Sustainability Where consumers corporates compromise

[Music]

sustainability

where consumers and corporates

compromise

what does it mean to you when your

favorite personal care product

food or household item is relaunched

sustainably

would you like it more do you think it

will work

just as well do you end up paying more

for it

for many everyday items the packaging or

product material often gets substituted

for renewable sources that are

redesignated as

recyclable or compostable some of them

work well

others not so much i was recently

reading about the recycling channel

where only

nine percent of plastic that has ever

been created

has been recycled in the world and

started learning about the current

system

in place for a sustainable future and i

became indignant

china has now shut its borders to

plastic and the rest of

asia is following suit and we have

nowhere to put our plastic

so instead of 91 of plastic gain to

landfills

oceans and incinerators now almost 100

percent will be

even that glimmer of hope of energy from

waste incinerators has been dashed

as we now know it is more carbon

intensive

second only to coal so

why was the blame being pushed onto us

as the consumers

why is it so difficult to live

sustainably

found myself asking these questions

during my process for founding a

sustainable personal hygiene company

i want to let you in on what my

entrepreneurial journey taught me

on sustainability and compromise

when i was in my final year of medical

school i was having a very bad

period i asked my housemate to buy me

some sanitary products

and had a good chuckle when he brought

home about half of the store

we got talking about periods and had a

rather enlightened discussion

he had never considered the

practicalities of periods

and i never had to justify them i’d

never really fully thought about the

environmental impact of my period

nor many activities in my daily life i

had rather lazily been reflexively

purchasing

what i thought was sustainable products

that were labeled

organic bioplastic and compostable i was

coming across these green terms

commonly in my daily life i don’t fully

understand them

what does sustainable leather mean how

can mass leather production

be sustainable with cows contributions

to climate change

how can must vegan leather production be

also sustainable without impacting

agriculture and food

ambiguous terms such as eco-friendly are

not specific

what does that mean is that referring to

the carbon footprint

there are different meanings of zero

waste so are we talking about an

individual product level on a mass

corporate scale where we look at

all aspects of the company and product

impact from cradle to grave

myself and my housemate aaron entered

imperial’s innovation competition

as it was rather fittingly the spark to

the discussion

we entered with the fully biodegradable

sanitary pad

we substituted conventional materials

with biodegradable ones

and combined with a savvy period app

sprinkled in with some machine learning

and entered with this idea we were

fortunate

and won and decided to use the money on

experimenting with the prototype and

testing out our hypothesis

we started off with understanding why

our biodegradable pad was better than a

conventional plastic one

and why we should convince people to buy

them

during this we found that people would

prefer sustainability

up to a certain point as long as it did

not impact their priorities

such as comfort or quality of the

product or lifestyle

is needed for a reusable one we learned

that in general

people would prioritize the intrinsic

factors of a product

over the extrinsic factors for

sustainability

whilst understanding what drove

purchasing decisions

we were also testing our hypothesis that

biodegradable pads are more sustainable

than conventional plastic ones

our first failure was that we didn’t

have a working definition of

sustainability

this is a key internal process that we

realized we needed

how can you strive for something if you

don’t have a clear

criteria or definition for success

we define product sustainability as a

product

that has a positive or no long-term

ecological impact

from production to disposal well then

our hypothesis was wrong as pads are

either flushed

incinerated or end up in landfill

none of our biodegradable pads would

ever

find a way to degrade we panicked

what do we do with the money now so we

had to change our solution once we

better

understood the problem we realized that

our initial proposal did nothing to the

actual

impact of the pad on the environment the

real problem

lay around the point of disposal and not

the materials

so we decided to create a flushable pad

a pad that uses existing infrastructure

to break down into starch and sugar

when put into contact with water before

it seemed insane to me

that every day in the uk over

2.5 million pads and 4.5

million tampons are flushed down the

toilets

that’s a third of all pads and tampons

being flushed away

but then when you think about it it

doesn’t seem

all that insane you are sitting on a

toilet

you flush toilet paper after use if you

thought along the same principles

it seems to follow that you should flush

your pad

we are surrounded by products that are

sold as sustainable

and better for the environment but we

realize that companies have only ever

