The secret to giving great feedback The Way We Work a TED series

Transcriber: TED Translators admin

If you look at a carpenter,
they have a toolbox;

a dentist, they have their drills.

In our era and the type of work
most of us are doing,

the tool we most need is actually centered

around being able to give
and receive feedback well.

[The Way We Work]

Humans have been talking
about feedback for centuries.

In fact, Confucius, way back in 500 BC,

talked about how important it is
to be able to say difficult messages well.

But to be honest,
we’re still pretty bad at it.

In fact, a recent Gallup survey found

that only 26 percent of employees
strongly agree

that the feedback they get
actually improves their work.

Those numbers are pretty dismal.

So what’s going on?

The way that most people
give their feedback

actually isn’t brain-friendly.

People fall into one of two camps.

Either they’re of the camp
that is very indirect and soft

and the brain doesn’t even recognize
that feedback is being given

or it’s just simply confused,

or they fall into the other
camp of being too direct,

and with that, it tips the other person
into the land of being defensive.

There’s this part of the brain
called the amygdala,

and it’s scanning
at all times to figure out

whether the message
has a social threat attached to it.

With that, we’ll move forward
to defensiveness,

we’ll move backwards in retreat,

and what happens is the feedback giver
then starts to disregulate as well.

They add more ums and ahs
and justifications,

and the whole thing
gets wonky really fast.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

I and my team have spent many years
going into different companies

and asking who here
is a great feedback giver.

Anybody who’s named again and again,

we actually bring into our labs
to see what they’re doing differently.

And what we find
is that there’s a four-part formula

that you can use to say
any difficult message well.

OK, are you ready for it? Here we go.

The first part of the formula
is what we call the micro-yes.

Great feedback givers begin their feedback

by asking a question
that is short but important.

It lets the brain know
that feedback is actually coming.

It would be something, for example, like,

“Do you have five minutes to talk
about how that last conversation went”

or “I have some ideas
for how we can improve things.

Can I share them with you?”

This micro-yes question
does two things for you.

First of all, it’s going to be
a pacing tool.

It lets the other person know
that feedback is about to be given.

And the second thing it does
is it creates a moment of buy-in.

I can say yes or no
to that yes or no question.

And with that,
I get a feeling of autonomy.

The second part of the feedback formula
is going to be giving your data point.

Here, you should name specifically
what you saw or heard,

and cut out any words
that aren’t objective.

There’s a concept we call blur words.

A blur word is something that can mean
different things to different people.

Blur words are not specific.

So for example, if I say
“You shouldn’t be so defensive”

or “You could be more proactive.”

What we see great feedback
givers doing differently

is they’ll convert their blur words
into actual data points.

So for example, instead of saying,

“You aren’t reliable,”

we would say, “You said you’d get
that email to me by 11,

and I still don’t have it yet.”

Specificity is also important
when it comes to positive feedback,

and the reason for that is that we want
to be able to specify exactly

what we want the other person
to increase or diminish.

And if we stick with blur words,

they actually won’t have
any clue particularly

what to do going forward
to keep repeating that behavior.

The third part of the feedback
formula is the impact statement.

Here, you name exactly
how that data point impacted you.

So, for example, I might say,
“Because I didn’t get the message,

I was blocked on my work
and couldn’t move forward”

or “I really liked
how you added those stories,

because it helped me
grasp the concepts faster.”

It gives you a sense of purpose

and meaning and logic between the points,

which is something
the brain really craves.

The fourth part of the feedback
formula is a question.

Great feedback givers wrap
their feedback message with a question.

They’ll ask something like,

“Well, how do you see it?”

Or “This is what I’m thinking
we should do,

but what are your thoughts on it?”

What it does is it creates commitment
rather than just compliance.

It makes the conversation
no longer be a monologue,

but rather becomes a joint
problem-solving situation.

But there’s one last thing.

Great feedback givers
not only can say messages well,

but also, they ask for feedback regularly.

In fact, our research
on perceived leadership

shows that you shouldn’t
wait for feedback to be given to you –

what we call push feedback –

but rather, you should
actively ask for feedback,

what we call pulling feedback.

Pulling feedback establishes you
as a continual learner

and puts the power in your hands.

The most challenging situations

are actually the ones
that call for the most skillful feedback.

But it doesn’t have to be hard.

Now that you know this four-part formula,

you can mix and match it to make it work
for any difficult conversation.

