Seeing a sustainable future Alex Steffen

[Music]

[Applause]

climate change is already a heavy topic

and it’s getting heavier because we’re

understanding that we need to do more

than we are right we’re understanding in

fact that those of us who live in the

developed world need to be really

pushing towards eliminating our

emissions that’s to put it mildly not

what’s on the table now

and it tends to feel a little

overwhelming when we look at what is

there in reality today and the magnitude

of the problem that we face and when we

have overwhelming problems in front of

us we tend to seek simple answers and I

think this is what we’ve done with

climate change we look at where the

emissions are coming from they’re coming

out of our tailpipes and smokestacks and

so forth and we say ok well the problem

is that they’re there they’re coming out

of fossil fuels that were burning so

therefore the answer must be to replace

those fossil fuels with clean sources of

energy and while of course we do need

clean energy I would put to you that

it’s possible that by looking at climate

change as a clean energy generation

problem we’re in fact setting ourselves

up not to solve it and the reason why is

that we live on a planet that is rapidly

urbanizing that shouldn’t be news to any

of us however it’s hard sometimes to

remember the extent of that urbanization

by mid-century we’re gonna have about 8

billion perhaps more people living in

cities or within a day’s travel of one

will be an overwhelmingly urban species

in order to provide the kind of energy

that it would take for 8 billion people

living in cities that are even somewhat

like the cities that those of us in the

global North live in today we would have

to generate an absolutely astonishing

amount of energy it may be possible that

we are not even able to build that much

clean energy right so if we’re seriously

talking about tackling climate change on

an urbanizing planet we need to look

somewhere else for the solution the

solution in fact maybe closer to hand

than we think because all of those

cities were building our opportunities

every city determines to a very large

extent

the amount of energy used by its

inhabitants right we tend to think of

energy use as a behavioral thing I

choose to turn this light switch on but

really enormous amounts of our energy

use are sort of predestined by the kinds

of communities and cities that we live

in I won’t show you very many graphs

today but if I can just focus on this

one for a moment it really tells us a

lot of what we need to know which is

quite simply that if you look for

example at transportation a major

category of climate emissions there is a

direct relationship between how dense a

city is and the amount of climate

emissions that its residents spew out

into the air and the correlation of

course is that denser places tend to

have lower emissions which isn’t really

all that difficult to figure out if you

think about it basically you know we

substitute in our lives access to the

things we want we go out there and we

hop in our cars and we drive from place

to place and we’re basically using

mobility to get the access we need but

when we live in a denser community

suddenly what we find of course is that

the things we need are closeby and since

the most sustainable trip is the one

that you never had to make in the first

place right suddenly our lives become

instantly more sustainable and it is

possible of course to increase the

density of the communities around us

some places are doing this with new eco

districts developing whole new

sustainable neighborhoods which is nice

work if you can get it but most of the

time what we’re talking about is in fact

reweaving the urban fabric that we

already have so we’re talking about

things like infill development really

sharp little changes to where we have

buildings where we’re developing urban

retrofitting creating different sorts of

spaces and uses out of places that are

already there increasingly we’re

realizing that we don’t even need to

densify an entire city what we need

instead is an average density that rises

to a level where we don’t drive as much

and so on and that can be done by

raising the density in very specific

spots a whole lot right so you could

think of it as tent poles that actually

raise the density of the entire city and

we find that when we do that we can in

fact have a few places that are really

hyper dense within a wider fabric of

places that are perhaps a little more

comfortable

and achieve the same results now we may

find that there are places that are

really really dense and still hold on to

their cars but the reality is that by

and large what we see when we get a lot

of people together with the right

conditions is a threshold effect where

people simply stop driving as much and

increasingly more and more people if

they’re surrounded by places that make

them feel at home give up their cars

altogether and this is a huge huge

energy savings because what comes out of

our tailpipe is really just you know the

beginning of the story with climate

emissions from cars we have the

manufacturer of the car the disposal of

the car all of the parking and freeways

and so on when you can get rid of all of