thought about the impact of the

environment during the making of their

products

leaving the burden of disposal to the

consumer

many public awareness campaigns focus

solely on the actions of the consumer

and not companies companies should be

thinking through the entire product life

cycle

so products are easy to use and disuse

sustainably in scale

for mass consumption as the r d for our

flushable pads that

took three years during that time we

realized a huge problem to tackle is the

misinformation and perception

surrounding sustainability we are

exposed to sustainable language on a

daily basis

most of these words mean next nothing in

in current objective sustainable

standards and the words that do provide

definition within context

are often misused in branding

we see this as a marketing push to

re-label the product or re-brand with

green washing without real innovation or

change to back it up

so this begs an important question how

can we expect to grow sustainable

businesses

and collectively decide on actions

without even being able to talk about it

properly

with the spotlight on growing

environmental social and governance

funds to drive

innovation in these sectors has prompted

changes within consumables

and our purchasing patterns slowly

we are defining some of these words such

as biodegradable

compostable and biodynamic into

universal scientific standards

but we still have a long way to go we

see a lot of companies with misleading

use of these words

as we set standards for them we’ll be

able to culture sustainable businesses

and educate consumers too

so by clarifying the language of

sustainability we can then

talk honestly about the true impact of

products

from companies that have made the switch

our focus group stated that they often

felt that the quality of the products

however were compromised

in sustainable options or their

lifestyle was compromised

with the switch to reusable and voiced

that their sustainable options were

usually more expensive

this compromise felt by the consumer

whether on performance

finance or lifestyle was mirrored by

many other consumer packaged goods

this compromise doesn’t have to mean

that you aren’t happy with making the

change

but ultimately more of one thing may

mean

less of another and these views

are mirrored for many consumer package

goods forcing consumers

some kind of compromise but is this

compromise inevitable

this consumer demand for better has

driven awareness and innovation and we

are seeing sustainable innovation

across industries as they’re asking

questions like who is the last person to

be holding the product at disposal

what disposal methods will be commonly

available to them

and importantly what incentivizes the

customer to correctly dispose of a

product

we are seeing a shift in responsibility

as companies

design consumer-centric sustainability

these companies are innovating products

to ensure that the entire

product life cycle is sustainable and

not

compromising the quality of their

products nor the environmental impact

we are seeing climate positive companies

who give

back more than they use and climate

conscious funds

driving changes in fields across sectors

let’s take a step back and compare how

the market values

different types of harm

we would never launch a product to the

market that knowingly caused damage to

consumers

beds are just unacceptable side effects

however extrinsic damage to the

environment is not considered

unacceptable the consumers are now

advocating for this damage to the

environment to be as

unacceptable as the intrinsic damage to

us

to stop harmful processes and materials

going into the products and into the

environment

so through asking a series of important

questions throughout my journey

i was able to learn what actions we can

do on our part as the consumer

to understand and promote sustainability

and where we are still

forced to compromise i urge you

to consider these three questions on

your next purchase

what does that really mean

by first understanding the language we

recognize that many companies

green wash their products so ask

yourself what actually is clean

natural plastic free and base your

decision on that and not the marketing

or branding behind it

the second question is where does it

come from and where does it go

pay attention to the complete life cycle

of your products

not only should your products be

sustainably produced and used

but also disused companies must take

back the responsibility of product

disposal

and this final question is do i really

need this

this recognizes that we as consumers are

the most

important factors we purchase the

product

i personally find this one the hardest

and wrestle with this

daily i live a modern life and

choose to be a hermit and reuse

everything however there is a certain

level of convenience and hygiene that i

get from disposable products

that i am sometimes unwilling to give up

this should be a balance that is

personal to your lifestyle

and you make the decision like i said

you

are the most important every product has

an impact no matter how sustainable

sometimes the consumer does not want to

compromise on convenience

other times the corporation does not

want to compromise on margins

we need to recognize that sustainability

is a spectrum

and consumption always has a price

thank you very much

[音乐]

