How to deconstruct racism one headline at a time Baratunde Thurston

My parents gave me an extraordinary name:

Baratunde Rafiq Thurston.

Now, Baratunde is based
on a Yoruba name from Nigeria,

but we’re not Nigerian.

(Laughter)

That’s just how black my mama was.

(Laughter)

“Get this boy the blackest name possible.
What does the book say?”

(Laughter)

Rafiq is an Arabic name,
but we are not Arabs.

My mom just wanted me to have difficulty
boarding planes in the 21st century.

(Laughter)

She foresaw America’s turn
toward nativism.

She was a black futurist.

(Laughter)

Thurston is a British name,
but we are not British.

Shoutout to the multigenerational,
dehumanizing economic institution

of American chattel slavery, though.

Also, Thurston makes
for a great Starbucks name.

Really expedites the process.

(Laughter)

My mother was a renaissance woman.

Arnita Lorraine Thurston

was a computer programmer,
former domestic worker,

survivor of sexual assault,

an artist and an activist.

She prepared me for this world
with lessons in black history,

in martial arts, in urban farming,

and then she sent me in the seventh grade
to the private Sidwell Friends School,

where US presidents send their daughters,

and where she sent me looking like this.

(Laughter)

I had two key tasks going to that school:

don’t lose your blackness
and don’t lose your glasses.

This accomplished both.

(Laughter)

Sidwell was a great place
to learn the arts and the sciences,

but also the art of living
amongst whiteness.

That would prepare me
for life later at Harvard,

or doing corporate consulting,

or for my jobs at “The Daily Show”
and “The Onion.”

I would write down many of these lessons
in my memoir, “How to Be Black,”

which if you haven’t read yet,
makes you a racist, because –

(Laughter)

you’ve had plenty of time
to read the book.

But America insists on reminding me

and teaching me

what it means to be black in America.

It’s December 2018,

I’m with my fiancé
in the suburbs of Wisconsin.

We are visiting her parents,
both of whom are white,

which makes her white.

That’s how it works.
I don’t make the rules.

(Laughter)

She’s had some drinks,
so I drive us in her parents' car,

and we get pulled over by the police.

I’m scared.

I turn on the flashing lights
to indicate compliance.

I pull over slowly

under the brightest streetlight I can find

in case I need witnesses
or dashcam footage.

We get out my identification,
the car registration,

lay it out in the open,
roll down the windows,

my hands are placed on the steering wheel,

all before the officer exits the vehicle.

This is how to stay alive.

As we wait, I think
about these headlines –

“Police shoot another
unarmed black person” –

and I don’t want to join them.

The good news is,
our officer was friendly.

She told us our tags were expired.

So to all the white parents out there,

if your child is involved with a person

whose skin tone is rated
Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson or darker –

(Laughter)

you need to get that car inspected,
update the paperwork every time we visit.

That’s just common courtesy.

(Laughter)

(Applause)

I got lucky.

I got a law enforcement professional.

I survived something
that should not require survival.

And I think about
this series of stories –

“Police shoot another
unarmed black person” –

and that season when those stories
popped up everywhere.

I would scroll through my feed

and I would see a baby announcement photo.

I’d see an ad for a product

I had just whispered
to a friend about yesterday.

I would see a video of a police officer
gunning down someone

who looked just like me.

And I’d see a think piece

about how millennials
have replaced sex with avocado toast.

(Laughter)

It was a confusing time.

Those stories kept popping up,

but in 2018, those stories got changed out
for a different type of story,

stories like, “White Woman Calls Cops
On Black Woman Waiting For An Uber.”

That was Brooklyn Becky.

Then there was, “White Woman Calls Police

On Eight-Year-Old Black Girl
Selling Water.”

That was Permit Patty.

Then there was, “Woman Calls Police

On Black Family BBQing
At Lake In Oakland.”

That was now infamous BBQ Becky.

And I contend that these stories
of living while black

are actually progress.

We used to find out
after the extrajudicial police killings.

Now, we’re getting video
of people calling 911.

We’re moving upstream,

closer to the problem
and closer to the solution.

So I started a collection

of as many of these stories
as I could find.

I built an evolving,
still-growing database

at baratunde.com/livingwhileblack.

Seeking understanding,
I realized the process

was really diagramming sentences
to understand these headlines.

And I want to thank
my Sidwell English teacher Erica Berry

and all English teachers.

You have given us tools
to fight for our own freedom.

What I found was a process
to break down the headline

and understand the consistent layers

in each one:

a subject takes an action against a target
engaged in some activity,

so that “White Woman Calls Police
On Eight-Year-Old Black Girl”

is the same as “White Man Calls Police
On Black Woman Using Neighborhood Pool”

is the same as “Woman Calls Cops
On Black Oregon Lawmaker

Campaigning In Her District.”

