SpaceXs plan to fly you across the globe in 30 minutes Gwynne Shotwell

Chris Anderson: So two months ago,
something crazy happened.

Can you talk us through this, because
this caught so many people’s attention?

Gwynne Shotwell: I’ll stay quiet
for the beginning,

and then I’ll start talking.

(Video) Voices: Five, four,
three, two, one.

(Cheering)

Woman: Liftoff. Go Falcon Heavy.

GS: So this was such
an important moment for SpaceX.

With the Falcon 9
and now the Falcon Heavy,

we can launch into orbit

any payload that has previously
been conceived or is conceived right now.

We’ve got a couple of launches
of Falcon Heavy later this year,

so this had to go right.

It was the first time we flew it,

and the star of the show, of course,

brother and sister side boosters landing.

I was excited.

(Laughter)

Thanking my team.

By the way, there’s maybe
a thousand people

standing around me right there.

And Starman.

Starman did not steal the show, though –

the boosters did.

CA: (Laughter)

CA: There had to be some payload –
why not put a Tesla into space?

GS: Exactly. It was perfect.

CA: Gwynne, let’s wind the clock back.

I mean, how did you end up an engineer
and President of SpaceX?

Were you supernerdy as a girl?

GS: I don’t think I was nerdy,

but I was definitely doing the things
that the girls weren’t doing.

I asked my mom, who was an artist,
when I was in third grade,

how a car worked,

so she had no idea so she gave me
a book, and I read it,

and sure enough, my first job
out of my mechanical engineering degree

was with Chrysler Motors
in the automotive industry.

But I actually got into engineering
not because of that book

but because my mom took me
to a Society of Women Engineers event,

and I fell in love with
the mechanical engineer that spoke.

She was doing really critical work,

and I loved her suit.

(Laughter)

And that’s what a 15-year-old
girl connects with.

And I used to shy away
from telling that story,

but if that’s what caused me
to be an engineer –

hey, I think we should talk about that.

CA: Sixteen years ago, you became
employee number seven at SpaceX,

and then over the next years,

you somehow built a multi-billion-dollar
relationship with NASA,

despite the fact that SpaceX’s
first three launches blew up.

I mean, how on earth did you do that?

GS: So actually, selling rockets
is all about relationships

and making a connection
with these customers.

When you don’t have a rocket to sell,

what’s really important
is selling your team,

selling the business savvy of your CEO –

that’s not really hard
to sell these days –

and basically, making sure
that any technical issue that they have

or any concern,
you can address right away.

So I think it was helpful
for me to be an engineer.

I think it was helpful to my role
of running sales for Elon.

CA: And currently,
a big focus of the company

is, I guess, kind of a race with Boeing

to be the first to provide
the service to NASA

of actually putting humans into orbit.

Safety considerations obviously
come to the fore, here.

How are you sleeping?

GS: I actually sleep really well.
I’m a good sleeper, that’s my best thing.

But I think the days leading up
to our flying crew

will probably be a little sleepless.

But really, fundamentally,
safety comes in the design

of the system that you’re going
to fly people on,

and so we’ve been working for years,

actually, almost a decade,
on this technology.

We’re taking the Dragon cargo spaceship

and we’re upgrading it
to be able to carry crew.

And as I said, we’ve been
engineering in these safety systems

for quite some time.

CA: So isn’t it that there’s one system
that actually allows instant escape

if there’s a problem.

GS: That’s right. It’s called
the launch escape system.

CA: I think we have that. Let’s show that.

GS: We’ve got a video
of a test that we ran in 2015.

So this simulated having
a really bad day on the pad.

Basically, you want the capsule
to get out of Dodge.

You want it to get away from the rocket

that had a bad day right below it.

This is if there was an issue on the pad.

We also will be doing
another demonstration later this year

on if we have an issue
with the rocket during flight.

CA: And those rockets have another
potential function as well, eventually.

GS: Yeah, so the launch escape system
for Dragon is pretty unique.

It’s an integrated launch escape system.

It’s basically a pusher,

so the propellant system and the thrusters
are integrated into the capsule,

and so if it detects a rocket problem,
it pushes the capsule away.

Capsule safety systems in the past
have been like tractor pullers,

and the reason we didn’t want to do that

is that puller needs to come off before
you can safely reenter that capsule,

so we wanted to eliminate, in design,
that possibility of failure.

CA: I mean, SpaceX has made
the regular reusability of rockets

seem almost routine,

which means you’ve done something

that no national
space program, for example,

has been able to achieve.

How was that possible?

GS: I think there’s a couple of things –

there’s a million things, actually –

that have allowed SpaceX to be successful.

The first is that we’re kind of standing
on the shoulders of giants. Right?

We got to look at the rocket industry
and the developments to date,

and we got to pick the best ideas,

leverage them.

