3 creative ways to fix fashions waste problem Amit Kalra

A few years ago, I found myself

looking for the most
cost-effective way to be stylish.

So naturally, I wound up
at my local thrift store,

a wonderland of other people’s trash

that was ripe to be plucked
to become my treasure.

Now, I wasn’t just looking
for your average

off-the-secondhand-rack
vintage T-shirt to wear.

For me, real style lives
at the intersection of design

and individuality.

So to make sure that I was getting
the most out of the things I was finding,

I bought a sewing machine

so I could tailor the 90’s-style
garments that I was finding,

to fit a more contemporary aesthetic.

I’ve been tailoring and making
my own clothes from scratch ever since,

so everything in my closet
is uniquely my own.

But as I was sorting through the endless
racks of clothes at these thrift stores,

I started to ask myself,

what happens to all the clothes
that I don’t buy?

The stuff that isn’t really cool or trendy

but kind of just sits there and rots away
at these secondhand stores.

I work in the fashion industry
on the wholesale side,

and I started to see
some of the products that we sell

end up on the racks
of these thrift stores.

So the question started to work its way
into my work life, as well.

I did some research

and I pretty quickly found
a very scary supply chain

that led me to some
pretty troubling realities.

It turned out that the clothes
I was sorting though

at these thrift stores

represented only a small fraction
of the total amount of garments

that we dispose of each year.

In the US, only 15 percent
of the total textile and garment waste

that’s generated each year

ends up being donated
or recycled in some way,

which means that the other 85 percent
of textile and garment waste

end up in landfills every year.

Now, I want to put this into perspective,

because I don’t quite think

that the 85 percent
does the problem justice.

This means that almost 13 million tons
of clothing and textile waste

end up in landfills every year
in just the United States alone.

This averages out to be
roughly 200 T-shirts per person

ending up in the garbage.

In Canada, we throw away enough clothing

to fill the largest stadium
in my home town of Toronto,

one that seats 60,000 people,

with a mountain of clothes
three times the size of that stadium.

Now, even with this,

I still think that Canadians
are the more polite North Americans,

so don’t hold it against us.

(Laughter)

What was even more surprising
was seeing that the fashion industry

is the second-largest
polluter in the world

behind the oil and gas industry.

This is an important comparison to make.

I don’t want to defend
the oil and gas industry

but I’d be lying if I said I was surprised
to hear they were the number one polluter.

I just assumed, fairly or not,
that that’s an industry

that doesn’t really mind
sticking to the status quo.

One where the technology
doesn’t really change

and the focus is more so
on driving profitability

at the expense of a sustainable future.

But I was really surprised to see
that the fashion industry was number two.

Because maintaining that status quo

is the opposite of what
the fashion industry stands for.

The unfortunate reality is,

not only do we waste
a lot of the things we do consume,

but we also use a lot to produce
the clothes that we buy each year.

On average, a household’s purchase
of clothing per year

requires 1,000 bathtubs
of water to produce.

A thousand bathtubs of water
per household, per year.

That’s a lot of water.

It seems that the industry
that always has been

and probably always will be
on the forefront of design,

creates products that are designed
to be comfortable, designed to be trendy

and designed to be expressive

but aren’t really designed
to be sustainable

or recyclable for that matter.

But I think that can change.

I think the fashion industry’s
aptitude for change

is the exact thing that should make it

patient zero for sustainable
business practices.

And I think to get started,
all we have to do

is start to design clothes
to be recyclable at the end of their life.

Now, designing recyclable clothing

is definitely something
to leave to the professionals.

But as a 24-year-old
thrift store aficionado

armed with a sewing machine,

if I were to very humbly
posit one perspective,

it would be to approach clothing design
kind of like building with Lego.

When we put together a brick of Lego,

it’s very strong
but very easily manipulated.

It’s modular in its nature.

Clothing design as it stands today
is very rarely modular.

Take this motorcycle jacket as an example.

It’s a pretty standard jacket
with its buttons, zippers and trim.

But in order for us to efficiently
recycle a jacket like this,

we need to be able
to easily remove these items

and quickly get down to just the fabric.

Once we have just the fabric,

we’re able to break it down
by shredding it

and getting back to thread level,

make new thread that then
gets made into new fabric

and ultimately new clothing,

whether it be a new jacket
or new T-shirts, for example.

But the complexity lies
with all of these extra items,

the buttons, the zippers and the trim.

Because in reality, these items
are actually quite difficult to remove.

So in many cases it requires
more time or more money

to disassemble a jacket like this.

In some cases, it’s just more
cost-effective to throw it away

rather than recycle it.

But I think this can change
if we design clothes in a modular way

to be easily disassembled
at the end of their lives.

We could redesign this jacket
to have a hidden wireframe,

kind of like the skeleton of a fish,
that holds all important items together.

