How to build and rebuild trust Frances Frei

I want to talk to you about
how to build and rebuild trust,

because it’s my belief that trust

is the foundation for everything we do,

and that if we can learn
to trust one another more,

we can have unprecedented human progress.

But what if trust is broken?

What if your CEO is caught on video,
disparaging an employee?

What if your employees experience
a culture of bias, exclusion and worse?

What if there’s a data breach,

and it feels an awful lot like a cover-up
than seriously addressing it?

And most tragically,

what if a technological fail
leads to the loss of human life?

If I was giving this talk six months ago,

I would have been wearing an Uber T-shirt.

I’m a Harvard Business School professor,

but I was super attracted
to going to an organization

that was metaphorically
and perhaps quite literally on fire.

I had read everything
that was written in the newspaper,

and that was precisely what drew me
to the organization.

This was an organization
that had lost trust

with every constituent that mattered.

But there’s a word about me
that I should share.

My favorite trait is redemption.

I believe that there is a better
version of us around every corner,

and I have seen firsthand

how organizations and communities

and individuals change
at breathtaking speed.

I went to Uber with the hopes
that a turnaround there

could give license to the rest of us

who might have narrower versions
of their challenges.

But when I got to Uber,
I made a really big mistake.

I publicly committed
to wearing an Uber T-shirt every day

until every other employee
was wearing an Uber T-shirt.

I had clearly not thought that through.

(Laughter)

It was 250 days
of wearing an Uber T-shirt.

Now I am liberated from that commitment,

as I am back at HBS,

and what I’d like to do is share with you

how far I have taken that liberty,

which, it’s baby steps,

(Laughter)

but I would just say I’m on my way.

(Laughter)

Now, trust, if we’re going to rebuild it,

we have to understand its component parts.

The component parts of trust
are super well understood.

There’s three things about trust.

If you sense that I am being authentic,

you are much more likely to trust me.

If you sense that I have
real rigor in my logic,

you are far more likely to trust me.

And if you believe that my empathy
is directed towards you,

you are far more likely to trust me.

When all three
of these things are working,

we have great trust.

But if any one of these three gets shaky,

if any one of these three wobbles,

trust is threatened.

Now here’s what I’d like to do.

I want each of us to be able
to engender more trust tomorrow,

literally tomorrow, than we do today.

And the way to do that is to understand
where trust wobbles for ourselves

and have a ready-made
prescription to overcome it.

So that’s what I would like
to do together.

Would you give me some sense
of whether or not you’re here voluntarily?

(Laughter)

Yeah. OK. Alright. Awesome.

OK. So –

(Laughter)

it’s just super helpful feedback.

(Laughter)

So the most common wobble is empathy.

The most common wobble

is that people just don’t believe
that we’re mostly in it for them,

and they believe
that we’re too self-distracted.

And it’s no wonder.

We are all so busy
with so many demands on our time,

it’s easy to crowd out the time and space

that empathy requires.

For Dylan to be Dylan,
that takes real time.

And for us, if we have too much to do,
we may not have that time.

But that puts us into a vicious cycle,

because without revealing empathy,

it makes everything harder.

Without the benefit of the doubt of trust,
it makes everything harder,

and then we have less and less time
for empathy, and so it goes.

So here’s the prescription:

identify where, when and to whom

you are likely to offer your distraction.

That should trace pretty perfectly

to when, where and to whom
you are likely to withhold your empathy.

And if in those instances,

we can come up with a trigger
that gets us to look up,

look at the people right in front of us,

listen to them,

deeply immerse ourselves
in their perspectives,

then we have a chance of having
a sturdy leg of empathy.

And if you do nothing else,

please put away your cell phone.

It is the largest distraction magnet
yet to be made,

and it is super difficult to create
empathy and trust in its presence.

That takes care of the empathy wobblers.

Logic wobbles can come in two forms.

It’s either the quality of your logic

or it’s your ability
to communicate the logic.

Now if the quality
of your logic is at risk,

I can’t really help you with that.

(Laughter)

It’s like, not in this much time.

(Laughter)

But fortunately, it’s often the case
that our logic is sound,

but it’s our ability to communicate
the logic that is in jeopardy.

Super fortunately,
there’s a very easy fix to this.

If we consider that there are
two ways to communicate in the world,

and Harvard Business School professors
are known for two-by-twos –

nonsense, it’s the triangle that rocks.

