Theres no such thing as not voting Eric Liu

Why bother?

The game is rigged.

My vote won’t count.

The choices are terrible.

Voting is for suckers.

Perhaps you’ve thought
some of these things.

Perhaps you’ve even said them.

And if so, you wouldn’t be alone,
and you wouldn’t be entirely wrong.

The game of public policy today
is rigged in many ways.

How else would more than half
of federal tax breaks

flow up to the wealthiest
five percent of Americans?

And our choices indeed are often terrible.

For many people
across the political spectrum,

Exhibit A is the 2016
presidential election.

But in any year, you can look
up and down the ballot

and find plenty to be uninspired about.

But in spite of all this,
I still believe voting matters.

And crazy as it may sound,

I believe we can revive the joy of voting.

Today, I want to talk
about how we can do that, and why.

There used to be a time
in American history when voting was fun,

when it was much more than just
a grim duty to show up at the polls.

That time is called
“most of American history.”

(Laughter)

From the Revolution
to the Civil Rights Era,

the United States had a vibrant,

robustly participatory
and raucous culture of voting.

It was street theater, open-air debates,
fasting and feasting and toasting,

parades and bonfires.

During the 19th century,
immigrants and urban political machines

helped fuel this culture of voting.

That culture grew with each
successive wave of new voters.

During Reconstruction,
when new African-American voters,

new African-American citizens,

began to exercise their power,

they celebrated in jubilee parades

that connected emancipation
with their newfound right to vote.

A few decades later, the suffragettes

brought a spirit
of theatricality to their fight,

marching together in white dresses
as they claimed the franchise.

And the Civil Rights Movement,

which sought to redeem
the promise of equal citizenship

that had been betrayed by Jim Crow,

put voting right at the center.

From Freedom Summer to the march in Selma,

that generation of activists
knew that voting matters,

and they knew that spectacle
and the performance of power

is key to actually claiming power.

But it’s been over a half century
since Selma and the Voting Rights Act,

and in the decades since,

this face-to-face culture of voting

has just about disappeared.

It’s been killed by television

and then the internet.

The couch has replaced the commons.

Screens have made
citizens into spectators.

And while it’s nice to share
political memes on social media,

that’s a rather quiet kind of citizenship.

It’s what the sociologist Sherry Turkle
calls “being alone together.”

What we need today

is an electoral culture
that is about being together together,

in person,

in loud and passionate ways,

so that instead of being
“eat your vegetables” or “do you duty,”

voting can feel more like “join the club”

or, better yet, “join the party.”

Imagine if we had,
across the country right now,

in local places but nationwide,

a concerted effort
to revive a face-to-face set of ways

to engage and electioneer:

outdoor shows in which candidates
and their causes are mocked

and praised in broad satirical style;

soapbox speeches by citizens;

public debates held inside pubs;

streets filled with political art
and handmade posters and murals;

battle of the band concerts in which
competing performers rep their candidates.

Now, all of this may sound
a little bit 18th century to you,

but in fact, it doesn’t have to be
any more 18th century

than, say, Broadway’s “Hamilton,”

which is to say vibrantly contemporary.

And the fact is that all around the world,

today, millions of people
are voting like this.

In India, elections are colorful,
communal affairs.

In Brazil, election day
is a festive, carnival-type atmosphere.

In Taiwan and Hong Kong,
there is a spectacle,

eye-popping, eye-grabbing spectacle

to the street theater of elections.

You might ask, well,
here in America, who has time for this?

And I would tell you

that the average American
watches five hours of television a day.

You might ask, who has the motivation?

And I’ll tell you,

any citizen who wants to be seen and heard

not as a prop, not as a talking point,

but as a participant, as a creator.

Well, how do we make this happen?

Simply by making it happen.

That’s why a group of colleagues and I

launched a new project
called “The Joy of Voting.”

In four cities across the United States –

Philadelphia, Miami,

Akron, Ohio, and Wichita, Kansas –

we’ve gathered together
artists and activists,

educators, political folks,
neighbors, everyday citizens

to come together and create projects

that can foster this culture
of voting in a local way.