This invisible fish-bone structure
can have all of these extra items,

the zippers and the buttons and the trim,

sewn into it and then
attached to the fabric.

So at the end of the jacket’s life,

all you have to do
is remove its fish bone

and the fabric comes with it

a lot quicker and a lot
easier than before.

Now, recycling clothing
is definitely one piece of the puzzle.

But if we want to take

fixing the environmental impact
that the fashion industry has

more seriously,

then we need to take this to the next step
and start to design clothes

to also be compostable
at the end of their lives.

For most of the types of clothes
we have in our closet

the average lifespan is about three years.

Now, I’m sure there’s many of us
that have gems in our drawers

that are much older than that,
which is great.

Because being able to extend the life
of a garment by even only nine months

reduces the waste and water impact
that that garment has

by 20 to 30 percent.

But fashion is fashion.

Which means that styles
are always going to change

and you’re probably going to be wearing
something different than you were today

eight seasons from now,

no matter how environmentally
friendly you want to be.

But lucky for us, there are some items
that never go out of style.

I’m talking about your basics –
your socks, underwear, even your pajamas.

We’re all guilty of wearing these items
right down to the bone,

and in many cases
throwing them in the garbage

because it’s really difficult

to donate your old ratty socks
that have holes in them

to your local thrift store.

But what if we were able
to compost these items

rather than throw them in the trash bin?

The environmental savings could be huge,

and all we would have to do
is start to shift more of our resources

to start to produce more of these items
using more natural fibers,

like 100 percent organic cotton.

Now, recycling and composting
are two critical priorities.

But one other thing
that we have to rethink

is the way that we dye our clothes.

Currently, 10 to 20 percent
of the harsh chemical dye that we use

end up in water bodies that neighbor
production hubs in developing nations.

The tricky thing is
that these harsh chemicals

are really effective
at keeping a garment a specific color

for a long period of time.

It’s these harsh chemicals
that keep that bright red dress

bright red for so many years.

But what if we were able
to use something different?

What if we were able to use something

that we all have
in our kitchen cabinets at home

to dye our clothes?

What if we were able to use
spices and herbs to dye our clothes?

There’s countless food options
that would allow for us to stain material,

but these stains change color over time.

This would be pretty different
than the clothes that were dyed harshly

with chemicals that we’re used to.

But dyeing clothes naturally this way
would allow for us

to make sure they’re more unique
and environmentally friendlier.

Let’s think about it.

Fashion today is all about individuality.

It’s about managing your own
personal appearance

to be just unique enough to be cool.

These days, everybody has the ability
to showcase their brand

their personal style,

across the world, through social media.

The pocket-sized billboards

that we flick through
on our Instagram feeds

are chock-full of models and taste-makers

that are showcasing their individuality

through their personal microbrands.

But what could be
more personalized, more unique,

than clothes that change color over time?

Clothes that with each wash
and with each wear

become more and more one of a kind.

People have been buying
and wearing ripped jeans for years.

So this would just be another example
of clothes that exist in our wardrobe

that evolve with us over our lives.

This shirt, for example, is one that,

much to the dismay of my mother
and the state of her kitchen,

I dyed at home, using turmeric,
before coming here today.

This shirt is something

that none of my friends
are going to have on their Instagram feed.

So it’s unique,

but more importantly, it’s naturally dyed.

Now, I’m not suggesting

that everybody dye their clothes
in their kitchen sink at home.

But if we were able to apply this

or a similar process
on a commercial scale,

then our need to rely on these
harsh chemical dyes for our clothes

could be easily reduced.

The 2.4-trillion-dollar fashion industry
is fiercely competitive.

So the business that can provide
a product at scale

while also promising its customers

that each and every garment
will become more unique over time

will have a serious competitive advantage.

Brands have been playing
with customization for years.

The rise of e-commerce services,

like Indochino,
a bespoke suiting platform,

and Tinker Tailor,
a bespoke dress-making platform,

have made customization
possible from your couch.

Nike and Adidas have been mastering
their online shoe customization platforms

for years.

Providing individuality at scale

is a challenge that most consumer-facing
businesses encounter.

So being able to tackle this

while also providing
an environmentally friendly product

could lead to a pretty
seismic industry shift.

And at that point,

it’s not just about doing
what’s best for our environment

but also what’s best for the bottom line.

There’s no fix-all,
and there’s no one-step solution.

But we can get started

by designing clothes
with their death in mind.

The fashion industry
is the perfect industry

to experiment with and embrace change

that can one day get us
to the sustainable future

we so desperately need.

Thank you.

