What happens if you cut down all of a citys trees Stefan Al

This is the tale of two ancient cities

and the trees
that determined their destinies.

In 3,000 BC Uruk was more densely
populated than modern day New York City.

This crowded capital had to continually
expand their irrigation system

to feed its growing population.

2,500 years later in Sri Lanka, the city
of Anuradhapura had a similar problem.

They were also growing constantly,

and like Uruk, their city relied heavily
on an elaborate irrigation system.

As Uruk grew, its farmers began chopping
down trees to make space for more crops.

In Anuradhapura, however,
trees were sacred.

Their city housed an offshoot
of the Bodhi tree

under which Buddha himself
was said to have attained enlightenment.

Religious reverence
slowed farmer’s axes

and even led the city to plant
additional trees in urban parks.

Initially, Uruk’s expansion worked well.

But without trees to filter
their water supply,

Uruk’s irrigation system
became contaminated.

Evaporating water left mineral deposits,

which rendered the soil
too salty for agriculture.

Conversely, Anuradhapura’s
irrigation system was designed to work

in concert with the surrounding forest.

Their city eventually grew to more than
twice Uruk’s population,

and today, Anuradhapura still cares
for a tree planted over 2,000 years ago.

We may think of nature as being
unconnected to our urban spaces,

but trees have always been
an essential part of successful cities.

Trees act like a natural sponge,
absorbing storm water runoff

before releasing it back
into the atmosphere.

The webs of their roots protect against
mudslides

while allowing soil to retain water
and filter out toxins.

Roots help prevent floods,

while reducing the need for storm
drains and water treatment plants.

Their porous leaves purify the air
by trapping carbon and other pollutants,

making them essential
in the fight against climate change.

Humanity has been uncovering
these arboreal benefits for centuries.

But trees aren’t just crucial
to the health of a city’s infrastructure;

they play a vital role in the health
of its citizens as well.

In the 1870’s, Manhattan had few trees
outside the island’s parks.

Without trees to provide shade,

buildings absorbed up to nine times
more solar radiation

during deadly summer heat waves.

Combined with the period’s
poor sanitation standards,

the oppressive heat made the city a
breeding ground for bacteria like cholera.

In modern day Hong Kong, tall skyscrapers
and underground infrastructure

make it difficult for trees to grow.

This contributes to the city’s
dangerously poor air quality,

which can cause bronchitis
and diminished lung function.

Trees affect our mental health as well.

Research indicates that the presence
of green foliage increases attention spans

and decreases stress levels.

It’s even been shown that hospital
patients with views of brick walls

recover more slowly than
those with views of trees.

Fortunately, many cities
are full of views like this—

and that’s no accident.

As early as the 18th century,

city planners began to embrace
the importance of urban trees.

In 1733, Colonel James Oglethorpe
planned the city of Savannah, Georgia

to ensure that no neighborhood
was more than a 2-minute walk from a park.

After World War II, Copenhagen directed
all new development along five arteries—

each sandwiched between a park.

This layout increased
the city’s resilience

to pollution and natural disasters.

And urban trees don’t just benefit people.

Portland’s Forest Park preserves
the region’s natural biodiversity,

making the city home to various
local plants,

112 bird species,
and 62 species of mammals.

No city is more committed to trees
than Singapore.

Since 1967, Singapore’s government
has planted over 1.2 million trees,

including those within 50-meter tall
vertical gardens called supertrees.

These structures sustain themselves
and nearby conservatories

with solar energy and collected rainwater.

Trees and vegetation currently cover
over 50% of Singapore’s landmass,

reducing the need for air conditioning

and encouraging low-pollution
transportation.

By 2050, it’s estimated that over 65% of
the world will be living in cities.

City planners can lay an eco-friendly
foundation,

but it’s up to the people who live
in these urban forests

to make them homes for more than humans.

