The business benefits of doing good Wendy Woods

A few years ago,

all the developed
countries in the world –

the wealthier ones –

and all of the charities

together donated about 200 billion dollars

to developing countries in the world –

the ones that bear most of the burden,

the heaviest burden
of the world’s biggest problems:

poverty, hunger,
climate change and inequality.

That same year,

businesses invested in those same
countries 3.7 trillion dollars.

Now, I get to travel a lot in my work

and I’m privileged
to see the amazing things

that NGOs and some governments are doing

with some of that 200 billion dollars:

helping malnourished children

or families that don’t
have access to clean water,

children who wouldn’t
be educated otherwise.

But it’s not enough

because the biggest problems
in our world need trillions

not just billions.

So if we’re going to make
lasting and significant progress

in the big challenges in our world,

we need business,

both the companies and the investors,

to drive the solutions.

So let’s talk about
what business should do.

And when I say that,

you probably think that I’m going
to talk about corporate philanthropy

or corporate social responsibility.

CSR is the norm today,

and it’s very useful.

It provides a route
for corporate generosity

and that generosity is important
to many corporations' employees

and customers.

But you know what?

It’s just not big enough,

or strong enough,

or durable enough

to drive solutions to the biggest
problems in our world today

because it’s incremental cost.

Even when business is booming,

CSR just isn’t designed to scale.

And then of course in a downturn,

it’s one of the first programs to be cut.

So no,

CSR –

corporate social responsibility –

isn’t the answer,

but TSI –

total societal impact, is.

TSI is the sum of all of the ways

business can affect society

by doing the real work:

thinking about their supply chains,

working on their product design
and manufacturing processes

and their distribution.

The real work of business,

when done with innovation,

can actually create
core business benefits for the company

and it can solve the meaningful
problems in our world today.

So what does TSI look like?

Focusing on TSI

means incorporating
social and environmental considerations.

And you know what?

It’s something that isn’t completely new.

It’s been thought about for a while.

But the hard part is that corporations
almost exclusively still think

about something called TSR:

total shareholder returns.

But TSI –

total societal impact –

needs to stand alongside TSR

as an important and valid driver
of corporate strategy

and corporate decision-making.

And we’ve got the data
to show you why and how.

Some companies
are already making this happen.

They’re beginning to make it happen.

So let me tell you the story about Mars.

Mars is the sixth-largest private company
in the United States.

If you’re like me,

they make some important products,

like coffee and chocolate.

So not surprisingly,

one of their most important
ingredients is cocoa.

And some of their competitors
are actually really worried

about the sustainability
and the availability of cocoa supplies.

But not Mars.

They’re confident in the stable supply
of that crop for the long term.

And why is that?

It’s because they partner
with NGOs around the world

that are working
with small shareholder farmers.

And those certification agency’s NGOs

are working to help farmers
improve crop yields,

they’re making sure that they get
a fair, premium, livable wage

and they’re helping them address
any human rights potential issues

in supply chains,

and they’re helping minimize
the effects on the environment,

like deforestation.

Mars is on a path
to 100 percent certified cocoa,

so this is a good program
for farming communities,

it’s a good program for the environment,

and it’s a good program for Mars,

who has solved a significant risk
in their supply chain.

But now let’s get to the data,

because it’s actually really awesome.

And let me explain exactly what the data
points I’m going to talk about are.

When analysts and financial people
look at companies,

they think about
a lot of different statistics.

I want to talk about
two of the most important ones.

I’m going to talk about
the overall value of a company –

its valuation –

and I’m going to talk about its margin.

Basically the difference
between all of its earnings

and all of its costs.

So in our study,

we looked at oil and gas companies,

and the oil and gas companies

that are performing
most strongly on TSI –

total societal impact –

see a 19 percent premium
on their valuation.

19 percent.

When they do really well

on things like minimizing
the impact of their company

on the environment and water,

and when they have very strong
occupational health and safety programs.

And when they also add in
strong employee training programs,

they get a 3.4 percentage point
premium on their margins.

But what about other industries?

Biopharmaceutical companies
that are the strongest performers on TSI

see a 12 percent premium
on their valuation.

And then if they’re best
at expanded access to medicines –

making medicines available
for the people who need them –

they see a 6.7 percentage point premium
on their gross margins.

For the retail banks
that are strongest on TSI,

they see a three percentage point
premium on their valuation,

and then for those that differentially
provide financial inclusion –

access to financial products
for people who need it –

they see a 0.5 percentage point premium
in their net income margin.

Now, these numbers for banks
may not seem very big,

but in highly competitive industries,

even really small differences
in margin matter a lot.

Now, what about those
consumer goods companies –

the ones who make those products we love
like coffee and chocolate?

Consumer goods companies
that perform best on total societal impact

see an 11 percent valuation premium.

