3 steps to turn everyday gettogethers into transformative gatherings Priya Parker

When I was a child,

every other Friday,

I would leave my mother
and stepfather’s home –

an Indian and British, atheist, Buddhist,

agnostic, vegetarian, new age-y sometimes,

Democratic household.

And I would go 1.4 miles
to my father and stepmother’s home

and enter a white, Evangelical Christian,

conservative, Republican,

twice-a-week-churchgoing,

meat-eating family.

It doesn’t take a shrink
to explain how I ended up

in the field of conflict resolution.

(Laughter)

Whether I was facilitating dialogues
in Charlottesville or Istanbul

or Ahmedabad,

the challenge was always the same:

despite all odds,

and with integrity,

how do you get people
to connect meaningfully,

to take risks,

to be changed by their experience?

And I would witness extraordinarily
beautiful electricity in those rooms.

And then I would leave those rooms

and attend my everyday
gatherings like all of you –

a wedding or a conference
or a back-to-school picnic –

and many would fall flat.

There was a meaning gap

between these high-intensity
conflict groups

and my everyday gatherings.

Now, you could say, sure,
somebody’s birthday party

isn’t going to live up to a race dialogue,

but that’s not what I was responding to.

As a facilitator,

you’re taught to strip everything away

and focus on the interaction
between people,

whereas everyday hosts
focus on getting the things right –

the food, the flowers, the fish knives –

and leave the interaction
between people largely to chance.

So I began to wonder how we might change
our everyday gatherings

to focus on making meaning
by human connection,

not obsessing with the canapés.

And I set out and interviewed
dozens of brave and unusual hosts –

an Olympic hockey coach,
a Cirque du Soleil choreographer,

a rabbi, a camp counselor–

to better understand
what creates meaningful

and even transformative gatherings.

And I want to share with you
some of what I learned today

about the new rules of gathering.

So when most people plan a gathering,

they start with an off-the-rack format.

Birthday party? Cake and candles.

Board meeting?

One brown table, 12 white men.

(Laughter)

Assuming the purpose is obvious,
we skip too quickly to form.

This not only leads to dull
and repetitive gatherings,

it misses a deeper opportunity

to actually address our needs.

The first step of creating
more meaningful everyday gatherings

is to embrace a specific
disputable purpose.

An expectant mother I know
was dreading her baby shower.

The idea of “pin the diaper
on the baby” games

and opening gifts felt odd and irrelevant.

So she paused to ask:

What is the purpose of a baby shower?

What is my need at this moment?

And she realized it was
to address her fears

of her and her husband’s –
remember that guy? –

transition to parenthood.

And so she asked two friends
to invent a gathering based on that.

And so on a sunny afternoon,
six women gathered.

And first, to address her fear of labor –
she was terrified –

they told her stories from her life

to remind her of the characteristics
she already carries –

bravery, wonder, faith, surrender –

that they believed would carry her
and help her in labor as well.

And as they spoke, they tied a bead
for each quality into a necklace

that she could wear around her neck
in the delivery room.

Next, her husband came in,

and they wrote new vows,
family vows, and spoke them aloud,

first committing to keep
their marriage central

as they transitioned to parenthood,

but also future vows to their future son

of what they wanted to carry with them
from each of their family lines

and what would stop with this generation.

Then more friends came along,
including men, for a dinner party.

And in lieu of gifts, they each brought
a favorite memory from their childhood

to share with the table.

Now, you might be thinking
this is a lot for a baby shower,

or it’s a little weird
or it’s a little intimate.

Good.

It’s specific.

It’s disputable.

It’s specific to them,

just as your gathering
should be specific to you.

The next step of creating
more meaningful everyday gatherings

is to cause good controversy.

You may have learned, as I did,

never to talk about sex, politics
or religion at the dinner table.

It’s a good rule in that
it preserves harmony,

or that’s its intention.

But it strips away a core ingredient
of meaning, which is heat,

burning relevance.

The best gatherings learn
to cultivate good controversy

by creating the conditions for it,

because human connection
is as threatened by unhealthy peace

as by unhealthy conflict.

I was once working
with an architecture firm,

and they were at a crossroads.

They had to figure out whether they wanted
to continue to be an architecture firm

and focus on the construction of buildings

or pivot and become
the hot new thing, a design firm,

focusing on beyond
the construction of spaces.

And there was real
disagreement in the room,

but you wouldn’t know, because no one
was actually speaking up publicly.

And so we hosted good controversy.

After a lunch break,
all the architects came back,

and we hosted a cage match.

They walked in,

we took one architect, put him
in one corner to represent architecture,

the other one to represent design.

We threw white towels around their necks,

stolen from the bathroom – sorry –

played Rocky music on an iPad,

got each a Don King-like manager

to rev them up and prepare them
with counterarguments,

and then basically made them each argue
the best possible argument

of each future vision.

The norm of politeness
was blocking their progress.

And we then had everybody else
physically choose a side

in front of their colleagues.

And because they were able
to actually show where they stood,

they broke an impasse.

Architecture won.

So that’s work.

