Underwater farms vs. climate change Ayana Elizabeth Johnson and Megan Davis

For 3 billion people around the world,

seafood provides a significant source
of protein and nutrition.

But recent studies show that 33% of wild
fisheries are overfished,

while another 60% are fished at their
maximum capacity.

In fact, over half the seafood we eat–

from finfish and shellfish to
seaweed and algae–

isn’t caught in the wild.

It’s grown through aquaculture,
or aquatic farming.

Farmed seafood is one of the
fastest-growing food industries,

expanding in volume by 5.8% each year.

But different methods of aquaculture come
with different advantages and issues–

some of which echo the serious problems
we’ve seen in industrial agriculture.

So how can we avoid repeating the mistakes
we’ve made on land, at sea?

What aquaculture approaches are we
currently using,

and what does a sustainable way
to farm the ocean really look like?

One of the most common aquaculture
methods involves large pens made of nets,

where fish are farmed offshore in floating
cages roughly 1000 square meters in size.

Commonly employed off the coast of Chile
and in the fjords of Norway,

these fish, like many industrially
farmed animals,

occupy stressful, overcrowded pens.

They produce massive amounts of waste,

polluting the surrounding areas

and potentially spreading diseases
to wild species.

Worse still, since the antibiotics
employed to fight disease

aren’t fully absorbed by the fish,

they get excreted back
into the environment.

Net pens are also susceptible to escapes,

unleashing huge numbers of fish which
compete for resources

and weaken the local gene pool
with genes adapted for captivity.

Escaped fish can even disrupt local
ecosystems as invasive species.

Other techniques,

such as man-made coastal ponds commonly
used for shrimp farming in Southeast Asia,

create additional environmental problems.

Just like net pens, these ponds are prone
to spreading pollution and disease.

Their construction also frequently
destroys important ecosystems

like mangroves and marshes,

which protect coastal areas from storms,

provide habitats, and absorb tons
of greenhouse gases.

One way to solve these problems is to farm
fish on land

in completely contained systems.

Tanks and raceways can recirculate and
filter water to prevent pollution.

But even fully contained facilities still
contend with another major hurdle:

fishmeal.

About 10% of the seafood caught globally
is used to feed animals,

including carnivorous farmed fish.

Researchers are working on fish feed made
of insects and plant-based proteins,

but for now many inland fish farms
are connected to overfishing.

All these obstacles can make sustainable
aquaculture feel a long way off,

but innovative farmers are finding new
ways to responsibly farm the seas.

The most promising solution of all
may be to look lower on the food chain.

Instead of cramming large, carnivorous
fish into pens,

we can work with natural ocean systems

to produce huge amounts of shellfish
and seaweeds.

These low-maintenance flora and fauna
don’t need to be fed at all.

In fact, they naturally improve
water quality,

filtering it as they feed off of sunlight
and nutrients in the seawater.

By absorbing carbon through
photosynthesis,

these farms help battle climate change,

and reduce local ocean acidification

while creating habitats for other
species to thrive.

Shifting to restorative ocean farming

could provide good jobs for
coastal communities,

and support healthy plant and
shellfish-based diets

that have an incredibly
low carbon footprint.

In just 5 months,

4,000 square meters of ocean can
produce 25 tons of seaweed

and 250,000 of shellfish.

With the right distribution network,

a series of small farms, collectively
the size of Washington State

could feed the planet.

Farms like these are already popping up
around the globe,

and a new generation of farmers is
stepping up

to pursue a more sustainable future.

Done properly,

regenerative ocean farming could play
a vital role in helping our oceans,

our climate, and ourselves.

对于全球 30 亿人来说,

海鲜
是蛋白质和营养的重要来源。

但最近的研究表明,33% 的野生
渔业被过度捕捞,

另有 60% 的捕捞量达到
最大。

事实上,我们吃的海鲜中有一半以上——

从有鳍鱼和贝类到
海藻和藻类——

都不是在野外捕获的。

它是通过水产养殖
或水产养殖种植的。

养殖海鲜是
增长最快的食品行业之一,

每年以 5.8% 的速度增长。

但不同的水产养殖方法
具有不同的优势和问题

——其中一些与
我们在工业化农业中看到的严重问题相呼应。

那么,我们如何才能避免重蹈
我们在陆地和海上所犯的错误呢?

我们目前正在使用哪些水产养殖方法

以及
海洋养殖的可持续方式究竟是什么样的?

最常见的水产养殖
方法之一是用网制成的大型围栏,

在近海用
大约 1000 平方米大小的浮动网箱养殖鱼类。 这些鱼

通常在智利海岸
和挪威峡湾受雇

,像许多工业化
养殖的动物一样,

占据压力大、拥挤不堪的围栏。

它们产生大量废物,

污染周边地区,

并可能将疾病传播
给野生物种。

更糟糕的是,由于
用于对抗疾病

的抗生素没有被鱼完全吸收,

它们会被排泄
回环境中。

网栏也容易逃跑,

释放大量鱼类,它们
争夺资源,


通过适应圈养的基因削弱当地基因库。

逃逸的鱼甚至可以
作为入侵物种破坏当地的生态系统。

其他技术,

例如在东南亚普遍用于养虾的人造沿海池塘
,会

造成额外的环境问题。

就像网栏一样,这些池塘
容易传播污染和疾病。

它们的建设还经常
破坏重要的生态系统,

如红树林和沼泽,

这些生态系统保护沿海地区免受风暴、

提供栖息地并吸收
大量温室气体。

解决这些问题的一种方法是

在完全封闭的系统中在陆地上养殖鱼类。

水箱和水道可以再循环和
过滤水以防止污染。

但即使是完全封闭的设施,仍然
面临另一个主要障碍:

鱼粉。

全球捕获的海产品中约有 10%
用于喂养动物,

包括肉食性养殖鱼类。

研究人员正在研究由
昆虫和植物蛋白制成的鱼饲料,

但目前许多内陆养鱼
场与过度捕捞有关。

所有这些障碍都可能使可持续
水产养殖感觉任重道远,

但创新的农民正在寻找
负责任地养殖海洋的新方法。

最有希望的解决方案
可能是在食物链上往下看。

我们可以利用自然海洋

系统生产大量的贝类
和海藻,而不是将大型肉食性鱼类塞进围栏中。

这些低维护的动植物
根本不需要喂食。

事实上,它们自然地改善了
水质,

在它们以阳光和海水中的营养为食时对其进行过滤

通过光合作用吸收碳

这些农场有助于应对气候变化

,减少当地海洋酸化,

同时为其他
物种的繁衍创造栖息地。

转向恢复性海洋养殖

可以为沿海社区提供良好的就业机会

并支持以植物和
贝类为基础的健康饮食

,这些饮食具有令人难以置信的
低碳足迹。

短短5个月,

4000平方米的海洋可以
生产25吨海藻

和25万只贝类。

有了正确的分销网络

,一系列小农场(
总规模相当于华盛顿州)

就可以养活地球。

像这样的农场已经
在全球范围内涌现

,新一代农民正在

加紧追求更可持续的未来。

如果做得好,

再生海洋农业可以
在帮助我们的海洋

、气候和我们自己方面发挥重要作用。