We also didn’t have technology
that we had to include

in our vehicle systems.

So we didn’t have to design
around legacy components

that maybe weren’t the most reliable
or were particularly expensive,

so we really were able to let physics
drive the design of these systems.

CA: I mean, there are other programs
started from scratch.

That last phrase you said there,
you let physics drive the design,

what’s an example of that?

GS: There’s hundreds of examples,
actually, of that,

but basically, we got to construct
the vehicle design

from, really, a clean sheet of paper,

and we got to make decisions
that we wanted to make.

The tank architecture –
it’s a common dome design.

Basically it’s like two beer cans
stacked together,

one full of liquid oxygen,

one full of RP,

and that basically saved weight.

It allowed us to basically take
more payload for the same design.

One of the other elements of the vehicle
that we’re flying right now

is we do use densified
liquid oxygen and densified RP,

so it’s ultracold,

and it allows you to pack
more propellent into the vehicle.

It is done elsewhere,

probably not to the degree that we do it,

but it adds a lot
of margin to the vehicle,

which obviously adds reliability.

CA: Gwynne, you became President
of SpaceX 10 years ago, I think.

What’s it been like to work
so closely with Elon Musk?

GS: So I love working for Elon.

I’ve been doing it for 16 years
this year, actually.

I don’t think I’m dumb enough
to do something for 16 years

that I don’t like doing.

He’s funny

and fundamentally without
him saying anything

he drives you to do your best work.

He doesn’t have to say a word.

You just want to do great work.

CA: You might be the person
best placed to answer this question,

which has puzzled me,

which is to shed light
on this strange unit of time

called “Elon time.”

For example, last year,
I asked Elon, you know,

when Tesla would
auto-drive across America,

and he said by last December,

which is definitely true,
if you take Elon time into account.

So what’s the conversion ratio
between Elon time and real time?

(Laughter)

GS: You put me
in a unique position, Chris.

Thanks for that.

There’s no question that Elon
is very aggressive on his timelines,

but frankly, that drives us
to do things better and faster.

I think all the time
and all the money in the world

does not yield the best solution,

and so putting that pressure on the team
to move quickly is really important.

CA: It feels like you play
kind of a key intermediary role here.

I mean, he sets these crazy goals
that have their impact,

but, in other circumstances,
might blow up a team

or set impossible expectations.

It feels like you’ve found a way
of saying, “Yes, Elon,”

and then making it happen
in a way that is acceptable

both to him and to your company,
to your employees.

GS: There is two really important
realizations for that.

First of all, when Elon says something,
you have to pause

and not immediately blurt out,
“Well, that’s impossible,”

or, “There’s no way we’re going
to do that. I don’t know how.”

So you zip it, and you think about it,

and you find ways to get that done.

And the other thing I realized,

and it made my job satisfaction
substantially harder.

So I always felt like my job
was to take these ideas

and kind of turn them into company goals,
make them achievable,

and kind of roll the company over
from this steep slope, get it comfortable.

And I noticed every time
I felt like we were there,

we were rolling over,
people were getting comfortable,

Elon would throw something out there,

and all of a sudden, we’re not comfortable

and we’re climbing that steep slope again.

But then once I realized
that that’s his job,

and my job is to get the company
close to comfortable

so he can push again
and put us back on that slope,

then I started liking my job a lot more,

instead of always being frustrated.

CA: So if I estimated
that the conversation ratio

for Elon time to your time is about 2x,

am I a long way out there?

GS: That’s not terrible,
and you said it, I didn’t.

(Laughter)

CA: You know, looking ahead,

one huge initiative

SpaceX is believed to be,
rumored to be working on,

is a massive network of literally
thousands of low earth orbit satellites

to provide high-bandwidth,
low-cost internet connection

to every square foot of planet earth.

Is there anything
you can tell us about this?

GS: We actually don’t chat very much
about this particular project,

not because we’re hiding anything,

but this is probably
one of the most challenging

if not the most challenging
project we’ve undertaken.

No one has been successful

deploying a huge constellation
for internet broadband,

or basically for satellite internet,

and I don’t think physics
is the difficulty here.

I think we can come up
with the right technology solution,

but we need to make a business out of it,

and it’ll cost the company
about 10 billion dollars or more

to deploy this system.

And so we’re marching steadily along

but we’re certainly
not claiming victory yet.

CA: I mean, the impact of that,
obviously, if that happened to the world,

of connectivity everywhere,
would be pretty radical,

and perhaps mainly for good –

I mean, it changes a lot
if suddenly everyone can connect cheaply.

GS: Yeah, there’s no question
it’ll change the world.

CA: How much of a worry is it,

and how much of a drag
on the planning is it,

are concerns just about space junk?

People worry a lot about this.

This would a huge increase in the total
number of satellites in orbit.

Is that a concern?

