Communicating Science...During a Pandemic

it has never been more apparent

just how important science communication

is than during the covid19 pandemic

where experts in virology public health

and epidemiology

have been providing regular commentary

to the public

today i’d like to share with you some of

what i have learned

about communicating science during a

pandemic

not only for those that might want to

get involved but also for anyone that

has seen a scientist on the news

and wondered why we do it

i’ve attended a couple of communication

courses over the years

and one thing that has always bothered

me is that we’re told to focus our talk

to a specific audience

am i talking to fellow scientists or to

the general public

but why can’t it be both science is

universal

and everybody deserves to understand it

the whole world has been watching as the

research around covid19 evolves

and i think we can all agree that there

hasn’t been such

constant media coverage of a topic than

there has about this pandemic people are

watching as science plays out in real

time

in a public forum and while that

presents opportunities to learn

and to discuss and debate ideas it has

also contributed to the rise

in science denialism and conspiracy

theories

if we recognize science communication

for the powerful tool it is

and encourage and train future

scientists in how to discuss their work

with their community

we could affect real change and see a

return

to the public’s trust in science

pandemics are nothing new they have

occurred

throughout history and with them there

have

always been people that have sought to

discredit scientists

but the pandemic we are currently living

through is the first to occur

in the age of tick tock a quote from the

irish writer jonathan swift

is falsehood flies and the truth comes

limping after it

one look at a facebook or twitter

timeline shows just how true this is

false information and fake news are more

likely to go viral on social

media and once they do it is almost

impossible to undo all of that damage

interestingly ted actually have

guidelines for what you can talk about

on this famous red dot

i couldn’t stand here and discuss

unproven pseudoscience

to whoever may be watching but hugely

influential people

and even world leaders or ex-leaders can

say whatever they like

knowing that their tweets will go viral

and that a lot of people will listen

so how do we counter the misinformation

that is out there

the answer is actually pretty simple

scientists need to talk to people we

need to engage with the media

with the public with policy makers and

politicians

and with scientists that hold opposing

views

to our own before 2020

i was researching how respiratory

viruses make us sick

i do a little bit of science outreach on

the side taking part in science

festivals

and going to schools trying to convince

kids that they should study viruses

and that it might actually come in

useful someday

then in february i received my first

media request

they asked me to comment on a new

respiratory virus

causing a few cases of pneumonia in

china

i turned this down i didn’t think i was

old enough

or had enough experience and i worried

that people wouldn’t take me seriously

because i didn’t have professor in front

of my name

but after further consideration and some

very insistent journalists

i realized that i shouldn’t treat this

any differently

to the science outreach i was used to

doing sure

the audience might be slightly older but

the goal is the same

to communicate science in a way that can

be easily understood

over the past year i’ve taken part in

hundreds of media appearances

and believe me it can be tough sometimes

i just want to go back to tweeting

about the great british bake off and

what my current favorite song from the

hamilton soundtrack

is this time

we’re talking about a pandemic but next

time

it might be an earthquake or a black

hole or a return to discussing climate

change

and we need people that can comment on

any eventuality

and for those future experts i’d like to

share a few of the things that i’ve

learned about

communicating science that i wish i knew

at the start of 2020

number one get involved take part in

local initiatives like festivals

and career days contact your institution

or company press office

or communications team and tell them