They’re the same.

Diagramming the sentences
allowed me to diagram the white supremacy

which allowed such sentences to be true,

and I will pause to define my terms.

When I say “white supremacy,”

I’m not just talking about Nazis

or white power activists,

and I’m definitely not saying
that all white people are racist.

What I’m referring to

is a system of structural advantage
that favors white people over others

in social, economic and political arenas.

It’s what Bryan Stevenson
at the Equal Justice Initiative

calls the narrative of racial difference,

the story we told ourselves
to justify slavery and Jim Crow

and mass incarceration and beyond.

So when I saw this pattern repeating,

I got angry,

but I also got inspired

to create a game,

a game of words that would allow me
to transform this traumatic exposure

into more of a healing experience.

I’m going to talk you through the game.

The first level is a training level,
and I need your participation.

Our objective: to determine
if this is real or fake.

Did this happen or not?

Here is the example:

“Catholic University Law Librarian
Calls Police On Student

For ‘Being Argumentative.'”

Clap your hands if you think this is real.

(Applause)

Clap your hands if you think this is fake.

(Applause)

The reals have it, unfortunately,

and a point of information,

being argumentative in a law library

is the exact right place to do that.

(Laughter)

This student should be
promoted to professor.

Training level complete,
so we move on to the real levels.

Level one, our objective is simple:

reverse the roles.

That means “Woman Calls Cops
On Black Oregon Lawmaker”

becomes “Black Oregon Lawmaker
Calls Cops On Woman.”

That means “White Man
Calls Police On Black Woman

Using Neighborhood Pool”

becomes “Black Woman Calls Police
On White Man Using Neighborhood Pool.”

How do you like
them reverse racist apples?

That’s it, level one complete,

and so we level up to level two,

where our objective is to increase
the believability of the reversal.

Let’s face it, a black woman
calling police on a white man using a pool

isn’t absurd enough,

but what if that white man was trying
to touch her hair without asking,

or maybe he was making oat milk
while riding a unicycle,

or maybe he’s just talking
over everyone in a meeting.

(Laughter)

We’ve all been there, right?

Seriously, we’ve all been there.

So that’s it, level two complete.

But it comes with a warning:

simply reversing the flow
of injustice is not justice.

That is vengeance,
that is not our mission,

that’s a different game
so we level up to level three,

where the objective
is to change the action,

also known as “calling the police
is not your only option

OMG, what is wrong with you people!”

(Applause)

And I need to pause the game
to remind us of the structure.

A subject takes an action
against a target engaged in some activity.

“White Woman Calls Police
On Black Real Estate Investor

Inspecting His Own Property.”

“California Safeway
Calls Cops On Black Woman

Donating Food To The Homeless.”

“Gold Club Twice Calls Cops
On Black Women For Playing Too Slow.”

In all these cases,
the subject is usually white,

the target is usually black,

and the activities are anything,

from sitting in a Starbucks

to using the wrong type of barbecue

to napping

to walking “agitated” on the way to work,

which I just call “walking to work.”

(Laughter)

And, my personal favorite,

not stopping his dog from humping her dog,

which is clearly a case for dog police,

not people police.

All of these activities add up to living.

Our existence is being
interpreted as crime.

Now, this is the obligatory moment
in the presentation where I have to say,

not everything is about race.

Crime is a thing, should be reported,

but ask yourself, do we need armed men
to show up and resolve this situation,

because when they show up for me,

it’s different.

We know that police officers

use force more with black people
than with white people,

and we are learning
the role of 911 calls in this.

Thanks to preliminary research
from the Center for Policing Equity,

we’re learning that in some cities,

most of the interactions
between cops and citizens

is due to 911 calls,

not officer-initiated stops,

and most of the violence,
the use of force by police on citizens,

is in response to those calls.

Further, when those officers
responding to calls use force,

that increases in areas

where the percentage
of the white population

has also increased,

aka gentrification,

aka unicycles and oat milk,

aka when BBQ Becky feels threatened,

she becomes a threat to me
in my own neighborhood,

which forces me and people like me

to police ourselves.

We quiet ourselves, we walk on eggshells,

we maybe pull over to the side of the road

under the brightest light we can find

so that our murder

might be caught cleanly on camera,

and we do this because we live in a system

in which white people
can too easily call on deadly force

to ensure their comfort.

(Applause)

The California Safeway

didn’t just call cops
on black woman donating food to homeless.

They ordered armed,
unaccountable men upon her.

They essentially called in a drone strike.

This is weaponized discomfort,

and it is not new.

From 1877 to 1950,

there were at least 4,400 documented
racial terror lynchings of black people

in the United States.

They had headlines as well.