(Laughter)

If we consider that there are
two ways to communicate in the world,

and the first one is when
you take us on a journey,

a magnificent journey
that has twists and turns

and mystery and drama,

until you ultimately get to the point,

and some of the best
communicators in the world

communicate just like this.

But if you have a logic wobble,

this can be super dangerous.

So instead, I implore you,

start with your point
in a crisp half-sentence,

and then give your supporting evidence.

This means that people
will be able to get access

to our awesome ideas,

and just as importantly,

if you get cut off before you’re done …

ladies –

(Laughter)

(Applause)

If you get cut off before you’re done,

you still get credit for the idea,

as opposed to someone else coming in
and snatching it from you.

(Applause)

You just gave me goosebumps.

(Laughter)

The third wobble is authenticity,
and I find it to be the most vexing.

We as a human species
can sniff out in a moment,

literally in a moment,

whether or not someone
is being their authentic true self.

So in many ways,
the prescription is clear.

You don’t want to have
an authenticity wobble? Be you.

Great.

And that is super easy to do

when you’re around people
who are like you.

But if you represent
any sort of difference,

the prescription to “be you”
can be super challenging.

I have been tempted
at every step of my career,

tempted personally
and tempted by coaching of others,

to mute who I am in the world.

I’m a woman of super strong opinions,

with really deep convictions,

direct speech.

I have a magnificent wife,

and together, we have such crazy ambition.

I prefer men’s clothes

and comfortable shoes.

Thank you, Allbirds.

(Laughter)

In some contexts, this makes me different.

I hope that each person here

has the beautiful luxury
of representing difference

in some context in your life.

But with that privilege

comes a very sincere temptation
to hold back who we are,

and if we hold back who we are,

we’re less likely to be trusted.

And if we’re less likely to be trusted,

we’re less likely to be given
stretch assignments.

And without those stretch assignments,
we’re less likely to get promoted,

and so on and so on
until we are super depressed

by the demographic tendencies
of our senior leadership.

(Laughter)

And it all comes back
to our being our authentic selves.

So here’s my advice.

Wear whatever makes you feel fabulous.

Pay less attention to what you think
people want to hear from you

and far more attention to what
your authentic, awesome self needs to say.

And to the leaders in the room,

it is your obligation

to set the conditions that not only
make it safe for us to be authentic

but make it welcome,

make it celebrated,

cherish it for exactly what it is,

which is the key for us
achieving greater excellence

than we have ever known is possible.

So let’s go back to Uber.
What happened at Uber?

When I got there,
Uber was wobbling all over the place.

Empathy, logic, authenticity
were all wobbling like crazy.

But we were able to find super effective,
super quick fixes for two of the wobbles.

I’ll give you an illustration of empathy.

In the meetings at Uber,

it was not uncommon
for people to be texting one another …

about the meeting.

(Laughter)

I had never seen anything like it.

(Laughter)

It may have done many things,

but it did not create a safe,
empathetic environment.

The solution though, super clear:

technology, off and away.

And that forced people to look up,

to look at the people in front of them,

to listen to them,

to immerse themselves
in their perspectives

and to collaborate in unprecedented ways.

Logic was equally wobbly,

and this was because
the hypergrowth of the organization

meant that people, managers
were getting promoted

again and again and again.

Soon, they were put in positions
that they had no business being in.

Their positions outstripped
their capability,

and it was not their fault.

The solution: a massive influx
of executive education

that focused specifically on logic,

on strategy and leadership.

It gave people the rigor
of the quality of their logic,

and it turned a whole lot
of triangles, right-side up,

so people were able to communicate
effectively with one another.

The last one, authenticity,
I’ll say it’s still mighty wobbly,

but honestly, that doesn’t
make Uber very different

from all of the other companies
I’ve seen in Silicon Valley and beyond.

It is still much easier
to coach people to fit in.

It is still much easier to reward people

when they say something
that you were going to say,

as opposed to rewarding people
when they say something

entirely different
than what you were going to say.

But when we figure out this,

when we figure out
how to celebrate difference

and how to let people bring
the best version of themselves forward,

well holy cow, is that the world
I want my sons to grow up in.

And with the collection of people here,

it would be a privilege
to lock arms with you

and go ahead and rebuild trust
in every corner of the globe.

Thank you very much.

(Applause)

我想和你谈谈
如何建立和重建信任,

因为我相信信任

是我们所做的一切的基础

,如果我们能够学会
更多地相互信任,

我们就能取得前所未有的人类进步。

但是,如果信任被打破了怎么办?

如果您的 CEO 被
拍到贬低员工怎么办?

