The dead zone of the Gulf of Mexico Nancy Rabalais

Good evening, welcome to New Orleans.

I don’t know if you knew this,

but you are sitting within 15 minutes
of one of the largest rivers in the world:

the Mississippi river.

Old Man River, Big Muddy.

And it goes as far north
as the state of Minnesota,

as far east as the state of New York,

as far west as Montana.

And 100 miles from here, river miles,

it empties its fresh water and sediments
into the Gulf of Mexico.

That’s the end of Geography 101.

(Laughter)

Now we’re going to go
to what is in that water.

Besides the sediment, there are dissolved
molecules, nitrogen and phosphorus.

And those, through a biological process,

lead to the formation
of areas called dead zones.

Now, dead zone is a quite ominous word

if you’re a fish or a crab.

(Laughter)

Even a little worm in the sediments.

Which means that there’s not enough oxygen

for those animals to survive.

So, how does this happen?

The nitrogen and the phosphorus

stimulate the growth of microscopic plants
called phytoplankton.

And small animals called zooplankton
eat the phytoplankton,

small fish eat the zooplankton,
large fish eat the small fish

and it goes on up into the food web.

The problem is that there’s just too much
nitrogen and phosphorus right now,

too much phytoplankton
falling to the bottom

and decomposed by bacteria
that use up the oxygen.

That’s the biology.

Now, you can’t see it
from the surface of the water,

you can’t see it in satellite images,

so how do we know it’s there?

Well, a trawler can tell you,

when she puts her net over the side
and drags for 20 minutes

and comes up empty,

that she knows she’s in the dead zone.

And she has to go somewhere else.

But where else do you go
if this area is 8,000 square miles big?

About the size of the state of New Jersey.

Well, you either make
a decision to go further,

without much economic return,

or go back to the dock.

As a scientist, I have access
to high-tech equipment

that we can put over the side
of the research vessel,

and it measures oxygen
and many more things.

We start at the Mississippi River,

we crisscross the Gulf of Mexico
all the way to Texas,

and even I sneak into Texas
every now and then and test their waters.

And you can tell by the bottom oxygen –

you can draw a map
of everything that’s less than two,

which is the magic number
for when the fish start to leave the area.

I also dive in this dead zone.

We have oxygen meters
that we have to deploy offshore

that tell us continuous measurements
of low oxygen or high oxygen.

And when you get into the water,
there’s a lot of fish.

Tons of fish, all kinds of fish,

including my buddy here,
the barracuda that I saw one day.

Everybody else swam this way
and I went this way with my camera.

(Laughter)

And then, down at 30 feet
you start to see fewer fish.

And then you get to the bottom.

And you don’t see any fish.

There’s no life on the platform,
there’s no life swimming around.

And you know you’re in the dead zone.

So, what’s the connection
between the middle of the United States

and the Gulf of Mexico?

Well, most of the watershed is farmland.

And in particular, corn-soybean rotation.

The nitrogen that is put in fertilizers
and the phosphorus goes on the land

and drains off into the Mississippi River

and ends up in the Gulf of Mexico.

There’s three times more
nitrogen in the water

in the Mississippi now,

than there was in the 1950s.

Three times.

And phosphorus has doubled.

And what that means is more phytoplankton
and more sinking sails and lower oxygen.

This is not a natural feature of the Gulf;
it’s been caused by human activities.

The landscape is not what it used to be.

It used to be prairies and forests
and prairie potholes

and duck areas and all kinds of stuff.

But not anymore – it’s row crops.

And there are ways that we can address
this type of agriculture

by using less fertilizer,
maybe precision fertilizing.

And trying some sustainable agriculture

such as perennial wheatgrass,
which has much longer roots

than the six inches of a corn plant,

that can keep the nitrogen on the soil
and keep the soil from running off.

And how do we convince
our neighbors to the north,

maybe 1,000 miles away or more,

that their activities are causing problems
with water quality in the Gulf of Mexico?

First of all, we can take them
to their own backyard.

If you want to go swimming
in Wisconsin in the summer

in your favorite watering hole,

you might find something like this

which looks like spilled green paint
and smells like it,

growing on the surface of the water.

This is a toxic blue-green algal bloom

and it is not good for you.

Similarly, in Lake Erie,
couple of summers ago

there was hundreds of miles
of this blue-green algae

and the city of Toledo, Ohio,
couldn’t use it for their drinking water

for several days on end.

And if you watch the news,

you know that lots of communities
are having trouble with drinking water.

I’m a scientist.

I don’t know if you could tell that.

(Laughter)

And I do solid science,
I publish my results,

my colleagues read them,
I get citations of my work.

But I truly believe that, as a scientist,

using mostly federal funds
to do the research,

I owe it to the public,

to agency heads and congressional people

to share my knowledge with them

so they can use it,
hopefully to make better decisions

about our environmental policy.

(Applause)

Thank you.

(Applause)

One of the ways that I was able to do this
is I brought in the media.

And Joby Warrick
from the “Washington Post”

put this picture in an article

on the front page, Sunday morning,
two inches above the fold.

