Art that reveals how technology frames reality Jiabao Li

I’m an artist and an engineer.

And lately, I’ve been thinking a lot
about how technology mediates

the way we perceive reality.

And it’s being done
in a superinvisible and nuanced way.

Technology is designed
to shape our sense of reality

by masking itself as
the actual experience of the world.

As a result, we are becoming
unconscious and unaware

that it is happening at all.

Take the glasses
I usually wear, for example.

These have become part of the way
I ordinarily experience my surroundings.

I barely notice them,

even though they are constantly
framing reality for me.

The technology I am talking about
is designed to do the same thing:

change what we see and think

but go unnoticed.

Now, the only time I do notice my glasses

is when something happens
to draw my attention to it,

like when it gets dirty
or my prescription changes.

So I asked myself,
“As an artist, what can I create

to draw the same kind of attention

to the ways digital media – like news
organizations, social media platforms,

advertising and search engines –

are shaping our reality?”

So I created a series
of perceptual machines

to help us defamiliarize and question

the ways we see the world.

For example, nowadays, many of us
have this kind of allergic reaction

to ideas that are different from ours.

We may not even realize that we’ve
developed this kind of mental allergy.

So I created a helmet that creates
this artificial allergy to the color red.

It simulates this hypersensitivity
by making red things look bigger

when you are wearing it.

It has two modes: nocebo and placebo.

In nocebo mode, it creates this
sensorial experience of hyperallergy.

Whenever I see red, the red expands.

It’s similar to social media’s
amplification effect,

like when you look at something
that bothers you,

you tend to stick with like-minded people

and exchange messages and memes,
and you become even more angry.

Sometimes, a trivial
discussion gets amplified

and blown way out of proportion.

Maybe that’s even why
we are living in the politics of anger.

In placebo mode, it’s
an artificial cure for this allergy.

Whenever you see red, the red shrinks.

It’s a palliative, like in digital media.

When you encounter people
with different opinions,

we will unfollow them,

remove them completely out of our feeds.

It cures this allergy by avoiding it.

But this way of intentionally
ignoring opposing ideas

makes human community
hyperfragmented and separated.

The device inside the helmet
reshapes reality

and projects into our eyes
through a set of lenses

to create an augmented reality.

I picked the color red,
because it’s intense and emotional,

it has high visibility

and it’s political.

So what if we take a look

at the last American
presidential election map

through the helmet?

(Laughter)

You can see that it doesn’t matter
if you’re a Democrat or a Republican,

because the mediation
alters our perceptions.

The allergy exists on both sides.

In digital media,

what we see every day
is often mediated,

but it’s also very nuanced.

If we are not aware of this,

we will keep being vulnerable
to many kinds of mental allergies.

Our perception is not only
part of our identities,

but in digital media, it’s also
a part of the value chain.

Our visual field is packed
with so much information

that our perception has become
a commodity with real estate value.

Designs are used to exploit
our unconscious biases,

algorithms favor content
that reaffirms our opinions,

so that every little corner
of our field of view is being colonized

to sell ads.

Like, when this little red dot
comes out in your notifications,

it grows and expands,
and to your mind, it’s huge.

So I started to think of ways
to put a little dirt,

or change the lenses of my glasses,

and came up with another project.

Now, keep in mind this is conceptual.
It’s not a real product.

It’s a web browser plug-in

that could help us to notice
the things that we would usually ignore.

Like the helmet,
the plug-in reshapes reality,

but this time, directly
into the digital media itself.

It shouts out the hidden filtered voices.

What you should be noticing now

will be bigger and vibrant,

like here, this story about gender bias
emerging from the sea of cats.

(Laughter)

The plug-in could dilute the things
that are being amplified by an algorithm.

Like, here in this comment section,

there are lots of people shouting
about the same opinions.

The plug-in makes
their comments super small.

(Laughter)

So now the amount of pixel presence
they have on the screen

is proportional to the actual value
they are contributing to the conversation.

(Laughter)

(Applause)

The plug-in also shows the real estate
value of our visual field

and how much of our perception
is being commoditized.

Different from ad blockers,

for every ad you see on the web page,

it shows the amount of money
you should be earning.

(Laughter)

We are living in a battlefield
between reality

and commercial distributed reality,

so the next version of the plug-in
could strike away that commercial reality

and show you things as they really are.

(Laughter)

(Applause)

Well, you can imagine how many directions
this could really go.

Believe me, I know the risks are high
if this were to become a real product.

And I created this with good intentions

to train our perception
and eliminate biases.

But the same approach
could be used with bad intentions,

like forcing citizens
to install a plug-in like that

to control the public narrative.

It’s challenging to make it
fair and personal

without it just becoming
another layer of mediation.

So what does all this mean for us?

Even though technology
is creating this isolation,

we could use it to make
the world connected again

by breaking the existing model
and going beyond it.

By exploring how we interface
with these technologies,

we could step out of our habitual,
almost machine-like behavior

and finally find common ground
between each other.

Technology is never neutral.

It provides a context and frames reality.

It’s part of the problem
and part of the solution.

We could use it to uncover our blind spots
and retrain our perception

and consequently, choose
how we see each other.

Thank you.