这是两个古老的城市


决定他们命运的树木的故事。

公元前 3000 年,乌鲁克的人口
密度超过了现代纽约市。

这个拥挤的首都不得不不断
扩大他们的灌溉系统

来养活不断增长的人口。

2500 年后的斯里兰卡,
阿努拉德普勒市也遇到了类似的问题。

他们也在不断地成长,

和乌鲁克一样,他们的城市严重
依赖精心设计的灌溉系统。

随着乌鲁克的成长,它的农民开始
砍伐树木,为更多的作物腾出空间。

然而,在阿努拉德普勒,
树木是神圣的。

他们的城市有
菩提树的一个分支,

据说佛陀本人
在这棵树下获得了启蒙。

宗教崇敬
减缓了农民的斧头

,甚至导致城市
在城市公园种植更多的树木。

最初,乌鲁克的扩张运作良好。

但是没有树木来
过滤供水,

乌鲁克的灌溉系统
被污染了。

蒸发的水留下了矿物质沉积物,

这使得土壤
太咸,不适合农业。

相反,阿努拉德普勒的
灌溉系统旨在

与周围的森林协同工作。

他们的城市最终增长到
乌鲁克人口的两倍多

,今天,阿努拉德普勒仍然关心
着一棵 2000 多年前种植的树。

我们可能认为自然
与我们的城市空间无关,

但树木一直
是成功城市的重要组成部分。

树木就像一块天然海绵,
吸收雨水径流,

然后将其释放
回大气中。

它们的根网可以防止
泥石流,

同时让土壤保持水分
并过滤掉毒素。

根有助于防止洪水,

同时减少对雨
水渠和水处理厂的需求。

它们多孔的叶子
通过捕获碳和其他污染物来净化空气,

使它们
在应对气候变化方面至关重要。

几个世纪以来,人类一直在发现这些树栖的好处。

但是树木不仅
对城市基础设施的健康至关重要;

它们在其公民的健康方面也发挥着至关重要的作用

在 1870 年代,曼哈顿
岛上的公园外几乎没有树木。

没有树木提供遮荫,

建筑物

在致命的夏季热浪中吸收的太阳辐射量高达 9 倍。

再加上当时
糟糕的卫生标准

,酷热使这座城市成为
霍乱等细菌的温床。

在现代香港,高耸的摩天大楼
和地下基础设施

使树木难以生长。

这导致该市
空气质量极差

,可能导致支气管炎
和肺功能下降。

树木也会影响我们的心理健康。

研究表明,绿叶的存在会
增加注意力

并降低压力水平。

甚至有研究表明,
看到砖墙的医院病人

比看到树木的病人恢复得更慢。

幸运的是,许多城市
都充满了这样的景色——

这绝非偶然。

早在 18 世纪,

城市规划者就开始接受
城市树木的重要性。

1733 年,詹姆斯·奥格尔索普上校
规划了佐治亚州萨凡纳市,

以确保没有任何
街区距离公园步行超过 2 分钟。

二战后,哥本哈根将
所有新开发项目都沿着五条主干道——

每条主干道夹在一个公园之间。

这种布局提高
了城市

对污染和自然灾害的抵御能力。

城市树木不仅有益于人们。

波特兰的森林公园保留
了该地区的自然生物多样性,

使这座城市成为各种
当地植物、

112 种鸟类
和 62 种哺乳动物的家园。

没有哪个城市比新加坡更注重树木

自 1967 年以来,新加坡政府
已种植超过 120 万棵树,

其中包括位于 50 米高的
垂直花园内的超级树。

这些结构

用太阳能和收集的雨水维持自己和附近的温室。

树木和植被目前覆盖
了新加坡 50% 以上的陆地,

减少了对空调的需求

并鼓励低污染
交通。

据估计,到 2050 年,全球将有超过 65% 的人口
居住在城市。

城市规划者可以奠定生态友好的
基础,

但生活
在这些城市森林中的

人们要让它们成为比人类更多的家园。