(Applause)

几年前,我发现自己

正在寻找最具
成本效益的时尚方式。

所以很自然地,
我在当地的旧货店结束了,这

是一个别人垃圾的仙境

,已经成熟,可以
采摘成为我的宝藏。

现在,我不只是在寻找

普通的二手衣架
复古 T 恤来穿。

对我来说,真正的风格生活
在设计

和个性的交汇处。

所以为了确保我能
充分利用我所找到的东西,

我买了一台缝纫机,

这样我就可以剪裁我所找到的 90 年代风格的
服装,

以适应更现代的审美。

从那以后,我一直从头开始裁缝和制作自己的衣服,

所以我衣橱里的所有东西
都是我自己的。

但是当我在这些旧货店里整理着无穷无尽的
衣架时,

我开始问自己,

那些我不买的衣服怎么办?

那些不是很酷也不是很时髦

的东西,只是坐在那里,
在这些二手商店里腐烂。

我在批发方面的时尚行业工作

,我开始
看到我们销售的一些产品

最终出现在
这些旧货店的货架上。

所以这个问题也开始影响
到我的工作生活。

我做了一些研究

,很快发现
了一个非常可怕的供应链

,这让我陷入了一些
非常令人不安的现实。

事实证明,

在这些旧货店分拣的衣服

只占

我们每年处理的服装总量的一小部分。

在美国,每年产生的
纺织品和服装废料总量中只有 15%

最终
以某种方式被捐赠或回收,

这意味着其他 85%
的纺织品和服装废料

每年最终都进入垃圾填埋场。

现在,我想从这个角度来看待这个问题,

因为我不太

认为 85
% 的人能解决问题。

这意味着仅在美国每年就有近 1300
万吨服装和纺织废料

最终进入垃圾填埋场

平均而言,
每人大约有 200 件 T 恤

最终被扔进了垃圾箱。

在加拿大,我们扔掉的衣服

足以填满
我家乡多伦多最大的体育场,

一个可容纳 60,000 人的体育场

,衣服堆积如山,
是该体育场的三倍。

现在,即使这样,

我仍然认为加拿大人
是更有礼貌的北美人,

所以不要反对我们。

(笑声

) 更令人惊讶的
是,时尚行业

仅次于石油和天然气行业的世界第二大污染源。

这是一个重要的比较。

我不想为
石油和天然气行业辩护,

但如果我说我很
惊讶听到他们是第一大污染者,那我就是在撒谎。

我只是假设,无论公平与否,
这是一个

不介意
坚持现状的行业。

一种技术
并没有真正改变的地方

,其重点更多

的是以牺牲可持续的未来为代价来提高盈利能力。

但我真的很惊讶地
看到时尚行业排名第二。

因为维持这种现状

与时尚业所代表的相反。

不幸的现实是,

我们不仅浪费
了很多我们消费的东西,

而且我们还用很多东西来生产
我们每年购买的衣服。

平均而言,一个家庭
每年购买衣服

需要 1000 个浴缸
来生产水。

每户每年一千个浴缸的水

那是很多水。

似乎这个
行业一直

并且可能永远
处于设计的最前沿,

创造的产品
设计得舒适、时尚

、富有表现力,

但并不是真正
为可持续

或可回收而设计的。 那件事。

但我认为这可以改变。

我认为时尚行业
的变革能力

正是让其

对可持续
商业实践保持零耐心的确切原因。

我认为要开始
,我们所要做的

就是开始设计衣服
,使其在使用寿命结束时可回收。

现在,设计可回收服装

绝对是
留给专业人士的事情。

但作为一个 24 岁的
旧货店爱好者,

手上拿着一台缝纫机,

如果我非常谦虚地
提出一个观点,

那就是接近服装
设计,就像用乐高积木一样。

当我们把一块乐高积木拼在一起时,

它非常坚固
但很容易操纵。

它本质上是模块化的。

今天的服装设计
很少是模块化的。

以这件机车夹克为例。

这是一件非常标准的夹克,
有纽扣、拉链和饰边。

但为了让我们有效地
回收这样的夹克,

我们需要
能够轻松地移除这些物品

并快速回到面料上。

一旦我们有了面料,

我们就可以
通过撕碎它

并回到线水平来分解它,

制作新线,然后
制成新面料

,最终制成新衣服,

无论是新夹克
还是新T- 以衬衫为例。

但复杂性
在于所有这些额外的物品

、纽扣、拉链和饰边。

因为在现实中,这些
物品实际上是很难移除的。

所以在很多情况下,拆卸这样的夹克需要
更多的时间或更多的

钱。

在某些情况下,
扔掉它

比回收它更具成本效益。

但我认为,
如果我们以模块化的方式设计衣服,

以便
在使用寿命结束时轻松拆卸,这可能会改变。

我们可以重新设计这件夹克
,让它有一个隐藏的线框,

有点像鱼的骨架