GS: So space debris is a concern,
there’s no question –

not because it’s so likely to happen,

but the consequences of it happening
are pretty devastating.

You could basically spew
a bunch of particles in orbit

that could take out that orbit
from being useful for decades or longer.

So as a matter of fact,

we are required to bring down
our second stage after every mission

so it doesn’t end up being
a rocket carcass orbiting earth.

So you really need to be
a good steward of that.

CA: So despite
the remarkable success there

of that Falcon Heavy rocket,

you’re actually not focusing on that
as your future development plan.

You’re doubling down
to a much bigger rocket

called the BFR,

which stands for …

GS: It’s the Big Falcon Rocket.
CA: The Big Falcon Rocket, that’s right.

(Laughter)

What’s the business logic of doing this

when you invested all that
in that incredible technology,

and now you’re just going
to something much bigger. Why?

GS: Actually, we’ve learned some lessons

over the duration where we’ve
been developing these launch systems.

What we want to do is not introduce
a new product before we’ve been able

to convince the customers that this
is the product that they should move to,

so we’re working on
the Big Falcon Rocket now,

but we’re going to continue
flying Falcon 9s and Falcon Heavies

until there is absolute
widespread acceptance of BFR.

But we are working on it right now,

we’re just not going to cancel
Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy

and just put in place BFR.

CA: The logic is that BFR is what you need
to take humanity to Mars?

GS: That’s correct.

CA: But somehow, you’ve also found
other business ideas for this.

GS: Yes. BFR can take the satellites
that we’re currently taking to orbit

to many orbits.

It allows for even a new class
of satellites to be delivered to orbit.

Basically, the width, the diameter
of the fairing is eight meters,

so you can think about
what giant telescopes

you can put in that fairing,
in that cargo bay,

and see really incredible things

and discover incredible things in space.

But then there are some
residual capabilities

that we have out of BFR as well.

CA: A residual capability?
GS: It’s a residual capability.

CA: Is that what you call this?
Talk about what the heck this is.

Oh wait a sec –

GS: That’s Falcon Heavy.

That’s worth pointing out, by the way.

What a beautiful rocket,

and that hangar could just fit
the Statue of Liberty in it,

so you get a sense of size
of that Falcon Heavy Rocket.

CA: And the fact that
there are 27 engines there.

That’s part of the design principle

that you, rather than just
inventing ever bigger rockets,

you team them up.

GS: It’s exactly this residual capability.

We developed the Merlin engine
for the Falcon 1 launch vehicle.

We could have tossed that engine

and built an entirely new engine
for the Falcon 9.

It would have been called
something different,

because Falcon 9 is nine Merlin engines,

but instead of spending a billion dollars
on a brand new engine,

we put nine of them together
on the back end of Falcon 9.

Residual capability:
glue three Falcon 9s together

and you have the largest
operational rocket flying.

And so it was expensive to do,

but it was a much more efficient path
than starting from scratch.

CA: And the BFR is the equivalent
of how much bigger than that,

in terms of its power?

GS: BFR is about, I believe,
two and half times the size of this.

CA: Right, and so that allows you –

I mean, I still don’t really believe
this video that we’re about to play here.

What on earth is this?

GS: So it currently is on earth,

but this is basically
space travel for earthlings.

I can’t wait for this residual capability.

Basically, what we’re going to do
is we’re going to fly BFR like an aircraft

and do point-to-point travel on earth,

so you can take off
from New York City or Vancouver

and fly halfway across the globe.

You’ll be on the BFR for roughly
half an hour or 40 minutes,

and the longest part –
yeah, it’s so awesome.

(Applause)

The longest part of that flight
is actually the boat out and back.

(Laughter)

CA: I mean. Gwynne, come on,
this is awesome, but it’s crazy, right?

This is never going to actually happen.

GS: Oh no, it’s definitely
going to happen.

This is definitely going to happen.

CA: How?

(Applause)

So first of all, countries are going
to accept this incoming missile –

(Laughter)

GS: Chris, so can you imagine
us trying to convince a federal range,

Air Force bases to take the incomers?

Because we’re doing it now,
regularly, right?

We’re bringing the first stages back,

and we’re landing them
on federal property on an Air Force base.

So I think doing it, I don’t know,

10 kilometers out from a city, maybe
it’s only five kilometers out from a city.

CA: So how many passengers
can possibly afford the fortune

of flying by space?

GS: So the first BFR is going to have
roughly a hundred passengers.

And let’s talk a little bit
about the business.

Everyone thinks rockets
are really expensive,

and to a large degree they are,

and how could we possibly compete
with airline tickets here?

But if you think about it,
if I can do this trip

in half an hour to an hour,

I can do dozens of these a day, right?

And yet, a long-haul aircraft
can only make one of those flights a day.

