Why should you read Tolstoys War and Peace Brendan Pelsue

“War and Peace,”

a tome,

a slog,

the sort of book you shouldn’t read in bed
because if you fall asleep,

it could give you a concussion, right?

Only partly.

“War and Peace” is a long book, sure,

but it’s also a thrilling examination
of history,

populated with some of the deepest, most
realistic characters you’ll find anywhere.

And if its length intimidates you,
just image how poor Tolstoy felt.

In 1863, he set out to write a short novel
about a political dissident

returning from exile in Siberia.

Five years later, he had produced
a 1,200 page epic

featuring love stories,

battlefields,

bankruptcies,

firing squads,

religious visions,

the burning of Moscow,

and a semi-domesticated bear,

but no exile and no political dissidents.

Here’s how it happened.

Tolstoy, a volcanic soul,

was born to a famously eccentric
aristocratic family in 1828.

By the time he was 30, he had already
dropped out of Kazan University,

gambled away the family fortune,

joined the army,

written memoirs,

and rejected the literary establishment
to travel Europe.

He then settled into Yasnaya Polyana,
his ancestral mansion,

to write about the return
of the Decembrists,

a band of well-born revolutionaries
pardoned in 1856 after 30 years in exile.

But, Tolstoy thought,

how could he tell the story
of the Decembrists return from exile

without telling the story of 1825,

when they revolted against
the conservative Tsar Nicholas I?

And how could he do that without telling
the story of 1812,

when Napoleon’s disastrous
invasion of Russia

helped trigger the authoritarianism
the Decembrists were rebelling against?

And how could he tell the story of 1812
without talking about 1805,

when the Russians first learned of
the threat Napoleon posed

after their defeat at
the Battle of Austerlitz?

So Tolstoy began writing,

both about the big events of history

and the small lives
that inhabit those events.

He focused on aristocrats,
the class he knew best.

The book only occasionally touches

on the lives of the vast majority
of the Russian population,

who were peasants,
or even serfs,

farmers bound to serve the owners
of the land on which they lived.

“War and Peace” opens on the eve
of war between France and Russia.

Aristocrats at a cocktail party fret
about the looming violence,

but then change the topic to those things
aristocrats always seem to care about:

money,

sex,

and death.

This first scene is indicative

of the way the book bounces
between the political and personal

over an ever-widening canvas.

There are no main characters
in “War and Peace.”

Instead, readers enter
a vast interlocking web

of relationships and questions.

Will the hapless
and illegitimate son of a count

marry a beautiful but conniving princess?

Will his only friend survive
the battlefields of Austria?

And what about that nice young girl
falling in love with both men at once?

Real historical figures mix and mingle
with all these fictional folk,

Napoleon appears several times,

and even one of Tolstoy’s ancestors
plays a background part.

But while the characters
and their psychologies are gripping,

Tolstoy is not afraid to interrupt
the narrative

to pose insightful
questions about history.

Why do wars start?

What are good battlefield tactics?

Do nations rise and fall on the actions
of so-called great men like Napoleon,

or are there larger cultural and economic
forces at play?

These extended digressions are part
of what make “War and Peace”

so panoramic in scope.

But for some 19th century critics,

this meant “War and Peace” barely felt
like a novel at all.

It was a “large, loose, baggy monster,”
in the words of Henry James.

Tolstoy, in fact, agreed.

To him, novels were
a western European form.

Russian writers had to write differently
because Russian people lived differently.

“What is ‘War and Peace’?” he asked.

“It is not a novel.

Still less an epic poem.

Still less a historical chronicle.

‘War and Peace’ is what the author wanted
and was able to express

in the form in which it was expressed.”

It is, in other words, the sum total
of Tolstoy’s imaginative powers,

and nothing less.

By the time “War and Peace” ends,

Tolstoy has brought his characters
to the year 1820,

36 years before the events he originally
hoped to write about.

In trying to understand his own times,

he had become immersed in the years
piled up behind him.

The result is a grand interrogation
into history,

culture,

philosophy,

psychology,

and the human response to war.

《战争与和平》,

一本大部头,

一本长篇小说

,那种你不应该在床上看的书,
因为如果你睡着了,

它会让你脑震荡,对吧?