“Rev. T.A. Allen was lynched
in Hernando, Mississippi

for organizing local sharecroppers.”

“Oliver Moore was lynched
in Edgecomb County, North Carolina,

for frightening a white girl.”

“Nathan Bird was lynched
near Luling, Texas,

for refusing to turn his son
over to a mob.”

We need to change the action,

whether that action is “lynches”

or “calls police.”

And now that I have shortened
the distance between those two,

let’s get back to our game,
to our mission.

Our objective in level three
is to change the action.

So what if, instead of

“Calls Cops On Black Woman
Donating Food To Homeless,”

that California Safeway simply thanks her.

Thanking is far cheaper than bringing
law enforcement to the scene.

(Applause)

Or, instead,

they could give the food
they would have wasted to her,

upped their civic cred.

Or, the white woman who called the police
on the eight-year-old black girl,

she could have bought all the inventory
from that little black girl,

support a small business.

And the white woman who called the police
on the black real estate investor,

we would all be better off,
the cops agree,

if she had simply ignored him
and minded her own damn business.

(Laughter)

Minding one’s own damn business
is an excellent choice, excellent choice.

Choose it more often.

Level three is complete,
but there is a final bonus level,

where the objective is inclusion.

We have also seen headlines like this:

“Powerful Man Masturbates
In Front Of Young Women

Visiting His Office.”

What an odd choice
for powerful man to make.

So many other actions available to him.

(Laughter)

Like, such as, “listens to,”

“mentors,”

“inspired by, starts joint venture,
everybody rich now.”

(Laughter)

I want to live in that world
of everybody rich now,

but because of his poor choice,
we are all in a poorer world.

Doesn’t have to be this way.

This word game reminded me that
there is a structure to white supremacy,

as there is to misogyny,

as there is to all
systemic abuses of power.

Structure is what makes them systemic.

I’m asking people here

to see the structure,

where the power is in it,

and even more importantly
to see the humanity

of those of us made targets
by this structure.

I am here because I was loved
and invested in and protected and lucky,

because I went to the right schools,
I’m semifamous, mostly happy,

meditate twice a day,

and yet,

I walk around in fear,

because I know that someone
seeing me as a threat

can become a threat to my life,

and I am tired.

I am tired of carrying

this invisible burden
of other people’s fears,

and many of us are,

and we shouldn’t have to,

because we can change this,

because we can change the action,
which changes the story,

which changes the system

that allows those stories to happen.

Systems are just collective
stories we all buy into.

When we change them,

we write a better reality
for us all to be a part of.

I am asking us

to use our power to choose.

I am asking us to level up.

Thank you.

I am Baratunde Rafiq Thurston.

(Applause)

我的父母给了我一个非凡的名字:

Baratunde Rafiq Thurston。

现在,Baratunde 是
基于来自尼日利亚的约鲁巴人的名字,

但我们不是尼日利亚人。

(笑声)

我妈妈就是这么黑的。

(笑声)

“给这个男孩起个最黑的名字。
书上说了什么?”

(笑声)

Rafiq 是一个阿拉伯名字,
但我们不是阿拉伯人。

我妈妈只是想让我
在 21 世纪难以登机。

(笑声)

她预见到美国会
转向本土主义。

她是一位黑人未来主义者。

(笑声)

瑟斯顿是一个英国名字,
但我们不是英国人。

不过,对美国动产奴隶制的多代人、
非人性化经济制度

大喊大叫。

此外,瑟斯顿也
为星巴克树立了一个伟大的名字。

确实加快了进程。

(笑声)

我的母亲是文艺复兴时期的女性。

Arnita Lorraine Thurston

是一名计算机程序员、
前家庭工人、

性侵犯幸存者

、艺术家和活动家。

她为我准备
了黑历史

、武术和城市农业课程,

然后她在七年级时把我
送到私立的西德维尔朋友学校

,美国总统把他们的

女儿送到那里,她把我送到那里看起来像 这。

(笑声)

我去那所学校有两个关键任务:

不要失去你的黑度
和不要失去你的眼镜。

这实现了两者。

(笑声)

西德维尔是
学习艺术和科学的好地方,

也是在白人中生活的艺术

这将使我
为以后在哈佛的生活做好准备,

或者做企业咨询,

或者为我在“每日秀”
和“洋葱”的工作做好准备。

我会
在我的回忆录《如何成为黑人》

写下这些教训 .