,将所有重要物品固定在一起。

这种隐形的鱼骨结构
可以将所有这些额外的物品

,拉链、纽扣和饰边

缝入其中,然后
连接到织物上。

因此,在夹克使用寿命结束时

,您所要做的
就是去除它的鱼刺

,面料

就会比以前更快、
更容易地送上来。

现在,回收衣物
绝对是难题之一。

但是,如果我们想更认真地

解决时尚行业对环境的影响

那么我们需要把它带到下一步
,开始设计衣服

,使其
在生命结束时也可以堆肥。

对于
我们衣橱里

的大多数衣服类型,平均寿命约为三年。

现在,我敢肯定,我们很多人
的抽屉

里都有比这更古老的宝石,
这很棒。

因为
即使仅能将服装的使用寿命延长 9 个月,该服装

的废物和水影响

减少了 20% 到 30%。

但时尚就是时尚。

这意味着风格
总是会发生变化,

而且从现在起八季后,你可能会穿上
不同于今天的衣服

无论
你想变得多么环保。

但对我们来说幸运的是,有些
物品永远不会过时。

我说的是你的基本款——
你的袜子、内衣,甚至你的睡衣。

我们都为把这些东西穿
到骨头里

而感到内疚,在很多情况下
把它们扔进了垃圾箱,

因为很难

把有洞的破旧袜子捐赠

给当地的旧货店。

但是,如果我们能够
将这些物品堆肥

而不是将它们扔进垃圾桶呢?

环境节约可能是巨大的

,我们所要做的
就是开始转移更多的资源

,开始
使用更多的天然纤维生产更多这些产品,

比如 100% 有机棉。

现在,回收和堆肥
是两个关键优先事项。


我们必须重新考虑的另一件事

是我们染衣服的方式。

目前,我们使用的 10% 到 20%
的刺激性化学染料

最终会
流入发展中国家生产中心附近的水体中。

棘手的是
,这些刺激性化学物质对于长时间

保持服装特定颜色非常有效

正是这些刺激性的化学
物质使那件鲜红色的连衣裙保持

鲜红色这么多年。

但是,如果我们
能够使用不同的东西呢?

如果我们能够用

家里厨柜里都有的东西

给我们的衣服染色呢?

如果我们能够使用
香料和草药来染色我们的衣服会怎样?

有无数的食物
选择可以让我们对材料进行染色,

但这些污渍会随着时间的推移而改变颜色。

这与我们
习惯用化学物质严重染色的衣服完全不同

但是以这种方式自然染色衣服
可以让

我们确保它们更加独特
和环保。

让我们考虑一下。

今天的时尚是关于个性的。

这是关于管理自己的
个人外表

,使其独特到足以酷炫。

如今,每个人都有能力通过社交媒体在世界
各地展示他们的品牌

个人风格

。 我们在 Instagram 上浏览

的袖珍广告牌

挤满了模特和品味制造者

,他们

通过个人微品牌展示自己的个性。

但是,还有什么能

比随时间改变颜色的衣服更个性化、更独特呢?

每次洗涤
和每次穿着的衣服都

变得越来越独特。

多年来,人们一直在购买
和穿着破洞牛仔裤。

所以这只是
我们衣橱中存在的衣服的另一个例子,这些衣服

会随着我们的生活而发展。

例如,这件衬衫让

我母亲
和她厨房的状况非常沮丧,

我今天来这里之前,是在家里用姜黄染的

这件衬衫

是我的朋友
都不会在他们的 Instagram 提要上拥有的东西。

所以它是独一无二的,

但更重要的是,它是天然染色的。

现在,我并不是

建议每个人都
在家里的厨房水槽里染衣服。

但是,如果我们能够在商业规模上应用这种

或类似的工艺

那么我们对这些
苛刻化学染料的依赖就

可以很容易地减少我们的衣服。

2.4万亿美元的时尚
产业竞争激烈。

因此,能够
大规模提供产品,

同时向客户承诺

,每件服装
都会随着时间的推移变得更加独特的企业

将拥有巨大的竞争优势。

品牌多年来一直在
玩定制。

电子商务服务的兴起

,如
定制西装平台 Indochino


定制服装制作平台 Tinker Tailor,使

您可以在沙发上进行定制。

耐克和阿迪达斯多年来一直在掌握
他们的在线鞋子定制

平台。

大规模提供个性

是大多数面向消费者的
企业遇到的挑战。

因此,能够


提供环保产品的同时解决这个问题,

可能会导致
行业发生翻天覆地的转变。

在这一点上,

这不仅是做
对我们的环境最有利的事情,

而且是对底线最有利的事情。

没有万能
的解决方案,也没有一步到位的解决方案。

但我们可以

从设计服装
开始,考虑到他们的死亡。

时尚行业
是一个完美的行业,

可以尝试和拥抱变革

,有一天可以让我们
实现我们迫切需要的可持续未来

谢谢你。

(掌声)