In Miami, that means
all-night parties with hot DJs

where the only way to get in
is to show that you’re registered to vote.

In Akron, it means political plays

being performed
in the bed of a flatbed truck

that moves from neighborhood
to neighborhood.

In Philadelphia,

it’s a voting-themed scavenger hunt
all throughout colonial old town.

And in Wichita, it’s making
mixtapes and live graffiti art

in the North End to get out the vote.

There are 20 of these projects,

and they are remarkable
in their beauty and their diversity,

and they are changing people.

Let me tell you about a couple of them.

In Miami, we’ve commissioned and artist,

a young artist named Atomico,

to create some vivid and vibrant images
for a new series of “I voted” stickers.

But the thing is, Atomico had never voted.

He wasn’t even registered.

So as he got to work on creating
this artwork for these stickers,

he also began to get over
his sense of intimidation about politics.

He got himself registered,

and then he got educated
about the upcoming primary election,

and on election day he was out there
not just passing out stickers,

but chatting up voters
and encouraging people to vote,

and talking about
the election with passersby.

In Akron, a theater company
called the Wandering Aesthetics

has been putting on
these pickup truck plays.

And to do so, they put out
an open call to the public

asking for speeches,
monologues, dialogues, poems,

snippets of anything
that could be read aloud

and woven into a performance.

They got dozens of submissions.

One of them was a poem

written by nine students in an ESL class,

all of them Hispanic migrant workers

from nearby Hartville, Ohio.

I want to read to you from this poem.

It’s called “The Joy of Voting.”

“I would like to vote for the first time

because things are changing for Hispanics.

I used to be afraid of ghosts.

Now I am afraid of people.

There’s more violence and racism.

Voting can change this.

The border wall is nothing.

It’s just a wall.

The wall of shame is something.

It’s very important to vote

so we can break down this wall of shame.

I have passion in my heart.

Voting gives me a voice and power.

I can stand up and do something.”

“The Joy of Voting” project
isn’t just about joy.

It’s about this passion.

It’s about feeling and belief,

and it isn’t just our organization’s work.

All across this country right now,

immigrants, young people, veterans,
people of all different backgrounds

are coming together to create
this kind of passionate, joyful activity

around elections,

in red and blue states,
in urban and rural communities,

people of every political background.

What they have in common is simply this:

their work is rooted in place.

Because remember,
all citizenship is local.

When politics becomes
just a presidential election,

we yell and we scream at our screens,
and then we collapse, exhausted.

But when politics is about us

and our neighbors
and other people in our community

coming together to create experiences
of collective voice and imagination,

then we begin to remember
that this stuff matters.

We begin to remember
that this is the stuff of self-government.

Which brings me back to where I began.

Why bother?

There’s one way to answer this question.

Voting matters because it is
a self-fulfilling act of belief.

It feeds the spirit of mutual interest
that makes any society thrive.

When we vote, even if it is in anger,

we are part of a collective,
creative leap of faith.

Voting helps us generate
the very power that we wish we had.

It’s no accident
that democracy and theater

emerged around the same time
in ancient Athens.

Both of them yank the individual
out of the enclosure of her private self.

Both of them create great
public experiences of shared ritual.

Both of them bring the imagination to life

in ways that remind us
that all of our bonds in the end

are imagined, and can be reimagined.

This moment right now,

when we think about
the meaning of imagination,

is so fundamentally important,

and our ability to take that spirit

and to take that sense

that there is something greater out there,

is not just a matter
of technical expertise.

It’s not just a matter of making the time
or having the know-how.

It is a matter of spirit.

But let me give you an answer
to this question, “Why bother?”

that is maybe a little less spiritual
and a bit more pointed.

Why bother voting?

Because there is
no such thing as not voting.

Not voting is voting,

for everything that you
may detest and oppose.

Not voting can be dressed up

as an act of principled,
passive resistance,

but in fact not voting

is actively handing power over

to those whose interests
are counter to your own,

and those who would be very glad
to take advantage of your absence.

Not voting is for suckers.

