Have You Tried Restarting it Rebooting Diversity in the Tech Industry

Transcriber: Jiaye Wang
Reviewer: Leonardo Silva

At the age of 13,

I had already resigned myself
to a life of mediocrity.

I, unlike all of the boys
in my eighth grade class,

had not yet written an iPhone app.

At this rate, I was never going to be
the best programmer in the world.

So I figured, “Why even bother?”

Obviously, becoming a doctor
would be much easier.

And believe it or not,

my medical school plan
was actually my way of rebelling

against the expectations
that I felt had been put on me,

not just by my parents,
but also by the world that surrounded me.

I grew up in essentially
the heart of Silicon Valley.

I went to school with the children
of tech giants and industry magnates.

And yet, I already felt at that young age
that tech did not have a place for me.

I ended up having to take
my first computer science class

because it was a requirement
for my psychology major.

But I had already made this arrogant
promise to my first-year dorm mates

that I would never step foot
in the Tufts computer science building:

Halligan Hall.

So I devised a scheme to keep up the ruse.

I would take my required
computer science classes over the summer

and no one would ever be the wiser.

Unfortunately, it turned out

that I enjoyed my data structures courses
much more than my organic chemistry,

and I was much better at them.

No small part of that was due to the fact

that my first computer science class
was taught by a renegade female professor,

decked out in tattoos,

who had legally changed her name
to match that of a superhero.

Dr. Strange made complicated concepts
seem beautifully simple.

But more importantly,

she taught me that wanting to be
the best programmer in the world

would be missing the true promise
of computer science

and technology overall.

Because technology is,
at its best, a wonderful tool.

It has the potential
to solve so many issues -

not all of them.

I don’t know if it’s possible
to hack poverty or hack world peace

in one 48-hour event,

but when used responsibly,

technology can make a huge impact
on the world’s most pressing issues.

It seems we’re having a bit of trouble

figuring out how exactly to go about
using tech as a tool for good.

We still tend to conceive
of the Internet and AI

as these nascent tools
that we can watch with anticipation.

But in reality, over the past two decades,

technology has permeated our social fabric
at whiplash-inducing speeds.

Its surveillance capabilities are becoming
increasingly clear to the public.

It’s even been weaponized
to suppress the democratic process.

So right now, we are at a crossroads

between tech becoming a force for good
or continuing to pose a threat to society.

I’m here to show you
that the key to tipping that balance

is surprisingly simple.

In order to change tech for the better,

we simply need to put
the power of technology

in the hands of a diverse group of people,

people who have never before had access
to that kind of power

and people who are ready to use it
in order to make a difference.

My path to this realization
began this past March,

when Covid hit and lockdowns
had gone into effect.

Tech companies around the country
had begun to announce cancellations

of their summer internships,

which meant that students
were losing their career prospects.

Around this time, my friend Wahhab,

an advocate for diversity
and inclusion in tech,

reached out to me.

He asked if I wanted
to help him find a way

to support underrepresented students

who had lost their
tech internships due to Covid.

I obviously agreed, and from there
we built the dream team.

Wahhab, Iris, Bori, Zohaib, Obum and I,

along with the help of countless others,

spent the next couple of months
building InternHacks.

InternHacks ultimately became
a six-week internship program

in which we placed hundreds of students
on teams to build projects together.

Along the way, interns were given
opportunities to interface with recruiters

and receive mentorship
from industry professionals.

Many of the students came from
nontraditional educational backgrounds,

over 40% identified as Black or Latinx,

and more than half identified as women.

This was really exciting to us,

especially given the fact that
the tech industry at large

only reports a combined total
of 28% Black and Latinx professionals.

Simply put, our little internship program,

which we had thrown together
within a matter of months,

was significantly more diverse
than the tech industry at large.

So the team and I were really excited
to have built such a diverse cohort,

but I know I personally didn’t anticipate
how it would affect the program.

A part of me expected these projects
to resemble the projects

that my largely homogenous group of peers
had pursued throughout college.

As one of the few women of color
in many of my classes,

I struggled to feel excited
about the ideas

that my mostly white male peers
were coming up with.

Often, they would be apps
for finding hookups

or dupes of misogynistic
and even violent video games.

I naively assumed

that this was the kind of thing
that people pursued for side projects,

and it wasn’t particularly
interesting to me.

So obviously, I was shocked

when nearly every InternHacks project
featured a civic or social impact tilt.

Now, we had not explicitly mandated
that the interns pursue social issues.

These were just the problems
that were at the forefront of their minds.

Remember, this program was underway
during the summer of 2020,

amidst the resurgence
of the Black Lives Matter movement

and during an ongoing global pandemic

that magnified existing
issues of inequality.

