The role of human emotions in science and research Ilona Stengel

I’m a scientist,

and I’m a big fan of Star Trek,

especially of Mr. Spock.

Mr. Spock is a scientist as well,

and at the same time,
he’s the first [officer]

of the starship Enterprise,

and during the adventures
of the Enterprise crew,

he and his colleagues are dealing a lot

with the presence or absence
of Mr. Spock’s emotions.

Mr. Spock is half-human and half-Vulcan,

and Vulcans are an alien race

who learn to control
and suppress their feelings

and to act purely out of logic.

As Mr. Spock is only half-Vulcan,

he sees himself constantly in conflict
in between logic and emotions,

and as he’s part of a team,

the whole crew is struggling with,

is analyzing,

and is making fun of this conflict.

And also the fans of Star Trek
watch with amusement

this seemingly contradictory behavior.

They find it quite fascinating.

And the matter is a golden thread

through the whole Star Trek series
and movies from the ’60s until today.

And that’s actually
what I want to talk about today:

the role of emotions in science.

We tend to think that science
is all about facts and logic

and human feelings are often neglected
or considered an obstacle to get rid of.

I would like to suggest that emotions
are as important in science

as they are in any other part
of our lives.

Science is made by humans,

and as human beings,

even if we try hard,
we cannot get rid of our emotions.

So instead of fighting them,

I believe that even in science,
we should make use of our feelings,

because for breakthroughs and innovation,

they are equally important
as facts and logic.

I will come back to Mr. Spock,

but first let me share my experience
on the role of emotions in science,

and one story in particular
kept me thinking about it

for the last couple of years.

I’m working in research
on organic light-emitting diodes,

so-called OLEDs.

This is how you might know them,

as new generation of displays.

OLEDs are more and more used
in smartphone displays and TV screens.

They make them appear bright,
truly colorful and bendable.

This is how they look like

in the research lab
of my physicist colleagues.

And this is what I, as a chemist,

have in mind when I think about them.

I’ve loved it ever since
I started to work on it.

So I didn’t really like the news

when the company I had been working for –

that was my previous employer –

announced that they wanted
to stop OLED research.

At the time, the management
had reasons for this decision,

and the company handled it
very well, actually.

Nobody lost their jobs,

and everybody was rewarded
for their performed work.

What I want to show you today

is what happened
with my scientist colleagues and me

during the time in between
the announcement

and the last working day on our project.

Consider it a small case study
on emotions in science.

In 2015, our research team
had grown to more than 80 people,

and even after the announcement
that our project was discontinued,

we could not stop working
from one day to another.

It took several months
to bring all activities to a sound end

and to find new jobs
within the company for everyone.

Here’s what happened.

Even though we knew
that we were working on a project

that was to be stopped,

during those months
our output hit the roof.

We were actually working
on two different OLED projects:

first, the development of materials
for blue-shining OLEDs,

which had started in 2001;

and second, materials for green OLEDs,
which had started in 2014.

And the results I show you here
concern the green OLED project.

In the graph, you can see
how the lifetime,

which is a crucial measure
for the durability of our devices,

developed over time.

In 2015, just half a year
into the project,

we were told to scale down,

to stop working on the project
as soon as possible

and to start over in other jobs.

Nevertheless, from this time on,

our results continued to improve rapidly.

How did that happen?

After the announcement, pretty quickly,
colleagues started leaving the team,

and soon, we were left in a small group,

all pretty much sharing
the same attitude of,

“I’m going to be the last person
leaving the ship.”

What I mean is,

while the number of scientists
working on the project was decreasing,

the dedication of people remaining
grew dramatically.

And also, a new and more intense
team spirit formed.

We all shared the same
passion for our work,

we all were sad that it was about to end,

and we all wanted to show
that we could turn our ideas into reality.

We felt that we belonged
to something bigger.

And furthermore,

our project was less and less
in the focus of the management,

because they started
to think about new projects,

restructuring and so on.

This resulted in additional freedom

and the possibility to take
a few things into our own hands.

Of course, more freedom
also means more responsibility,

which we were happy to take,
because we believed in our work.

We felt empowered.

And these three pillars –

dedication, belonging and empowerment –

worked together in a kind
of self-reinforcing cycle,

and the closer we got to shutdown,

the better our output became.

So we were working
with such personal engagement

on a project already sentenced to death

because we felt connected
to something meaningful.

Of course, it was also a hard
and sometimes frustrating time,

but we were sitting together in the lab,

or occasionally in the café,

sharing our sadness
about the end of our project

as well as the joy in our work.

So overall, we had a very intense
and mesmerizingly exciting time.

And the lifetime we finally obtained
for our materials

was on one level with already
commercialized materials

for green OLEDs at the time,

and we achieved this within just one year.

And those results helped our employer

to sell the patents for real value.