只是部分。

《战争与和平》是一本很长的书,当然,

但它也是对历史的激动人心的考察

其中包含一些
你在任何地方都能找到的最深刻、最现实的人物。

如果它的长度吓到你
,想象一下托尔斯泰的可怜感受吧。

1863 年,他着手撰写一部短篇小说,
讲述一位政治异见人士

从西伯利亚流放归来的故事。

五年后,他创作
了一部长达 1200 页的史诗

,讲述了爱情故事、

战场、

破产、

行刑队、

宗教愿景、

莫斯科的焚烧

和一只半驯化的熊,

但没有流放者,也没有政治异议人士。

事情是这样发生的。

托尔斯泰,一个火山的灵魂,1828

年出生在一个以古怪着称的
贵族家庭。

到30岁时,他已经
从喀山大学退学,

赌掉了家产,

参军,

写了回忆录

,拒绝了文学。 建立
去欧洲旅行。

然后,他定居在他的祖居亚斯纳亚波利亚纳(Yasnaya Polyana)

,写下
十二月党人的回归,这

是一群出身名门的革命者
,在流放 30 年后于 1856 年被赦免。

但是,托尔斯泰想,

如果
不讲 1825 年他们反抗保守的沙皇尼古拉一世的故事,他怎么能讲出十二月党人从流放归来

的故事

呢?

如果不讲述 1812 年的故事,他怎么能做到这一点

当时拿破仑
对俄罗斯的灾难性入侵

引发
了十二月党人反抗的威权主义?

他怎么能不谈论 1812 年的故事
而不谈论 1805 年,

当时俄国人第一次得知
拿破仑

在奥斯特里茨战役中战败后所构成的威胁?

于是托尔斯泰开始写作,

既是关于历史上的重大事件,也是关于这些事件

中的小生命

他专注于贵族,
他最了解的阶级。

这本书只是偶尔触及

绝大多数俄罗斯人口的生活,

他们是农民,
甚至是农奴,

农民必须为
他们所居住土地的所有者服务。

《战争与和平》
在法俄战争前夕开场。

鸡尾酒会上的贵族们
担心迫在眉睫的暴力,

但随后将话题转移到
贵族们似乎总是关心的那些事情上:

金钱、

和死亡。

第一个场景

表明了这本书

在不断扩大的画布上在政治和个人之间跳跃的方式。

《战争与和平》中没有主角。

取而代之的是,读者进入
了一个庞大的相互

关联的关系和问题网络。

一个倒霉的私生子会

嫁给一个美丽但纵容的公主吗?

他唯一的朋友会在
奥地利的战场上幸存下来吗?

那个漂亮的年轻女孩
同时爱上了两个男人呢?

真实的历史人物
与所有这些虚构的人物混杂在一起,

拿破仑多次出现,

甚至托尔斯泰的一位祖先也
扮演了背景角色。

但是当人物
和他们的心理扣人心弦时,

托尔斯泰并不害怕
打断叙述

,提出
关于历史的深刻问题。

为什么战争会开始?

什么是好的战场战术?

国家的兴衰取决于
拿破仑等所谓伟人的行动,

还是有更大的文化和经济
力量在起作用?

这些扩展的题外话
是使“战争与和平”

的范围如此全景的一部分。

但对于一些 19 世纪的评论家来说,

这意味着《战争与和平》根本就
不像一部小说。 用亨利詹姆斯的话说,

它是一个“大而松散的怪物”

事实上,托尔斯泰同意了。

对他来说,小说是
一种西欧形式。

俄罗斯作家必须以不同的方式写作,
因为俄罗斯人的生活方式不同。

“什么是‘战争与和平’?” 他问。

“这不是小说。

更不是史诗。

更不是历史编年史。

‘战争与和平’是作者想要
并能够

以它所表达的形式来表达的。”

换句话说,它
是托尔斯泰想象力的总和

,仅此而已。

到《战争与和平》结束时,

托尔斯泰将他的角色
带到了 1820

年,比他最初希望写的事件早了 36 年

在试图了解自己的时代时,

他已经沉浸在
他身后堆积的岁月中。

结果是
对历史、

文化、

哲学、

心理学

和人类对战争的反应进行了一次宏大的审问。