The problem with rocket emissions

this

is our stratosphere

it’s the second layer

of our atmosphere and within it

we have our ozone layer

our ozone layer is this massive

invisible protective shield that

surrounds our planet blocking out 98

of harmful ultraviolet radiation

without it we’d all essentially get

fried to death

plants animals and life itself simply

wouldn’t exist

we must protect our ozone layer at all

costs

but

we have a problem

each time we send something into space

we risk damaging our ozone layer one bit

at a time exposing life on earth to more

harmful radiation

we as humans are curious competitive

creatures it’s why we love space travel

and i want to make it clear that space

travel has brought us so many good

things

i mean we’ve flown by every planet in

our solar system we’ve sent humans to

the moon

and we’ve even sent satellites into

interstellar realm outside our solar

system

it’s led to the innovations and

inventions of

laptops phone cameras gps insulin pumps

and we could go on

and on and on

i mean we’ve escaped gravity here this

is one of or perhaps humanity’s greatest

accomplishment but

it’s important to examine the

consequences of our actions

each time we send a rocket into space

burning either solid or liquid rocket

fuel

we shoot out a bunch of these teeny tiny

particles into our stratosphere

they’re made of black carbon or soot and

alumina

these particles are between 0.3 and 10

microns in diameter

for reference a single strand of human

hair is 50 microns wide

but these particles arrange together in

these ginormous stratospheric clouds and

they can stay here for a really long

time of up to four years

when they stay here for up to four years

they absorb and reflect sunlight

this actually changes the flow of

radiation from our sun

into our stratosphere

we call this radiative forcing

and radiative forcing heats up our

stratosphere and as our stratosphere

gets hotter it speeds up the rate of

processes that damage and thin out our

ozone

and what’s more is that these harmful

processes can occur on the surface of

alumina particles themselves

so you may be wondering how much does

rocket pollution contribute to our ozone

loss

well the current estimates which may be

a little inaccurate say that we’ve

destroyed our ozone from rockets by

between 0.01

and 0.1 percent

that’s no big deal

isn’t it well it’s actually a huge deal

and let me explain why

as we speak we’re currently in the midst

of a modern space race but instead of

the soviet union sending a bunch of

satellites into space and us americans

sending even more satellites into space

it’s led by these guys

yup our favorite billionaire space

moguls

elon musk jeff bezos and richard branson

who own these ginormous private space

companies

let me repeat that private space

companies not governmental agencies

this privatization of space travel is a

huge deal

because it creates a space economy

and in today’s space economy we have

over a hundred corporations across

across the globe

and countries across the globe like

india and china each sending more

objects the space than we ever imagined

and these billionaires simply don’t care

that much about the environment and it’s

understandable i mean it’s not their top

priority this is a space race we’re

talking about here and they’re trying to

get as much stuff into space as fast as

they possibly can

just within the past year in 2021

we’ve sent 1100 objects into space

that’s almost 10 percent of all objects

ever sent into space

just within the past seven months

in 2021

and that measly current point one

percent of global ozone loss is bound to

grow significantly especially with the

advent of space tourism

in 2013 a bunch of celebrities like brad

pitt justin bieber selena gomez on the

list goes on

dozens of these celebrities bought

tickets to go to outer space in the

coming decades