So even if my rocket
was slightly more expensive

and the fuel is
a little bit more expensive,

I can run 10x at least
what they’re running in a day,

and really make the revenue
that I need to out of that system.

CA: So you really believe this is going
to be deployed at some point

in our amazing future. When?

GS: Within a decade, for sure.

CA: And this is Gwynne time or Elon time?

GS: That’s Gwynne time.
I’m sure Elon will want us to go faster.

(Laughter)

CA: OK, that’s certainly amazing.

(Laughter)

GS: I’m personally invested in this one,
because I travel a lot

and I do not love to travel,

and I would love to get to see
my customers in Riyadh,

leave in the morning
and be back in time to make dinner.

CA: So we’re going to test this out.

So within 10 years,
an economy price ticket,

or, like, a couple thousand dollars
per person to fly New York to Shanghai.

GS: Yeah, I think it’ll be between
economy and business,

but you do it in an hour.

CA: Yeah, well, OK,
that is definitely something.

(Laughter)

And meanwhile, the other use
of BFR is being developed

to go a little bit further than Shanghai.

Talk about this.

You guys have actually developed
quite a detailed, sort of, picture

of how humans might fly to Mars,

and what that would look like.

GS: Yeah. So we’ve got a video,
this is a cropped video

from others we’ve shown, and then
there’s a couple of new bits to it.

But basically, you’re going
to lift off from a pad,

you’ve got a booster as well as the BFS,
the Big Falcon Spaceship.

It’s going to take off.

The booster is going to drop
the spaceship off in orbit,

low earth orbit,

and then return just like
we’re returning boosters right now.

So it sounds incredible,
but we’re working on the pieces,

and you can see us achieve these pieces.

So booster comes back.

The new thing here

is that we’re going to actually land
on the pad that we launched from.

Currently, we land on a separate pad,
or we land out on a boat.

Fast, quick connect.

You take a cargo ship full of fuel,

or a fuel depot,

put it on that booster, get that in orbit,

do a docking maneuver,
refuel the spaceship,

and head on to your destination,

and this one is Mars.

CA: So, like, a hundred people
go to Mars at one time,

taking, what, six months? Two months?

GS: It ends up depending
on how big the rocket is.

I think this first version,
and we’ll continue to make

even bigger BFRs,

I think it’s a three-month trip.

Right now, the average is six to eight,

but we’re going to try to do it faster.

CA: When do you believe SpaceX
will land the first human on Mars?

GS: It’s a very similar time frame
from the point-to-point.

It’s the same capability.

It will be within a decade –
not this decade.

CA: In real time, again, within a decade.

Well, that would also be amazing.

(Laughter)

Why, though? Seriously, why?

I mean, you’ve got a company
where this is the official stated mission.

Has everyone actually
bought into that mission,

given that, I mean,
there’s a lot of people around

who think, come on,
you’ve got so much talent,

so much technology capability.

There are so many things on earth
that need urgent attention.

Why would you have this escape trip
off to another planet?

(Applause)

GS: So I am glad you asked that,

but I think we need
to expand our minds a little bit.

There are plenty of things to do on earth,

but there are lots of companies
working on that.

I think we’re working on one of
the most important things we possibly can,

and that’s to find another place
for humans to live and survive and thrive.

If something happened on earth,

you need humans living somewhere else.

(Applause)

It’s the fundamental risk reduction
for the human species.

And this does not subvert

making our planet here better
and doing a better job taking care of it,

but I think you need
multiple paths to survival,

and this is one of them.

And let’s not talk about the downer piece,

like, you go to Mars to make sure
all earthlings don’t die.

That’s terrible, actually,
that’s a terrible reason to go do it.

Fundamentally,
it’s another place to explore,

and that’s what makes humans
different from animals,

it’s our sense of exploration
and sense of wonderment

and learning something new.

And then I also have to say,

this is the first step
in us moving to other solar systems

and potentially other galaxies,

and I think this is the only time
I ever out-vision Elon,

because I want to meet other people
in other solar systems.

Mars is fine, but it is
a fixer-upper planet.

There’s work to do there
to make it habitable.

(Laughter)

I want to find people,
or whatever they call themselves,

in another solar system.

CA: That is a big vision.

Gwynne Shotwell, thank you.

You have one of the most
amazing jobs on the planet.

GS: Thank you very much. Thanks, Chris.

克里斯安德森:所以两个月前,
发生了一些疯狂的事情。

你能跟我们谈谈吗,因为
这引起了很多人的注意?