you’re willing to comment

on certain topics and be active on

social media let people see what it is

like to do your job

number two it always takes more time

than you think

do not underestimate the time commitment

that public engagement takes

not only to do the event or interview

but also to prepare for it

which brings me to number three always

be prepared

ask the producer or reporter or host or

chair

or whoever is running the event what the

topic is

and if they have a list of possible

questions make sure you know your facts

and find out if you’ll be appearing

alongside anyone else

and google them know their standpoint on

an issue

number four you can never be completely

prepared but that is okay

it is okay not to know something in fact

it’s a good thing when you’re honest

about it

and number five it is okay to say no

i find this one quite tough i struggle

to say no when someone asks me for

a favor but if it is something you do

not feel confident doing

say no and maybe suggest a colleague

and remember science outreach is a skill

it takes training and practice

not only that but it isn’t really part

of our job description

very few scientific jobs have time set

aside

to allow for public engagement this is

something that we have to balance

alongside our other work commitments

while still trying to maintain that

mythical work-life balance

thankfully attitudes are starting to

change

research institutes and funding bodies

are recognizing the importance

of the public trust in science because

science

alone cannot solve a public health

crisis like covid19

for the public to trust in science again

we need experts that are able to

translate science

into language that is easier to

understand

science needs to move with the times we

need experts that are relatable

and representative to act as translators

for those who haven’t learned to speak

the language of science

the rest of that jonathan swift quote

that i mentioned earlier

is actually when men come to be

undeceived

it is too late like a physician

who has found an infallible medicine

after the patient is dead

let’s not wait too long to realize that

communication

is one of the greatest tools we have to

tackle

this and any future pandemics

you

在新冠病毒大流行期间,科学传播的重要性从未像现在这样明显

,病毒学公共卫生

和流行病学

专家今天定期向公众发表

评论 大流行期间的科学

不仅适用于那些可能

想参与其中的人,也适用

于那些在新闻上看到科学家

并想知道我们为什么这样做

的人多年来我参加了几门交流课程

,一件事一直 困扰

我的是,我们被告知要将谈话重点

放在特定的听众上,

我是在与科学家同行还是在与公众交谈,

但为什么科学不能是

普遍的

,每个人都应该理解

它,全世界都在关注 随着

围绕covid19的研究不断发展

,我认为我们都可以同意,

媒体对某个话题的报道

没有像这次大流行那样持续不断 人们正在

观看科学

在公共论坛上的实时播放,虽然这

提供了学习

、讨论和辩论想法的机会,但

如果我们认识到科学传播

是它的强大工具,它也有助于科学否认主义和阴谋论的兴起 是

并鼓励和培训未来的

科学家如何与他们的社区讨论他们的工作

我们可以影响真正的变化并看到

公众对科学的信任

流行病在整个历史上都不是什么新鲜事,

而且一直都有人 试图

诋毁科学家,

但我们目前正在经历的大流行

是第一次发生

在滴答滴答的时代爱尔兰作家乔纳森斯威夫特的一句话

是谎言苍蝇,真相

在它一瘸一拐地

一看脸书或推特

时间线显示 这是多么真实的

虚假信息和虚假新闻更有

可能在社交

媒体和社交媒体上传播 他们这样做了几乎

不可能消除所有这些损害

有趣的是ted实际上有

指导方针,您可以

在这个著名的红点上谈论什么

我不能站在这里

与任何可能正在观看但具有巨大

影响力的人

甚至是讨论未经证实的伪科学 世界领导人或前领导人可以

随心所欲地说什么,因为他们

知道他们的推文会像病毒一样传播开来

,而且很多人都会听,

所以我们如何应对存在的错误信息

答案实际上很简单,

科学家需要与我们的人交谈

需要与媒体接触

与公众 与政策制定者和

政治家

以及与我们持相反

观点的科学家 在 2020 年之前

我正在研究呼吸道

病毒如何使我们生病

我在参与科学的同时进行了一些科学外展

节日

和上学试图说服

孩子们他们应该研究病毒

,并且它可能在某天在二月的

某一天变得有用

去年我收到了我的第一个

媒体请求,

他们让我评论一种新的

呼吸道病毒

导致中国发生了几例肺炎

我拒绝了我认为我

不够大

或没有足够的经验,我

担心人们不会 认真对待我,

因为我的名字前面没有教授,

但经过进一步考虑和一些

非常坚持不懈的记者,

我意识到我不应该将这

我习惯做的科学宣传有任何不同,以

确保观众可能会略微 年纪大了,

但目标是相同的

,以一种易于理解的方式传播科学 在

过去的一年中,我参加了

数百次媒体露面

,相信我有时会很艰难,

我只想回到推特

上 Great British bake off,

我目前最喜欢的

汉密尔顿原声带歌曲

是这次

我们谈论的是流行病,但下

一次可能是地震、

黑洞或回归 讨论气候

变化

,我们需要能够对任何可能性发表评论的人

,对于那些未来的专家,我想

分享一些我在

传播科学方面学到的东西,我希望我

在 2020 年初

知道 参与

当地活动,如节日

和职业日 联系你的机构

或公司新闻办公室

或沟通团队,告诉他们

你愿意

对某些话题发表评论,并在社交媒体上保持活跃

让人们了解

你的工作是什么样的

第二,它总是

比你想象的要花更多

的时间不要

低估公众参与

不仅要进行活动或采访

而且要为它做准备所花费的时间,

这使我想到第三要始终

做好准备

询问制片人或记者或主持人 或

主持

或主持活动的任何人 主题是什么

,如果他们有可能的问题清单,请

确保您

了解事实并确定您是否会出现 g

与其他任何人一起

并在谷歌上搜索他们知道他们对

第四个问题的立场 你永远无法完全

准备好,但

没关系 不知道

实际上是一件好事,当你诚实的时候这是一件好事

,第五个是 可以说不,

我觉得这个很难

,当有人要求我帮忙时,我很难说不,

但如果这是你

没有信心做的事情,

说不,也许建议同事

,记住科学推广是一项

需要培训的技能 并实践

不仅如此,而且它并不是

我们工作描述的一部分

  • 生活平衡

谢天谢地,态度开始

改变

研究机构和资助机构

正在认识

到公众对科学的信任的重要性,因为

仅靠科学无法解决问题

像covid19这样的公共卫生危机

让公众再次信任科学

我们需要能够

将科学翻译

成更容易理解的语言的专家

科学需要与时俱进 我们

需要具有相关性

和代表性的专家担任

翻译 那些还没有学会

说科学语言的人

我之前提到的乔纳森·斯威夫特的其余部分

实际上是当人们变得不被

欺骗

时,为时已晚,就像医生

在患者死后找到了可靠的药物一样

让我们 不要等太久才能意识到

沟通

是我们应对

这一问题以及未来任何流行病的最重要工具之一