?

说出
每个美国人都应该接受的美国价值观,

无论他们在哪个政党

。每个选民都算数

,每张选票都应该算数,

这是美国的价值观。

多数人
应该统治美国的观念,

这是美国的价值观。

现任总统

应该光荣而优雅地让步

并确保和平移交权力,

而不是试图利用
书中的每一个技巧

来保住权力,

这也是美国的价值观。

如果你坚持这些价值观,

你将
被更多人听到,

并帮助国家团结起来。

最后,对不起各位,
投票是不够的,

你们必须
积极参与,参与进来。

你可以加入并
用你的钱支持。

一些现有的组织、
强大的团体,


民权领袖会议、

美国公民自由联盟、全国

有色人种协进会、法律辩护基金、

不可分割、ColorOfChange.org,

这些团体将
在法庭上

战斗,在国会战斗,

试图确保
我们有一个公平的结果。

这些团体可以使用
您的帮助和捐款。

但是,如果它到了

觉得你必须把它带到街头的地步

,你将不得不到外面

去示威、游行和抗议,

请和平地去做。

这不仅仅是哲学或道德。

许多研究

表明,

在挑战这些潜在的独裁者

和扭转政变企图方面,和平抗议更为成功。

是和平的,为什么?

因为当抗议活动变得暴力时,

所有的混乱和屠杀
实际上都会赶走支持者。

因此

示威活动并没有变得越来越大,抗议活动越来越大

,反而开始缩小。

那么政府
在打压时看起来是合理的。

所以实际上

听从
已故伟大的吉恩·夏普的指导要好得多。

现在,他写得很漂亮,很好地

讲述了你可以如何战略性

地通过非常聪明、
非常有纪律、非常非暴力的抗议来推翻政变。

他的许多最好的想法,
以及受其影响的人们,

都可以在一本名为“坚持到底”的新指南中找到

你可以查一下,

它叫《坚守阵地
,保卫民主指南》。

您可以在 holdthelineguide.com 上获得。

如果你觉得你必须把它带到街头,这可以给你
一个真正好的框架

,以一种聪明、和平的方式前进

现在看,

我知道所有这些东西都是压倒性的

,我不得不承认,
其中一些步骤可能还不够。

一个真正的流氓总统

可以呼吁私人武装民兵

试图恐吓立法者
以保持他或她的权力。

或者他们可以滥用
他们的紧急权力

并试图无限期地留在办公室。

所以
我们的系统存在一些实际问题。

阻止政变的最好方法

是在选举结束后立即更新和加强
我们的民主

制度。

也许我们需要重新思考、
重新构想或干脆

摆脱整个选举团,
首先是额外的局。

我确信

我们必须在
保护选民权利、起诉恐吓选民方面做得更好,

并确保
我们拥有

没有人需要
害怕选民欺诈的技术。

这些是
我们必须采取的步骤,

以确保我们拥有民主
并且民主持续存在。

因为永远不要忘记这一点:

在漫长的人类历史中

,民主共和国

是地球上最罕见的政府形式。

民主是脆弱的。

民主国家可能会失败。

公民在危机时刻做什么或不做什么

可以决定

政府的最终命运,由人民组成,为人民服务。

因此,让我们尽力而为,投票,但这一次,

我们必须保持警惕和积极,

即使在计票之后也是如此。

我们必须一直保持活跃

直到就职日。

但我想对大家说,无论哪位候选人获胜,

我都支持
自由公正的选举

获胜者,

反对任何

歪曲程序、面目全非的所谓获胜者

因为任何美国人都应该
愿意承认选举,

但任何美国人都不应该承认

民主本身的核心原则。

谢谢你。