What about a hypothetical
tense Thanksgiving dinner?

Anyone?

(Laughter)

So first, ask the purpose.

What does this family need this year?

If cultivating good heat is part of it,

then try for a night banning opinions
and asking for stories instead.

Choose a theme
related to the underlying conflict.

But instead of opinions,

ask everybody to share a story
from their life and experience

that nobody around the table
has ever heard,

to difference or to belonging

or to a time I changed my mind,

giving people a way in to each other

without burning the house down.

And finally, to create more meaningful
everyday gatherings,

create a temporary alternative world

through the use of pop-up rules.

A few years ago, I started noticing
invitations coming with a set of rules.

Kind of boring or controlling, right?

Wrong.

In this multicultural,
intersectional society,

where more of us are gathered and raised

by people and with etiquette
unlike our own,

where we don’t share the etiquette,

unspoken norms are trouble,

whereas pop-up rules allow us
to connect meaningfully.

They’re one-time-only constitutions
for a specific purpose.

So a team dinner,

where different generations are gathering

and don’t share the same
assumptions of phone etiquette:

whoever looks at their phone first

foots the bill.

(Laughter)

Try it.

(Applause)

For an entrepreneurial advice circle
of just strangers,

where the hosts don’t want
everybody to just listen

to the one venture capitalist
in the room –

(Laughter)

knowing laugh –

(Laughter)

you can’t reveal what you do for a living.

For a mom’s dinner,

where you want to upend the norms

of what women who also happen
to be mothers talk about when they gather,

if you talk about your kids,
you have to take a shot.

(Laughter)

That’s a real dinner.

Rules are powerful,

because they allow us to temporarily
change and harmonize our behavior.

And in diverse societies,

pop-up rules carry special force.

They allow us to gather across difference,

to connect,

to make meaning together

without having to be the same.

When I was a child,

I navigated my two worlds
by becoming a chameleon.

If somebody sneezed in my mother’s home,

I would say, “Bless you,”

in my father’s, “God bless you.”

To protect myself, I hid,

as so many of us do.

And it wasn’t until I grew up
and through conflict work

that I began to stop hiding.

And I realized that gatherings for me,

at their best,

allow us to be among others,

to be seen for who we are,

and to see.

The way we gather matters

because how we gather

is how we live.

Thank you.

(Applause)

当我还是个孩子的时候,

每隔一个星期五,

我就会离开我母亲
和继父的家——

一个印度和英国,无神论者,佛教徒,

不可知论者,素食主义者,有时是新时代的

民主家庭。

我会去 1.4 英里外
的父亲和继母的家

,进入一个白人、福音派基督徒、

保守派、共和党人、

每周两次去教堂、

吃肉的家庭。

不用费力
地解释我是如何最终

进入冲突解决领域的。

(笑声)

无论我是
在夏洛茨维尔、伊斯坦布尔

还是艾哈迈达巴德促进对话

,挑战总是一样的:

尽管困难重重,

并且正直,

你如何让人们
有意义地联系

,承担风险

,被他们的经历改变?

我会
在那些房间里看到异常美丽的电力。

然后我会离开那些房间


像你们所有人一样参加我的日常聚会

——婚礼、会议
或返校野餐

——很多人都会失败。

这些高强度的
冲突团体

和我的日常聚会之间存在意义差距。

现在,你可以说,当然,
某人的生日

派对不会辜负种族对话,

但这不是我要回应的。

作为一名主持人,

你被教导要剥离一切

,专注于人与人之间的互动

而日常的主人则
专注于把事情做好

——食物、鲜花、鱼刀——

并将人与人之间的互动
主要留给 机会。

所以我开始想知道我们如何才能改变
我们的日常聚会

,专注于通过人际关系来创造意义

而不是痴迷于小吃。

我出发并采访了
数十位勇敢且不同寻常的主持人——

一位奥林匹克曲棍球教练、
一位太阳马戏团编舞、

一位拉比、一位营地顾问——

以更好地了解
是什么创造了有意义

甚至变革性的聚会。

我想和大家分享
一下我今天

学到的关于聚会新规则的一些知识。

因此,当大多数人计划聚会时,

他们会从现成的形式开始。

生日聚会? 蛋糕和蜡烛。

董事会会议?

一张棕色桌子,12 个白人。

(笑声)

假设目的很明显,
我们跳得太快而无法形成。

这不仅会导致无聊
和重复的聚会,

还会错过更深层次的机会

来实际解决我们的需求。

创建
更有意义的日常聚会的第一步

是接受一个特定的
有争议的目的。

我认识的一位准妈妈
害怕她的婴儿洗澡。

“把尿布别
在婴儿身上”的游戏

和打开礼物的想法让人觉得奇怪和无关紧要。

所以她停下来问:

婴儿洗澡的目的是什么?

我此刻的需要是什么?

