Why the metric system matters Matt Anticole

What does the French Revolution

have to do with the time NASA accidentally
crashed a $200 million orbiter

into the surface of Mars?

Actually, everything.

That crash happened due to an error

in converting between
two measurement systems,

U.S. customary units

and their S.I, or metric, equivalence.

So what’s the connection to
the French Revolution?

Let’s explain.

For the majority of recorded
human history,

units like the weight of a grain
or the length of a hand weren’t exact

and varied from place to place.

And different regions didn’t just use
varying measurements.

They had completely different
number systems as well.

By the late Middle Ages,
the Hindu-Arabic decimal system

mostly replaced Roman numerals
and fractions in Europe,

but efforts by scholars like John Wilkins
to promote standard decimal-based measures

were less successful.

With a quarter million different units
in France alone,

any widespread change would require
massive disruption.

And in 1789, that disruption came.

The leaders of the French Revolution
didn’t just overthrow the monarchy.

They sought to completely
transform society

according to the rational principles
of the Enlightenment.

When the new government took power,

the Academy of Sciences convened
to reform the system of measurements.

Old standards based on arbitrary authority
or local traditions

were replaced with mathematical
and natural relationships.

For example, the meter,
from the Greek word for measure,

was defined as 1/10,000,000
between the Equator and North Pole.

And the new metric system was,
in the words of the Marquis de Condorcet,

“For all people, for all time.”

Standardizing measurements
had political advantages

for the Revolutionaries as well.

Nobles could no longer manipulate local
units to extract more rent from commoners,

while the government could collect
taxes more efficiently.

And switching to a new Republican Calendar
with ten-day weeks

reduced church power
by eliminating Sundays.

Adoption of this new system wasn’t easy.

In fact, it was a bit of a mess.

At first, people used new units
alongside old ones,

and the Republican Calendar
was eventually abandoned.

When Napoléon Bonaparte took power,

he allowed small businesses
to use traditional measurements

redefined in metric terms.

But the metric system remained standard
for formal use,

and it spread across the continent,
along with France’s borders.

While Napoléon’s empire
lasted eight years,

its legacy endured far longer.

Some European countries reverted
to old measurements upon independence.

Others realized the value
of standardization

in an age of international trade.

After Portugal and the Netherlands
switched to metric voluntarily,

other nations followed,

with colonial empires spreading the system
around the world.

As France’s main rival,

Britain had resisted revolutionary ideas
and retained its traditional units.

But over the next two centuries,
the British Empire slowly transitioned,

first approving the metric system
as an optional alternative

before gradually making it offical.

However, this switch came too late
for thirteen former colonies

that had already gained independence.

The United States of America stuck with
the English units of its colonial past

and today remains one
of only three countries

which haven’t fully embraced
the metric system.

Despite constant initiatives
for metrication,

many Americans consider units like feet
and pounds more intuitive.

And ironically, some regard the once
revolutionary metric system

as a symbol of global conformity.

Nevertheless, the metric system is almost
universally used in science and medicine,

and it continues to evolve according
to its original principles.

For a long time,

standard units were actually defined by
carefully maintained physical prototypes.

But thanks to improving technology
and precision,

these objects with limited access
and unreliable longevity

are now being replaced with standards
based on universal constants,

like the speed of light.

Consistent measurements are such
an integral part of our daily lives

that it’s hard to appreciate what a major
accomplishment for humanity they’ve been.

And just as it arose
from a political revolution,

the metric system remains crucial
for the scientific revolutions to come.

法国

大革命与美国宇航局意外
将价值 2 亿美元的轨道飞行器

撞入火星表面的时间有什么关系?

其实,一切。

那次崩溃的发生是由于

两个测量系统之间的转换错误,

美国习惯单位

和它们的 S.I 或公制等价物。

那么
与法国大革命有什么关系呢?

让我们解释一下。

对于大多数有记录的
人类历史来说,

像一粒谷物的重量
或一只手的长度这样的单位并不准确,

而且因地而异。

不同的地区不仅仅使用
不同的测量方法。

他们也有完全不同的
数字系统。

到中世纪晚期
,印度教-阿拉伯十进制系统在欧洲

大部分取代了罗马数字
和分数,

但像约翰威尔金斯这样的学者
推动标准十进制测量

的努力不太成功。 仅

在法国就有 25 万个不同的单位

任何广泛的变化都需要
大规模的破坏。

而在 1789 年,这种颠覆来了。

法国大革命的领导人
不仅推翻了君主制。

他们试图根据

启蒙运动的理性原则彻底改造社会。

新政府上台后

,科学院召开会议
改革测量系统。

基于任意权威
或地方传统的旧标准

被数学
和自然关系所取代。

例如,米,
来自希腊语中的度量,

被定义为
赤道和北极之间的 1/10,000,000。


孔多塞侯爵的话来说,新的公制系统是

“为所有人,为所有时间”。

标准化测量

对革命者也有政治优势。

贵族不能再操纵地方
单位从平民那里榨取更多租金,

而政府可以
更有效地征税。

改用新的共和党日历
,每周十天

,取消了星期日,从而降低了教会的权力。

采用这个新系统并不容易。

事实上,这有点乱。

起初,人们将新单位
与旧单位一起使用,

最终放弃了共和
历。

当拿破仑·波拿巴掌权时,

他允许小
企业使用

以公制术语重新定义的传统测量方法。

但是公制系统仍然
是正式使用的标准

,并且
随着法国的边界传播到整个大陆。

虽然拿破仑的帝国
持续了八年,但

它的遗产持续的时间要长得多。

一些欧洲国家
在独立后恢复了旧的衡量标准。

其他人

在国际贸易时代意识到标准化的价值。

在葡萄牙和荷兰
自愿改用公制后,

其他国家也纷纷效仿

,殖民帝国将这一系统传播
到世界各地。

作为法国的主要竞争对手,

英国抵制了革命思想
,保留了传统单位。

但在接下来的两个世纪里,
大英帝国慢慢转型,

首先批准公制
作为可选替代品,

然后逐渐将其正式化。

然而,
对于

已经获得独立的 13 个前殖民地来说,这一转变来得太晚了。

美利坚合众国坚持
其殖民历史的英制单位

,今天仍然
是仅有的三个

尚未完全
接受公制的国家之一。

尽管不断
提出度量标准,但

许多美国人认为英尺
和磅等单位更直观。

具有讽刺意味的是,有些人认为曾经
革命性的公制系统

是全球一致性的象征。

尽管如此,公制几乎
普遍用于科学和医学,


根据其原始原理继续发展。

长期以来,

标准单位实际上是由
精心维护的物理原型定义的。

但是,由于技术
和精度的提高,

这些访问受限
且寿命不可靠的物体

现在正被
基于通用常数(

如光速)的标准所取代。

一致的测量
是我们日常生活中不可或缺的一部分,

以至于很难理解
它们为人类带来的重大成就。

就像它
源于一场政治革命一样

,公制对于
即将到来的科学革命仍然至关重要。