Why school should start later for teens Wendy Troxel

Translator: Leslie Gauthier
Reviewer: Joanna Pietrulewicz

It’s six o’clock in the morning,

pitch black outside.

My 14-year-old son
is fast asleep in his bed,

sleeping the reckless,
deep sleep of a teenager.

I flip on the light and physically
shake the poor boy awake,

because I know that,
like ripping off a Band-Aid,

it’s better to get it over with quickly.

(Laughter)

I have a friend who yells “Fire!”
just to rouse her sleeping teen.

And another who got so fed up

that she had to dump cold water
on her son’s head

just to get him out of bed.

Sound brutal …

but perhaps familiar?

Every morning I ask myself,

“How can I –

knowing what I know

and doing what I do for a living –

be doing this to my own son?”

You see,

I’m a sleep researcher.

(Laughter)

So I know far too much about sleep

and the consequences of sleep loss.

I know that I’m depriving my son
of the sleep he desperately needs

as a rapidly growing teenager.

I also know that by waking him up

hours before his natural
biological clock tells him he’s ready,

I’m literally robbing him
of his dreams –

the type of sleep most associated
with learning, memory consolidation

and emotional processing.

But it’s not just my kid
that’s being deprived of sleep.

Sleep deprivation among
American teenagers is an epidemic.

Only about one in 10 gets
the eight to 10 hours of sleep per night

recommended by sleep scientists
and pediatricians.

Now, if you’re thinking to yourself,

“Phew, we’re doing good,
my kid’s getting eight hours,”

remember,

eight hours is
the minimum recommendation.

You’re barely passing.

Eight hours is kind of like
getting a C on your report card.

There are many factors
contributing to this epidemic,

but a major factor preventing teens
from getting the sleep they need

is actually a matter of public policy.

Not hormones, social lives or Snapchat.

Across the country,

many schools are starting
around 7:30am or earlier,

despite the fact that major
medical organizations recommend

that middle and high school
start no earlier than 8:30am.

These early start policies
have a direct effect on how much –

or really how little sleep
American teenagers are getting.

They’re also pitting
teenagers and their parents

in a fundamentally unwinnable fight
against their own bodies.

Around the time of puberty,

teenagers experience a delay
in their biological clock,

which determines when we feel most awake
and when we feel most sleepy.

This is driven in part by a shift
in the release of the hormone melatonin.

Teenagers' bodies wait to start releasing
melatonin until around 11pm,

which is two hours later than what
we see in adults or younger children.

This means that waking a teenager up
at 6am is the biological equivalent

of waking an adult up at 4am.

On the unfortunate days
when I have to wake up at 4am,

I’m a zombie.

Functionally useless.

I can’t think straight,

I’m irritable,

and I probably shouldn’t be driving a car.

But this is how many American
teenagers feel every single school day.

In fact, many of the, shall we say,

unpleasant characteristics
that we chalk up to being a teenager –

moodiness, irritability,
laziness, depression –

could be a product
of chronic sleep deprivation.

For many teens
battling chronic sleep loss,

their go-to strategy to compensate
is consuming large quantities of caffeine

in the form of venti frappuccinos,

or energy drinks and shots.

So essentially,

we’ve got an entire population
of tired but wired youth.

Advocates of sleep-friendly
start times know

that adolescence is a period
of dramatic brain development,

particularly in the parts of the brain

that are responsible for those
higher order thinking processes,

including reasoning, problem-solving
and good judgment.

In other words, the very type
of brain activity that’s responsible

for reining in those impulsive
and often risky behaviors

that are so characteristic of adolescence

and that are so terrifying
to us parents of teenagers.

They know that like the rest of us,

when teenagers don’t
get the sleep they need,

their brains, their bodies
and behaviors suffer

with both immediate and lasting effects.

They can’t concentrate,

their attention plummets

and many will even show
behavioral signs that mimic ADHD.

But the consequences of teen sleep loss
go well beyond the classroom,

sadly contributing to many
of the mental health problems

that skyrocket during adolescence,

including substance use,

depression and suicide.

In our work with teens
from LA Unified School District,

we found that teens with sleep problems

were 55 percent more likely
to have used alcohol in the past month.

In another study with over
30,000 high school students,

they found that
for each hour of lost sleep,

there was a 38 percent increase
in feeling sad or hopeless,

and a 58 percent increase
in teen suicide attempts.

And if that’s not enough,

teens who skip out on sleep
are at increased risk

for a host of physical health problems
that plague our country,

including obesity,
heart disease and diabetes.

Then there’s the risk
of putting a sleep-deprived teen,

with a newly minted driver’s license,

behind the wheel.

Studies have shown that getting five hours
or less of sleep per night

is the equivalent of driving with a blood
alcohol content above the legal limit.

Advocates of sleep-friendly start times,

and researchers in this area,

have produced tremendous science

showing the tremendous benefits
of later start times.