消费者和企业

妥协的可持续性

当您

最喜欢的个人护理产品

食品或家居用品以可持续的方式重新推出时,这对您意味着

什么 您是否更喜欢它 您认为它

是否

同样有效 您是否最终会为此付出更多

对于许多日常用品,包装或

产品材料经常被

重新指定为

可回收或可堆肥的可再生资源所取代,其中一些

效果很好,

另一些则不然

已经在世界范围内被回收,并

开始了解

当前为可持续未来而建立的系统,我

变得

愤愤不平 91 塑料

垃圾填埋场

海洋和焚化炉现在几乎 100

%

将是一线希望 来自

垃圾焚烧炉的能源已经破灭,

因为我们现在知道它的碳

密集度

仅次于煤炭,所以

为什么要把责任推到我们

作为消费者

身上,为什么可持续生活如此困难?

在我的过程中发现自己问这些问题 成立一家

可持续发展的个人卫生公司

我想让你了解

我在医学院最后一年的创业历程中教给我的关于可持续发展和妥协的内容

当他把

大约一半的商店带回家时笑得很好,

我们谈到了经期,并进行了

相当开明的讨论

他从未考虑过经期的

实用性

,我也不必为它们辩护

我的时期的影响,

也没有我日常生活中的许多活动,

我相当懒惰地反射性地

购买

我认为可持续的产品

标有

有机生物塑料和可堆肥的管道 我在

日常生活中经常遇到这些绿色术语

我不完全

理解它们

可持续皮革意味着

什么 大规模皮革生产

如何可持续,奶牛

对气候变化的贡献

纯素皮革必须如何 生产在

不影响

农业和食品的

情况下也是可持续的

我们从摇篮到坟墓审视

公司的各个方面和产品

影响的规模

我和我的室友 aaron 参加了

Imperial 的创新竞赛,

因为这恰好引发了我们讨论的火花,

我们用可生物降解的

卫生巾代替了传统材料

并结合精明的时期 应用

程序加入了一些机器学习

并带着这个想法进入了我们很

幸运

并获胜并决定用这笔钱来

试验原型并

测试我们的假设

我们开始了解为什么

我们的可生物降解垫比传统塑料垫更好

并且 为什么我们应该说服人们

在此期间购买它们我们发现人们会

在一定程度上更喜欢可持续性,只要它

不影响他们的优先事项,

例如产品的舒适度或

质量或

生活方式需要一个可重复使用的产品我们

了解到 一般来说,

人们会优先考虑产品的内在

因素而不是

外在因素以

实现可持续性,

同时了解推动

购买决策的因素

我们也在测试我们的假设,即可

生物降解垫比传统塑料垫更可持续

我们的第一个失败是我们

没有 可持续性的工作定义

这是一个关键的内部过程 如果您没有明确的成功标准或定义,我们

意识到我们需要

您如何为某事努力

我们将产品可持续性定义为

从生产到处置具有积极或没有长期生态影响的产品,然后

我们的假设 这是错误的,因为垫子

要么被冲洗

焚烧,要么最终被填埋

,我们的可生物降解垫都

找不到降解的方法 我们惊慌失措

现在用钱做什么,所以

一旦我们

更好地

理解了我们意识到的问题,我们就不得不改变我们的解决方案

我们最初的提议

对垫子对环境的实际影响没有任何作用,

真正的问题

在于处理点而

不是材料,

所以我们决定创建一个可冲洗的

垫子,一个使用现有基础设施

分解成淀粉和糖的垫子

在英国,每天有超过

250 万个卫生巾和 450

万个卫生棉条被冲下,我觉得这简直是疯了。

马桶占所有卫生巾和卫生棉条的三分之一

被冲走,

但是当您想到它时

,您坐在

马桶上

似乎并没有那么疯狂 你应该冲洗

你的垫子

我们周围都是

以可持续

和对环境更好的方式出售的产品,但我们

意识到公司只

考虑过

在制造产品期间对环境的影响,

而将处理的负担留给了

消费者

许多公众意识活动

只关注消费者的行为,

而不是公司公司应该

考虑整个产品生命

周期,

