What role does luck play in your life Barry Schwartz

Hello, everybody.

I’m honored to be here to talk to you,

and what I’m going to talk about today
is luck and justice

and the relation between them.

Some years ago,

a former student of mine called me

to talk about his daughter.

It turns out his daughter
was a high school senior,

was seriously interested
in applying to Swarthmore,

where I taught,

and he wanted to get my sense
of whether she would get in.

Swarthmore is an extremely
hard school to get into.

So I said, “Well, tell me about her.”

And he told me about her,

what her grades were like,
her board scores,

her extracurricular activities.

And she just sounded like a superstar,

wonderful, wonderful kid.

So I said, “She sounds fabulous.

She sounds like just the kind of student

that Swarthmore would love to have.”

And so he said, “Well, does that mean
that she’ll get in?”

And I said, “No.

There just aren’t enough spots
in the Swarthmore class

for everybody who’s good.

There aren’t enough spots at Harvard
or Yale or Princeton or Stanford.

There aren’t enough spots
at Google or Amazon or Apple.

There aren’t enough spots
at the TED Conference.

There are an awful lot of good people,

and some of them
are not going to make it.”

So he said, “Well, what are we
supposed to do?”

And I said, “That’s a very good question.”

What are we supposed to do?

And I know what colleges
and universities have done.

In the interest of fairness,

what they’ve done is
they’ve kept ratcheting up the standards

because it doesn’t seem fair
to admit less qualified people

and reject better qualified people,

so you just keep raising
the standards higher and higher

until they’re high enough
that you can admit

only the number of students
that you can fit.

And this violates a lot of people’s sense
of what justice and fairness is.

People in American society
have different opinions

about what it means
to say that some sort of process is just,

but I think there’s one thing
that pretty much everyone agrees on,

that in a just system, a fair system,

people get what they deserve.

And what I was telling my former student

is that when it comes
to college admissions,

it just isn’t true that people
get what they deserve.

Some people get what they deserve,
and some people don’t,

and that’s just the way it is.

When you ratchet up requirements
as colleges have done,

what you do is you create
a crazy competition

among high school kids,

because it’s not adequate to be good,

it’s not adequate to be good enough,

you have to be better than everybody else
who is also applying.

And what this has done,

or what this has contributed to,

is a kind of epidemic
of anxiety and depression

that is just crushing our teenagers.

We are wrecking a generation
with this kind of competition.

As I was thinking about this,

it occurred to me
there’s a way to fix this problem.

And here’s what we could do:

when people apply to college,

we distinguish between the applicants
who are good enough to be successful

and the ones who aren’t,

and we reject the ones who aren’t
good enough to be successful,

and then we take all of the others,
and we put their names in a hat,

and we just pick them out at random

and admit them.

In other words, we do
college admissions by lottery,

and maybe we do job offers
at tech companies by lottery,

and – perish the thought –

maybe we even make decisions
about who gets invited to talk at TED

by lottery.

Now, don’t misunderstand me,

a lottery like this is not
going to eliminate the injustice.

There will still be plenty of people
who don’t get what they deserve.

But at least it’s honest.

It reveals the injustice for what it is
instead of pretending otherwise,

and it punctures the incredible
pressure balloon

that our high school kids
are now living under.

So why is it that this perfectly
reasonable proposal,

if I do say so myself,

doesn’t get any serious discussion?

I think I know why.

I think it’s that we hate the idea

that really important things in life
might happen by luck or by chance,

that really important things in our lives
are not under our control.

I hate that idea.

It’s not surprising
that people hate that idea,

but it simply is the way things are.

First of all, college admissions
already is a lottery.

It’s just that the admissions officers
pretend that it isn’t.

So let’s be honest about it.

And second,

I think if we appreciated
that it was a lottery,

it would also get us to acknowledge
the importance of good fortune

in almost every one of our lives.

Take me.

Almost all the most significant
events in my life have occurred,

to a large degree,

as a result of good luck.

When I was in seventh grade,
my family left New York

and went to Westchester County.

Right at the beginning of school,

I met a lovely young girl
who became my friend,

then she became my best friend,

then she became my girlfriend

and then she became my wife.

Happily, she’s been my wife now

for 52 years.

I had very little to do with this.
This was a lucky accident.

I went off to college,

and in my first semester, I signed up
for a class in introduction to psychology.

I didn’t even know what psychology was,

but it fit into my schedule
and it met requirements,

so I took it.

And by luck, the class was taught

by a superstar introductory
psychology teacher, a legend.

Because of that, I became
a psychology major.

Went off to graduate school.

I was finishing up.