and just the other day jeff bezos and

richard branson went into outer space

this space economy is going to be

booming

so you may be wondering

what laws do we have in place or rules

or regulations do we have to try to

limit and reduce this pollution

the answer

is none

we have no laws to reduce this pollution

the montreal protocol which is the 1987

international treaty responsible for

protecting our ozone layer

has nothing to say about rocket

emissions

in addition international space law has

no mention of rocket emissions either

for reference

the previously banned ozone depleting

substances by the montreal protocol

adds up to about three percent and

rocket emissions are thought to be

between 0.01 and 0.1 percent as of now

we as humans need to learn from our

mistakes

for example we saw an eerily similar

problem with space debris

ever since we launched the first

satellite in 1957

the sputnik won by the soviet union into

orbit

we’ve created space junk and today we

have hundreds of millions of this these

tiny fragments of space junk orbiting

our planet at 10 times the speed of a

bullet

each one having the capability to

severely damage a spacecraft

so how many laws do we have today

that prevent us from making more space

junk

the answer

zero

we have none

we cannot make this same mistake with

rocket pollution but as of now we’re

currently headed down the same path

especially because we haven’t done our

research

the current scientific studies and

models that exist of this pollution have

been conducted several decades ago

and they consist of pollutants that

don’t really damage your ozone layer by

that much

we haven’t created mechanisms to try to

reduce this pollution and we haven’t we

don’t know how much pollution is really

up there and what impact it really has

we don’t know how newer methane based

fuels may impact our planet

even nasa which is a governmental agency

is actively working to fund these

private companies and to accelerate

space travel

so

here we are guys we’re living in the

midst of this exhilarating space race

corporations and countries across the

globe are actively working to send more

satellites into space than we’ve ever

seen before

it’s the year 2021 and there’s no going

back

i decided to manifest my two cents into

a science fair project

in the year 2019 when i was 16 years old

i made it my goal to create some sort of

air purifier for the stratosphere

i envisioned that with a drone or a

weather balloon this air purifier could

go up into the stratosphere after a

rocket launch and collect this pollution

when it’s kind of concentrated

but

making an air filter that will survive

in the stratosphere is no easy task the

stratosphere is an unpleasant and

unforgiving environment

such a filter had to meet several

criteria it had to be porous

relatively inexpensive

strong

hydrophobic

lightweight

resistant to ozone vacuum and radiation

conditions in the stratosphere

i used a material called air gel for my

filter

aerogel is an ultra light strong and

porous material

specifically i chose to use polyemit air

gels

polyamide is a material used by nasa

because of its wide temperature range

remarkable strength and inexpensive

price

i infused my polyamide aero gels with

cerium oxide nanoparticles

these nanoparticles are so small that a

hundred thousand of them could fit in

the width of a single human hair

so using these cerium oxide

nanoparticles in my polyimide air gel

allowed it to meet all my criteria they

made them uv and ozone resistant

while being hydrophobic

without clogging up my filter

so how did i test my filter

well

as you can imagine as a 16 year old i

didn’t really have access to the

stratosphere

so

i built my very own stratospheric

chamber

and with enormous amounts of help from

teachers parents and friends i was able

to test out my filters

against this rocket pollution in a lab

