Dark matter How does it explain a stars speed Don Lincoln

Transcriber: tom carter
Reviewer: Bedirhan Cinar

Of all the spectacles mankind has viewed through a telescope,

there are few lovelier than a spiral galaxy.

Majestic whirlpools of stars, they rotate in a stately and predictable dance.

The fact that we see many billions of them in our telescopes

tells us they are both common and stable.

It is perhaps surprising that it is relatively easy to understand the inner workings of these cosmic pinwheels.

By combining physical principles worked out by Sir Isaac Newton in the late 17th century,

with the observed amount of mass in a galaxy,

scientists can calculate the rates at which these galaxies rotate.

Using these techniques, astronomers predict how fast stars at different distances from the center of the galaxy should move.

Stars very close to the center move slowly.

That’s because there is very little mass between them and the center of the galaxy to pull them along.

Stars a bit further away move faster,

because they are being pulled by all of the stars in between them and the center.

As we get really far away, the stars are predicted to move slowly again.

Their great distance reduces gravity to a gentle tug,

so they move leisurely in their orbits.

Knowing this, scientists looked at the galaxies and measured how fast stars were moving.

To their surprise, they found that while the stars closer to the center of the galaxy behaved as predicted,

those further away moved far too quickly.

This observation was devastating to the tradtional theories of gravity and motion.

If the stars were moving as fast as their measurement suggested,

galaxies should have torn themselves apart.

It was a crisis, and astronomers and physicists scrambled to find a mistake in their calculation.

Was Newton’s theory of gravity wrong?

Was his theory of motion wrong?

Or was it possible that astronomers had incorrectly measured the galaxy’s mass?

All options were investigated, and all were ruled out. Except one.

Today, scientists believe that the answer lies in a previously unknown kind of matter, called dark matter.

This dark matter can be envisioned as a cloud which surrounds most galaxies.

This matter is very unusual. It is affected by gravity,

but it is invisible to visible light and all other forms of electromagnetic radiation.

The name “dark matter” originates in this form of matter’s inability to emit or absorb light.

Dark matter adds to the gravity of the galaxy

and explains the orbital speed of stars far from the galactic center.

Dark matter has not yet been directly observed,

but scientists believe that it is likely to be real,

mostly because the other options have been ruled out.

Using dozens of approaches, astronomers and physicists continue to search for direct evidence

that would prove that the dark matter hypothesis is true.

This question is one of the most important physics research questions of the 21st century.

抄写员:汤姆卡特
审稿人:Bedirhan Cinar

在人类通过望远镜看到的所有景象中,

没有什么比螺旋星系更可爱了。

雄伟的恒星漩涡,它们以庄严而可预测的舞蹈旋转。

我们在望远镜中看到了数十亿个它们的事实

告诉我们它们既常见又稳定。

令人惊讶的是,理解这些宇宙风车的内部运作相对容易。

通过将艾萨克·牛顿爵士在 17 世纪后期提出的物理原理

与星系中观测到的质量相结合,

科学家们可以计算出这些星系的旋转速率。

使用这些技术,天文学家预测距银河系中心不同距离的恒星应该移动多快。

离中心很近的恒星移动缓慢。

那是因为它们和银河系中心之间几乎没有质量可以拉动它们。

稍远一点的恒星移动得更快,

因为它们被它们和中心之间的所有恒星拉动。

当我们离得很远时,预计星星会再次缓慢移动。

它们的远距离将重力降低为轻柔的拖曳,

因此它们在轨道上悠闲地移动。

知道了这一点,科学家们观察了星系并测量了恒星的移动速度。

令他们惊讶的是,他们发现虽然靠近银河系中心的恒星表现得如预期,

但那些更远的恒星移动得太快了。

这一观察结果对传统的引力和运动理论是毁灭性的。

如果恒星的移动速度与测量结果显示的一样快,那么

星系应该已经将自己撕裂了。

这是一场危机,天文学家和物理学家争先恐后地找出计算中的错误。

牛顿的万有引力理论错了吗?

他的运动理论错了吗?

或者天文学家有没有可能错误地测量了星系的质量?

所有选项都进行了调查,所有选项都被排除在外。 除了一个。

今天,科学家认为答案在于一种以前未知的物质,称为暗物质。

这种暗物质可以设想为围绕大多数星系的云。

这件事很不寻常。 它受重力影响,

但对可见光和所有其他形式的电磁辐射是不可见的。

“暗物质”这个名称源于这种物质无法发射或吸收光。

暗物质增加了银河系的引力,

并解释了远离银河系中心的恒星的轨道速度。

暗物质尚未被直接观察到,

但科学家认为它很可能是真实的,

主要是因为已经排除了其他选择。

使用数十种方法,天文学家和物理学家继续寻找直接证据

来证明暗物质假说是正确的。

这个问题是21世纪最重要的物理研究问题之一。