如果您的员工体验
到偏见、排斥甚至更糟的文化怎么办?

如果发生数据泄露

,感觉更像是掩盖而
不是认真解决怎么办?

最可悲的是

,如果技术失败
导致人命丧生怎么办?

如果我在六个月前做这个演讲,

我会穿着 Uber T 恤。

我是哈佛商学院的教授,

但我非常喜欢
去一个

隐喻性
很强的组织,也许真的很火。

我已经阅读
了报纸上写的所有内容,

而这正是吸引我
加入该组织的原因。

这是一个

所有重要成员都失去信任的组织。

但是有一个关于我的词
我应该分享。

我最喜欢的特质是救赎。

我相信
每个角落都有更好的我们

,我亲眼目睹

了组织、社区

和个人如何
以惊人的速度发生变化。

我去了优步,希望
那里的转变

可以让我们其他人获得许可,这些

人可能
面临着更窄版本的挑战。

但是当我到优步时,
我犯了一个非常大的错误。

我公开承诺
每天都穿 Uber T 恤,

直到所有其他
员工都穿 Uber T 恤。

我显然没有想到这一点。

(笑声)

穿着 Uber T 恤已经 250 天了。

现在我从那个承诺中解脱出来了,

因为我回到了哈佛商学院

,我想做的就是和你们分享

我已经采取了多大的自由

,这是婴儿的步骤,

(笑声)

但我只想说我 我在路上。

(笑声)

现在,相信,如果我们要重建它,

我们必须了解它的组成部分。

信任的组成部分
非常好理解。

关于信任有三件事。

如果你觉得我是真实的,

你就更有可能信任我。

如果你觉得
我的逻辑非常严谨,

你就更有可能信任我。

如果你相信我的同理心
是针对你的,

你就更有可能信任我。

当所有这
三件事都起作用时,

我们有很大的信任。

但是,如果这三个中的任何一个出现动摇,

如果这三个中的任何一个摇摆不定,

信任就会受到威胁。

现在这就是我想做的。

我希望我们每个人都
能够在明天,

确切地说是明天,比我们今天产生更多的信任。

而做到这一点的方法是
了解我们的信任在哪里摇摆不定,

并有一个现成的
处方来克服它。

所以这就是我想
一起做的事情。

你能告诉我
你是不是自愿来这里的吗?

(笑声)

是的。 行。 好吧。 惊人的。

行。 所以——

(笑声)

这只是非常有用的反馈。

(笑声)

所以最常见的摇摆就是同理心。

最常见的摇摆

是人们只是不
相信我们主要是为了他们

,他们
认为我们太自私了。

这也难怪。

我们都忙于
对我们的时间提出如此多的要求,

很容易挤出

同理心所需的时间和空间。

让迪伦成为迪伦,
这需要时间。

而对我们来说,如果我们有太多事情要做,
我们可能没有那个时间。

但这使我们陷入了一个恶性循环,

因为如果不表现出同理心,

一切都会变得更加困难。

没有信任怀疑的好处,
它会让一切变得更难,

然后我们有越来越少的时间
去同理心,事情就这样发生了。

所以这是处方:

确定您可能在哪里、何时以及向谁

分心。

这应该可以完美地追溯到您可能在

何时、何地以及对谁
隐瞒您的同理心。

如果在这些情况下,

我们可以想出一个触发点
,让我们抬头,

看着我们面前的人,

倾听他们的声音,

深深地沉浸
在他们的观点中,

那么我们就有机会拥有
一个坚强的人 同理心的腿。

如果你什么都不做,

请收起你的手机。

它是迄今为止最大的分散注意力的磁铁

,很难
在它的存在下产生同理心和信任。

这照顾移情摇摆不定。

逻辑摆动可以有两种形式。

要么是你的逻辑质量,要么是你

传达逻辑的能力。

现在,如果
您的逻辑质量受到威胁,

我真的无法帮助您。

(笑声

) 就像,不是在这么多时间里。

(笑声)

但幸运的是,通常情况
下我们的逻辑是合理的,

但我们
沟通逻辑的能力处于危险之中。

非常幸运的是,
有一个非常简单的解决方法。

如果我们考虑到世界上有
两种交流方式,

而哈佛商学院的教授
们以二对二而闻名——

胡说八道,那就是三角关系。

(笑声)