The findings are unequivocal,

and as a sleep scientist,

I rarely get to speak
with that kind of certainty.

Teens from districts
with later start times get more sleep.

To the naysayers who may think
that if schools start later,

teens will just stay up later,

the truth is,

their bedtimes stay the same,

but their wake-up times get extended,

resulting in more sleep.

They’re more likely to show up for school;

school absences dropped
by 25 percent in one district.

And they’re less likely to drop out.

Not surprisingly,
they do better academically.

So this has real implications
for reducing the achievement gap.

Standardized test scores
in math and reading

go up by two to three percentage points.

That’s as powerful as reducing class sizes
by one-third fewer students,

or replacing a so-so teacher
in the classroom

with a truly outstanding one.

Their mental and physical health improves,

and even their families are happier.

I mean, who wouldn’t enjoy a little
more pleasantness from our teens,

and a little less crankiness?

Even their communities are safer

because car crash rates go down –

a 70 percent reduction in one district.

Given these tremendous benefits,

you might think,

well, this is a no-brainer, right?

So why have we as a society
failed to heed this call?

Often the argument against later
start times goes something like this:

“Why should we delay
start times for teenagers?

We need to toughen them up
so they’re ready for the real world!”

But that’s like saying
to the parent of a two-year-old,

“Don’t let Johnny nap,

or he won’t be ready for kindergarten.”

(Laughter)

Delaying start times also presents
many logistical challenges.

Not just for students and their families,

but for communities as a whole.

Updating bus routes,

increased transportation costs,

impact on sports,

care before or after school.

These are the same concerns
that come up in district after district,

time and again around the country

as school start times are debated.

And they’re legitimate concerns,

but these are problems
we have to work through.

They are not valid excuses

for failing to do the right thing
for our children,

which is to start middle and high schools
no earlier than 8:30am.

And in districts around the country,

big and small,
who have made this change,

they found that these fears
are often unfounded

and far outweighed by the tremendous
benefits for student health

and performance,

and our collective public safety.

So tomorrow morning,

when coincidentally we get
to set our clocks back by an hour

and you get that delicious
extra hour of sleep,

and the day seems a little longer,

and a little more full of hope,

think about the tremendous power of sleep.

And think about what a gift it would be

for our children to be able
to wake up naturally,

in harmony with their own biology.

Thank you,

and pleasant dreams.

译者:Leslie Gauthier
审稿人:Joanna

Pietrulewicz 早上六点,

外面一片漆黑。

我 14 岁的儿子
在他的床上

熟睡
,像一个少年那样鲁莽而沉沉地睡着。

我打开灯,用身体
把这个可怜的男孩摇醒,

因为我知道,
就像撕掉创可贴一样,

最好快点结束。

(笑声)

我有一个朋友大喊“火!”
只是为了唤醒她熟睡的孩子。

还有一个厌倦了

,她不得不把冷水倒
在儿子的头上,

只是为了让他起床。

听起来很残酷……

但也许很熟悉?

每天早上我都会问自己:

“我怎么能——

知道我所

知道的并以我为生的工作——

对我自己的儿子这样做?”

你看,

我是一名睡眠研究人员。

(笑声)

所以我对睡眠

和睡眠不足的后果了解太多了。

我知道我剥夺了我儿子

作为一个快速成长的少年迫切需要的睡眠。

我也知道,

在他的自然
生物钟告诉他准备好之前几个小时叫醒他,

我实际上是在剥夺
他的梦想——

与学习、记忆巩固

和情绪处理最相关的睡眠类型。

但不只是我的
孩子被剥夺了睡眠。

美国青少年睡眠不足是一种流行病。

只有大约十分之一的人
获得睡眠科学家和儿科医生推荐的每晚 8 到 10 小时的睡眠

现在,如果你对自己说,

“呸,我们做得很好,
我的孩子有八小时,”

