A Parkland teachers homework for us all Diane WolkRogers

I teach history

at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

On February 14, 2018,

my school experienced one of the worst
mass school shootings in American history.

People want to know what we saw,

what I felt.

I don’t remember everything,

but I do remember I went into crisis mode,

mother mode.

There was no emotion.

I lined up the kids,

I held up a sign so they could
follow me through the hall,

just like a fire drill.

I heard shots from one direction.

Luckily, we were already
moving in the opposite direction.

We made it outside.

We made it to safety.

I called my mother.

“I’m OK.”

I called my husband.

“I’m OK.”

Then my daughter called, my voice cracked,
and I knew I had to pull myself together.

I sat alone in my thoughts,

worried about my colleagues and students.

We sat there, only understanding
that somehow, Valentine’s Day –

We sat there, only understanding
that somehow, Valentine’s Day

had ended up with our babies dead,

and we didn’t know what to do next.

It’s been two months,

and every day I still hear the echoes
of the “pop, pop” sound of the gunfire.

I remember the fearful faces
of my students

when we knew it wasn’t a drill.

Still, there’s no constant emotion,

except for flashes
of pain, grief and anger

triggered by the news,

or an insensitive comment,

or just silence.

Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School
lost 17 precious lives

on that horrible day.

After, students asked us, the adults

the hardest question:

How can we stop the senseless violence?

This was the most difficult
question I’ve been asked.

But it was not the first time
I’ve been humbled by a student’s question.

I’ve been teaching
in the public schools for 33 years,

so I know you have to admit
what you don’t know

before you can share what you do know.

In fact, there’s a method
to being an engaged student,

teacher, citizen.

First, listen closely
to the person asking you a question.

Second, admit your vulnerability.
Admit what you don’t know.

Third, do your homework.

Fourth, humbly share your knowledge.

I know all about this process.

My students ask really
thoughtful questions all the time.

They’re eager to learn,

and sometimes they’re eager
to prove their smarts.

And believe me, they know
when I have no idea of the answer,

so in those instances, I say to them,

“That’s a great question.
Let me research that and get back to you.”

So when my students asked,

“How do we stop this senseless violence?”

I listened,

and then I admitted,

“I don’t know.”

And like I always do when I don’t know
the answer to one of my questions,

I began doing my homework.

And as a history teacher,

I knew I needed to start
with the Second Amendment and the NRA.

In case it’s been a while since
you’ve been sitting in a history class,

here is what the Second Amendment

actually says:

“A well regulated Militia,

being necessary
to the security of a free State,

the right of the people
to keep and bear arms,

shall not be infringed.”

Meaning, the federal government could not
infringe on the rights of citizens

to participate in well-regulated militias.

The Second Amendment
was ratified 226 years ago.

It was written in a time before
the federal government’s armed forces

were among the most powerful in the world

and when state militias were viewed
as necessary to protect the states.

Fast-forward 80 years, to 1871.

The American Civil War
had ended a few years prior,

but a couple of Union officers

had witnessed some pretty shoddy
marksmanship on the battlefield.

So in an attempt to prepare their men
for any future conflicts,

they founded the National
Rifle Association

to promote rifle practice.

In short, the Second Amendment
was written to ensure

that our newly formed and fragile country

had access to organized state militias.

And the NRA’s original mission was
to ensure future soldiers had good aim.

Someone could teach an entire course

on how the next 150 years influenced
the gun regulation conversations

we’re having in the United States

and our interpretation
of the Second Amendment.

Almost every pivotal moment
in our nation’s history

in one way or another

influenced how we as a people

manufacture, debate,
regulate and feel about guns.

A lot of change has occurred.

As a matter of fact, it wasn’t until 2008

that the Supreme Court
ruled for the first time

the Second Amendment protects
an individual right to possess a firearm

unconnected with service in a militia

and to use that arm
for traditionally lawful purposes,

such as self-defense within the home.

Within the home.

This change over time is striking to me,

because it reminds us

that the interpretation
of the Second Amendment

and cultural attitudes about guns

have changed over time.

Which gives me hope
they could change again.

(Applause)

It’s an incredibly complex
and dynamic history lesson,

but it’s not the lesson
I’m here to teach today,

because we don’t have time.

I’m not talking about time,

the time that I have here
to stand and speak.

I’m talking about the fact
we don’t have time to lose.

According to the CDC,

over the last five years,

on average, each day 96 people
are killed by guns in the United States,

and if we don’t figure out how to answer
my students' question soon,

one of us could be next.

So, if the question is,
how do we stop this senseless violence,

the best way I can think to answer

is to look at multiple choice.

You remember multiple-choice
questions in high school, don’t you?

Let’s start.

Choice A: this will end when we
hold gun manufacturers responsible

for the deadliness of their products.

