Normalizing Disability Begins in School

Transcriber: yoojae lee
Reviewer: David DeRuwe

I’m in a wheelchair,
in case you didn’t notice.

I have a very visible,
very obvious disability,

but that is not the case
for most disabilities.

When I started college,
I was completely able-bodied.

My first encounter with another
student with a disability,

as far as I knew, was my freshman year,

and this other student
received extra time on tests

as an academic accommodation.

I couldn’t tell what his disability was.

I didn’t understand why
he was getting extra time on tests.

I thought this was really unfair.
He got extra time on tests

I could certainly use extra
time on tests. Why? Why?

And I think this came
from looking back at grade school.

I don’t think I knew
anyone else with a disability.

I didn’t know anyone else
receiving academic accommodations.

According to the National Center
for Education Statistics,

14 percent of students in pre-kindergarten
through 12th grade have a disability.

That’s one out of every seven students
require academic accommodations.

I knew more than seven
students, so statistically, yes.

Yes, I did know other people.
I was just not aware of that.

Fast forward a couple years,

and I’m the one now who needs
academic accommodations.

I need extra time on tests.

I need some assistance with notes,

whether it be from teachers
or other students.

And other students would say
the exact same thing to me

that I had said just years before,
that I’m so lucky,

“I can’t believe you get this.”

Well, I didn’t feel lucky.

You know, I would much rather
not need academic accommodations.

It wasn’t a matter of wanting them,

but I needed academic accommodations
in order to be successful at school.

So going back into grade school,

I can look at those other students.

According to a study I read
by Newman and colleagues in 2011,

out of 14 percent of students
who are identified with a disability,

37 percent of those students
don’t identify themselves

as having a disability
eight years after high school.

Now, when I’m saying identify,

I’m talking about the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act

In order to receive
academic accommodations,

there needs to be a medical professional,

there needs to be teachers,
school administrators, the parents,

the students themselves.

All of these people need to agree
on what academic accommodations

are necessary in order for the student
to be successful in school.

With all of these individuals,
I find it very, very hard to believe

that these students
are somehow being misidentified.

And yet, according to the CDC,

adults between the ages of 18 and 44,
25 percent of them have a disability.

That’s one out of four adults
have a disability.

Now, these seem to be
contradicting statistics to me,

and I think some of that might come
between that concept

that I was mentioning
between want and need.

So some of these students might not want
to be viewed as having a disability,

but maybe they need
academic accommodations.

So go back into college now with me,

and once I’m finally comfortable
with my own disability, I’m OK with it,

I thought I could be one of those people
to help other students with disabilities

and make it a more inclusive environment
on a college campus.

So I joined a group
of other faculty members,

the goal of which was increasing
inclusion on a college campus.

So my idea, and this is going back

into the civil rights calls
for disability rights,

and the call was:
“Nothing about me without me.”

Pretty straightforward, I think,

is don’t make decisions
about students with students

or individuals with disabilities without
input from individuals with disabilities.

Seemed pretty straightforward
and made sense to me.

So I joined this group
and I’m listening to them

and I’m listening to them,

and I’m listening,

and finally, I just had to ask,
“What about students with disabilities?”

And they told me, “Yeah,
they’re an important group too,

but that’s not really who
we’re talking about with this group.”

Why is inclusion
somehow an exclusive idea?

(Applause)

Why are individuals with disabilities

not included in the idea
or discussions of inclusion?

So looking back into grade school again,

I think I can see this
in grade school as well.

And it starts way back there as well.

So there are these things
called inclusion classes.

I’m not saying that these are a bad thing,
so don’t get me wrong,

but stick with me for a sec.

So inclusion classes are bringing students

from special education
into general education courses.

This has been scientifically studied.

It’s been shown to be very beneficial
for individuals with disabilities.

So that’s not what my argument is,

but what I’m saying is what is it telling
the students with disabilities

when they hear, “Oh, this is the class
for you, go be over here.”

Or what is it telling
other students when they hear,

“Oh, you don’t need to be in this class,

you don’t have disabilities or academic
struggles, you don’t need this one.

These are for the other people.”

I think that idea is kind of brought forth
and brought forward as they grow up.

And so what I’m really talking about

is normalizing the idea and concept
of disability in society,

and I really think that this needs
to occur in grade school.

And so there are three groups of people
that I’ve talked about here:

One is the group of individuals
with disabilities.

Students with disabilities need to see

that they can have a disability
and be successful.

Second, students
without disabilities need to see

that an individual can be successful
and have a disability.

I don’t know where it comes from,

but disability is, in itself,
nothing to be ashamed of.

And third, the third group
is school stakeholders,

school stakeholders: I’m meaning teachers,
I’m meaning administrators,

and I’m talking about, yes,
even parents as well.

All of these individuals
need to see that some of their actions

and perhaps inactions, actually can be
harmful to individuals with disabilities.

Now, all of this, again,
is in the context of school.

School is a place for learning,

so I think the biggest thing
that can be done is to learn about it.

Ignorance, I think, is the biggest
contributor to this idea

of a divide between individuals with
and individuals without disabilities.

And so … learn about it.

For me, I am now a high school teacher.

I’m right in there, and I am contributing
to disability awareness

kind of by default, but I’m doing
it intentionally as well.

And so I guess my question for all of you
then is: “What are you going to do?”

Thank you.