记住,

八小时
是最低建议。

你勉强通过了。

八小时有点像
在你的成绩单上得到一个 C。

导致这种流行病的因素有很多,

但阻止青少年
获得所需睡眠的一个主要因素

实际上是公共政策问题。

不是荷尔蒙、社交生活或 Snapchat。

在全国范围内,

许多学校
在早上 7 点 30 分左右或更早开始上课,

尽管主要
医疗机构

建议初中和
高中不早于早上 8 点 30 分开始上课。

这些早起
政策直接影响美国青少年

睡眠的多少——或者说真的是睡眠的多少

他们还让
青少年和他们的父母与自己的身体

进行一场根本无法取胜的
斗争。

在青春期前后,

青少年
的生物钟会出现延迟,

这决定了我们什么时候最清醒
,什么时候最困。

这部分是由
激素褪黑激素释放的变化驱动的。

青少年的身体要
等到晚上 11 点左右才开始释放褪黑激素,

这比
我们在成人或年幼儿童身上看到的要晚两个小时。

这意味着
早上 6 点叫醒青少年在生物学上

相当于凌晨 4 点叫醒成年人。

在我必须在凌晨 4 点起床的不幸日子里,

我是一个僵尸。

功能上没用。

我无法思考,

我很烦躁

,我可能不应该开车。

但这就是美国
青少年每个上学日的感受。

事实上,我们应该说,

青少年时期的许多令人不快的特征——

喜怒无常、易怒、
懒惰、抑郁——

可能
是长期睡眠不足的产物。

对于许多
与慢性睡眠不足作斗争的青少年来说,

他们的首选策略
是摄入大量

咖啡因,例如星冰乐

或能量饮料和饮料。

所以从本质上讲,

我们有一整
群疲惫但有头脑的年轻人。

提倡睡眠友好的
开始时间的人知道

,青春期是
大脑发育的一个时期,

尤其是大脑

中负责
高阶思维过程的部分,

包括推理、解决问题
和良好的判断力。

换句话说,
正是这种大脑活动类型

负责控制那些冲动
且通常具有风险的行为

,这些行为是青春期的特征,对我们的

青少年父母来说是如此可怕

他们知道,和我们其他人一样,

当青少年
得不到所需的睡眠时,

他们的大脑、身体
和行为都会

受到直接和持久的影响。

他们无法集中注意力,

注意力直线下降

,许多人甚至会
表现出模仿多动症的行为迹象。

但是,青少年睡眠不足的后果
远远超出了课堂范围,

令人遗憾的是,它导致了许多在青春期飙升
的心理健康问题

包括吸毒、

抑郁和自杀。

在我们
与洛杉矶联合学区

青少年的合作中,我们发现有睡眠问题的青少年

在过去一个月中饮酒的可能性要高出 55%。

在另一项针对
30,000 多名高中生的研究中,

他们发现
,每少睡一小时,

感到悲伤或绝望的人就会增加 38%

,青少年自杀企图增加 58%。

如果这还不够,那么

不睡觉的青少年

患一系列困扰我们国家的身体健康问题
的风险会增加,

包括肥胖、
心脏病和糖尿病。

再有就是
让一个睡眠不足、

持有新驾照的青少年驾驶汽车的风险

研究表明,每晚睡 5 小时
或更少的睡眠

相当于驾驶时血液中的
酒精含量超过法定限值。

睡眠友好开始时间的倡导者

和该领域的研究人员

已经产生了巨大的科学成果,

显示
了延迟开始时间的巨大好处。

这些发现是明确的

,作为一名睡眠科学家,

我很少能
以这种确定性说话。

开始时间较晚的地区的青少年睡眠时间更长。

反对者可能会认为
,如果学校晚开学,

青少年只会熬夜

,事实是,

他们的就寝时间保持不变,

但他们的起床时间会延长,

从而导致更多的睡眠。

他们更有可能出现在学校;

一个地区的缺勤率下降了 25%。

而且他们不太可能辍学。

毫不奇怪,
他们在学业上做得更好。

因此,这
对于缩小成就差距具有实际意义。

数学和阅读的标准化考试成绩

提高了两到三个百分点。

这就像将班级人数减少三分之一一样强大

或者用真正优秀的老师
代替课堂

上一般的老师。

他们的身心健康得到改善,

甚至他们的家人也更加幸福。

我的意思是,谁不喜欢
我们十几岁的孩子多一点快乐

,少一点脾气暴躁?

甚至他们的社区也更安全了,

因为车祸率下降了——

一个地区减少了 70%。

鉴于这些巨大的好处,

您可能会想

,这很简单,对吧?

那么,为什么我们作为一个社会
没有注意到这一呼吁呢?

反对推迟开始时间的论点通常
是这样的:

“我们为什么要推迟
青少年的开始时间?

我们需要让他们变得坚强,
以便他们为现实世界做好准备!”

但这就像
对一个两岁孩子的父母说:

“不要让约翰尼小睡,

否则他就不能上幼儿园了。”

(笑声)

延迟开始时间也带来了
许多后勤挑战。

不仅是为了学生和他们的家庭,

也是为了整个社区。

更新公交路线、

增加交通成本、

对运动的影响、

课前或课后护理。 随着学校开学时间的争论,

这些问题

在全国各地一次又一次地出现在一个又一个地区

它们是合理的担忧,

但这些是
我们必须解决的问题。

它们不是

没有为我们的孩子做正确的事情的正当借口

即不早于早上 8:30 开始初中和高中

在全国各地

做出这种改变的地区,

无论大小,他们发现这些担忧
往往是没有根据的

,而且
对学生健康

和表现

以及我们集体公共安全的巨大好处远远超过了这些担忧。

所以明天早上

,巧合的是,当
我们将时钟拨回一个小时

,你可以
多睡一小时

,这一天似乎

更长了一点,充满了希望,

想想睡眠的巨大力量。

想想

我们的孩子能够
自然地醒来,

与他们自己的生物学相协调,这将是多么大的一份礼物。

谢谢你,祝你

好梦。