That’s a big deal.

And Senator John Breaux, from Louisiana,

said, “Oh my gosh, that’s what they think
the Gulf of Mexico looks like?”

And I said, “Well, you know,
there’s the proof.”

And we’ve go to do something about it.

At the same time,
Senator Olympia Snowe from Maine

was having trouble with harmful
algal blooms in the Gulf of Maine.

They joined forces – it was bipartisan –

(Laughter)

(Applause)

And invited me to give
congressional testimony,

and I said, “Oh, all I’ve done
is chase crabs around south Texas,

I don’t know how to do that.”

(Laughter)

But I did it.

(Cheers)

And eventually, the bill passed.

And it was called – yeah, yay!

It was called The Harmful Algal Bloom

and Hypoxia Research
and Control Act of 1998.

(Laughter)

(Applause)

Thank you.

Which is why we call it
the Snowe-Breaux Bill.

(Laughter)

The other thing is
that we had a conference in 2001

that was put on by
the National Academy of Sciences

that looked at fertilizers,
nitrogen and poor water quality.

Our plenary speaker
was the former governor

of the state of New Jersey.

And she …

There was no thinking she wasn’t serious
when she peered at the audience,

and I thought,
“Surely she’s looking at me.”

“You know, I’m really tired
of this thing being called New Jersey.

Pick another state, any state,
I just don’t want to hear it anymore.”

But she was able to move the action plan

across President George H.W. Bush’s desk

so that we had environmental goals

and that we were working to solve them.

The Midwest does not feed the world.

It feeds a lot of chickens, hogs, cattle

and it generates ethanol

to put into our gasoline,

which is regulated by federal policy.

We can do better than this.

We need to make decisions

that make us less consumptive

and reduce our reliance on nitrogen.

It’s like a carbon footprint.

But you can reduce
your nitrogen footprint.

I do it by not eating much meat –

I still like a little
every now and then –

not using corn oil,

driving a car that I can put
nonethanol gas in

and get better gas mileage.

Just things like that
that can make a difference.

So I’m challenging, not just you,

but I challenge a lot of people,
especially in the Midwest –

think about how you’re treating your land
and how you can make a difference.

So my steps are very small steps.

To change the type
of agriculture in the US

is going to be many big steps.

And it’s going to take political
and social will for that to happen.

But we can do it.

I strongly believe
we can translate the science,

bridge it to policy and make
a difference in our environment.

We all want a clean environment.

And we can work together to do this

so that we no longer have
these dead zones in the Gulf of Mexico.

Thank you.

(Applause)

晚上好,欢迎来到新奥尔良。

我不知道您是否知道这一点,

但您
距离世界上最大的河流之一

:密西西比河不到 15 分钟路程。

老人河,大泥泞。

它北
至明尼苏达州

,东至纽约州

,西至蒙大拿州。

距离这里 100 英里,河流英里,

它将淡水和沉积物
排入墨西哥湾。

这就是地理 101 的结尾。

(笑声)

现在我们
要去看看水里的东西。

除了沉积物外,还有溶解的
分子、氮和磷。

而这些,通过一个生物过程,

导致形成
称为死区的区域。

现在,如果您是鱼或螃蟹,死区是一个非常不祥的词

(笑声)

即使是沉积物中的小虫子。

这意味着这些动物没有足够的氧气

来生存。

那么,这是怎么发生的呢?

氮和磷

刺激称为浮游植物的微观植物的生长

称为浮游动物的小动物
吃浮游植物

,小鱼吃浮游动物,大鱼吃小鱼

,然后进入食物网。

问题是现在有太多的
氮和磷,

太多的浮游植物
落到底部

并被
消耗氧气的细菌分解。

这就是生物学。

现在,你
在水面

上看不到它,在卫星图像上也看不到它

,那我们怎么知道它的存在呢?

好吧,拖网渔船可以告诉你,

当她把网放在一边
并拖了 20

分钟后空无一物时

,她知道她在死区。

她必须去别的地方。

但是,
如果这个区域有 8,000 平方英里大,你还能去哪里?

大约相当于新泽西州的大小。

好吧,你要么
决定走得更远,

没有太多的经济回报,

要么回到码头。

作为一名科学家,我可以使用

我们可以放在
研究船侧面的高科技设备

,它可以测量氧气
和更多东西。

我们从密西西比河开始,穿过

墨西哥湾
一直到德克萨斯州

,甚至我也时不时地潜入
德克萨斯州试水。

你可以通过底部的氧气来判断——

你可以画出
小于 2 的所有东西的地图,


是鱼开始离开该区域的神奇数字。

我也潜入这个死区。

我们有必须在海上部署的氧气计,

可以告诉我们连续
测量低氧或高氧。

当你进入水中时,
有很多鱼。

成吨的鱼,各种各样的鱼,

包括我这里
的小伙伴,我一天看到的梭鱼。

其他人都这样游
,我带着相机也这样游。

(笑声

) 然后,在 30 英尺处,
你开始看到更少的鱼。

然后你就到了谷底。

而且你看不到任何鱼。

平台上没有生命,
没有生命游来游去。

你知道你在死区。

那么,
美国中部

和墨西哥湾之间有什么联系呢?