她意识到这是
为了解决她

对她和她丈夫的恐惧——
还记得那个人吗? ——

过渡到为人父母。

所以她请两个朋友
在此基础上发明一个聚会。

等一个阳光明媚的下午,
六个女人聚集在一起。

首先,为了解决她对劳动的恐惧——
她很害怕——

他们讲述了她生活中的故事,

以提醒她已经具备的特征
——

勇敢、奇迹、信仰、投降

——他们相信这些特征会承载她
和 帮助她分娩。

当他们说话时,他们将
每种品质的珠子绑在一条项链

上,她可以戴
在产房的脖子上。

接下来,她的丈夫进来了

,他们写下了新的誓言,
家庭誓言,并大声说出来,

首先承诺在

他们过渡到为人父母的过程中以婚姻为中心,

而且还向未来的儿子发誓

他们想要随身携带的东西
来自他们的每个家族,

以及这一代人会停止什么。

然后更多的朋友,
包括男人,来参加晚宴。

而代替礼物,他们每个人都
带来了童年最喜欢的回忆

与餐桌分享。

现在,您可能会认为
这对于婴儿送礼会来说很重要,

或者有点奇怪,
或者有点亲密。

好的。

这是具体的。

这是有争议的。

它是特定于他们的,

就像你的聚会
应该是特定于你一样。

创建
更有意义的日常聚会的下一步

是引起良好的争议。

你可能已经学会了,就像我一样,

永远不要在餐桌上谈论性、政治
或宗教。

这是一个很好的规则,因为
它可以保持和谐,

或者这就是它的意图。

但它剥夺了意义的核心成分
,即热、

燃烧的相关性。

最好的聚会学会

通过为它创造条件来培养良好的争议,

因为
不健康的和平

和不健康的冲突一样威胁着人际关系。

我曾经
在一家建筑公司工作

,他们正处于十字路口。

他们必须弄清楚他们是想
继续成为一家建筑公司

,专注于建筑的建造,

还是转而
成为炙手可热的新事物,一家设计公司,

专注于超越
空间的建造。

房间里确实
存在分歧,

但你不会知道,因为
实际上没有人公开发言。

所以我们举办了很好的争论。

午休后,
所有建筑师都回来了

,我们举办了一场笼子比赛。

他们走进来,

我们带了一位建筑师,把他
放在一个角落代表建筑

,另一个代表设计。

我们把白毛巾围在他们的脖子上,

从浴室偷来——对不起——

在 iPad 上播放 Rocky 音乐,

让每个人都像唐金一样的经理

给他们提速并
准备反驳,

然后基本上让他们每个人都争论

每个未来愿景的最佳论证。

礼貌的规范
阻碍了他们的进步。

然后我们让其他人

在他们的同事面前亲自选择一方。

而且因为他们
能够真正展示他们的立场,

他们打破了僵局。

建筑赢了。

所以这就是工作。

假设的
紧张感恩节晚餐怎么样?

任何人?

(笑声)

所以首先,问目的。

这个家庭今年需要什么?

如果培养良好的热量是其中的一部分,

那么尝试一晚禁止意见
并询问故事。

选择
与潜在冲突相关的主题。

但是,不要发表意见,而是

请每个人分享
他们生活和经历中的故事,而这些故事

在餐桌旁
没有人听过

,关于差异或归属感

或我改变主意的时间,

让人们在

不燃烧的情况下相互了解 房子下来。

最后,为了创造更有意义的
日常聚会,通过使用弹出规则

创建一个临时的替代世界

几年前,我开始
注意到带有一套规则的邀请。

有点无聊或控制,对吧?

错误的。

在这个多元文化、
交叉的社会中,

我们中的更多人被人们聚集和抚养长大

,礼仪
与我们自己不同

,我们不分享礼仪,

潜规则是麻烦,

而弹出规则允许我们
有意义地联系。

它们是
针对特定目的的一次性宪法。

所以一个团队晚宴

,不同的世代聚集在一起,

并且不分享相同
的电话礼仪假设:

谁先看他们的电话,

谁就买单。

(笑声)

试试看。

(掌声)

对于一个只有陌生人的创业建议圈

,主持人不希望
每个人都只听房间

里的一个风险
投资家——

(笑声)会

笑——

(笑声)

你不能透露你的想法 以此为生。

对于一个妈妈的晚餐

,你想颠覆

那些
碰巧也是母亲的女性在聚会时谈论的规范,

如果你谈论你的孩子,
你必须试一试。

(笑声)

那是一顿真正的晚餐。

规则很强大,

因为它们允许我们暂时
改变和协调我们的行为。

在多元化的社会中,

弹出式规则具有特殊的力量。

它们使我们能够跨越差异聚集

、连接、

共同创造意义,

而不必保持相同。

当我还是个孩子的时候,

我通过成为变色龙来驾驭我的两个世界

如果有人在我母亲家打喷嚏,

我会说,“保佑你”,

在我父亲家,“上帝保佑你”。

为了保护自己,我躲起来了,

就像我们很多人一样。

直到我长大
并通过冲突工作

,我才开始停止隐藏。

我意识到,对我来说,最好的聚会可以

让我们成为其他人,让我们

看到我们是谁

,看到我们。

我们收集的方式很重要,

因为我们如何收集

就是我们的生活方式。

谢谢你。

(掌声)