And then if they do those smart
things with their supply chain –

inclusive and responsibly
sourcing their product –

they see a 4.8 percentage point premium
on their gross margins.

These numbers are significant.

We’ve long known that things
like fundamental financials,

growth rates and financial risks
are key drivers of valuation,

but this rigorous analysis shows
that social and environmental factors –

total societal impact measures –

are also linked to valuations and margins.

Wow.

All else equal –

we didn’t confuse
the analysis with anything.

All else being equal,

companies that perform strongly
on social and environmental areas

achieve higher margins

and higher valuations.

Now, I do understand

that companies are under
a lot of short-term earnings pressures.

But fortunately,

the investors who create
some of this pressure

are actually more and more themselves
starting to think longer-term

and starting to think with this TSI lens.

In our conversations
and surveys with investors,

75 percent of them say
they expect to see improved revenues

and improved operating efficiency

for companies that are thinking
with a TSI lens.

And they’re actually starting
to incorporate this

in their own investing behavior.

Last year,

23 trillion in global assets

were in the category
of socially responsible investing.

Now, that’s five billion
over just the last two years.

And it represents a quarter of the total
global assets managed in the world.

I know that some of you
may be cringing a little bit right now.

Because in my decades
of strategy consulting

with businesses and NGOs
and governments around the world,

I find that many businesspeople

are hesitant to talk
or even sometimes think about

the business benefits of doing good.

They somehow think
it’s going to negate the value

of the benefits
they’re creating for society.

Or that they’ll be perceived
as heartless or even mercenary.

But we really do need
to think differently.

We need to think differently

because the only way
we’re going to make substantial progress

on the challenging problems of our time

is for business to drive the solutions.

The job of business
is to meet customer needs

and to do so profitably.

They need to to survive.

So one of the best ways for businesses
to help ensure their own growth,

their own longevity,

is to meet some of the hardest
challenges in our society

and to do so profitably.

And when they do that innovatively,

when they do that ethically,
responsibly, incredibly,

they should be proud.

But if you still aren’t sure about this,

let’s talk about a few more examples.

What if you’re a technology company

and you’re trying to grow your platform

and you’re trying to grow your customers?

Like, Airbnb.

Airbnb has a portfolio
of total societal impact activities.

They’re all spot-on their core business.

In one initiative,

they’re helping enable their community

to provide housing for free
to those in disaster:

crisis survivors and relief workers.

In another effort on their part,

they’re actually helping
and working with NGOs

to ensure that people can provide
housing for free for refugees.

Now, what I love about this program

is that I don’t think
most people would’ve figured out

how to express their generosity

and open their homes
for those in such dire need –

certainly not so quickly
or so easily or efficiently –

without this innovation by Airbnb.

But at the same time,

this is core to their corporate strategy

and core to their growth

because they grow by increasing
the number of hosts and guests

using their platform.

But if they’d only
been thinking exclusively

about the return side of things,

I’m not sure they would have ever
figured out this route to growth,

because they’re not
charging transaction fees.

So it’s a pretty exciting way,

when they were thinking
about how to bring their capabilities

to a need in society

and at the same time
drive their own growth.

But what if you’re trying to find
new customer segments?

Let’s move to South Africa,

and let’s talk about Standard Bank.

In South Africa,

the government has a regulation

that requires all banks
to donate 0.2 percent of their profits

to small and medium
black-owned enterprises.

And many banks just donate
this to the entrepreneurs,

but Standard Bank thought creatively.

And what they did is they took those funds

and they invested them
in an independent trust,

and they used that trust to fund loans
to these black entrepreneurs.

This is a highly leveraged model.

They can support a lot more
entrepreneurs with capital,

and because their success
is completely intertwined

with the success of the entrepreneurs,

they’re actually also using the fund
to provide technical assistance.

More entrepreneurs supported,

more people and communities
being lifted out of poverty.

And it’s successful for Standard Bank.

So successful that they’re actually
working on expanding this program

to other areas in their portfolio.

It’s not like we haven’t been trying
to solve the problems in our world

for a long time.

We have, and they’re still here.

We’re making progress,

but it’s not far enough,

or fast enough,

or universal enough.

We need to flip our thinking.

We need to have business –

both companies and investors –

bring creative, innovative
corporate strategy and capital

to solving the biggest
problems in our world.

And when they do that innovatively,

and when they do that

with all of their thinking
and all of their strategy

and all of their capital,

and they’re creating
both total shareholder returns

and total societal impact,

we know that we will solve those problems,

both profitably and generously.

Thank you.