嗯,大部分流域是农田。

特别是玉米-大豆轮作。

肥料中的氮
和磷进入土地

并排入密西西比河

,最终流入墨西哥湾。

现在密西西比河
水中的氮

含量是 1950 年代的三倍。

三次。

磷增加了一倍。

这意味着更多的浮游植物
和更多的下沉帆和更低的氧气。

这不是海湾的自然特征;
它是由人类活动引起的。

风景不像以前那样了。

它曾经是草原和森林
,草原坑洼

和鸭区以及各种各样的东西。

但不再是——它是行作物。

还有一些方法可以通过使用更少的肥料来解决
这种类型的农业


也许是精确施肥。

并尝试一些可持续农业,

例如多年生小麦草,
它的根

比玉米植物的六英寸长得多

,可以保持土壤中的氮
并防止土壤流失。

我们如何
说服北方的邻居,

可能在 1000 英里或更远的地方

,他们的活动正在
导致墨西哥湾的水质问题?

首先,我们可以带他们
去他们自己的后院。

如果你想
在夏天去威斯康星

州你最喜欢的水坑里游泳,

你可能会发现这样的东西

,看起来像溢出的绿色油漆
,闻起来像它,

在水面上生长。

这是一种有毒的蓝绿色藻华

,对您不利。

同样,在伊利湖,
几个夏天前

,这种蓝绿色藻类生长了数百英里

,俄亥俄州托莱多市连续几天
无法将其用作饮用水

如果你看新闻,

你就会知道很多社区
都遇到了饮用水问题。

我是科学家。

我不知道你能不能说出来。

(笑声)

我做扎实的科学,
我发表我的结果,

我的同事阅读它们,
我的工作被引用。

但我真的相信,作为一名科学家,

主要使用联邦
资金进行研究,

我应该为公众

、机构负责人和国会人员

与他们分享我的知识,

以便他们可以使用它,
希望能做出更好的

决定 我们的环境政策。

(掌声)

谢谢。

(掌声)

我能够做到这一点的方法之一
是我引入了媒体。

周日早上,
《华盛顿邮报》的乔比·沃里克

把这张照片放在头版的一篇文章中

,距离首屏
两英寸。

这是一件大事。

来自路易斯安那州的参议员约翰·布鲁

说:“天哪,这就是他们认为
的墨西哥湾的样子?”

我说,“嗯,你知道,
有证据。”

我们要为此做点什么。

与此同时,
来自缅因州的参议员奥林匹亚·斯诺(Olympia Snowe)在缅因湾

的有害藻华问题上遇到了麻烦

他们联手——这是两党合作——

(笑声)

(掌声)

并邀请我在
国会作证

,我说,“哦,我所做的
只是在德克萨斯州南部追逐螃蟹,

我不知道该怎么做 去做。”

(笑声)

但我做到了。

(欢呼声

)最终,该法案通过了。

它被称为——是的,是的!

它被称为 1998 年有害藻华

和缺氧研究
和控制法案。

(笑声)

(掌声)

谢谢。

这就是为什么我们
称它为 Snowe-Breaux Bill。

(笑声

) 另一件事是
,我们在 2001 年召开

了一次由
美国国家科学院举办的会议

,研究肥料、
氮和水质差。

我们的全体发言人

新泽西州的前州长。

而她……

当她凝视观众时,没有想到她不是认真的

,我想,
“她肯定在看着我。”

“你知道,我真的厌倦
了这个被称为新泽西的东西。

选择另一个州,任何州,
我只是不想再听到它了。”

但她能够将行动计划转移

到乔治 H.W. Bush 的办公桌,

这样我们就有了环境目标

,并且我们正在努力解决这些目标。

中西部不能养活世界。

它喂养了大量的鸡、猪、牛

,并产生乙醇

加入我们的汽油中,

这是受联邦政策监管的。

我们可以做得比这更好。

我们需要

做出减少消耗

并减少对氮的依赖的决定。

这就像一个碳足迹。

但是你可以减少
你的氮足迹。

我通过不吃太多肉来做到这

一点——我仍然时不时地喜欢
一点——

不使用玉米油,

驾驶一辆可以加入非
乙醇汽油

并获得更好油耗的汽车。

像这样的
事情可以有所作为。

所以我在挑战,不仅是你,

而且我挑战了很多人,
尤其是在中西部——

想想你如何对待你的土地
,你如何能有所作为。

所以我的步骤是非常小的步骤。

改变美国的农业类型

将是许多重大步骤。

这需要政治
和社会意愿才能实现。

但我们可以做到。

我坚信
我们可以转化科学,

将其与政策联系起来,并
改变我们的环境。

我们都想要一个干净的环境。

我们可以共同努力做到这一点,

以便我们
在墨西哥湾不再有这些死区。

谢谢你。

(掌声)