It might surprise you to learn that we’ve
actually thought about this before.

Between 1998 and 2000,

30 counties and cities
sued gun manufacturers,

saying they should
make their products safer

and do a better job of tracking
where their products are sold.

In response, manufacturers argued

that they had no direct liability
for how their products were used.

They said the stores who sold the guns
and the owners who bought them

were responsible
should anything bad happen.

In response to this
and many other lawsuits,

the NRA lobbied
for the passage of the PLCAA,

the Protection of Lawful
Commerce in Arms Act.

The PLCAA passed
with bipartisan support in 2005

and entrusts gun manufacturers

to design guns safely,

stores to sell those guns responsibly

and someone to own
and use the gun responsibly.

And so when 17 students
and faculty die at my school,

no one in this chain
will assume responsibility.

Let’s take a look at another option,

Choice B:

this will end when we
hold ourselves accountable

and regulate the estimated
300 million guns available in America.

Yes, voting is one of the best ways

to take personal responsibility
for gun violence.

Making sure that our lawmakers
are willing to pass commonsense gun reform

is one of the most effective ways to get
those 300 million guns under control.

And also, gun owners
can take personal initiative.

If you own a gun,

ask yourself:

Do I have an extra gun I don’t need?

Could it fall into the wrong hands?

Have I attended the latest training?

Perhaps as a gun owner,

you should also ask

whether you have been
taking care of your mental health?

When it comes to gun violence,
the mental health argument falls flat

if we don’t acknowledge
our own personal vulnerabilities

to mental illness.

One in six Americans
will struggle with mental illness.

If we own a gun, we should be
rigorously engaged in the upkeep

of our emotional well-being

so we don’t pull a trigger

in times of illness.

Otherwise, we should
seriously ask ourselves

whether we really have the time
and attention to own a gun.

Perhaps for some of us

it’s time to lay down our arms.

Then we have Choice C:

this will end when we do a better job
of taking care of each other.

Many social issues affect
why people buy and use guns.

Sixty-two percent of US gun fatalities

between 2012 and 2016 were suicides,

yet we call people maniacs
and psychos, shaming them.

We are creating barriers
for people that need help.

Why are we embarrassing each other?

Let’s make it easier, not harder,

for people to access
better mental health care.

What else? Sexism, racism
and poverty affect gun ownership

and gun-related fatalities.

On average, it’s estimated that 50 women
were fatally shot each month

between 2010 and 2014

due to domestic violence,

and women are still dying in their homes.

Let’s empower women

and give our young boys a chance to learn

how to work out their conflicts
and emotions with words, not weapons.

And the “Washington Post”
reported that last year,

nearly 1,000 people were fatally wounded

by on-duty police officers.

Talk to Black Lives Matter
and the police union about that.

We need to tackle this.

(Applause)

At the end of the day,

perhaps people won’t feel the need

to buy and use a gun

when they all equally feel safe,

healthy, respected and cared for.

All right, discussion time is over.

It’s now time to answer the question.

How do we stop this senseless violence?

Is it Choice A,

Choice B,

Choice C?

Now, I know what you’re all thinking.

You remember that
multiple-choice questions

almost never end
with just three possibilities.

There’s always that fourth,
Choice D: all of the above.

Maybe that’s the answer here.

Or maybe “all of the above” is too easy,
and this is not an easy problem.

It requires deep analytical
thinking by all of us.

So instead, I’m asking you
to do your homework,

write your own Choice D

using supporting detail.

And if you’re not sure where to start,
look to my students as role models.

They are armed with incredible
communication skills

and a sense of citizenship
that I find so inspiring.

(Applause)

These are public school kids
engaged in the issue of gun regulation,

and their endeavor has moved our hearts.

And they shouldn’t have
to do this on their own.

They’re asking you,

they’re asking all of us,

to get involved.

This isn’t a spectator sport.

So what’s the right answer?

I don’t know. Listen,
I’m no gun control expert.

I teach the humanities.

To be human is to learn,

and to be part of a civilization
is to share your knowledge.

This kind of honest,
brave and sincere engagement

is what I ask of my students,

what I expect of myself as a teacher

and what I demand of you now.

Every one of you
needs to do your homework.

And then what?

Humbly share your knowledge
with each other.

Please teach your family,

teach your community,

your city council, your state legislature.

Teach Congress a lesson.

Thank you.

(Applause)

Thank you. Thank you.