以便产品易于使用和以

可持续的方式废弃以

供大众消费,因为我们的

可冲洗垫的研发

耗时三年 在那段时间里,我们

意识到要解决的一个巨大问题是围绕我们的可持续性的

错误信息和看法

每天接触可持续语言

这些词中的大多数

在当前客观的可持续

标准中毫无意义,并且在上下文中提供定义的词

经常在品牌推广中被滥用,

我们将其视为

重新标记产品或重新标记的营销推动 -

绿色洗涤的品牌没有真正的创新或

改变来支持它,

所以这引出了一个重要的问题,

我们如何期望发展可持续

业务

并集体决定

行动,甚至无法

在关注日益增长的

环境社会和

推动

这些行业创新的治理基金

促使消耗品

和我们的购买模式发生了缓慢的变化

我们正在将其中一些词定义为通用科学标准,

例如可生物降解的

堆肥和生物动力,

但我们还有很长的路要走 我们

看到很多公司 当我们为这些词设定标准时,如果误导性地

使用这些词

,我们将

能够 o 培养可持续发展的企业

并教育消费者,

因此通过澄清可持续发展的语言,

我们可以

诚实地谈论

那些做出转变的公司的产品的真正影响

我们的焦点小组表示,他们经常

觉得产品的质量受到了

损害

在可持续选择或他们的

生活方式

因转向可重复使用而受到损害,并

表示他们的可持续选择

通常更昂贵

,消费者感受到的这种妥协,

无论是在绩效

财务或生活方式方面,都反映在

许多其他消费包装商品上,

这种妥协不必

意味着你对做出改变不满意,

但最终更多的一件事可能

意味着

更少的另一件事,这些

观点反映在许多消费品包装

商品上,迫使消费者

做出某种妥协,但这种

妥协是不可避免的,

这种消费者对更好的需求

推动了 意识和创新,

我们看到可持续发展 ble 创新

跨行业,因为他们会问这样的

问题,例如谁是最后

一个持有产品的人 他们

通常可以使用哪些处置方法

,重要的是,是什么激励

客户正确处置

我们看到的产品的转变 责任,

因为公司

设计以消费者为中心的可持续性

这些公司正在创新产品,

以确保整个

产品生命周期是可持续的,并且

损害其产品的质量

或环境影响

我们看到气候积极的公司

回馈超过他们使用和气候

有意识的资金

推动跨行业领域的变化

让我们退后一步,比较

市场如何评估

不同类型的损害

我们永远不会向

市场推出故意对消费者造成损害的产品

床只是不可接受的副作用,

但对

环境的外部损害 不被认为是

不可接受的 消费者现在

主张这种对

环境

的损害与对我们的内在损害一样不可接受,

以阻止有害过程和材料

进入产品和

环境,

因此通过

在整个旅程中提出一系列重要问题,

我能够学习 作为消费者,我们可以采取哪些行动

来理解和促进可持续性

以及我们仍然

被迫妥协的地方 我敦促您

在下次购买时考虑这三个问题

首先理解我们认识到的语言的真正含义是什么?

公司

绿色清洗他们的产品,所以问问

自己什么实际上是干净的

天然塑料免费并

根据它而不是其背后的营销

或品牌来做出决定

第二个问题是它

来自哪里以及它去哪里

注意整个生命周期

您的

产品不仅应该是

可持续生产和使用的,

而且应该是废弃的公司 IES 必须

承担产品处置的责任

,最后一个问题是我真的需要这个吗?

这承认我们作为消费者是

我们购买

产品的最重要因素

生活并

选择成为隐士并重复使用

所有东西,但是我从一次性产品中获得了一定

程度的便利和卫生,

我有时不愿意放弃

这应该是一种

适合您生活方式的平衡

,您可以做出决定 就像我说的那样,

是最重要的,每件产品都会

产生影响,无论可持续性如何,

有时消费者不想

在便利性上妥协,

有时公司

不想在利润上妥协,

我们需要认识到可持续性

是一个范围,

而消费总是 有价格

非常感谢