(Applause)

抄写员:yoojae lee
审稿人:David DeRuwe

我坐在轮椅上
,以防你没有注意到。

我有一个非常明显、
非常明显的残疾,


大多数残疾并非如此。

当我开始上大学时,
我身体完全健全。 据

我所知,我与另一
名残疾学生的第一次相遇

是在我大一的时候

,另一名学生
在考试中获得了额外的时间

作为学术住宿。

我不知道他的残疾是什么。

我不明白
他为什么要在考试中获得额外的时间。

我觉得这真的很不公平。
他有额外的测试时间

我当然可以
在测试中使用额外的时间。 为什么? 为什么?

我认为这来自
于回顾小学。

我不认为我认识
其他任何有残疾的人。

我不知道还有其他人
接受学术住宿。

根据国家
教育统计中心的数据,

14% 的学前班
至 12 年级学生有残疾。

每七名学生中就有一名
需要学术住宿。

我认识超过七名
学生,从统计上看,是的。

是的,我确实认识其他人。
我只是没有意识到这一点。

快进几年

,我现在是需要
学术住宿的人。

我需要额外的时间进行测试。

我需要一些笔记方面的帮助,

无论是来自老师
还是其他学生。

其他学生会
对我

说几年前我说过的话,
说我很幸运,

“我不敢相信你能得到这个。”

好吧,我并不觉得幸运。

你知道,我宁愿
不需要学术住宿。

这不是想要他们的问题,

但我需要学术
住宿才能在学校取得成功。

所以回到小学,

我可以看看其他学生。

根据我
在 2011 年读到的 Newman 及其同事的一项研究,

在 14%
被认定为残疾的学生中,有

37% 的学生在高中毕业八年后
并没有认定

自己有残疾

现在,当我说识别时,

我指的是《
残障人士教育法》

为了获得
学术住宿,

需要有医疗专业人员,

需要有老师、
学校管理人员、家长

、学生自己 .

所有这些人

都需要就学生
在学校取得成功所需的学术安排达成一致。

对于所有这些人
,我很难

相信这些
学生不知何故被误认了。

然而,根据疾病预防控制中心的数据,

在 18 至 44 岁之间的成年人中,有
25% 的人患有残疾。

这是四分之一的成年人
有残疾。

现在,这些
对我来说似乎与统计数据相矛盾,

我认为其中一些可能
介于


在需要和需要之间提到的那个概念之间。

因此,其中一些学生可能不
希望被视为有残疾,

但也许他们需要
学术住宿。

所以现在和我一起回到大学

,一旦我最终
对自己的残疾感到满意,我就可以接受了,

我想我可以成为
帮助其他残疾学生

并使其成为更具包容性的环境的人之一
在大学校园里。

所以我加入了
一群其他教职员工,他们

的目标是增加
大学校园的包容性。

所以我的想法,这又回到

了民权
对残疾人权利

的呼吁,呼吁是:
“没有我,我什么都没有。”

我认为,非常简单的

是,如果没有残障人士的意见,不要
对有学生的学生

或残障人士做出决定

看起来很简单
,对我来说很有意义。

所以我加入了这个小组
,我在听他们

,我在听他们

,我在听

,最后,我只需要问,
“残疾学生呢?”

他们告诉我,“是的,
他们也是一个重要的群体,

但这并不是
我们与这个群体真正谈论的人。”

为什么包容在
某种程度上是一种排他性的想法?

(掌声)

为什么残疾人

没有被纳入包容的想法
或讨论?

所以再次回顾小学,

我想我也可以
在小学看到这一点。

它也从那里开始。

所以有这些东西
叫做包含类。

我并不是说这些是坏事,
所以不要误会我的意思,

但请坚持一会儿。

因此,全纳课程将学生

从特殊教育
带入通识教育课程。

这是经过科学研究的。

它已被证明对残疾人非常有益

所以这不是我的论点,

而是我要说的是

当残疾学生听到“哦,这是
给你的课,到这里来”时,它是在告诉他们什么。

或者
当其他学生听到

“哦,你不需要上这个班,

你没有残疾或学业
困难,你不需要这个”时,它是在告诉其他学生什么。

这些是给其他人的。”

我认为这个想法是
随着他们的成长而提出和提出的。

所以我真正要谈论的

是使社会中残疾的观念和概念正常化

我真的认为这
需要在小学进行。

所以我在这里谈到了三类人:

一类是
残疾人。

残疾学生需要

看到他们可以有残疾
并取得成功。

其次,
没有残疾的学生需要

看到一个人可以成功
并有残疾。

我不知道它从何而来,

但残疾本身并
没有什么可耻的。

第三,第三组
是学校利益相关者,

学校利益相关者:我是指老师,
我是指行政人员

,我说的是,是的,
甚至是父母。

所有这些人都
需要看到他们的一些行为

和可能的不作为,实际上可能
对残障人士有害。

现在,所有这一切,再次,
都是在学校的背景下。

学校是一个学习的地方,

所以我认为能做的最大的
事情就是了解它。

我认为,无知是

造成残疾人与非残疾人之间存在分歧的最大因素。

所以……了解它。

对我来说,我现在是一名高中老师。

我就在那里,

默认情况下,我正在为提高残疾意识做出贡献,但我
也是故意这样做的。

所以我想我对你们所有人的问题
是:“你们要做什么?”

谢谢你。

(掌声)