Gwynne Shotwell:一开始我会保持
安静,

然后我会开始说话。

(视频)声音:五、四、
三、二、一。

(欢呼)

女人:升空。 去猎鹰重型。

GS:所以这
对 SpaceX 来说是一个非常重要的时刻。

有了猎鹰 9 号
和现在的猎鹰重型,

我们可以


之前设想或现在设想的任何有效载荷送入轨道。

我们在
今年晚些时候推出了几次重型猎鹰,

所以这必须正确。

这是我们第一次飞它,

而节目中的明星,当然是

兄弟姐妹侧助推器降落。

我很兴奋。

(笑声)

感谢我的团队。

顺便说一句,

我周围站着大概有一千个人。

还有斯塔曼。

不过,Starman 并没有抢尽风头

——助推器做到了。

CA:(笑声)

CA:必须有一些有效载荷——
为什么不把特斯拉送上太空呢?

GS:没错。 它是完美的。

CA:格温,让我们把时钟拨回去。

我的意思是,你是如何
成为 SpaceX 的工程师和总裁的?

作为一个女孩,你是超人吗?

GS:我不认为我是书呆子,

但我确实做
了女孩们没有做的事情。

我在三年级的时候问我妈妈,她是一位艺术家,

汽车是如何工作的,

她不知道所以她给了我
一本书,我读了它

,果然,我的第
一份机械工作 工程学学位


在汽车行业的克莱斯勒汽车公司。

但我实际上
并不是因为那本书,

而是因为我妈妈带我
参加了一个女性工程师协会的活动,我才真正进入工程学领域

,我爱上
了说话的机械工程师。

她正在做非常重要的工作

,我喜欢她的西装。

(笑声)

这就是一个 15 岁的
女孩的联系方式。

我过去常常
回避讲述这个故事,

但如果这就是
我成为工程师的原因——

嘿,我认为我们应该谈谈这个。

CA:16 年前,你成为
SpaceX 的第 7 号员工,

然后在接下来的几年里,

你不知何故与 NASA 建立了价值数十亿美元的
关系,

尽管 SpaceX 的
前三次发射都失败了。

我的意思是,你到底是怎么做到的?

GS:所以实际上,销售火箭
就是建立关系


与这些客户建立联系。

当你没有火箭要卖的时候

,真正重要的
是卖掉你的团队,

卖掉你 CEO 的商业头脑——

这在现在并不
难卖

——基本上,
确保他们遇到的任何技术问题

或任何问题,
您可以立即解决。

所以我认为
成为一名工程师对我很有帮助。

我认为这对我担任
Elon 的销售工作很有帮助。

CA:我想,目前,公司的
一大重点

是与波音公司展开一场竞赛,

成为第一个
为美国宇航局提供服务,

将人类送入轨道的公司。

在这里,安全考虑显然是最重要的。

你睡得怎么样?

GS:我实际上睡得很好。
我睡得很好,这是我最好的。

但我认为
我们的飞行机组人员的前几天

可能会有点失眠。

但实际上,从根本上说,
安全性来自于


将搭载人员的系统设计

,因此我们多年来一直在研究这项技术,

实际上,将近十年

我们正在乘坐 Dragon 货运飞船

,我们正在对其进行升级,
以便能够搭载船员。

正如我所说,我们
在这些安全系统中进行工程设计已经

有一段时间了。

CA:难道不是有一个
系统实际上允许

在出现问题时立即逃跑。

GS:没错。 它被
称为发射逃生系统。

CA:我认为我们有。 让我们展示一下。

GS:我们有一个
我们在 2015 年进行的测试的视频。

所以这个模拟
了在垫子上度过了非常糟糕的一天。

基本上,您希望
胶囊离开道奇。

您希望它远离在其

下方度过糟糕日子的火箭。

这是如果垫上有问题。

如果我们
在飞行过程中遇到火箭问题,我们还将在今年晚些时候进行另一次演示。

CA:这些火箭
最终还有另一个潜在的功能。

GS:是的,所以 Dragon 的发射逃生
系统非常独特。

这是一个集成的发射逃生系统。

它基本上是一个推进器,

所以推进剂系统和推进器
被集成到太空舱中

,所以如果它检测到火箭问题,
它就会将太空舱推开。

过去的胶囊安全系统
就像拖拉机牵引器

,我们不想这样做的原因

是,在
您可以安全地重新进入该胶囊之前,牵引器需要脱落,

所以我们希望在设计上消除
这种可能性 失败。

CA:我的意思是,SpaceX 已经让
火箭的常规可重复使用性

看起来几乎是家常便饭,

这意味着你已经做了

一些国家
太空计划

无法实现的事情。

这怎么可能?

GS:我认为有几件事——

实际上有一百万件事——

让 SpaceX 取得了成功。

首先是我们有点
站在巨人的肩膀上。 对?

我们必须看看火箭工业
和迄今为止的发展

,我们必须选择最好的想法,

利用它们。

我们也
没有必须包含

在车辆系统中的技术。

所以我们不必
围绕

可能不是最可靠
或特别昂贵的遗留组件进行设计,

所以我们真的能够让物理
驱动这些系统的设计。

CA:我的意思是,还有其他程序
是从头开始的。

你在那里说的最后一句话,
你让物理驱动设计,有

什么例子?