those because somebody doesn’t use any

of them really you find that you can

actually cut transportation emissions as

much as 90 percent and people are

embracing this all around the world

we’re seeing more and more people

embrace this sort of walk shed life

people are saying that it’s moving from

the idea of the dream home to the dream

neighborhood and when you layer that

over with the kind of ubiquitous

communications that we’re starting to

see what you find is in fact even more

access sort of suffused into spaces some

of its transportation access this is a

magnificent map that shows me in this

case how far I can get from my home in

30 minutes using public transportation

some of it is about walking’s not all

perfect yet this is Google walking maps

I asked how to do the greater Ridge way

and it told me to go via Guernsey it

didn’t tell me that this route may be

missing sidewalks or pedestrian paths

though but the technologies are getting

better and we’re starting to really kind

of crowdsource this navigation and as we

just heard earlier of course we’re also

learning how to put information on dumb

objects things that don’t have any

wiring in them at all we’re learning how

to include in these sort of systems of

notation and navigation part of what

we’re finding with this is that what we

thought was the major point of

manufacturing and consumption which is

to get a bunch of stuff is not in fact

how we really live best in dense

environments what we’re finding is that

what we want is access to the capacities

of things my favorite example is a drill

who here owns a drill a home power drill

okay I do to the average home power

drill is used somewhere between 6 and 20

minutes in its entire lifetime depending

on who you

and you know so what we do is we buy

these drills that have a potential

capacity of thousands of hours of drill

time use them once or twice to put a

hole in the wall and let them sit right

our cities I would put to your

stockpiles of these surplus capacities

and while we could try and figure out

new ways to use those capacities such as

cooking or making ice sculptures or even

a mafia hit you know what we probably

will find is that in fact turning those

products into services that we have

access to when we want them is a small

is a far smarter way to go and in fact

even space itself is turning into a

service we’re finding that people can

share the same spaces do stuff with

vacant space buildings are becoming

bundles of services right so we have new

designs that are helping us take

mechanical things that we used to spend

energy on like heating cooling etc and

turn them into things that we avoid

spending energy on so we light our

buildings with daylight we cool them

with breezes we heat them with sunshine

in fact when we use all these things

what we found is that in some cases

energy use in a building can drop as

much as 90 percent which brings on

another threshold effect I like to call

furnace dumping which is quite simply if

you have a building that doesn’t need to

be heated with a furnace you save a

whole bunch of money up front these

things actually become cheaper to build

than the alternatives now when we look

at being able to you know /r our product

you slash our transportation use slash

you know our our building energy use all

of that is great but it still leaves

something behind and if we’re gonna

really truly become sustainable cities

we need to think a little differently

this is one way to do it this is

Vancouver’s propaganda about how

greenest city they are and certainly

lots of people have taken to heart this

idea that a sustainable city is covered

in greenery so we have visions like this

we have visions like this

we have visions like this now all of

these are fine projects but they really

have kind of missed an essential point

which is it’s not about the Leafs above

it’s about the system’s below do they

for instance capture rainwater so that

we can reduce water use water is energy

intensive do they perhaps include green

infrastructures so that we can take

runoff and water that’s going out of our

houses and clean it and filter it and

grow urban street trees do they connect

us back to the ecosystems around

by for example connecting us to rivers

and allowing for restoration do they

allow for pollination pollinator

pathways that bees and butterflies and

such can come back into our cities do

they even take the very waist matter

that we have from food and fiber and so

forth and turn it back into soil right

and sequester carbon take carbon out of

the air in the process of using our

cities I would submit to you that all of

these things are not only possible

they’re being done right now and that

it’s a darn good thing because right now

our economy by and large operates as

Paul Hawken said by stealing the future

selling it in the present and calling it

GDP and if we have another eight billion

or seven billion or six billion even

people living on a planet where their

cities also steal the future we’re gonna

run out of future really fast but if we

think differently I think that in fact

we can have cities that are not only

zero emissions but have unlimited

possibilities as well thank you very

much

[Applause]