Now, let me tell you the same story

with different characters
and a slightly different operation.

The story is part of Star Trek.

And sorry for those of you
who haven’t seen the movies,

but I need to introduce a spoiler here.

After Mr. Spock sacrificed himself
to save the starship Enterprise

at the end of Star Trek II,

Captain Kirk and his core team

were determined to hunt
through the universe to search for Spock,

even though they could see
only very little chance

in finding him alive.

And Starfleet Command
did not give them permission

nor a starship to do so,

so they took it very passionately
into their own hands

to travel out to find Spock.

And after dealing with great challenges,
they eventually found Spock,

and he happily and gratefully
joined the team again.

He could feel the dedication
and the connection of his team

towards their project,
which was to save him

and to hold the crew together.

And over the years,
over the episodes of the saga,

Mr. Spock came to realize

that the combination
of both logic and emotions

is crucial for facing challenges
and exploring new worlds,

and there was no contradiction anymore.

So the storyline here
for both our OLED story and Star Trek

is actually the basic setting
for a lot of breakthrough stories,

in and out of science.

The main characters
are all part of a great team.

All team members show a huge dedication
towards reaching their goal.

They strive to seize
all the freedom they can get,

and they take the responsibility
they need to take.

During the time our OLED project
was nearing the end,

I received one piece of advice
several times.

“Don’t take it to your heart.

You can work on something else.”

If I had followed it,

it would have saved me
several depressed evenings

and many tears,

but at the same time,

I would have failed to gain a great deal
in personal development and happiness.

And as the same is true
for my colleagues and our whole project,

we would have achieved far less.

So of course, science
should be based on facts and logic.

When I say we should use
our emotions in science,

I do not suggest we should use
feelings instead of facts.

But I say we should not be afraid
of using our feelings

to implement and to catalyze
fact-based science and innovation.

Emotions and logic
do not oppose each other.

They complement each other,

and they reinforce each other.

The feeling of being dedicated
to something meaningful,

of belonging to something bigger

and of being empowered

is crucial for creativity and innovation.

Whatever you are working on,

make sure that it matters,

and take it to your heart
as much as you like.

Thank you.

(Applause)

我是一名科学家

,我是《星际迷航》的忠实粉丝,

尤其是斯波克先生。

史波克先生也是一名科学家,

同时
他是进取号星舰的第一任[军官]

,在进取号船员的冒险过程中,

他和他的同事们处理了很多

关于先生的存在与否
的问题。 .Spock的情绪。

斯波克先生是半人半瓦肯人,

而瓦肯人是一个外星种族

,他们学会控制
和压制自己的感情,

并完全出于逻辑行事。

由于 Spock 先生只有半个瓦肯人,

他认为自己经常在
逻辑和情感之间发生冲突,

而作为团队的一员

,整个剧组都在努力应对

、分析

和取笑这种冲突。

而星际迷航的粉丝们也乐于
观看

这种看似矛盾的行为。

他们觉得这很迷人。 从 60 年代到今天

,这件事是

贯穿整个星际迷航系列
和电影的金线。

这实际上
就是我今天要谈论的内容:

情绪在科学中的作用。

我们倾向于认为科学
都是关于事实和逻辑的

,人类的感受往往被忽视
或被认为是摆脱的障碍。

我想说的是,情绪
在科学中的重要性与在我们生活

的任何其他部分
中一样重要。

科学是人类创造的

,作为人类,

即使再努力
,也无法摆脱情绪。

所以与其与他们抗争,

我认为即使在科学中,
我们也应该利用我们的感受,

因为对于突破和创新,

它们
与事实和逻辑同等重要。

我会回到斯波克先生,

但首先让我分享一下我
对情绪在科学中的作用的经验

,特别是一个故事
让我

在过去几年里一直在思考它。

我正在
研究有机发光二极管,

即所谓的 OLED。 作为新一代显示器

,您可能会这样认识它们

OLED 越来越多地
用于智能手机显示屏和电视屏幕。

它们使它们看起来明亮、
真正多彩且可弯曲。

这就是他们


我的物理学家同事的研究实验室中的样子。

这就是我,作为一名化学家,

当我想到它们时会想到的。

自从我开始研究它以来,我就喜欢
它。

所以

当我一直工作的公司——

那是我以前的雇主——

宣布他们
想要停止 OLED 研究时,我真的不喜欢这个消息。

当时管理层
做出这个决定是有原因的

,实际上公司处理
得很好。

没有人失去工作

,每个人都
因所做的工作而获得奖励。

今天我想向您展示的

,在
宣布宣布

和我们项目的最后一个工作日之间,我和我的科学家同事发生了什么事。

把它当作一个关于科学情绪的小案例研究

2015年,我们的研究团队
已经发展到80多人

,即使在
宣布我们的项目停止之后,

我们也
一天天地停不下来。

花了几个月的时间
才让所有的活动顺利结束,


在公司内为每个人找到新的工作。

这就是发生的事情。

尽管我们
知道我们正在开展一个

将要停止的项目,但

在那几个月里,
我们的产出达到了顶峰。

我们实际上在
从事两个不同的 OLED 项目:

首先,开发
蓝光 OLED 材料

,始于 2001 年;

第二,绿色OLED材料
,2014年开始。

我在这里给大家展示的结果是
关于绿色OLED项目。

在图表中,您可以看到

作为衡量
我们设备耐用性的关键指标的寿命是如何

随着时间的推移而发展的。

2015年,项目刚开始
半年,

就被告知要缩减规模,

尽快停止项目工作

,重新开始其他工作。

尽管如此,从这个时候开始,

我们的成绩继续迅速提高。

那是怎么发生的?

宣布之后,很快,
同事们开始离开团队

,很快,我们就被分成了一个小团体,

几乎都分享

“我将是最后一个
离开这艘船的人”的态度。

我的意思是,

虽然从事该项目的科学家人数
正在减少,

但剩余人员的奉献精神
却在急剧增加。

而且,形成了一种新的、更强烈的
团队精神。

我们都
对我们的工作有着同样的热情,

我们都为即将结束而感到难过

,我们都想
证明我们可以将我们的想法变为现实。

我们觉得我们属于
更大的东西。

而且,

我们的项目越来越
不被管理层关注,

因为他们
开始考虑新项目、

重组等等。

这带来了额外的自由


将一些事情掌握在自己手中的可能性。

当然,更多的自由
也意味着更多的责任

,我们乐于承担,
因为我们相信自己的工作。

我们感到被赋予了权力。

这三个支柱——

奉献精神、归属感和授权——


一种自我强化的循环中协同工作

,我们越接近关闭,

我们的产出就越好。

所以我们

在一个已经被判处死刑的项目上进行了如此个人的参与,

因为我们觉得
与一些有意义的事情有联系。

当然,这也是一段艰难
且有时令人沮丧的时期,

但我们一起坐在实验室里,

或者偶尔在咖啡馆里,

分享
我们对项目结束的悲伤

以及工作中的快乐。

所以总的来说,我们度过了一个非常紧张
和令人着迷的激动人心的时刻。

我们最终获得
的材料寿命

与当时已经
商业化

的绿色 OLED 材料处于同一水平,

而我们仅在一年内就实现了这一目标。

这些结果帮助我们的雇主

以真正的价值出售专利。

现在,让我告诉你同样的故事

,不同的角色
和略有不同的操作。

这个故事是星际迷航的一部分。

对于
那些没有看过电影的人,

我很抱歉,但我需要在这里介绍一个剧透。

在史波克先生

在星际迷航II结束时牺牲自己拯救星舰进取号后,

柯克船长和他的核心

团队决心
在宇宙中寻找史波克,

尽管他们

发现他活着的机会微乎其微 .

而星际舰队司令部
并没有允许他们

这样做,也没有星舰这样做,

所以他们非常热情地把它
掌握在自己手中

,出去寻找Spock。

而在应对了巨大的挑战之后,
他们最终找到了Spock

,他又高兴又感激地
再次加入了团队。

他可以
感受到他的团队

对他们的项目的奉献精神和联系,
这是为了拯救他

并将船员们团结在一起。

多年来,
在故事情节中,

史波克先生开始意识到

逻辑和情感

的结合对于面对挑战
和探索新世界至关重要

,不再有矛盾了。

因此,
我们的 OLED 故事和《星际迷航》的故事情节实际上是科学内外

许多突破性故事的基本背景

主要角色
都是一个伟大团队的一部分。

所有团队成员都表现出对实现目标的巨大奉献精神

他们努力抓住
他们可以获得的所有自由,

并承担他们需要承担的责任

在我们的 OLED
项目接近尾声期间,

我多次收到一条建议

“别把它放在心上。

你可以做点别的事情。”

如果我遵循它,

它会为我节省
几个沮丧的夜晚

和许多眼泪,

但与此同时,

我将无法
在个人发展和幸福方面获得很大的收获。

正如
我的同事和我们的整个项目一样,

我们取得的成就会少得多。

所以当然,科学
应该基于事实和逻辑。

当我说我们应该
在科学中使用我们的情绪时,

我并不是建议我们应该使用
感觉而不是事实。

但我说,我们不应该
害怕用我们的感受

来实施和催化
基于事实的科学和创新。

情感和逻辑
并不相互对立。

它们相互补充

,相互加强。

专注
于有意义的事情

,归属于更大的事情

和被授权

的感觉对于创造力和创新至关重要。

无论你在做什么,

确保它很重要,

并尽可能地把它放在你的心里

谢谢你。

(掌声)