GS:实际上,有数百个例子,

但基本上,我们必须从一张白纸上
构建车辆设计

,我们必须做出我们想要做出的决定

坦克结构——
这是一种常见的圆顶设计。

基本上就像两个啤酒罐
叠在一起,

一个装满液氧,

一个装满RP

,这样基本就减重了。

它使我们基本上可以
为相同的设计采取更多的有效载荷。

我们现在正在飞行的飞行器的其他元素之一

是我们确实使用了致密
液氧和致密 RP,

所以它是超冷的

,它可以让你
在飞行器中装入更多的推进剂。

它是在其他地方完成的,

可能没有我们这样做的程度,

但它
为车辆增加了很多余量,

这显然增加了可靠性。

CA:格温
,我想你是 10 年前成为 SpaceX 的总裁的。

与埃隆马斯克密切合作是什么感觉

GS:所以我喜欢为 Elon 工作。

事实上,我今年已经做了 16 年了

我不认为我愚蠢
到可以做 16

年我不喜欢做的事情。

他很有趣,

而且基本上没有
他说什么,

他会驱使你把工作做到最好。

他不必说一句话。

你只是想做伟大的工作。

CA:你可能是
最适合回答这个问题的人,

这个问题让我感到困惑,


阐明这个

称为“埃隆时间”的奇怪时间单位。

例如,去年
我问埃隆,你知道,

特斯拉什么时候会
在美国自动驾驶

,他说在去年 12 月之前


如果你考虑埃隆的时间,这绝对是真的。

那么
Elon时间和实时之间的转换率是多少呢?

(笑声)

GS:你让我
处于一个独特的位置,克里斯。

感谢那。

毫无疑问,埃隆
在他的时间表上非常激进,

但坦率地说,这促使我们
把事情做得更好更快。

我认为世界上所有的时间
和所有的钱都

不会产生最好的解决方案

,因此向团队施加压力
以迅速行动非常重要。

CA:感觉你
在这里扮演了一个关键的中介角色。

我的意思是,他设定了这些
具有影响力的疯狂目标,

但在其他情况下,
可能会炸毁团队

或设定不可能的期望。

感觉就像你找到了
一种说“是的,埃隆”的方式

,然后
以一种

他和你的公司
、你的员工都可以接受的方式让它发生。

GS:对此有两个非常重要的
认识。

首先,当埃隆说什么时,
你必须停下来

,不要马上脱口而出,
“嗯,那是不可能的”,

或者,“我们不可能
那样做。我不知道怎么做。”

所以你把它拉上拉链,然后思考它,然后找到完成它的

方法。

我意识到的另一件事是

,它使我的工作满意度
变得更加困难。

所以我一直觉得我的工作
就是把

这些想法变成公司目标,
让它们可以实现,

然后让公司
从这个陡峭的斜坡上翻过来,让它舒服些。

而且我注意到每次
我觉得我们在那里,

我们翻身,
人们变得舒服,

埃隆会扔东西在那里

,突然之间,我们不舒服

,我们又爬上了那个陡峭的斜坡。

但是当我意识到
那是他的工作,

而我的工作是让公司
接近舒适,

这样他就可以再次推动
并让我们回到那个斜坡上,

然后我开始更喜欢我的工作,

而不是总是感到沮丧。

CA:所以,如果我估计

Elon 时间与你时间的对话比率约为 2 倍,那么

我还有很长的路要走吗?

GS:这并不可怕
,你说过,我没有。

(笑声)

CA:你知道,展望未来,据传 SpaceX 正在

开展的一项巨大计划

是一个由
数以千计的近地轨道卫星组成的庞大网络,

以提供高带宽、
低成本的互联网

连接 每平方英尺的地球。

你有什么
可以告诉我们的吗?

GS:我们实际上很少
谈论这个特定的项目,

不是因为我们隐瞒了任何事情,

但这可能
是我们承担

的最具挑战性的项目之一,如果不是最具挑战性的
项目之一。

没有人成功地

为互联网宽带

或基本上为卫星互联网部署一个巨大的星座

,我不认为物理学
是这里的难点。

我认为我们可以
提出正确的技术解决方案,

但我们需要利用它来做生意

,部署这个系统将花费公司
大约 100 亿美元或

更多。

所以我们正在稳步前进,

但我们肯定还
没有宣布胜利。

CA:我的意思是,
很明显,如果这种情况发生在世界上,

无处不在的连接,
将会非常激进,

而且可能主要是好的——

我的意思是,
如果突然之间每个人都可以廉价地连接,它会发生很大的变化。

GS:是的,毫无疑问
它会改变世界。

CA:这有多大的担忧,对规划

有多大的拖累

仅仅是对太空垃圾的担忧吗?