(Applause)

我是一名艺术家和一名工程师。

最近,我一直在
思考技术如何调节

我们感知现实的方式。

而且它
是以一种超隐形和微妙的方式完成的。

技术旨在

通过将自身掩盖为
世界的实际体验来塑造我们的现实感。

结果,我们变得
无意识

,根本没有意识到它正在发生。


我平时戴的眼镜为例。

这些已经成为
我通常体验周围环境的方式的一部分。

我几乎没有注意到它们,

尽管它们不断地
为我构建现实。

我正在谈论的技术
旨在做同样的事情:

改变我们所看到和思考

但被忽视的东西。

现在,我唯一注意到我的眼镜

是在发生某些
事情引起我的注意时,

例如当它变脏
或我的处方改变时。

所以我问自己,
“作为一名艺术家,我能创造什么

来引起对

数字媒体——如新闻
机构、社交媒体平台、

广告和搜索引擎——

正在塑造我们的现实的方式的同样关注?”

所以我创造了
一系列感知机器

来帮助我们陌生化和质疑

我们看待世界的方式。

例如,如今,我们中的许多人对

与我们不同的想法都有这种过敏反应。

我们甚至可能没有意识到我们已经
产生了这种精神过敏症。

所以我创造了一个头盔,它
会对红色产生这种人为的过敏。 当你穿着

它时,它
通过让红色的东西看起来更大来模拟这种过敏

它有两种模式:反安慰剂和安慰剂。

在 nocebo 模式下,它会产生这种
过敏的感官体验。

每当我看到红色时,红色就会扩大。

这类似于社交媒体的
放大效应,

比如当你看到让
你烦恼的事情时,

你会倾向于和志同道合的人在一起

,交换信息和表情包
,你会变得更加愤怒。

有时,琐碎的
讨论会被放大

和夸大其词。

也许这就是
我们生活在愤怒政治中的原因。

在安慰剂模式下,它是
一种针对这种过敏的人工疗法。

每当你看到红色时,红色就会缩小。

这是一种姑息疗法,就像在数字媒体中一样。

当您遇到
有不同意见的人时,

我们将取消关注他们,

将他们完全从我们的提要中删除。

它通过避免它来治愈这种过敏。

但是这种故意
忽略对立思想的方式

使人类社区变得
极度分裂和分离。

头盔内的设备
重塑现实,

并通过一组镜头投射到我们的眼睛中

从而创造出增强现实。

我选择了红色,
因为它强烈而情绪化

,具有很高的知名度

和政治性。

那么,如果我们通过头盔

看一看上届美国
总统大选地图

呢?

(笑声)

你可以看到
无论你是民主党人还是共和党人都没有关系,

因为调解
会改变我们的看法。

过敏存在于两侧。

在数字媒体中,

我们每天看到的
内容通常是经过中介的,

但也非常微妙。

如果我们没有意识到这一点,

我们将继续容易
受到多种精神过敏的影响。

我们的感知不仅
是我们身份的一部分,

而且在数字媒体中,它也是
价值链的一部分。

我们的视野充满
了如此多的信息

,以至于我们的感知已成为
具有房地产价值的商品。

设计被用来利用
我们无意识的偏见,

算法偏爱
重申我们观点的内容,

因此
我们视野的每一个小角落都被殖民

以出售广告。

就像,当这个小红点
出现在你的通知中时,

它会增长和扩展
,在你看来,它是巨大的。

所以我开始想
办法放一点污垢,

或者更换我的眼镜镜片,

然后想出了另一个项目。

现在,请记住这是概念性的。
它不是真正的产品。

这是一个网络浏览器插件

,可以帮助我们
注意到我们通常会忽略的事情。

就像头盔一样
,插件重塑了现实,

但这一次,直接
进入了数字媒体本身。

它喊出隐藏的过滤声音。

你现在应该注意到的

将会更大、更有活力,

就像这里,这个关于
从猫海中出现的性别偏见的故事。

(笑声

) 插件可以稀释
被算法放大的东西。

就像,在这个评论部分,

有很多人
大喊相同的观点。

该插件使
他们的评论超级小。

(笑声)

所以现在
他们在屏幕上的像素数量与他们对对话

的实际价值成正比

(笑声)

(掌声)

这个插件还显示
了我们视野的房地产价值,

以及我们的感知
有多少被商品化了。

与广告拦截器不同,

对于您在网页上看到的每个广告,

它都会显示
您应该赚取的金额。

(笑声)

我们生活在
现实

和商业分布式现实之间的战场,

所以下一个版本的插件
可以消除商业现实

,向你展示真实的事物。

(笑声)

(掌声)

嗯,你可以想象这到底能有多少个方向

相信我,我知道
如果这要成为一个真正的产品,风险很高。

我创建这个是

为了训练我们的感知
并消除偏见。

但同样的方法
可能会被恶意使用,

比如强迫
公民安装这样的插件

来控制公共叙事。

在不成为另一层调解的情况下使其公平和个人化是具有挑战性的

那么这一切对我们意味着什么呢?

尽管技术
正在创造这种隔离,

但我们可以利用它

打破现有模型
并超越它,让世界再次连接起来。

通过探索我们如何
与这些技术交互,

我们可以摆脱我们习惯性的、
几乎像机器一样的行为

,最终找到
彼此之间的共同点。

技术从来都不是中立的。

它提供了一个背景和框架现实。

这是问题
的一部分,也是解决方案的一部分。

我们可以用它来发现我们的盲点
并重新训练我们的感知

,从而选择
我们如何看待彼此。

谢谢你。

(掌声)