The history of marriage Alex Gendler

There have been many different things

written and said about marriage.

From the sweetly inspirational

to the hilariously cynical.

But what many of them have in common

is that they sound like they express

a universal and timeless truth,

when in fact nearly everything about marriage,

from its main purpose

to the kinds of relationships it covers

to the rights and responsibilities involved,

has varied greatly between different eras,

cultures and social classes.

So, let’s take a quick look at

the evolution of marriage.

Pair bonding and raising children

is as old as humanity itself.

With the rise of sedentary agricultural societies

about 10,000 years ago,

marriage was also a way

of securing rights to land and property

by designating children born under certain circumstances

as rightful heirs.

As these societies became larger and more complex,

marriage became not just a matter

between individuals and families,

but also an official institution

governed by religious and civil authorities.

And it was already well established by 2100 B.C.

when the earliest surviving written laws

in the Mesopotamian Code of Ur-Nammu

provided many specifics governing marriage,

from punishments for adultery

to the legal status of children born to slaves.

Many ancient civilizations allowed some form of

multiple simultaneous marriage.

And even today, less than a quarter of the world’s

hundreds of different cultures prohibit it.

But just because something was allowed

doesn’t mean it was always possible.

Demographic realities,

as well as the link between marriage and wealth,

meant that even though rulers and elites

in Ancient Mesopotamia,

Egypt and Israel

had multiple concubines or wives,

most commoners could only afford one or two

tending towards monogamy in practice.

In other places, the tables were turned,

and a woman could have multiple husbands

as in the Himalayan Mountains

where all brothers in a family

marrying the same woman

kept the small amount of fertile land

from being constantly divided into new households.

Marriages could vary

not only in the number of people they involved

but the types of people as well.

Although the names and laws for such arrangements

may have differed,

publicly recognized same-sex unions

have popped up

in various civilizations throughout history.

Mesopotamian prayers included blessings for such couples,

while Native American Two-Spirit individuals

had relationships with both sexes.

The first instances of such arrangements

actually being called “Marriage”

come from Rome,

where the Emperors Nero and Elagabalus

both married men in public ceremonies

with the practice being explictly banned

in 342 A.D.

But similar traditions survived

well into the Christian era,

such as Adelphopoiesis,

or “brother-making” in Orthodox churches,

and even an actual marriage between two men

recorded in 1061 at a small chapel in Spain.

Nor was marriage even necessarily

between two living people.

Ghost marriages,

where either the bride or groom were deceased,

were conducted in China

to continue family lineages

or appease restless spirits.

And some tribes in Sudan maintain similar practices.

Despite all these differences,

a lot of marriages throughout history

did have one thing in common.

With crucial matters

like property and reproduction at stake,

they were way too important

to depend on young love.

Especially among the upperclasses,

matches were often made by families or rulers.

But even for commoners, who had some degree of choice,

the main concern was practicality.

The modern idea of marriage

as being mainly about love and companionship

only emerged in the last couple of centuries.

With industrialization,

urbanization

and the growth of the middle class

more people became independent

from large extended families

and were able to support

a new household on their own.

Encouraged by new ideas

from the Enlightenment,

people began to focus

on individual happiness and pursuits,

rather than familial duty or wealth and status,

at least some of the time.

And this focus on individual happiness

soon led to other transformations,

such as easing restrictions on divorce

and more people marrying at a later age.

So, as we continue to debate the role and definition

of marriage in the modern world,

it might help to keep in mind

that marriage has always been shaped by society,

and as a society’s

structure, values and goals

change over time,

its ideas of marriage will continue to change along with them.

关于婚姻,有许多不同的

文字和说法。

从甜蜜的励志

到滑稽的愤世嫉俗。

但他们中的许多人的共同点

是,他们听起来像是表达

了一个普遍而永恒的真理,

而事实上,几乎所有关于婚姻的事情,

从其主要目的

到它所涵盖的关系类型,

再到所涉及的权利和责任,

都有很大的不同 在不同的时代、

文化和社会阶层之间。

那么,让我们快速看一下

婚姻的演变。

结对和抚养孩子

与人类本身一样古老。

随着大约 10,000 年前久坐不动的农业社会的兴起

婚姻也是

通过指定在某些情况下出生的孩子

为合法继承人来确保土地和财产权的一种方式。

随着这些社会变得更大、更复杂,

婚姻不仅成为

个人和家庭之间的事情,

而且成为

由宗教和民事当局管理的官方机构。

到公元前 2100 年,它已经很成熟了。

最早幸存

的美索不达米亚乌尔纳姆法典中的成文法

提供了许多关于婚姻的细节,

从通奸的惩罚

到奴隶所生子女的法律地位。

许多古代文明允许某种形式的

多重同时婚姻。

即使在今天,世界上

数百种不同的文化中也只有不到四分之一禁止它。

但仅仅因为某些事情被允许

并不意味着它总是可能的。

人口现实,

以及婚姻和财富之间的联系,

意味着即使

古代美索不达米亚、

埃及和以色列的统治者和精英

有多个妃嫔或妻子,

大多数平民在实践中只能负担一两个

倾向于一夫一妻制的人。

在其他地方,情况发生了逆转

,一个女人可以有多个丈夫,

就像在喜马拉雅山脉

中,一个家庭中的所有兄弟都

娶了同一个女人,这

使得少量肥沃的土地

不被不断地分成新的家庭。

婚姻

不仅可以在他们所涉及的人数上有所不同,而且可以在

人的类型上有所不同。

尽管此类安排的名称和法律

可能有所不同,但

历史上各种文明中都出现了公开承认的同性结合。

美索不达米亚的祈祷包括对这样的夫妇的祝福,

而美洲原住民的双灵个体

则与两性都有关系。

这种安排

实际上被称为“婚姻”的第一个例子

来自罗马

,尼禄皇帝和埃拉加巴

卢斯皇帝都在公共仪式上与男人结婚

,这种做法

在公元 342 年被明确禁止,

但类似的传统

在基督教时代幸存下来,

例如 Adelphopoiesis ,

或东正教教堂中的“兄弟制造”,

甚至是

1061 年在西班牙的一个小教堂记录的两个男人之间的实际婚姻。

甚至

在两个活着的人之间也不一定要结婚。

鬼婚

,新娘或新郎都死了,

在中国进行,

以延续家族血统

或安抚不安的灵魂。

苏丹的一些部落也保持着类似的做法。

尽管存在所有这些差异,但

历史上的许多婚姻

确实有一个共同点。

由于

财产和生育等关键问题受到威胁,

它们太重要了,

不能依赖年轻的爱情。

尤其是在上层阶级中,

比赛往往是由家庭或统治者进行的。

但即使对于有一定选择余地的平民来说

,主要关心的还是实用性。

现代

婚姻主要是关于爱和陪伴的观念

只是在最近几个世纪才出现的。

随着工业化、

城市化

和中产阶级的壮大,

越来越多的人

摆脱了大家庭的束缚

,能够自己养家糊口

在启蒙运动的新思想的鼓舞下,

人们开始

关注个人的幸福和追求,

而不是家庭责任或财富和地位,

至少在某些时候。

这种对个人幸福的关注

很快导致了其他转变,

例如放宽离婚限制

和更多人晚婚。

因此,当我们继续辩论现代世界中婚姻的角色和定义时

,请

记住婚姻一直是由社会塑造的

,随着社会的

结构、价值观和目标

随着时间的推移而发生变化,

它的观念可能会有所帮助。 婚姻会随着他们不断改变。