Imagine where this country would be

if all the folks who in 2010
created the Tea Party

had decided that,
you know, politics is too messy,

voting is too complicated.

There is no possibility
of our votes adding up to anything.

They didn’t preemptively
silence themselves.

They showed up,

and in the course of showing up,
they changed American politics.

Imagine if all of the followers
of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders

had decided not to upend
the political status quo

and blow apart the frame
of the previously possible

in American politics.

They did that by voting.

We live in a time right now,

divided, often very dark,

where across the left and the right,
there’s a lot of talk of revolution

and the need for revolution
to disrupt everyday democracy.

Well, here’s the thing:

everyday democracy already
gives us a playbook for revolution.

In the 2012 presidential election,

young voters, Latino voters,

Asian-American voters, low-income voters,

all showed up at less than 50 percent.

In the 2014 midterm elections,
turnout was 36 percent,

which was a 70-year low.

And in your average local election,

turnout hovers
somewhere around 20 percent.

I invite you to imagine 100 percent.

Picture 100 percent.

Mobilize 100 percent,

and overnight, we get revolution.

Overnight, the policy priorities
of this country change dramatically,

and every level of government
becomes radically more responsive

to all the people.

What would it take
to mobilize 100 percent?

Well, we do have to push back
against efforts afoot

all across the country right now

to make voting harder.

But at the same time,

we have to actively create
a positive culture of voting

that people want to belong to,

be part of, and experience together.

We have to make purpose.

We have to make joy.

So yes, let’s have that revolution,

a revolution of spirit, of ideas,

of policy and participation,

a revolution against cynicism,

a revolution against the self-fulfilling
sense of powerlessness.

Let’s vote this revolution into existence,

and while we’re at it,

let’s have some fun.

Thank you very much.

(Applause)

何必呢?

游戏被操纵。

我的票不算数。

选择是可怕的。

投票是给傻逼的。

也许你已经想到了
其中的一些事情。

也许你甚至说过它们。

如果是这样,你就不会孤单
,你也不会完全错了。

今天的公共政策游戏
在许多方面受到操纵。

否则,超过一半
的联邦税收减免如何

流向最富有的
5% 美国人?

我们的选择确实常常很糟糕。

对于许多政界人士来说

图表 A 是 2016 年的
总统选举。

但在任何一年,你都可以
在选票上上下翻看

,发现有很多没有灵感的地方。

但尽管如此,
我仍然认为投票很重要。

虽然听起来很疯狂,但

我相信我们可以重振投票的乐趣。

今天,我想
谈谈我们如何做到这一点,以及为什么。

在美国历史上曾经有一段时间投票很有趣,当时投票

不仅仅是
一项严峻的义务。

那段时间被称为
“美国历史上的大部分时间”。

(笑声)

从大革命
到民权时代

,美国有一个充满活力、

积极参与
和喧闹的投票文化。

那是街头剧场、露天辩论、
禁食、宴会和敬酒、

游行和篝火。

在 19 世纪,
移民和城市政治机器

助长了这种投票文化。

这种文化随着每一
波新选民的相继涌现而发展。

在重建期间,
当新的非裔美国选民、

新的非裔美国公民

开始行使他们的权力时,

他们在

将解放
与他们新获得的选举权联系起来的禧年游行中庆祝。

几十年后,女权

主义者为他们的斗争带来了戏剧性的精神,


他们声称获得特许权时穿着白色连衣裙一起游行。

民权

运动试图挽回

被吉姆·克劳背叛的平等公民承诺,

将投票权置于中心位置。

从“自由之夏”到塞尔玛游行,

那一代激进分子
知道投票很重要

,他们知道壮观
和权力表现

是真正获得权力的关键。


自塞尔玛和《投票权法案》以来已经过去了半个多世纪

,在此后的几十年里,

这种面对面的投票文化

几乎消失了。

它被电视

和互联网扼杀了。

沙发取代了公地。

屏幕让
市民变成了观众。

虽然
在社交媒体上分享政治模因很好,

但这是一种相当安静的公民身份。

这就是社会学家雪莉·特克尔
所说的“单独在一起”。

我们今天需要的

是一种选举文化
,这种文化是关于

以大声和热情的方式面对面地在一起,

这样投票就可以感觉更像是“加入俱乐部”,而不是
“吃你的蔬菜”或“你有责任”