[音乐]

[掌声]

气候变化已经是一个沉重的话题

,而且越来越重,因为我们

明白我们需要做的

比我们正确的要多 我们明白

事实上我们这些生活在

发达国家的人需要 真正

推动消除我们的

排放,这是温和的,而不是

现在摆在桌面上的

东西,

当我们看到

今天的现实情况以及

我们面临的问题的严重性以及当我们

有压倒性的时候,它往往会让人感到有点不知所措 摆在我们面前的问题

我们倾向于寻求简单的答案,我

认为这就是

我们在应对气候变化

方面所做的事情 问题

是它们在那里它们来自

燃烧的化石燃料,

因此答案必须是

用清洁能源取代这些化石燃料

,当然我们确实需要

清洁能源 我会告诉你,

有可能通过将气候

变化视为清洁能源生产

问题,我们实际上是在设置

自己不去解决它,原因

是我们生活在一个正在迅速

城市化的星球上 对我们任何人来说都不是新闻,

但有时很难

记住到本世纪中叶城市化的程度

我们将有

大约 80 亿人生活在

城市中,或者在一天的旅行

中将成为绝大多数城市的

物种 为了

提供80亿

生活在城市中的能源

,这些城市甚至有点像我们

今天在全球北方居住的城市,我们

必须产生绝对惊人

的能源量 有可能

我们甚至无法正确地建造那么多的

清洁能源,所以如果我们认真

讨论在

一个城市化的星球上应对气候变化,我们需要在

其他地方寻找解决方案,

所以 事实上,解决方案可能

比我们想象的更接近,因为所有这些

城市都在创造我们的机会

每个城市在很大程度上决定

了其居民使用的能源量,

我们倾向于将

能源使用视为我

选择的一种行为方式 打开这个电灯开关,但

实际上我们大量的能源

使用是由

我们所居住的社区和城市类型决定的

它确实告诉了我们

很多我们需要知道的事情,这

很简单,例如,如果您

以交通为例,

这是气候排放的主要类别,

城市的密集程度与其居民的气候

排放量之间存在直接关系

喷到空气中,相关性

当然是密度较高的地方往往

排放量较低

,如果

您基本上考虑一下,这并不难弄清楚 现在

,我们在生活中替代了获得

我们想要的东西

的机会

突然之间,我们当然发现

我们需要的东西就在附近,

因为最可持续的旅行

是您一开始就不必进行的旅行,

突然我们的生活

变得更加可持续

,当然可以增加

我们周围社区的密度

一些地方正在这样做,新的生态

区正在开发全新的

可持续社区

有所以我们在谈论

诸如填充开发之类的事情

对我们拥有建筑物的地方几乎没有什么变化

我们正在开发城市

改造 创造不同类型的

空间和用途 对于已经存在的地方,

我们越来越多地

意识到,我们甚至不需要

使整个城市

变得密集,我们需要的是平均密度上升

到我们不经常开车的水平

等等,这可以 可以通过

提高非常特定地点的密度来完成,

所以你可以

把它想象成实际上

提高了整个城市密度的帐篷杆,

我们发现当我们这样做时,我们

实际上可以有几个地方是

在可能更舒适并获得相同结果的更广泛的地方结构中真的超密集

现在我们可能会

发现有些地方

真的非常密集并且仍然坚持

他们的汽车,但现实是

,总的来说 我们看到,当我们让

很多人在合适的条件下聚集在一起时,这

是一个门槛效应,

人们只是停止开车,

越来越多的人

被包围在让他们感到宾至如归的地方

放弃他们的

整个汽车,这是一个巨大的

节能,因为从

我们的排气管出来的东西真的只是你知道

汽车的气候排放故事的开始

我们有汽车

制造商汽车的处置

所有的停车场和高速公路

等等,当你可以摆脱所有

这些因为有人不

使用它们时,你会发现你实际上可以

减少

多达 90% 的交通排放,而且

世界各地的人们都在接受这一点,

