Making room for the inbetween

i’d like to start

by sharing the story of carson king

carson was a spectator at a college

football game

who could be seen in the background of a

game day broadcast

holding up a sign saying his busch light

supply

needed to be replenished conveniently

it also included his venmo username

viewers chuckled decided to pitch in

and in a few hours the story had gone

viral

carson used the money that poured in to

buy one case of beer

and then pledged to donate the rest to a

local children’s hospital

anheuser-busch and venmo agreed to match

the donation

and carson was offered a one-year supply

of bushlight

within just a few weeks a 24 year old

making a comical plea for beer money

had raised roughly three million dollars

for charity

this is a great story one with an

unassuming hero

who used an unlikely and unanticipated

platform

to do tremendous good but the story

doesn’t

end here social media posts that carson

made in high school

containing racist content were brought

to light

anheuser-busch and venmo quickly

distanced themselves

and then the journalists who discovered

the posts

lost his job after offensive social

media content from his own past

was revealed many following the story

had whiplash

from just trying to distinguish the hero

from the villain

so i’d like to ask a few questions was

the choice

that carson made when bestowed with a

windfall a good one

is it okay that prior to this act of

extraordinary generosity

he made choices that were discriminatory

and hurtful

toward others should the hospital have

declined the donation

do one’s actions in the past negate good

will

in the present i share this story

because it illustrates our basic human

tendency

to take complex information from our

environment

and break it down so it fits into simple

categories

categories like good and bad red

and blue and hero versus villain

thanks to social media we now have

unprecedented

access to the views and daily activities

of others

and this sheer amount of information can

be overwhelming

when we put people into categories we

eliminate the need to think carefully

about them

as individuals or the unique

circumstances

that give rise to their choices and

actions

but people are complex the issues that

matter most to us

are complex and what has evolved into a

collective

aversion to complexity i would argue

is contributing to some of our growing

divides

so how did we get here i’m a social

psychologist

who studies how our identities shape and

are shaped by

our interactions with others drawing on

this work

i’d like to share three insights the

first

is that social media is as much about

affirming

and communicating our identity as it is

about connecting with others

in other words it helps us figure out

and express

who we are and it’s not just what we

write

in our social media posts what we choose

to like or dislike

who we’ve included in our social network

and the groups we allow ourselves to be

linked to

all convey information about who we are

and how we want to be viewed by others

the second insight is that identity is

communicated in very simple ways on

social media

social media allows us to share our

deepest and most defining beliefs

on some platforms and 280 characters or

less

our profiles state our attitudes

preferences

and life history as concrete and

unambiguous facts

and we use hashtags a string of just a

few

letters to underscore our positions on

complex issues these structural

characteristics of social media

also contribute to the quick and

intuitive judgments we make of others

which are now more than ever based on