或者,更好的是,“加入派对”。

想象一下,如果我们
现在

在全国范围内,在地方但在全国范围内,

齐心协力恢复一系列

面对面参与和选举的方式:

户外表演,候选人
及其事业

受到广泛的嘲笑和赞扬 讽刺风格;

公民的肥皂盒演讲;

在酒吧内举行的公开辩论;

充满政治艺术
和手工海报和壁画的街道;

乐队音乐会之战,
竞争的表演者代表他们的候选人。

现在,所有这一切对你来说可能听起来
有点 18 世纪,

但事实上,它不必

比百老汇的“汉密尔顿”更 18 世纪,也就是说,

充满活力的当代。

事实是,

今天,全世界有数百万人
在这样投票。

在印度,选举是丰富多彩的
公共事务。

在巴西,选举日
是喜庆的、狂欢式的气氛。

在台湾和香港,街头的选举剧场上演
着一场奇观,

令人瞠目结舌,令人眼花缭乱

你可能会问,好吧
,在美国,谁有时间做这个?

我会告诉你

,美国人平均
每天看五个小时的电视。

你可能会问,谁有动力?

我会告诉你,

任何想要被看到和听到的公民,

不是作为道具,不是作为话题,

而是作为参与者,作为创造者。

那么,我们如何做到这一点呢?

只需让它发生。

这就是为什么我和一群同事

启动了一个
名为“投票的喜悦”的新项目。

在美国的四个城市——

费城、迈阿密

、俄亥俄州的阿克伦和堪萨斯州的威奇托——

我们聚集了
艺术家和活动家、

教育家、政治人物、
邻居、普通公民

,共同

创造可以促进 这种
以当地方式投票的文化。

在迈阿密,这意味着
与热门 DJ 的通宵派对,

其中唯一的进入方式
就是表明您已登记投票。

在阿克伦,这意味着

在从一个街区到另一个街区移动的平板卡车的床上进行政治戏剧

在费城,

这是一个以投票为主题的寻宝游戏,
遍布整个殖民时期的老城区。

在威奇托,它正在北端制作
混音带和现场涂鸦艺术

以争取投票。

其中有 20 个项目,

它们
的美丽和多样性令人瞩目

,它们正在改变人们。

让我告诉你其中的几个。

在迈阿密,我们委托

了一位名叫 Atomico 的年轻艺术家,

为一系列新的“我投票”贴纸创作了一些生动而充满活力的图像

但问题是,Atomico 从未投票过。

他甚至没有注册。

因此,当他开始
为这些贴纸创作这幅艺术品时,

他也开始克服
对政治的恐吓感。

他注册了自己,

然后接受了
有关即将举行的初选的教育

,在选举日,他
不仅在外面分发贴纸,

还与选民聊天
并鼓励人们投票,


与路人谈论选举。

在阿克伦,一家
名为 Wandering

Aesthetics 的剧院公司一直在
上演这些皮卡车剧。

为此,他们
向公众公开

征集演讲、
独白、对话、诗歌、

任何可以大声朗读

并融入表演的片段。

他们收到了几十份意见书。

其中一首

是 ESL 班的九名学生写的一首诗

,他们都是

来自俄亥俄州哈特维尔附近的西班牙裔移民工人。

我想从这首诗中读给你听。

它被称为“投票的喜悦”。

“我想第一次投票,

因为西班牙裔的情况正在发生变化。

我以前害怕鬼。

现在我害怕人。

有更多的暴力和种族主义。

投票可以改变这一点

。边界墙什么都不是。

它是 只是一堵墙

。耻辱墙是什么东西

。投票非常重要,

这样我们才能打破这堵耻辱墙。

我心中有激情。

投票给了我发言权和力量。

我可以站起来做点什么。”