A friend of mine who taught
at Swarthmore decided

he didn’t want to be a professor anymore,

and so he quit to go to medical school.

The job that he occupied opened up,

I applied for it, I got it,

the only job I’ve ever applied for.

I spent 45 years teaching at Swarthmore,

an institution that had an enormous impact
on the shape that my career took.

And to just give one last example,

I was giving a talk about
some of my work in New York,

and there was somebody in the audience
who came up to me after my talk.

He introduced himself.

He said, “My name is Chris.

Would you like to give a talk at TED?”

And my response was, “What’s TED?”

Well, I mean, he told me,

and TED then wasn’t what it is now.

But in the intervening years,

the talks I’ve given at TED
have been watched

by more than 20 million people.

So the conclusion is, I’m a lucky man.

I’m lucky about my marriage.

I’m lucky about my education.

I’m lucky about my career.

And I’m lucky to have had a platform
and a voice at something like TED.

Did I deserve the success I’ve had?

Sure I deserve that success,

just as you probably deserve your success.

But lots of people also deserve
successes like ours

who haven’t had it.

So do people get what they deserve?

Is society just?

Of course not.

Working hard and playing by the rules
is just no guarantee of anything.

If we appreciate the inevitability
of this kind of injustice

and the centrality of good fortune,

we might ask ourselves

what responsibilities do we have

to the people we are now celebrating
as heroes in this time of the pandemic

when a serious illness
befalls their family

to make sure that they remain whole
and their lives aren’t ruined

by the cost of dealing with the illness?

What do we owe people who struggle,

work hard and are less lucky than we are?

About a half century ago,

the philosopher John Rawls wrote a book
called “A Theory of Justice,”

and in that book, he introduced a concept
that he called “the veil of ignorance.”

The question he posed was:

If you didn’t know what your position
in society was going to be,

what kind of a society
would you want to create?

And what he suggested

is that when we don’t know
whether we’re going to enter society

at the top or at the bottom,

what we want is a society
that is pretty damn equal,

so that even the unlucky

will be able to live decent,
meaningful and satisfying lives.

So bring this back, all of you lucky,
successful people, to your communities,

and do what you can to make sure
that we honor and take care of

people who are just as deserving
of success as we are,

but just not as lucky.

Thank you.

大家好。

很荣幸能在这里

和大家聊聊,今天我要聊的
就是运气和正义

,以及它们之间的关系。

几年前

,我以前的一个学生打电话给

我谈论他的女儿。

事实证明,他的女儿
是一名高中生,

对申请斯沃斯莫尔大学非常感兴趣,

我在那里任教

,他想
知道她是否会被录取。

斯沃斯莫尔大学是一所非常
难进入的学校。

所以我说,“好吧,告诉我关于她的事。”

他告诉我关于她的事

,她的成绩如何,
她的董事会分数,

她的课外活动。

她听起来就像一个超级巨星,

很棒,很棒的孩子。

所以我说,“她听起来很棒。

她听起来

正是斯沃斯莫尔希望拥有的那种学生。”

于是他说,“嗯,这是否
意味着她会进来?”

我说,“不

。斯沃斯莫尔班没有足够的名额

给每个优秀的人。

哈佛
、耶鲁、普林斯顿或斯坦福

没有足够的名额
。谷歌、亚马逊或苹果没有足够的名额 .

TED 会议的名额不够。

有很多好人,

其中一些
人不会成功。”

于是他说:“好吧,我们
该怎么办?”

我说,“这是一个非常好的问题。”

我们应该怎么做?

我知道学院
和大学做了什么。

为了公平起见,

他们所做的就是
不断提高标准,

因为
接纳不合格的人

而拒绝合格的人似乎是不公平的,

所以你只是不断
提高标准,

直到他们 ‘足够高
,你可以只录取

你能适应的学生数量。

而这违背了很多人
对什么是正义和公平的认知。

美国社会中的
人们

对于说某种过程是公正的含义有不同的看法,

但我
认为几乎每个人都同意一件事

,在一个公正的系统,一个公平的系统中,

人们得到他们应得的东西。

我对我以前的学生说的

是,
在大学招生方面

,人们
得到他们应得的东西是不正确的。

有些人得到了他们应得的东西
,有些人没有

,这就是事实。

当你像大学一样提高要求时

你所做的就是在高中生之间制造
一场疯狂的竞争

因为做得好

是不够的,不够好是不够的,

你必须比其他任何
人都好 也在申请。

而这造成了什么,

或者它促成了什么,

是一种
焦虑和抑郁的流行病

,它正在压垮我们的青少年。

我们正在
用这种竞争破坏一代人。

当我在思考这个问题时,我突然想到

有一种方法可以解决这个问题。

这就是我们可以做的:

当人们申请大学时,

我们区分
那些足够优秀的申请者和那些不适合的申请者

,我们拒绝那些
不够优秀而不能成功的申请者,

然后 我们把所有其他人都带走
,我们把他们的名字放在帽子里

,我们只是随机挑选他们

并承认他们。

换句话说,我们
通过抽签方式录取大学

,也许我们
通过抽签方式在科技公司提供工作机会,

而且——打消这个念头——

也许我们甚至可以通过抽签
决定谁被邀请参加 TED 演讲

现在,不要误会我,

像这样的彩票
不会消除不公正。

仍然会有很多
人得不到他们应得的。

但至少它是诚实的。

它揭示了它的不公正,
而不是假装

,它刺破

了我们高中生
现在生活在下面的令人难以置信的压力气球。

那么

如果我自己这么说,

为什么这个完全合理的提议没有得到任何认真的讨论?

我想我知道为什么。

我认为这是我们讨厌这样的想法

,即生活中真正重要的事情
可能会偶然发生

,我们生活中真正重要的事情
不受我们控制。

我讨厌那个主意。

人们讨厌这个想法并不奇怪,

但这就是事情的本来面目。

首先,大学录取
已经是彩票。

只是招生官
假装不是。

所以说实话吧。

其次,

我认为如果我们
意识到这是一张彩票,

它也会让我们
认识到好运

在我们生活中几乎每一个人的重要性。

带我去。 我生命中

几乎所有最重要的
事件都

在很大程度上

由于好运而发生。

当我七年级的时候,
我的家人离开了纽约

,去了威彻斯特县。

刚上学的时候,

我遇到了一个可爱的小女孩
,她成了我的朋友,

然后她成了我最好的朋友,

然后她成了我的女朋友

,然后她成了我的妻子。

令人高兴的是,她现在已经是我的妻子

52 年了。

我和这件事关系不大。
这是一个幸运的意外。

我去了大学

,在我的第一个学期,我报名
参加了心理学导论课程。

我什至不知道心理学是什么,

但它符合我的日程安排
并且符合要求,

所以我接受了。

幸运的是,这门课是

由一位传奇的超级明星入门
心理学老师教授的。

因此,我成为
了心理学专业的学生。

去了研究生院。

我正在完成。

我的一个在斯沃斯莫尔教书的朋友
决定

不再想当教授

,所以他辞职去医学院。

他的工作开始了,

我申请了,我拿到了,

这是我申请过的唯一一份工作。

我在斯沃斯莫尔大学任教了 45 年,

这所机构
对我的职业生涯产生了巨大影响。

举最后一个例子,

我正在谈论
我在纽约的一些工作,

听众中有人在
我演讲后走到我面前。

他介绍了自己。

他说:“我叫克里斯。

你愿意在 TED 上做一个演讲吗?”

我的回答是,“什么是 TED?”

嗯,我的意思是,他告诉我,

当时的 TED 不是现在的样子。

但在随后的几年里,

我在 TED 上的演讲
已经

被超过 2000 万人观看了。

所以结论是,我是一个幸运的人。

我很幸运我的婚姻。

我很幸运我的教育。

我的职业生涯很幸运。

我很幸运能
在 TED 之类的活动中拥有一个平台和一个声音。

我应得的成功吗?

当然,我应得的成功,

就像您可能应得的成功一样。

但是很多人也应该
像我们

这样没有成功的人。

那么人们得到他们应得的了吗?

社会公正吗?

当然不是。

努力工作和遵守规则
并不能保证任何事情。

如果我们意识到
这种

不公正的必然性和好运的重要性,

我们可能会问自己

,在大流行病

临到他们的家人时,我们

对我们现在作为英雄庆祝的人们有什么责任 确定他们保持完整
并且他们的生活不会被

治疗疾病的费用所毁?

我们欠那些奋斗、

努力工作、不如我们幸运的人什么?

大约半个世纪前

,哲学家约翰·罗尔斯(John Rawls)写了一本
名为《正义理论》的

书,并在书中引入了
一个他称之为“无知之幕”的概念。

他提出的问题是:

如果你不知道自己
在社会中的位置是

什么,你想创建一个什么样的社会

而他的建议

是,当我们不
知道进入社会

是处于顶层还是底层时,

我们想要的是一个
该死的平等的社会,

这样即使不幸的人

也能活下去 体面、
有意义和满足的生活。

所以,把这件事带回来,你们所有幸运的、
成功的人,回到你们的社区,

并尽你所能
确保我们尊重和

照顾那些
和我们一样值得成功

但没有那么幸运的人。

谢谢你。