如果我们认为世界上有
两种交流方式

,第一种是当
你带我们去旅行时,一段

波折

、神秘和戏剧的壮丽旅程,

直到你最终切入正题 ,世界

上一些最好

沟通者就是这样沟通的。

但是,如果你有一个逻辑摆动,

这可能是超级危险的。

所以相反,我恳求你,

用一个清晰的半句话开始你的观点,

然后给出你的支持证据。

这意味着人们
将能够接触

到我们很棒的想法

,同样重要的是,

如果你在完成之前就被切断了……

女士们——

(笑声)

(掌声)

如果你在你之前就被切断了。 重新完成后,

您仍然会因这个想法

而受到赞誉,而不是其他人进来
并从您那里抢走它。

(掌声)

你简直让我起鸡皮疙瘩。

(笑声

) 第三个摇摆是真实性
,我觉得这是最让人头疼的。

作为一个人类物种,我们
可以在一瞬间,

从字面上看,是在一瞬间嗅出,

无论某人
是否是他们真实的真实自我。

所以在很多方面
,处方是明确的。

你不想有
一个真实性摇摆不定? 成为你。

伟大的。

当你
和像你一样的人在一起时,这非常容易做到。

但是,如果你代表了
任何一种差异,

那么“成为你”的处方
可能会非常具有挑战性。

我在职业生涯的每一步都受到诱惑,

个人受到诱惑,也受到他人指导的诱惑,

让我在世界上的身份保持沉默。

我是一个意见超强的女人,

有着非常深刻的信念,

直言不讳。

我有一个伟大的妻子

,我们在一起,有着如此疯狂的野心。

我更喜欢男装

和舒适的鞋子。

谢谢你,全鸟。

(笑声)

在某些情况下,这让我与众不同。

我希望这里的每个人都

拥有

在你生活中的某些背景下代表差异的美丽奢侈。

但有了这种特权,

就会有一种非常真诚的诱惑
来隐瞒我们的身份

,如果我们隐瞒自己的身份,

我们就不太可能被信任。

如果我们不太可能被信任,

我们就不太可能被
分配到扩展任务中。

如果没有这些延伸任务,
我们就不太可能升职,

如此等等,
直到

我们对高级领导层的人口趋势感到极度沮丧。

(笑声

) 这一切都回到
了我们做真实的自己。

所以这是我的建议。

穿任何让你感觉很棒的衣服。

少关注您认为
人们想从您那里听到的内容,

而多关注
您真实、出色的自我需要说的话。

对于房间里的领导人,

有义务设定条件,不仅
让我们能够安全地保持真实,

而且让它受欢迎,

让它庆祝,

珍惜它的本来面目,

这对我们来说是关键
实现

比我们所知道的更大的卓越是可能的。

所以让我们回到优步。
优步发生了什么?

当我到达那里时,
优步到处都在摇晃。

同理心、逻辑、真实性
都像疯了一样摇摆不定。

但是我们能够为其中两个摆动找到超级有效、
超级快速的修复方法。

我会给你一个同理心的例子。

在优步的会议上,

人们互相发短信……

关于会议的情况并不少见。

(笑声)

我从来没有见过这样的事情。

(笑声)

它可能做了很多事情,

但它并没有创造一个安全、
善解人意的环境。

不过,解决方案非常明确:

技术,断断续续。

这迫使人们抬头

,看着他们面前的人

,倾听他们的声音

,沉浸
在他们的观点中,

并以前所未有的方式进行合作。

逻辑同样不稳定

,这是
因为组织的高速增长

意味着人员、经理

一次又一次地得到晋升。

很快,他们就

被安排到了他们不该担任的职位上。他们的职位超出了
他们的能力范围

,这不是他们的错。

解决方案:大量涌入

专门针对逻辑

、战略和领导力的高管教育。

它给
人们逻辑质量的严谨性

,它把
很多三角形,正面朝上,

所以人们能够
有效地相互交流。

最后一个,真实性,
我会说它仍然非常不稳定,

但老实说,这并没有
让优步与

我在硅谷及其他地区看到的所有其他公司有很大不同。

指导人们适应环境

仍然容易得多。

当人们说出你要说的话时

奖励他们仍然容易得多,而不是
在他们说出与你要说的话完全不同的话时奖励他们

但是当我们弄清楚这一点时,

当我们弄清楚
如何庆祝差异

以及如何让人们展现
出最好的自己时

,天哪,这就是
我希望我的儿子

们成长的世界。 在座的各位,

很荣幸
能与你们紧紧相拥

,继续
在全球每个角落重建信任。

非常感谢你。

(掌声)