(Applause)

几年前,

世界上所有的发达国家——

较富裕的国家——

和所有的慈善机构

一共向

世界上的发展中国家

——那些负担

最重、负担最重的国家——捐赠了大约2000亿美元
世界上最大的问题:

贫困、饥饿、
气候变化和不平等。

同年,

企业在这些国家投资了
3.7 万亿美元。

现在,我在工作中经常出差

,我
有幸看到

非政府组织和一些政府

用这 2000 亿美元中的一部分做的令人惊奇的事情:

帮助营养不良的儿童

或无法
获得清洁水的家庭 ,

否则不会
接受教育的孩子。

但这还不够,

因为
我们世界上最大的问题需要数万亿,

而不仅仅是数十亿。

因此,如果我们要

在世界面临的重大挑战中取得持久而重大的进展,

我们需要

企业和投资者

来推动解决方案。

那么让我们来谈谈
业务应该做什么。

当我这么说的时候,

你可能会认为我
会谈论企业慈善事业

或企业社会责任。

企业社会责任是当今的常态,

而且非常有用。

它为企业慷慨提供了一条途径

而这种慷慨
对许多公司的员工

和客户来说都很重要。

但你知道吗?

它只是不够大、

不够强大、

不够耐用,

无法解决当今世界上最大的问题,

因为它是增量成本。

即使业务蓬勃发展,

企业社会责任也并非旨在扩展。

当然,在经济低迷时期,

它是最先被削减的项目之一。

所以不,

CSR——

企业社会责任——

不是答案,

但 TSI——

总体社会影响,才是答案。

TSI 是企业通过实际工作影响社会的所有方式的总和

考虑他们的供应链,

致力于他们的产品设计
和制造流程

以及他们的分销。

真正的业务工作,

在完成创新后,

实际上可以
为公司创造核心业务利益

,它可以解决
当今世界上有意义的问题。

那么TSI是什么样的呢?

关注 TSI

意味着纳入
社会和环境因素。

你知道吗?

这不是全新的东西。

它已经考虑了一段时间。

但困难的部分是,公司
几乎仍然只考虑

一种叫做 TSR 的东西:

股东总回报。

但 TSI——

总社会影响——

需要与 TSR 并驾齐驱,

作为企业战略和企业决策的重要且有效的驱动

我们有数据
可以向您展示原因和方式。

一些
公司已经在实现这一目标。

他们开始实现它。

所以让我告诉你关于火星的故事。

玛氏是美国第六大私营公司

如果你像我一样,

他们会生产一些重要的产品,

比如咖啡和巧克力。

所以毫不奇怪

,它们最重要的
成分之一是可可。

他们的一些
竞争对手实际上真的很担心

可可供应的可持续性和可用性。

但不是火星。

他们
对该作物的长期稳定供应充满信心。

为什么是这样?

这是因为他们
与世界各地与小股东合作的非政府组织

合作。

这些认证机构的非政府组织

正在努力帮助农民
提高作物产量,

他们确保他们
获得公平、优质、宜居的工资

,他们正在帮助他们解决供应链中的
任何潜在人权问题

,他们正在帮助
尽量减少对环境的影响,

例如砍伐森林。

玛氏正朝着
100% 可可认证之路迈进,

所以这
对农业社区

来说是一个很好的计划,对环境

来说是一个很好的计划,对玛氏来说也是一个很好的计划,

它已经解决
了供应链中的重大风险。

但现在让我们来看看数据,

因为它真的很棒。

让我准确解释一下
我要讨论的数据点是什么。

当分析师和财务人员
查看公司时,

他们会
考虑许多不同的统计数据。

我想谈谈
其中最重要的两个。

我将谈论
一家公司的整体价值——

它的估值

——我将谈论它的利润率。

基本上
是其所有收入

与其所有成本之间的差额。

因此,在我们的研究中,

我们研究了石油和天然气公司,

在 TSI(

总社会影响)方面表现最强劲的石油和天然气公司

的估值溢价 19%。

19%。

当他们


尽量减少公司

对环境和水的影响等事情上做得非常好,

并且当他们有非常强大的
职业健康和安全计划时。

当他们还加入
强大的员工培训计划时,

他们的利润率会提高 3.4 个百分点

但是其他行业呢?

TSI 表现最强劲的生物制药公司的估值

溢价 12%

然后,如果他们最
擅长扩大获得药物的机会——

为需要的人提供药物——

他们会看到毛利率有 6.7 个百分点的
溢价。

对于
在 TSI 上最强的零售银行,

他们看到估值溢价 3 个百分点

然后对于那些提供差异化
金融包容性的零售银行——

为有需要的人提供金融产品——

他们看到 0.5 个百分点的溢价
在他们的净利润率。

现在,对于银行来说,这些数字
可能看起来不是很大,

但在竞争激烈的行业中,

即使是很小
的利润率差异也很重要。

现在,那些
消费品公司呢

?那些生产我们喜欢的产品的公司,
比如咖啡和巧克力?