人们对此非常担心。

这将大大增加
在轨卫星的总数。

这是一个问题吗?

GS:所以空间碎片是一个问题,
这是毫无疑问的——

不是因为它发生的可能性很大,

而是它发生的后果
是相当毁灭性的。

你基本上可以
在轨道上喷出一堆粒子,

这些粒子可能会使该轨道
在几十年或更长时间内无法使用。

所以事实上,

我们需要
在每次任务后关闭我们的第二阶段,

这样它就不会成为
绕地球运行的火箭残骸。

所以你真的需要成为
一个好的管家。

CA:因此,尽管猎鹰重型火箭
在那里取得了非凡的成功,但

您实际上并没有将其
作为您未来的发展计划。

你正在加倍
使用一个更大的火箭,

称为 BFR,

它代表……

GS:它是大猎鹰火箭。
CA:大猎鹰火箭,没错。

(笑声)

当你把所有的钱都
投入到令人难以置信的技术上时,这样做的商业逻辑是什么,

而现在你要做
的事情要大得多。 为什么?

GS:实际上,我们

在开发这些发射系统的过程中吸取了一些教训。

我们要做的不是
在我们

能够说服客户这
是他们应该转向的产品之前推出新产品,

所以我们现在正在
研究 Big Falcon Rocket,

但我们将 继续
飞行 Falcon 9s 和 Falcon Heavies,

直到 BFR 被绝对
广泛接受。

但我们现在正在努力,

我们只是不会取消
猎鹰 9 和猎鹰重型

,而是实施 BFR。

CA:逻辑是 BFR 是
将人类带到火星所需要的?

GS:没错。

CA:但不知何故,你也为此找到了
其他商业理念。

GS:是的。 BFR 可以
将我们目前正在带入轨道的卫星

带到许多轨道。

它甚至可以将一类新
的卫星送入轨道。

基本上,整流罩的宽度,直径
是八米,

所以你可以想一想

你可以在那个整流罩里,
在那个货舱里放什么巨型望远镜

,看到真正不可思议的东西

,在太空中发现不可思议的东西。

但是

,我们也有一些来自 BFR 的剩余功能。

CA:剩余能力?
GS:这是一种残余能力。

CA:这就是你所说的吗?
说说这是什么鬼。

哦,等一下——

GS:那是猎鹰重型。

顺便说一句,这值得指出。

多么漂亮的火箭啊

,那个机库刚好能装
下自由女神像,

所以你可以
感受到猎鹰重型火箭的大小。

CA:事实上
那里有 27 个引擎。

这是设计原则的一部分

,你不仅仅是
发明更大的火箭,

而是将它们组合起来。

GS:正是这种残余能力。

我们
为猎鹰一号运载火箭开发了梅林发动机。

我们本可以扔掉那个

引擎并为猎鹰 9 号建造一个全新的引擎

它会被称为
不同的东西,

因为猎鹰 9 号是九个梅林引擎,

但我们没有花 10 亿美元
购买一个全新的引擎,

而是投入了九个 它们
在 Falcon 9 的后端在一起。

剩余能力:
将三个 Falcon 9 粘合在一起

,您将拥有最大的
可操作火箭飞行。

所以这样做的成本很高,

但它比从头开始更有效

CA:就其功率
而言,BFR 相当于比这大多少

GS:我相信,BFR 大约
是这个大小的两倍半。

CA:是的,这样你就可以——

我的意思是,我仍然不
相信我们要在这里播放的视频。

这到底是什么?

GS:所以它目前在地球上,但这基本上是地球人的

太空旅行。

我迫不及待地想要这种剩余的能力。

基本上,我们要做的
是像飞机一样飞行 BFR

,在地球上进行点对点旅行,

这样你就可以
从纽约市或温哥华

起飞,飞越半个地球。

您将在 BFR 上停留大约
半小时或 40 分钟,

其中最长的部分——
是的,太棒了。

(掌声)

这次飞行中最长的部分
实际上是往返的船。

(笑声)

CA:我是说。 格温,来吧,
这太棒了,但它很疯狂,对吧?

这永远不会真正发生。

GS:哦不,这肯定
会发生。

这肯定会发生。

CA:怎么样?

(掌声

)首先,各国
将接受这种来袭导弹——

(笑声)

GS:克里斯,你能想象
我们试图说服联邦靶场、

空军基地接收来袭者吗?

因为我们现在经常这样做
,对吧?

我们正在恢复第一阶段,

并将它们降落
在空军基地的联邦财产上。

所以我想这样做,我不知道,

离城市10公里,
也许离城市只有5公里。

CA:那么有多少乘客
能够负担得起

太空飞行的财富呢?

GS:所以第一个 BFR 将有
大约一百名乘客。

让我们
谈谈业务。

大家都觉得
火箭真的很贵

,而且很大程度是这样的,

我们
这里怎么可能和机票竞争呢?