(Applause)

在 Marjory Stoneman Douglas 高中教历史。

2018 年 2 月 14 日,

我的学校经历了美国历史上最严重的
大规模校园枪击事件之一。

人们想知道我们看到了

什么,我感受到了什么。

我不记得一切,

但我记得我进入了危机模式,

母亲模式。

没有任何情绪。

我把孩子们排成一排

,举起一个牌子,这样他们就可以
跟着我穿过大厅,

就像消防演习一样。

我听到来自一个方向的枪声。

幸运的是,我们已经
朝着相反的方向前进。

我们在外面成功了。

我们做到了安全。

我打电话给妈妈。

“我可以。”

我打电话给我丈夫。

“我可以。”

然后我女儿打来电话,我的声音沙哑了
,我知道我必须振作起来。

我独自坐在我的脑海里,

担心我的同事和学生。

我们坐在那里,只
知道不知何故,情人节——

我们坐在那里,只
知道不知何故,情人节

以我们的婴儿死亡而告终

,我们不知道下一步该做什么。

两个月过去了

,每天我仍然能听到
枪声“砰砰砰”的回声。

我记得

当我们知道这不是演习时,我的学生们恐惧的面孔。

尽管如此,

除了新闻引发
的痛苦、悲伤和愤怒

或者麻木不仁的评论,

或者只是沉默之外,没有持续的情绪。

Marjory Stoneman Douglas 高中在那可怕的一天
失去了 17 条宝贵的生命

之后,学生们问我们,

成年人最难的问题:

我们如何才能制止这种毫无意义的暴力行为?

这是我被问到的最困难的
问题。

但这并不是我第一次
被学生的问题所困扰。


在公立学校教书 33 年,

所以我知道你必须先承认
你不知道的东西,

然后才能分享你知道的东西。

事实上,有一种方法
可以成为一名敬业的学生、

教师、公民。

首先,仔细
聆听向您提问的人。

其次,承认你的脆弱。
承认你不知道的。

第三,做好功课。

第四,虚心分享你的知识。

我对这个过程了如指掌。

我的学生一直在问非常
深思熟虑的问题。

他们渴望学习

,有时他们
渴望证明自己的聪明才智。

相信我,
当我不知道答案时,他们知道,

所以在这种情况下,我对他们说,

“这是一个很好的问题。
让我研究一下,然后回复你。”

所以当我的学生问:

“我们如何制止这种毫无意义的暴力行为?”

我听了,

然后我承认,

“我不知道。”

当我不知道
我的一个问题的答案时,我总是这样做,

我开始做我的家庭作业。

作为一名历史老师,

我知道我需要
从第二修正案和 NRA 开始。

如果你已经有一段时间
没有上过历史课了

,那么第二修正案

实际上是这样说的:

“一个受到良好监管的民兵,

对于自由国家的安全是必要

的,人民
有权保持和 携带武器,

不得侵犯。”

这意味着,联邦政府不能
侵犯

公民参与管理良好的民兵组织的权利。

第二修正案
于 226 年前获得批准。

它是在
联邦政府的

武装部队成为世界上最强大的军队之一之前编写的

,当时州民兵被认为
是保护各州所必需的。

快进 80 年,到 1871

年。美国内战
在几年前就结束了,

但几名联邦军官

在战场上目睹了一些相当劣质的
枪法。

因此,为了让他们的
人为未来的任何冲突做好准备,

他们成立了全国
步枪协会

来促进步枪练习。

简而言之,第二修正案
的编写是为了

确保我们新成立的脆弱国家

能够获得有组织的国家民兵。

NRA 最初的任务
是确保未来的士兵有良好的目标。

有人可以教一整门课程

,讲述未来 150 年如何影响我们在美国进行
的枪支管制对话

以及我们
对第二修正案的解释。

几乎
我们国家历史上的每一个关键时刻都

以某种方式

影响了我们作为一个民族

制造、辩论、
监管和感受枪支的方式。

发生了很多变化。

事实上,直到 2008 年

,最高法院才
首次裁定

第二修正案
保护个人拥有

与民兵服务无关的枪支

以及将枪支
用于传统合法目的的权利,

例如 在家中自卫。

屋内。

随着时间的推移,这种变化让我很震惊,

因为它提醒我们


对第二修正案的解释

和对枪支的文化态度

随着时间的推移而发生了变化。

这让我希望
他们可以再次改变。

(掌声)

这是一堂非常复杂
和充满活力的历史课,

但这不是
我今天要教的课,

因为我们没有时间。

我不是在谈论

时间,我在
这里站着说话的时间。

我说的是
我们没有时间浪费的事实。

根据疾病预防控制中心的数据,

在过去的五年里,美国

平均每天有 96
人死于枪击

,如果我们不尽快弄清楚如何
回答学生的问题

,我们中的一个可能就是下一个 .

所以,如果问题是,
我们如何制止这种毫无意义的暴力,

我能想到的最好的回答方式

就是看多项选择。

你还记得
高中的多项选择题,不是吗?