抄写员:TED Translators admin

如果你看一个木匠,
他们有一个工具箱;

牙医,他们有他们的钻头。

在我们这个时代和
我们大多数人正在做的工作类型中,

我们最需要的工具实际上

是以能够很好地提供
和接收反馈为中心的。

[我们的工作方式]

几个世纪以来,人类一直在谈论反馈。

事实上,早在公元前 500 年,孔子就

谈到
了能够很好地表达难懂的信息是多么重要。

但老实说,
我们在这方面仍然很糟糕。

事实上,最近的一项盖洛普调查发现

,只有 26% 的员工
强烈

同意他们得到的反馈
实际上改善了他们的工作。

这些数字相当惨淡。

发生什么了?

大多数人
给出反馈的方式

实际上对大脑并不友好。

人们落入两个阵营之一。

要么他们
属于非常间接和柔软的阵营

,大脑甚至没有
意识到正在给出反馈

,要么只是感到困惑,

要么他们属于过于直接的另一个
阵营

,因此,它提示 对方
进入防御之地。

大脑中有一个
叫做杏仁核的部分

,它一直在扫描
,以

确定信息
是否带有社会威胁。

有了这个,我们将
向前防御,

我们将在撤退中向后移动,

然后反馈提供者也
开始放松管制。

他们添加了更多的 ums 和 ahs
和理由

,整个事情
变得非常快。

它不必是这样的。

我和我的团队已经花了很多年时间
进入不同的公司,

并询问这里谁
是一个很好的反馈提供者。

任何一次又一次被点名的人,

我们实际上都会带进我们的实验室
,看看他们在做什么不同。

我们
发现有一个由四部分组成的公式

,你可以用它来很好地表达
任何困难的信息。

好的,你准备好了吗? 开始了。

公式的第一部分
就是我们所说的微是。

优秀的反馈提供者

通过提出一个
简短但重要的问题来开始他们的反馈。

它让大脑
知道反馈实际上正在到来。

例如,

“你有五分钟时间
谈谈上次谈话的进展情况吗?”

或者“我有一些
关于如何改进事情的想法。

我可以和你分享吗?”

这个微是的问题
为你做了两件事。

首先,它将成为
一个节奏工具。

它让其他人知道
即将给出反馈。

它做的第二件事
是它创造了一个买入的时刻。

我可以对
是或否的问题说是或否。

有了这个,
我有一种自主的感觉。

反馈公式的第二部分
将给出您的数据点。

在这里,你应该具体
说出你看到或听到的东西,

并删除
任何不客观的词。

有一个概念我们称之为模糊词。

模糊词
对不同的人可能意味着不同的事物。

模糊词并不具体。

例如,如果我说
“你不应该如此防御”

或“你可以更积极主动”。

我们看到优秀的反馈提供
者的不同之处

在于,他们会将模糊词
转换为实际数据点。

例如,与其说

“你不可靠”,不如

说“你说你会
在 11 点之前收到那封电子邮件,但

我还没有收到。”

当涉及到正面反馈时,特异性也很重要

,原因是我们希望
能够准确地指定

我们希望
对方增加或减少什么。

如果我们坚持使用模糊的词,

他们实际上不会有
任何线索,特别是

下一步该做什么
来继续重复这种行为。

反馈公式的第三部分
是影响陈述。

在这里,您准确
说出该数据点对您的影响。

所以,例如,我可能会说,
“因为我没有收到信息,

所以我的工作被阻止了
,无法继续前进”

或“我真的很喜欢
你添加这些故事的方式,

因为它帮助我
掌握了概念 快点。”

它给你一种目的感、意义感

和点之间的逻辑,

这是
大脑真正渴望的东西。

反馈公式的第四部分
是一个问题。

优秀的反馈提供者
用一个问题来包装他们的反馈信息。

他们会问类似的问题,

“嗯,你怎么看?”

或者“这是我认为
我们应该做的,

但你对此有何看法?”

它所做的是创造承诺,
而不仅仅是遵守。

它使谈话
不再是独白,

而是成为
共同解决问题的情景。

但还有最后一件事。

优秀的反馈提供者
不仅可以很好地表达信息,

而且他们会定期征求反馈。

事实上,我们
对感知领导力的研究

表明,你不
应该等待反馈给你——

我们称之为推送反馈——

而是你应该
积极寻求反馈,

我们称之为拉反馈。

拉取反馈使您
成为持续学习者

,并将权力掌握在您手中。

最具挑战性

的情况实际上
是需要最熟练的反馈的情况。

但这并不一定很难。

现在您知道了这个由四部分组成的公式,

您可以混合搭配它以使其适用
于任何困难的对话。