但是你想一想,
如果我能

在半小时到一个小时内完成这次旅行,

我一天可以做几十个,对吧?

然而,一架长途飞机
每天只能完成一次这样的飞行。

所以即使我的
火箭稍微贵一点

,燃料
也贵一点,

我至少可以运行
他们一天运行的 10 倍,

并且真正
从该系统中获得我需要的收入。

CA:所以你真的相信这将

在我们令人惊叹的未来的某个时候部署。 什么时候?

GS:十年之内,肯定的。

CA:这是 Gwynne 时间还是 Elon 时间?

GS:那是格温的时间。
我相信埃隆会希望我们走得更快。

(笑声)

CA:好的,这当然很棒。

(笑声)

GS:我个人投资了这个,
因为我经常旅行

,但我不喜欢旅行

,我很想去
利雅得见我的客户,

早上离开,
然后及时回来 做晚饭。

CA:所以我们要测试一下。

所以在 10 年内,
一张经济舱机票,

或者说,每人几千美元
,从纽约飞往上海。

GS:是的,我认为它会介于
经济和商业之间,

但你会在一小时内完成。

CA:是的,嗯,好吧,
那绝对是。

(笑声

) 同时,BFR 的其他
用途正在开发

中,比上海走得更远。

谈论这个。

你们实际上已经
绘制了一张非常详细的、某种意义上的

人类如何飞往火星的图片,

以及那会是什么样子。

GS:是的。 所以我们有一个视频,
这是

我们展示过的其他人的裁剪视频,然后
有几个新的部分。

但基本上,你
要从一个垫子上起飞,

你有一个助推器以及 BFS
,大猎鹰宇宙飞船。

它要起飞了。

助推器将把
宇宙飞船送入轨道,

近地轨道,

然后返回,就像
我们现在正在返回助推器一样。

所以这听起来不可思议,
但我们正在研究这些作品

,你可以看到我们完成了这些作品。

所以助推器回来了。

这里的新事物

是我们将真正降落
在我们发射的垫子上。

目前,我们降落在单独的垫子上,
或者我们降落在船上。

快速,快速连接。

你乘坐一艘装满燃料的货船,

或者一个燃料库,

把它放在那个助推器上,把它送入轨道,

做一个对接机动,
给宇宙飞船加油,

然后前往你的目的地

,这就是火星。

CA:所以,一百个人
一次去火星

,要花六个月的时间? 两个月?

GS:最终
取决于火箭有多大。

我认为这是第一个版本
,我们将继续制作

更大的 BFR,

我认为这是一次为期三个月的旅行。

目前,平均水平是六到八,

但我们将尝试更快地做到这一点。

CA:你认为 SpaceX 什么时候
会让第一个人类登陆火星?

GS:从点对点来看,这是一个非常相似的时间框架

这是相同的能力。

这将是十年之内——
不是这个十年。

CA:十年之内,又是实时的。

好吧,那也太棒了。

(笑声)

为什么呢? 说真的,为什么?

我的意思是,你有一家公司
,这是官方声明的使命。

每个人都真的
接受了这个

任务吗,我的意思是,
周围有很多

人认为,来吧,
你有这么多的才能,

这么多的技术能力。

地球上有很多
事情需要紧急关注。

你为什么要
逃到另一个星球?

(掌声)

GS:所以我很高兴你提出这个问题,

但我认为
我们需要稍微扩展一下思路。

地球上有很多事情要做,

但是有很多公司
在做这件事。

我认为我们正在努力
做我们可能做的最重要的事情之一

,那就是
为人类寻找另一个生活、生存和繁荣的地方。

如果地球上发生了什么事,

你需要人类生活在其他地方。

(掌声)

这是降低人类风险的根本

这并没有颠覆

让我们的星球在这里变得更好
并更好地照顾它,

但我认为你需要
多条生存途径

,这就是其中之一。

让我们不要谈论令人沮丧的部分,

比如,你去火星是为了确保
所有地球人都不会死。

这太可怕了,实际上,
这是一个可怕的理由去做它。

从根本上说,
这是另一个探索的地方

,这就是人类
与动物的不同之处,

它是我们的
探索感、惊奇感

和学习新事物的感觉。

然后我还不得不说,


是我们向其他太阳系

和潜在其他星系迈出的第一步

,我认为这是
我唯一一次超越埃隆,

因为我想
在其他太阳系认识其他人 系统。

火星很好,但它是
一个固定的上层行星。

那里有工作要做
以使其适合居住。

(笑声)

我想在另一个太阳系中找到人
,或者不管他们如何称呼自己

CA:这是一个宏大的愿景。

格温·肖特韦尔,谢谢。

你拥有
这个星球上最了不起的工作之一。

GS:非常感谢。 谢谢,克里斯。