我们看到的越来越多 越来越多的人

接受这种步行棚生活

人们说它正在从

梦想家园的想法转移到梦想中的

社区当你

用无处不在的交流方式叠加

它时,我们开始

看到你发现的是 事实上,甚至更多

的交通通道渗透到空间中,它的一些交通通道这是一

张宏伟的地图,在这种情况下,它向我展示了

使用 publ 在 30 分钟内我可以从家到多远 ic 交通

其中一些是关于步行的,但它并不

完美,但这是谷歌步行地图

我问如何走更大的山脊路

,它告诉我要经过根西岛,它

没有告诉我这条路线可能

缺少人行道或人行道

但是技术越来越

好,我们开始真正

将这种导航众包起来,正如我们

刚才听到的,当然,我们也在

学习如何将信息放在

没有任何

接线的愚蠢物体上 我们正在学习

如何将这些符号和导航系统包含在

我们的发现中,其中一部分是我们

认为制造和消费的主要点,

即获得一堆东西不在 事实上

,我们如何在密集的环境中真正生活得最好

我们发现的是,

我们想要的是获得事物的能力

me

电钻在其整个生命周期中的使用时间在 6 到 20 分钟之间,

具体

取决于您

和您认识的人,所以我们所做的是我们购买

这些具有

数千小时钻孔时间的潜在容量的电钻,

使用它们一次或两次放置

在墙上挖个洞,让他们就坐

我们的城市

我们可能

会发现,事实上,将这些

产品转化为我们可以

在我们想要它们时访问的服务

是一种更聪明的方式,事实上,

甚至空间本身也正在变成一种

服务,我们发现人们 可以

共享相同的空间 与

空置空间一起做事 建筑物正在

成为服务捆绑,因此我们有新的

设计可以帮助

我们采用以前花费能源的机械设备,

例如加热冷却

等 将它们放入我们避免

消耗能源的东西上 所以我们

用日光照亮我们的建筑物 我们

用微风冷却它们 我们用阳光加热它们

事实上,当我们使用所有这些东西时

,我们发现在某些情况下

,建筑物的能源使用会下降

高达 90% 会带来

另一个阈值效应,我喜欢将其称为

熔炉倾倒,这很简单,如果

你有一栋不需要用熔炉加热的建筑物,你就

可以

节省一大笔钱,这些

东西实际上变成了

现在建造比替代品更便宜,当我们

看到能够让您了解/r 我们的产品时,

您削减了我们的交通使用削减了

您知道我们的建筑能源使用

所有这一切都很棒,但它仍然留下了

一些东西,如果我们要

真正成为可持续发展的城市

我们需要有一点不同的想法

这是一种方法 这是

温哥华关于

他们是多么绿色的城市的宣传当然

很多人已经把它放在心上了 他

认为一个可持续发展的城市被

绿色植物覆盖所以我们有这样的愿景

上面是关于系统的下面它们

是否例如收集雨水,以便

我们可以减少用水量水是能源

密集型的,它们是否可能包括绿色

基础设施,以便我们可以收集

径流和流出

房屋的水,并对其进行清洁和过滤

种植城市行道树它们是否将

我们与周围的生态系统

连接起来,例如将我们连接到河流

并允许恢复它们是否

允许蜜蜂和蝴蝶等授粉传粉途径

回到我们的城市

它们甚至占据了腰部

我们从食物和纤维等中获得的物质,

并将其转化为土壤,

并隔离碳,

在此过程中从空气中去除碳 ss 使用我们的

城市我会向你提出,所有

这些事情不仅是可能的,

而且它们现在正在完成,而且

这是一件非常好的事情,因为现在

我们的经济

总体上按照保罗霍肯所说的那样通过窃取未来来运作

在现在出售它并称之为

GDP 如果我们还有 80 亿

或 70 亿或 60 亿

人生活在一个他们的城市也窃取未来的星球上,

我们很快就会耗尽未来,但如果我们换个思路

我觉得其实

我们可以拥有不仅是

零排放的城市,还有无限的

可能,非常感谢

[鼓掌]