This tool will help improve your critical thinking Erick Wilberding

Socrates, one of the founding fathers
of Western philosophical thought,

was on trial.

Many Athenians believed
he was a dangerous enemy of the state,

accusing the philosopher
of corrupting the youth

and refusing to recognize their gods.

However, Socrates wasn’t feared
for claiming to have all the answers,

but rather, for asking too many questions.

While he loathed formal lectures,

the philosopher frequently
engaged friends and strangers

in lengthy conversations
about morality and society.

These discussions weren’t debates,
nor would Socrates offer explicit advice.

In fact, the philosopher often claimed
to know nothing at all,

responding to his partner’s answers
only with further questions.

But through this process,
Socrates probed their logic,

revealing its flaws and helping both
parties reach a more robust understanding.

These insightful questions made Socrates
beloved by his followers.

Two of his students, Plato and Xenophon,
were so inspired

that they replicated their mentor’s
process in fictional dialogues.

These invented exchanges
provide perfect examples

of what would come to be known
as the Socratic Method.

In one of these fabricated dialogues,

Socrates is conversing with
a young man named Euthydemus,

who is confident that he understands
the nature of justice and injustice.

Socrates probes the student’s values
by asking him to label actions

such as lying and theft
as just or unjust.

Euthydemus confidently categorizes
them as injustices,

but this only prompts another question:

is it just for a general to deceive
or pillage a hostile army?

Euthydemus revises his assertion.

He claims that these actions
are just when done to enemies,

and unjust when done to friends.

But Socrates isn’t finished.

He asks the young man to consider
a commander lying to his troops

to boost their morale.

Before long, Euthydemus is despondent.

It seems that every answer
leads to further problems,

and perhaps he’s not quite sure
what constitutes justice after all.

In employing this
question-oriented approach,

Socrates described himself as a midwife,

whose inquiries assist others
in giving birth to their ideas.

His method of questioning draws out an
individual’s unexamined assumptions,

and then challenges those biases.

It doesn’t always provide
definitive answers,

but the method helps clarify the questions

and eliminate contradictory
or circular logic.

And by following a line of inquiry
where it logically leads,

both the question asker and answerer
can end up in unexpected places.

This technique isn’t limited
by the conversation’s content,

making it incredibly useful
in numerous fields.

During the Renaissance, the method was
used to teach clinical medicine.

Students proposed their rationale
for different diagnoses,

while a doctor questioned their
assumptions and moderated discussion.

In this model, the method could even
produce conclusive results.

This same approach was later used
in other sciences,

such as astronomy, botany,
and mathematics.

Following the Protestant Reformation,

it was adapted to tackle abstract
questions of faith.

In the 19th century, the method
became an essential part

of American legal education.

Professors explored students’
understanding of judicial reasoning

by challenging them with unforeseen
hypothetical situations.

This approach is still used today
by the Supreme Court

to imagine the unintended impacts
of passing a law.

The Socratic Method can be adapted
to teach almost any topic

that relies on critical reasoning,

but its success depends on the teacher
employing it.

An effective Socratic educator
must be well versed in their subject.

Rather than bullying their students
or showing off their superior intellect,

they should be modest, genuinely curious,
and affirming of every contribution.

In this regard, Socrates himself

may not have been
the most subtle Socratic teacher.

Historians believe he was deeply critical
of Athens’ particular brand of democracy,

and known to pass those concerns
onto his followers.

These subversive beliefs were
distorted in public forums

and thought to have inspired
two of his pupils to treasonous ends.

It was likely for these ideas
Socrates was brought to trial,

and eventually,
sentenced to death.

But even on his deathbed, artists depict
a serene philosopher—

ever curious to explore
the ultimate question.

苏格拉底,
西方哲学思想的奠基人之一,

正在受审。

许多雅典人认为
他是国家的危险敌人,

指责这位
哲学家腐蚀年轻人

并拒绝承认他们的神。

然而,苏格拉底并不是
因为声称拥有所有答案

而害怕,而是因为问了太多问题。

虽然他讨厌正式的讲座,但

这位哲学家
经常让朋友和陌生人

就道德和社会进行冗长的对话。

这些讨论不是辩论,
苏格拉底也不会提供明确的建议。

事实上,这位哲学家经常声称
自己一无所知,只用进一步的问题

来回应他的伙伴的
回答。

但通过这个过程,
苏格拉底探查了他们的逻辑,

揭示了它的缺陷,帮助
双方达成了更深刻的理解。

这些有见地的问题使苏格拉底
深受追随者的喜爱。

他的两个学生柏拉图和色诺芬
深受启发

,他们
在虚构的对话中复制了导师的过程。

这些发明的交流

后来被
称为苏格拉底方法的东西提供了完美的例子。

在其中一个虚构的对话中,

苏格拉底正在与
一个名叫 Euthydemus 的年轻人交谈,

他相信自己理解
正义和不正义的本质。

苏格拉底
通过要求学生

将撒谎和盗窃等行为标记
为正义或不正义来探索学生的价值观。

Euthydemus自信地将
他们归类为不公正,

但这只会引发另一个问题

:仅仅是将军欺骗
或掠夺敌军吗?

Euthydemus 修改了他的断言。

他声称这些行为
对敌人是公正的

,对朋友是不公正的。

但是苏格拉底还没有说完。

他要求年轻人考虑
一名指挥官向他的部队撒谎

以提高他们的士气。

不久,欧西德摩斯就沮丧了。

似乎每一个答案都会
导致进一步的问题

,也许他不太清楚
到底什么是正义。

在采用这种以
问题为导向的方法时,

苏格拉底将自己描述为一名助产士,

她的询问有助于其他
人产生他们的想法。

他的提问方法引出了
个人未经检验的假设,

然后挑战这些偏见。

它并不总是提供
明确的答案,

但该方法有助于澄清问题

并消除矛盾
或循环逻辑。

并且通过遵循
逻辑上导致的询问线

,提问者和回答者
都可能最终出现在意想不到的地方。

这种技术
不受对话内容的限制,

使其
在许多领域都非常有用。

在文艺复兴时期,这种方法被
用于教授临床医学。

学生们提出了他们
对不同诊断的理由,

而医生质疑他们的
假设并主持了讨论。

在这个模型中,该方法甚至可以
产生确凿的结果。

这种方法后来被
用于其他科学,

如天文学、植物学
和数学。

在新教改革之后,

它被改编为解决抽象
的信仰问题。

在 19 世纪,这种方法
成为美国法律教育的重要组成部分

教授通过用不可预见的假设情况挑战学生来探索学生
对司法推理的理解

。 最高法院

今天仍然使用这种方法

来想象
通过法律的意外影响。

苏格拉底方法可以适用
于教授几乎任何

依赖批判性推理的主题,

但它的成功取决于
使用它的老师。

一个有效的苏格拉底式教育者
必须精通他们的学科。

与其欺负学生
或炫耀他们的超人智慧,

他们应该谦虚、真诚地好奇
并肯定每一项贡献。

在这方面,苏格拉底本人

可能
不是最微妙的苏格拉底老师。

历史学家认为,他
对雅典特殊的民主品牌提出了深刻的批评,

并以将这些担忧传递
给他的追随者而闻名。

这些颠覆性的信念
在公共论坛上被歪曲,

并被认为激发
了他的两个学生叛国的目的。

由于这些想法,
苏格拉底很可能受到审判,

并最终被
判处死刑。

但即使在他临终的时候,艺术家们也描绘
了一位宁静的哲学家——

总是好奇地
探索终极问题。