“投票的喜悦”
项目不仅仅是关于快乐。

就是关于这种热情。

这是关于感觉和信念,

而不仅仅是我们组织的工作。

现在,在全国各地,

移民、年轻人、退伍军人、
不同背景

的人聚集在一起

围绕选举,

在红州和蓝州,
在城市和农村社区,

每一个政治背景的人,创造这种充满激情、快乐的活动 背景。

他们的共同点很简单:

他们的工作扎根于原地。

因为请记住,
所有公民身份都是本地的。

当政治
变成总统选举时,

我们对着屏幕大喊大叫,
然后我们崩溃,筋疲力尽。

但是,当政治是关于我们

、我们的邻居
和社区中的其他人

聚在一起创造
集体声音和想象力的体验时

,我们就会开始
记住这些东西很重要。

我们开始
记住这是自治的东西。

这让我回到了我开始的地方。

何必呢?

有一种方法可以回答这个问题。

投票很重要,因为它是
一种自我实现的信念行为。

它滋养了共同利益的精神
,使任何社会都能蓬勃发展。

当我们投票时,即使是在愤怒中,

我们也是集体的、
创造性的信仰飞跃的一部分。

投票帮助
我们产生我们希望拥有的权力。

民主和戏剧

在古雅典几乎同时出现并非偶然。

他们俩都将个人
从她的私人自我的围墙中拉出来。

他们都创造
了共享仪式的伟大公共体验。

他们都将想象带入生活

,提醒
我们所有的联系最终

都是想象的,并且可以重新想象。

现在,

当我们思考
想象力的意义时,这一刻

非常重要

,我们能够接受这种精神

并接受这种感觉

,即那里有更伟大的东西,

不仅仅是技术专长的问题。

这不仅仅是花时间
或拥有专业知识的问题。

这是一个精神问题。

但是,让我来回答你
这个问题,“为什么要打扰?”

这可能有点不那么精神
,但更尖锐。

为什么要麻烦投票?

因为没有不投票这回事。

不投票就是投票,

因为你
可能讨厌和反对的一切。

不投票可以伪装

成一种有原则的、
被动的抵抗行为,

但实际上不投票

是在主动把权力

交给那些
与你的利益背道而驰的人,

以及那些很
乐意利用你缺席的人。

不投票是给傻逼的。

想象一下,

如果 2010 年
创建茶党的所有人

都认为,政治太混乱,

投票太复杂,这个国家会是什么样子。

我们的选票不可能加起来。

他们并没有先发制人地
让自己沉默。

他们

出现了,在出现的过程中,
他们改变了美国政治。

想象一下,如果
唐纳德特朗普和伯尼桑德斯的所有追随者

都决定不
颠覆政治现状

并打破

美国政治先前可能存在的框架。

他们通过投票做到了这一点。

我们现在生活在一个

分裂的时代,通常非常黑暗,

在左翼和右翼之间,
有很多关于革命

和需要革命
来破坏日常民主的讨论。

好吧,事情是这样的:

日常民主已经
为我们提供了革命的剧本。

在 2012 年的总统大选中,

年轻选民、拉丁裔选民

、亚裔选民、低收入选民的支持率均

低于 50%。

在 2014 年的中期选举中,
投票率为 36%

,为 70 年来的最低点。

在你的平均地方选举中,

投票率
徘徊在 20% 左右。

我邀请你去想象 100%。

图片 100%。

动员 100%

,一夜之间,我们得到了革命。

一夜之间,
这个国家的政策重点发生了巨大变化

,各级政府
都从根本上

对所有人的反应更加敏感。

动员 100% 需要什么?

好吧,我们现在确实必须反对

全国各地正在进行

的使投票更加困难的努力。

但与此同时,

我们必须积极营造
一种积极的投票文化,

让人们想要归属

、参与和共同体验。

我们必须制定目标。

我们必须制造欢乐。

所以,是的,让我们来一场

精神、思想

、政策和参与

的革命,一场反对犬儒

主义的革命,一场反对自我实现
的无力感的革命。

让我们投票支持这场革命

吧,趁着我们在做的时候,

让我们玩得开心。

非常感谢你。

(掌声)