在总体社会影响方面表现最佳的消费品公司的

估值溢价为 11%。

然后,如果他们
用他们的供应链做这些聪明的事情——

包容和负责任地
采购他们的产品——

他们会看到他们的毛利率有 4.8 个百分点的
溢价。

这些数字很重要。

我们早就知道
,基本财务、

增长率和金融风险
等因素是估值的关键驱动因素,

但这项严格的分析表明
,社会和环境因素——

总体社会影响指标——

也与估值和利润率相关。

哇。

其他条件相同——

我们没有将
分析与任何事情混淆。

在其他条件相同的情况下,在社会和环境

领域表现出色的公司

可以获得更高的利润率

和更高的估值。

现在,我确实

明白公司面临
着很大的短期盈利压力。

但幸运的

是,
造成这种压力

的投资者实际上越来越多地
开始思考更长远的问题,

并开始以 TSI 的视角思考。

在我们
与投资者的对话和调查中,

75% 的投资者表示,
他们希望看到采用 TSI 视角思考的公司的收入

和运营效率会有所提高

他们实际上开始
将这一点

纳入自己的投资行为中。

去年,

全球有 23 万亿资产

属于社会责任投资。

现在,
仅在过去两年中就达到了 50 亿。

它占
全球管理的全球总资产的四分之一。

我知道你们中的一些人
现在可能有点畏缩。

因为在我数十年来

与世界各地的企业、非
政府组织和政府进行战略咨询的过程中,

我发现许多

商人不愿谈论
甚至有时会考虑

做好事的商业利益。

他们以某种方式认为
这会否定

他们为社会创造的利益的价值。

或者他们会被
视为无情甚至是雇佣兵。

但我们确实
需要换个角度思考。

我们需要以不同

的方式思考,因为
我们要

在我们这个时代的挑战性问题上取得实质性进展的唯一方法

是让企业推动解决方案。

企业的工作
是满足客户需求

并从中获利。

他们需要生存。

因此
,企业帮助确保自身增长和

长寿的最佳方式之一

就是迎接
我们社会中一些最艰巨的挑战

并从中获利。

当他们以创新的方式做到这一点时,

当他们以道德、
负责任、令人难以置信的方式做到这一点时,

他们应该感到自豪。

但是,如果您仍然不确定这一点,

让我们再谈几个例子。

如果您是一家技术公司,

并且您正在努力发展您的平台

并且您正在努力发展您的客户怎么办?

比如,Airbnb。

Airbnb 拥有一系列
具有社会影响力的活动。

他们都专注于他们的核心业务。

在一项倡议中,

他们正在帮助他们的社区

为灾难中的人免费提供住房:

危机幸存者和救援人员。

在他们的另一项努力中,

他们实际上是在帮助
非政府组织并与他们合作,

以确保人们可以
免费为难民提供住房。

现在,我喜欢这个项目的地方

在于,我认为
大多数人不会想出

如何表达他们的慷慨,


为那些急需的人开放家园——

当然不会那么快
、那么容易或那么有效——

没有 Airbnb 的这项创新。

但与此同时,

这是他们公司战略

的核心,也是他们成长的核心,

因为他们通过增加使用其平台
的房东和客人的数量来实现增长

但如果他们只

考虑事物的回报方面,

我不确定他们是否会
想出这条增长之路,

因为他们不
收取交易费用。

所以这是一种非常令人兴奋的方式,

当他们
考虑如何将自己的

能力满足社会需求

并同时
推动自己的成长时。

但是,如果您想寻找
新的客户群怎么办?

让我们搬到南非

,让我们谈谈标准银行。

在南非

,政府有一项规定

,要求所有银行
将其利润的 0.2% 捐赠

给中小型
黑人拥有的企业。

许多银行只是把
这个捐赠给企业家,

但标准银行创造性地思考。

他们所做的就是将这些

资金投入
到一个独立的信托基金中,

并利用该信托基金
为这些黑人企业家提供贷款。

这是一个高度杠杆化的模型。

他们可以用资金支持更多的
创业者

,因为他们的成功和创业者的成功
是完全交织

在一起的,

所以他们实际上也在用这笔资金
来提供技术援助。

更多的企业家得到支持,

更多的人和
社区摆脱了贫困。

这对标准银行来说是成功的。

如此成功,以至于他们实际上
正在努力将该计划扩展

到其投资组合中的其他领域。

这并不是说我们很久没有
尝试解决我们世界上的问题了

我们有,他们还在这里。

我们正在取得进展,

但还不够远,

不够快,

也不够普遍。

我们需要翻转我们的想法。

我们需要企业

——公司和投资者——

带来创造性的、创新的
企业战略和资本

来解决
我们世界上最大的问题。

当他们以创新的方式做到这一点时

,当他们

用他们所有的思想
、所有的战略

和所有的资本来做到这一点时

,他们正在
创造股东总回报

和总的社会影响,

我们知道我们将解决这些问题 ,

既有利可图又慷慨。

谢谢你。

(掌声)