single social media posts

the third insight is that identity is

about who we are

but it’s also about who we are not

parked in my driveway at this very

moment

is a vehicle with the license plate duke

hater

i completed my graduate work at duke

university and

this is not a reflection of

self-loathing the proclaimed ducator

is my husband a chapel hill native and

graduate of the university of north

carolina

duke’s archrival from eight miles down

the road

as this demonstrates we sometimes affirm

important aspects of our identity by

emphasizing what it is that we are not

and this when communicated on social

media

or a license plate can facilitate the

simplification

of our identity and our social worlds

so how do we move forward

one way is by resisting the urge to

simplify

if we can stop and think twice before

unfriending an acquaintance with

differing views

or cancelling a celebrity whose actions

or social media posts

don’t align with the ideals we hold them

to

we can begin to open ourselves up to the

complexity around us

we can challenge ourselves to stop

thinking of republicans and democrats or

those who are wealthy and those living

in poverty

as one-dimensional entities that are

either entirely good

or entirely bad instead

we can do the more difficult work of

seeing others as

multi-dimensional beings who are many

things

at once we can recognize that people can

and do make mistakes but they also have

a remarkable capacity

to learn from them maintaining

meaningful relationships with people who

see the world in a very different way

can be frustrating uncomfortable and at

times

downright infuriating but if we can

challenge ourselves to acknowledge and

maybe even embrace

nuance and complexity i think we’ll be

moving in the right direction

in a universe of eithers and oars let’s

make some room for the in-between

thank you

you

我想

先分享一下卡森王卡森的故事

包括他的 venmo 用户名

观众笑了 决定投入

其中,几个小时后,这个故事已经

传播开来,

卡森用涌入的

钱买了一箱啤酒

,然后承诺将其余的捐赠给

当地儿童医院

anheuser-busch 和 venmo 同意与

捐款相匹配,

并且卡森在短短几周内获得了为期一年

的丛林灯供应

一个 24 岁的人

以可笑的方式请求啤酒钱

为慈善事业筹集了大约 300 万美元

这是一个伟大的故事,讲述了一个

谦逊的英雄

谁使用了一个不太可能和意想不到的

平台

来做巨大的好事,但故事

并没有

到此结束,

卡森在高中时发布的

包含种族主义内容的社交媒体帖子是兄弟

应该点燃

安海斯-布希和文莫迅速拉开

距离

,然后发现这些帖子的记者

在他自己过去的令人反感的社交媒体内容

被揭露后失去了工作,许多人在报道这个故事后

受到了鞭打

,因为他们只是试图区分英雄

和反派,

所以 我想问几个问题

,卡森在获得

意外之财

时做出的选择是个好选择

捐赠 过去的行为否定

了现在的善意 我分享这个故事,

因为它说明了我们人类

从环境中获取复杂信息

并将其分解的基本倾向,因此它适合简单的

类别,如好坏红色

和蓝色和 借助

社交媒体,我们现在可以前所未有地

访问观点和日常活动

当我们将人们分类时,我们

无需仔细

考虑他们

作为个人或

导致他们选择和行动的独特环境,

但人们很复杂,

最重要的问题是 我们

是复杂的,并且已经演变成对

复杂性的集体厌恶我认为

这导致了我们日益增长的一些

分歧

所以我们是如何到达这里的

借鉴

这项工作,

我想分享三个见解

首先

是社交媒体既是关于

确认

和传达我们的身份,也是

关于与他人联系

,换句话说,它帮助我们弄清楚

和表达

我们是谁,而不是

正是我们在社交媒体上发布的内容 我们

选择喜欢或不

喜欢我们社交网络中包含的人

以及我们允许的群组 我们自己

与所有人联系在一起

传达关于我们是谁

以及我们希望别人如何看待我们

的信息 第二个见解是,身份

在社交媒体上以非常简单的方式传达

社交媒体允许我们在某些方面分享我们

最深刻和最明确的

信念 平台和 280 个字符或

更少

我们的个人资料将我们的态度

偏好

和生活史作为具体和

明确的事实陈述

,我们使用标签一串仅

几个

字母来强调我们在复杂问题上的立场

社交媒体的这些结构特征

也有助于快速和

我们对他人的直觉判断

现在比以往任何时候都基于

单一的社交媒体

帖子 第三个见解是,身份

与我们是谁有关,

但也与我们没有

停在我车道上的人

有关。 车牌杜克

仇恨者

我在杜克大学完成了我的研究生工作,

这并不是

对专业人士自我厌恶的反映 声称 ducator

是我的丈夫,一个教堂山本地人,

毕业于北卡罗来纳大学

杜克大学的主要竞争对手,距离公路 8 英里,

因为这表明我们有时会

通过

强调我们不是什么来肯定我们身份的重要方面,

并且在交流时会强调这一点 社交

媒体

或车牌可以

促进我们的身份和社交世界的简化,

所以我们如何前进的

一种方式是抵制简化的冲动,

如果我们可以在

与意见不同的熟人解除朋友关系

或取消名人之前停下来三思而后行 他们的行为

或社交媒体帖子

与我们所坚持的理想不符

我们可以开始向我们周围的复杂性敞开心扉

我们可以挑战自己,停止

思考共和党人和民主党人或

那些富有和生活

在贫困中的人

作为

完全好

或完全坏的一维实体,

我们可以做更困难的工作

将他人视为

同时拥有许多事物的多维生物,

我们可以认识到人们可以

而且确实会犯错,但他们也

有非凡的能力

从错误中学习,

以非常不同的方式看待世界的人保持有意义的关系

可以 令人沮丧的不舒服,

有时

甚至是彻头彻尾的愤怒,但如果我们能够

挑战自己,承认

甚至拥抱

细微差别和复杂性,我认为我们将

在一个非此即彼的世界中朝着正确的方向前进,让我们

为中间腾出一些空间

谢谢你