开始吧。

选择 A:当我们要求
枪支制造

商对其产品的期限负责时,这将结束。

得知我们之前实际上已经考虑过这一点,您可能会感到惊讶

1998 年至 2000 年间,

30 个县市
起诉枪支制造商,

称他们应该
使产品更安全

,并更好地
跟踪产品的销售地点。

作为回应,制造商辩称

,他们对
产品的使用方式没有直接责任。

他们说,如果发生任何不好的事情,出售枪支的商店
和购买枪支的所有者都有

责任。

作为对这
起诉讼和许多其他诉讼的回应

,NRA
游说通过 PLCAA,

即《
武器合法贸易保护法》。

PLCAA
于 2005 年在两党支持下通过

并委托枪支制造商

安全地设计枪支、

商店以负责任的方式销售这些枪支,

并委托某人以负责任的方式拥有
和使用枪支。

因此,当
我学校有 17 名学生和教职员工死亡时

,这个链条中的任何人
都不会承担责任。

让我们看看另一个选项,

选择 B:

当我们
对自己负责

并规范美国估计有
3 亿支枪支时,这将结束。

是的,投票是对枪支暴力承担个人责任的最佳方式之一

确保我们的
立法者愿意通过常识性枪支改革


控制这 3 亿支枪支的最有效方法之一。

而且,枪支拥有者
可以采取个人主动性。

如果你有枪,

问问自己:

我有没有多余的枪不需要?

它会落入坏人之手吗?

我参加过最新的培训吗?

或许作为持枪者,

你也应该问问

自己是否一直
在照顾自己的心理健康?

在枪支暴力方面,

如果我们不承认
自己

对精神疾病的脆弱性,那么精神健康的论点就会落空。

六分之一的美国人
将与精神疾病作斗争。

如果我们拥有枪支,我们应该
严格地

维护我们的情绪健康,

这样我们就不会

在生病时扣动扳机。

否则,我们应该
认真问问自己,

我们是否真的有时间
和精力拥有一把枪。

也许对我们中的一些人

来说,是时候放下武器了。

然后我们有选择 C:

当我们更好地照顾彼此时,这将结束

许多社会问题会影响
人们购买和使用枪支的原因。 2012 年至 2016 年期间

,美国 62% 的枪支死亡事件

是自杀,

但我们称人们为疯子
和精神病,以此羞辱他们。

我们正在
为需要帮助的人设置障碍。

为什么我们互相难堪?

让我们让人们更容易而不是更难

地获得
更好的心理保健。

还有什么? 性别歧视、种族主义
和贫困影响枪支所有权

和与枪支有关的死亡人数。

平均而言,据估计,

2010 年至 2014 年间,每月有 50 名妇女

因家庭暴力而被枪杀,

而妇女仍在家中丧生。

让我们赋予女性权力

,让我们的年轻男孩有机会学习

如何
用语言而不是武器来解决他们的冲突和情绪。

而《华盛顿邮报》
报道称,去年有

近1000人

被执勤的警察打死。

与 Black Lives Matter
和警察工会讨论此事。

我们需要解决这个问题。

(掌声

) 说到底,当人们都同样感到安全、健康、尊重和关心时,

也许人们就不会觉得有

必要购买和使用枪支

了。

好了,讨论时间到了。

现在是回答这个问题的时候了。

我们如何制止这种毫无意义的暴力?

是选择A、

选择B、

选择C吗?

现在,我知道你们都在想什么。

你记得
多项选择题

几乎永远不会
只有三种可能性。

总是有第四个,
选择 D:以上所有。

也许这就是这里的答案。

或者也许“以上所有”太容易了
,这不是一个容易的问题。

这需要
我们所有人进行深入的分析思考。

所以相反,我要求
你做功课,使用支持细节

编写你自己的选择 D。

如果您不确定从哪里开始,
请以我的学生为榜样。

他们拥有令人难以置信的
沟通技巧

和公民意识
,我觉得这很鼓舞人心。

(掌声)

这些都是公立学校的孩子们
在搞枪支管制问题

,他们的努力感动了我们。

他们不应该
自己做这件事。

他们要求你,

他们要求我们

所有人都参与进来。

这不是观赏性运动。

那么正确答案是什么?

我不知道。 听着,
我不是枪支管制专家。

我教人文学科。

做人就是学习

,成为文明的一部分
就是分享你的知识。

这种诚实、
勇敢和真诚的参与

是我对学生的要求,

是我对自己作为老师的期望,也是

我现在对你们的要求。

你们每个人都
需要做功课。

然后什么?

谦虚地与彼此分享您的知识

请教你的家人、

教你的社区、

你的市议会、你的州议会。

给国会一个教训。

谢谢你。

(掌声)

谢谢。 谢谢你。

(掌声)