During their presentations,

the interns shared how they had come up
with their problem statements,

and in many cases,
they had chosen problems

that either they themselves were tackling
or their communities were facing.

Let me give you a few examples.

One team’s goal was
to make food bank inventories

easily accessible to the public.

They called it Project Ample.

Project Ample was a double whammy

in that it provided real-time,
accurate information

to both those who are in need of food
and those who are looking to donate food.

The team is currently working
on building up their app in New York City

as it was one of the hardest hit
early on in the current crisis,

but they’re looking forward
to expanding it.

Another team created
a fintech solution called Ready Ball,

which provided, next of kin, a secure way
to access financial insurance

and will-related information
in the event of a tragedy.

It allows them to do all of this

without any legal or cost-related
complications and hassles.

After hearing our interns pitch
impactful and frankly refreshing projects

like these and so many more,

I realized something:

our communities have the solutions,
just not the power to enact them.

Technology can change that.

If the tech industry looked anything
like the InternHacks cohort,

we would see it being used
to solve sweeping systemic issues

and making a positive impact.

Now, I’m by no means

the first person to call
for more diversity in the tech industry,

but I do think that the motivation behind
those calls needs to be re-evaluated.

Early on in my undergraduate career,

I spent one and a half years
working in the Harvard psychology lab

that pioneered the idea
of implicit or unconscious bias.

During that time,

I worked on diversity trainings
for some of our big industry partners

that position diversity

as something that was good
for the company’s bottom line.

Now, this was a successful
approach in many cases,

and we weren’t the only ones to try it.

I’m sure you’ve seen headlines

claiming that diverse teams
improve economic performance.

And while that may be true,

the tech industry still tends
to conceive of diversity initiatives

as auxiliary or even charitable.

So clearly, this old mantra
of diversity being good for business

hasn’t exactly produced the results
that we hoped it might.

We have to reimagine this framework.

Diversity in tech is not charity.

Diversity in tech is not even
about the bottom line.

Diversity in tech is about power.

InternHacks was compelling

because we saw students from the community
empowered by technology,

working for their community
to build stronger solutions.

And why were their solutions stronger?

They understood their users.

It’s a basic principle of technology.

“Know your user.”

“Know what they want
before they even know it.”

And in many cases,

our interns understood the problems
they were tackling on a personal level,

which is not to say

that any given problem in a certain
community is that community’s problem.

Far from it.

It’s all of our problem.

Those who have the privilege
of being in leadership positions in tech

can begin to use that privilege

by supporting
underrepresented individuals,

thereby investing long term
in more equitable solutions and products.

Because the burden to fix an issue

should not be put on those
who are most affected by it.

But their perspective is invaluable
in the path to finding a solution,

and they should get to benefit
from its success.

In practice.

this looks like more diversity not only
amongst those who create our technology,

but also amongst those who lead.

Without diverse guidance
and ideation at that level,

the tech industry will never
fundamentally change.

If everyone’s going to use a product,

everyone should have a say
in how it’s made.

And just as important as it is
to recognize the myriad of perspectives

that a diverse group offers,

it’s equally as important

to recognize the variety of experiences
within each of those groups.

For example, as a South Asian woman
who grew up in the California Bay Area,

my experience is likely very different

than that of a South Asian woman
who grew up in Fargo, North Dakota.

All of those nuances are important,

and we need all of them at the table

while building tools
for the next generation.

So this is important to you,

even if you’re not in the tech industry
and don’t ever plan on entering it,

because technology is a part of your life,
no matter who you are.

It’s shaping the world you live in.

So making sure that it’s built by a group
of diverse, thoughtful individuals

who care about
the implications of their work

is in your best interest.

As consumers, we can make an effort
to be more aware of what our tech does

or even who builds it.

But to a certain extent,
technology is ubiquitous.

That’s why the public
can and should demand action

and, where necessary,
regulation of the tech industry.

The first step is knowing
what we do and don’t want

in our tech and in our communities.

If you are part of the tech industry
or you’re considering dipping your toe in,

take a moment to consider why.

What unique perspective do you have?

How can you use tech as a tool?

As you go through your education
and your career,

don’t let anyone tell you
that you’re just an engineer

so you should keep your head down.

Stay up to date with what’s happening
in the world and, more importantly,

how your work affects it.

If you’re interested in social justice

and making the world
a more equitable place,

I implore you to consider
technology as a tool on your side

rather than something to be avoided.

Because technology is the future,
but you have the power to shape it.

So what are you going to do with it?

Thank you.

抄写员:王家业
审稿人:莱昂纳多·席尔瓦

13 岁时,

我已经
放弃了平庸的生活。


八年级班上的所有男孩不同,我

还没有编写过 iPhone 应用程序。

按照这个速度,我永远不会
成为世界上最好的程序员。

所以我想,“为什么还要麻烦?”