the result

my dull polyimide penny looking air gels

try saying that 10 times fast collected

over two and a half times the pollution

of ordinary furnace filters in addition

to being twice as strong

and add half the density now

although my nifty little high school

science fair project is very fascinating

thank you very much

it’s simply a small step in the right

direction

and we need to take several leaps before

we can get rocket pollution under

control

how can we create the world’s first

modern atmospheric models of this

pollution

how can we raise awareness about this

poorly known and poorly studied issue

how can we reduce this rocket pollution

without stunting our innovation

my hope is that we can get lawmakers

activists and scientists to all come

together to make a difference

to protect our ozone

to protect our planet and all the

beautiful life in it

and to allow us to achieve humanity’s

wildest space dreams

during this accelerating space race

thank you

是我们的

平流层

,是我们大气层的第二层,在里面

我们有我们的臭氧层

我们的臭氧层是这个巨大的

无形防护罩,它

围绕着我们的星球,阻挡了 98

种有害的紫外线辐射,

没有它,我们基本上都会

被炸死

植物动物和生命本身

根本不存在

我们必须不惜一切代价保护我们的臭氧层

但是

每次我们将某些东西送入太空时都会遇到问题

我们冒着一次一点地破坏我们的臭氧层

使地球上的生命暴露于更

有害的辐射

作为人类,我们是好奇的竞争

生物,这就是为什么我们喜欢太空旅行

,我想澄清一下,太空

旅行给我们带来了这么多美好的

东西

月球

,我们甚至将卫星送入

太阳系外的星际领域,

这导致了

笔记本电脑、手机摄像头、gps 胰岛素泵的创新

和发明,我们c

我的意思是我们已经摆脱了重力,这

可能是人类最伟大的

成就之一,但

每次我们将火箭送入太空

燃烧固体或液体火箭

燃料时,检查

我们行为的后果很重要

向我们的平流层射出一堆这些微小的颗粒

它们是由黑碳或煤烟和氧化铝制成的

这些颗粒的直径在 0.3 到 10 微米之间

作为参考一根人的

头发是 50 微米宽

但这些颗粒排列在一起 在

这些巨大的平流层云中,

它们可以在这里停留

长达四年的时间,

当它们在这里停留长达四年时,

它们吸收并反射阳光,

这实际上改变了

从太阳

到平流层的辐射流,

我们称之为 辐射强迫

和辐射强迫加热了我们的

平流层,随着我们的平流层

变热,它加快

了破坏和破坏过程的速度。 稀释我们的

臭氧

,更重要的是,这些有害

过程可能发生在氧化铝颗粒本身的表面,

所以你可能想知道

火箭污染对我们的臭氧

损失

有多大影响,目前的估计可能

有点不准确,说我们 我们已经

从火箭中破坏

了 0.01

% 到 0.1% 的臭氧,

这没什么大不了

的,这实际上是一个大问题

,让我解释一下为什么

在我们说话的时候,我们目前正

处于现代太空竞赛中,而

不是 苏联向太空发射了一堆

卫星,而我们美国人

向太空发射了更多的卫星,

这是由这些人领导的

不是政府机构

,太空旅行的私有化是一件

大事,

因为它创造了太空经济

,在今天的太空经济中,我们拥有

全球一百多家公司

以及

印度和中国等全球国家每家向太空发送的

物品都比我们想象的要多,

而这些亿万富翁根本不

关心环境,这是可以

理解的,我的意思是这不是他们的

首要任务 这是一场我们在这里谈论的太空竞赛

,他们正试图

尽可能快地将尽可能多的东西送入太空。

在过去的一年中,即 2021 年,

我们已经将 1100 个物体送入太空

,几乎占所有物体的 10%

仅在 2021 年的过去 7 个月

内就曾有物体送入太空,而目前这一点

,全球臭氧损失的 1% 肯定

会显着增加,尤其是

随着 2013 年太空旅游的出现,

一群名人,如

布拉德皮特贾斯汀比伯赛琳娜戈麦斯

名单还在继续

,这些名人中有数十人购买

了未来几十年去外太空的门票

,就在前几天杰夫贝索斯和

理查德布兰森去了我 到外太空,

这个太空经济将

蓬勃发展,

所以你可能想

知道我们有什么法律或规则

或条例我们是否必须尝试

限制和减少这种

污染答案

是没有

我们没有减少这种污染的法律

蒙特利尔议定书是 1987 年

负责

保护我们的臭氧层的国际条约,

对火箭排放没有任何

规定,此外,国际空间法也

没有提及火箭排放,以

参考,蒙特利尔议定书先前禁止的消耗臭氧层

物质

加起来约为 3%,

火箭的排放量目前被认为

在 0.01% 到 0.1% 之间,

作为人类,我们需要从

错误中吸取教训

,例如

自从 1957 年发射第一颗

人造卫星 sputnik 以 苏联进入

轨道

我们制造了太空垃圾 今天我们

拥有数亿个这种

微小的碎片 太空垃圾

以 10 倍于子弹的速度绕着我们的星球运行,

每一个都有能力

严重损坏航天器

所以我们今天有多少法律

阻止我们制造更多的太空

垃圾答案是

我们没有

我们无法制定 火箭污染也犯了同样的错误,

但到目前为止,我们

目前正走在同样的道路上,

特别是因为我们还没有进行

研究,目前

存在的这种污染的科学研究和模型是

几十年前进行的

,它们由污染物组成

并没有真正损害你的臭氧层

我们还没有建立机制来试图

减少这种污染我们还没有我们

不知道

那里到底有多少污染以及它真正有什么影响

我们不知道 不知道新的基于甲烷的

燃料会如何影响我们的星球,

即使是作为政府机构的美国宇航局

也在积极努力为这些

私营公司提供资金并加速

太空旅行,

所以

我们在这里 ‘生活在

这场令人振奋的太空竞赛中

2019 年的一个科学博览会项目,当时我 16 岁

,我的目标是

为平流层制造某种空气净化器,

我设想通过无人机或

气象气球,这种空气净化器

可以在经过

火箭发射并收集这种污染

但要

制造能够在平流层中存活的空气过滤器

并非易事

平流层是一个令人不快和

无情的环境

这样的过滤器必须满足几个

标准 它必须是多孔的

相对便宜

疏水

轻质

耐臭氧真空

和平流层辐射条件

我使用了一种叫做气凝胶的材料作为我的

过滤器

气凝胶是一种超轻强度和

多孔材料,

特别是我选择使用 polyemit 气凝胶 聚酰胺是美国国家航空航天局使用的

一种材料,

因为它具有广泛的温度范围、

显着的强度和低廉的

价格

我在我的聚酰胺气凝胶中注入了

氧化铈纳米颗粒,

这些纳米颗粒非常小

十万个可以容纳

一根头发的宽度,

因此

在我的聚酰亚胺气凝胶中使用这些氧化铈纳米粒子

使其符合我的所有标准,它们

使它们具有抗紫外线和抗臭氧性,

同时具有疏水性

而不会堵塞我的过滤器,

所以 我是如何测试我的过滤器的,

正如你想象的那样,作为一个 16 岁的孩子,我

并没有真正进入

平流层,

所以

我建造了自己的平流层

,并在老师父母和朋友的大量帮助下,

能够测试 在实验室里拿出我的过滤器来

对抗这种火箭污染

结果

我的聚酰亚胺一分钱看起来暗淡的空气凝胶

试着说 10 次 f ast 收集

普通炉过滤器的两倍半以上的污染,除了强度是普通炉过滤

器的两倍

,现在增加了一半的密度,

尽管我漂亮的小高中

科学展览项目非常吸引人

,非常感谢,

这只是迈出了一小步 正确的

方向

,我们需要采取几个飞跃

才能控制火箭污染

我们如何创建世界上第一个

这种污染的现代大气模型

我们如何提高对这个

鲜为人知和研究不足的问题的认识

我们如何减少这种火箭污染

在不阻碍我们的创新的情况下,

我希望我们能够让立法者、

活动家和科学家

齐心协力,

为保护我们的臭氧

、保护我们的星球和其中所有

美丽的生命做出贡献,

并让我们在此期间实现人类

最疯狂的太空梦想

加速太空竞赛

谢谢