显然,成为一名医生
会容易得多。

信不信由你,

我的医学院
计划实际上是我反抗

我所感受到的期望的方式,

不仅是我的父母,
还有我周围的世界。

我基本上
是在硅谷的中心长大的。


和科技巨头和行业巨头的孩子一起上学。

然而,在我年轻的时候,我已经
觉得科技没有适合我的地方。

我最终不得不参加
我的第一堂计算机科学课,

因为这是
我的心理学专业的要求。

但我已经
向我的第一年宿舍同学做出了这个傲慢的承诺,

我永远不会
踏入塔夫茨计算机科学大楼:

哈利根大厅。

所以我设计了一个计划来保持这个诡计。

我会在夏天参加我要求的
计算机科学课程

,没有人会更聪明。

不幸的是,事实

证明我更喜欢我的数据结构课程
,而不是我的有机化学,

而且我在这些方面做得更好。

这在很大程度上是

因为我的第一堂计算机科学课
是由一位背叛的女教授教的

,她身上有纹身,

她合法地改了名字
以匹配超级英雄的名字。

Strange 博士让复杂的概念
看起来非常简单。

但更重要的是,

她告诉我,如果想
成为世界上最好的程序员,

就会失去
计算机科学

和技术的真正承诺。

因为技术
在最好的情况下是一个很好的工具。

它有
可能解决很多问题——

不是所有的问题。

我不知道是否有可能

在一次 48 小时的活动中消除贫困或破坏世界和平,

但如果以负责任的方式使用

技术,可以
对世界上最紧迫的问题产生巨大影响。

似乎我们在

弄清楚如何
将技术用作永远的工具时遇到了一些麻烦。

我们仍然倾向于
将互联网和人工智能视为

我们可以期待看到的这些新生工具。

但实际上,在过去的二十年里,

技术已经以引发鞭打的速度渗透到我们的社会结构
中。

它的监视能力
越来越为公众所知。

它甚至被武器化
以压制民主进程。

因此,现在,我们正处于

科技成为一种向善的力量
或继续对社会构成威胁的十字路口。

我在这里向你展示
,打破这种平衡的关键

非常简单。

为了让技术变得更好,

我们只需要将
技术的力量

掌握在不同的人群手中,这些

人以前从未接触过
这种力量

,并且准备好
按顺序使用它 有所作为。

我实现
这一目标的道路始于去年 3 月,

当时 Covid 袭击和封锁
开始生效。

全国各地的科技公司
已经开始宣布

取消他们的暑期实习,

这意味着学生
们正在失去他们的职业前景。

大约在这个时候,我的朋友 Wahhab 与我联系,他

是技术多元化
和包容性的倡导者

他问我是否
想帮助他找到一种方法

来支持

因 Covid 而失去技术实习机会的人数不足的学生。

我显然同意了,从那里
我们建立了梦之队。

Wahhab、Iris、Bori、Zohaib、Obum 和我,

在无数其他人的帮助下,

在接下来的几个月里
构建了 InternHacks。

InternHacks 最终成为
一个为期六周的实习

计划,我们将数百名学生安排
在团队中,共同构建项目。

在此过程中,实习生有
机会与招聘人员交流


接受行业专业人士的指导。

许多学生来自
非传统教育背景,

超过 40% 被确定为黑人或拉丁裔

,超过一半被确定为女性。

这对我们来说真的很令人兴奋,

特别是考虑到
整个科技行业

只报告了
总共 28% 的黑人和拉丁裔专业人士。

简而言之,我们

在几个月内完成的小型实习计划

比整个科技行业更加多样化。

所以团队和我真的很高兴
能够建立这样一个多元化的团队,

但我知道我个人没有预料
到它会如何影响这个项目。

我的一部分期望这些项目

类似于我的同质群体
在整个大学期间所追求的项目。

作为
我许多班级中为数不多的有色人种女性之一,

我努力为

我的大多数白人男性同龄
人提出的想法感到兴奋。

通常,它们是
用于寻找

厌恶女性
甚至暴力视频游戏的连接或欺骗的应用程序。

我天真地

认为这是
人们在业余项目中追求的那种东西,

对我来说并不是特别有趣。

很明显,

当几乎每个 InternHacks 项目
都具有公民或社会影响倾向时,我感到震惊。

现在,我们没有明确
要求实习生从事社会问题。

这些
只是他们最关心的问题。

请记住,该计划是
在 2020 年夏季进行的,

当时正值
“黑人的命也是命”运动的复苏

以及正在

扩大现有
不平等问题的全球大流行期间。

在他们的演讲中

,实习生分享了他们是如何提出
问题陈述的

,在许多情况下,
他们选择

了他们自己正在解决的问题
或他们的社区面临的问题。

让我给你举几个例子。

一个团队的目标
是让公众轻松获取食品银行的库存

他们将其称为“充足计划”。

Project Ample 是一个双重打击

,因为它

为需要食物的
人和希望捐赠食物的人提供了实时、准确的信息。

该团队目前正致力于
在纽约市构建他们的应用程序,

因为它是当前危机初期受灾最严重的应用程序之一

但他们期待
着扩展它。

另一个团队创建
了一个名为 Ready Ball 的金融科技解决方案,

它为近亲提供了一种在发生悲剧时
获取金融保险

和遗嘱相关信息的安全方式

它允许他们在

没有任何法律或成本相关的
复杂性和麻烦的情况下完成所有这些工作。

在听到我们的实习生推销这些具有
影响力且坦率地令人耳目一新的项目后

我意识到了一些事情:

我们的社区有解决方案,但
没有制定它们的权力。

技术可以改变这一点。

如果科技行业看起来
像 InternHacks 群体,

我们会看到它被
用来解决全面的系统性问题

并产生积极影响。

现在,我绝不

是第一个
呼吁科技行业更加多元化的人,

但我确实认为这些呼吁背后的动机
需要重新评估。

在我本科生涯的早期,


在哈佛心理学实验室工作了一年半,该实验室

开创
了隐性或无意识偏见的概念。

在那段时间里,


为我们的一些大型行业合作伙伴进行了多元化培训,这些合作伙伴

将多元化定位

为有
利于公司盈利的东西。

现在,在许多情况下,这是一种成功的
方法,

而且我们并不是唯一尝试它的人。

我敢肯定,您已经看到头条新闻

声称多元化的团队可以
提高经济绩效。

虽然这可能是真的

,但科技行业仍然倾向于
将多元化举措

视为辅助性甚至是慈善性的。

很明显,这种
多样性对企业有利的古老口头禅

并没有完全
产生我们希望的结果。

我们必须重新构想这个框架。

技术的多样性不是慈善。

技术的多样性甚至不是
底线。

技术的多样性与权力有关。

InternHacks 之所以引人注目,

是因为我们看到来自社区的学生
被技术赋能,

为他们的社区工作
以构建更强大的解决方案。

为什么他们的解决方案更强大?

他们了解他们的用户。

这是技术的基本原理。

“了解你的用户。”


在他们知道之前就知道他们想要什么。”

在许多情况下,

我们的实习生
在个人层面上理解他们正在解决的问题,

这并不是

说某个社区中的任何给定问题
都是该社区的问题。

离得很远。

这都是我们的问题。

那些
有幸在科技领域担任领导职务的人

可以

通过支持
代表性不足的个人来开始利用这一特权,

从而长期投资
于更公平的解决方案和产品。

因为解决问题的负担

不应该放在
受问题影响最大的人身上。

但他们的观点
在寻找解决方案的道路上非常宝贵

,他们应该
从其成功中受益。

在实践中。

这看起来不仅
在创造我们技术的人之间,

而且在领导者之间更加多样化。

没有
那个层面的多样化指导和理念

,科技行业永远不会发生
根本性的变化。

如果每个人都要使用一种产品,那么

每个人都应该
对它的制造方式有发言权。


认识

到多元化群体提供的无数

观点同样重要

,认识
到每个群体中的各种经历同样重要。

例如,作为
在加利福尼亚湾区长大的南亚女性,

我的经历可能与

在北达科他州法戈长大的南亚女性大不相同。

所有这些细微差别都很重要,

在为下一代构建工具时,我们需要所有这些细微差别

所以这对你来说很重要,

即使你不在科技行业
,也不打算进入它,

因为科技是你生活的一部分,
不管你是谁。

它正在塑造你生活的世界。

因此,确保它是由一群关心他们工作影响
的多元化、深思熟虑的个人建立的,这

符合你的最大利益。

作为消费者,我们可以
努力更多地了解我们的技术是做什么的,

甚至是由谁制造的。

但在一定程度上,
技术无处不在。

这就是为什么公众
可以而且应该要求采取行动,

并在必要时
要求对科技行业进行监管。

第一步是
了解我们在技术和社区中做什么和不想要什么

如果您是科技行业的一员,
或者您正在考虑涉足,请

花点时间考虑一下原因。

你有什么独特的观点?

您如何将技术用作工具?

当你完成你的教育
和你的职业生涯时,

不要让任何人
告诉你你只是一名工程师,

所以你应该保持低调。

及时了解世界上正在发生的
事情,更重要的是,

了解您的工作如何影响它。

如果您对社会正义

和让世界
变得更加公平感兴趣,

我恳请您将
技术视为您身边的工具,

而不是应避免的事情。

因为技术是未来,
但你有能力塑造它。

那么你打算用它做什么呢?

谢谢你。