但美国坚持提醒我

并教我

在美国成为黑人意味着什么。

现在是 2018 年 12 月,

我和未婚夫
在威斯康星州郊区。

我们正在拜访她的父母
,他们都是白人,

这使她变得白人。

这就是它的工作原理。
我不制定规则。

(笑声)

她喝了一些酒,
所以我开她父母的车

,我们被警察拦了下来。

我很害怕。

我打开闪光灯
以表示合规。

在我能找到的最亮的路灯下慢慢停车

,以防我需要目击者
或行车记录仪镜头。

我们拿出我的身份证明,
车牌,

把它放在空旷的地方,
摇下车窗,

我的手放在方向盘上,

这一切都在警官下车之前完成。

这就是活下去的方法。

在我们等待的时候,我想到
了这些头条新闻——

“警察射杀了另一个
手无寸铁的黑人”

——我不想加入他们的行列。

好消息是,
我们的军官很友好。

她告诉我们我们的标签已过期。

所以对于所有的白人父母来说,

如果你的孩子和一个

肤色被评为
Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson 或更深的人交往——

(笑声)

你需要检查那辆车,
每次我们访问时都要更新文件 .

这只是普通的礼貌。

(笑声)

(掌声)

我很幸运。

我找了一个执法专家。

我在
不应该需要生存的事情中幸存下来。

我想到了
这一系列的故事——

“警察射杀了另一个
手无寸铁的黑人”——

以及那些故事
无处不在的那个季节。

我会滚动浏览我的提要

,我会看到一张婴儿公告照片。

我会看到一个产品的广告,该产品是

我昨天刚刚和朋友耳语的。

我会看到一个警察
枪杀

一个长得像我的人的视频。

我会看到一篇

关于千禧一代如何
用鳄梨吐司代替性的思考。

(笑声

) 那是一个令人困惑的时期。

这些故事不断涌现,

但在 2018 年,这些故事变成
了另一种类型的

故事,例如“白人妇女
在等待 Uber 的黑人妇女上报警”。

那是布鲁克林贝基。

然后是“白人妇女因

8 岁黑人女孩
卖水而报警”。

那是许可证帕蒂。

然后是,“女人在奥克兰湖边的

黑人家庭烧烤时报警
。”

那是现在臭名昭著的烧烤贝基。

我认为这些
黑人生活的故事

实际上是进步。

我们过去常常
在法外警察处决之后才知道。

现在,我们正在获取
人们拨打 911 的视频。

我们正在向上游移动,

更接近问题
和解决方案。

所以我开始

收集尽可能多的这些故事

我在 baratunde.com/livingwhileblack 上建立了一个不断发展的、
仍在增长的数据库

寻求理解,
我意识到这个

过程实际上是用图表
来理解这些标题。

我要感谢
我的 Sidwell 英语老师 Erica Berry

和所有的英语老师。


为我们提供了为自己的自由而战的工具。

我发现了
一个分解标题

并理解每个标题的一致层次的过程

一个主题对从事某种活动的目标采取行动

因此“白人妇女
对八岁的黑人女孩报警”

是 与“白人男子
使用社区游泳池对黑人妇女报警

”与“妇女
对俄勒冈州黑人立法者

在她所在地区的竞选活动报警”相同。

他们是一样的。

用图表描绘这些句子
让我能够描绘出让

这些句子成为真实的白人至上主义

,我将停下来定义我的术语。

当我说“白人至上”时,

我不仅仅是在谈论纳粹

或白人权力活动家

,我绝对不是
说所有白人都是种族主义者。

我指的

是一种结构优势系统,

在社会、经济和政治领域有利于白人而不是其他人。

这就是
平等正义倡议组织的布莱恩史蒂文森

所说的种族差异叙事,

我们告诉自己
为奴隶制

和吉姆克劳以及大规模监禁等辩护的故事。

所以当我看到这种模式重复时,

我很生气,

但我也受到启发

去创造一个游戏,

一个文字游戏,可以让我
将这种创伤暴露

转化为更多的治疗体验。

我将通过游戏与您交谈。

第一关是训练关
,需要你的参与。

我们的目标:
确定这是真的还是假的。

这发生了没有?

下面是一个例子:

“天主教大学法律图书馆员因

学生‘争辩’而向警察报警。”

如果你认为这是真的,请拍手。

(鼓掌)

如果你认为这是假的,就拍拍手。

(掌声

) 不幸的是,现实有它,

而且有一点信息,

在法律图书馆里争论

是完全正确的地方。

(笑声)

这个学生应该
被提升为教授。

训练关卡完成,
所以我们进入真正的关卡。

第一层,我们的目标很简单:

颠倒角色。

这意味着“女性向
俄勒冈州黑人立法者报警”

变成了“俄勒冈州黑人立法者向
女性报警”。

这意味着“白人男子

使用社区游泳池向

黑人妇女报警”变成了“黑人妇女
使用社区游泳池向白人男子报警”。

你如何看待
他们反种族主义的苹果?

就是这样,第一级完成

,所以我们升级到第二级

,我们的目标是增加
反转的可信度。

让我们面对现实吧,一个黑人女子
在游泳池里对一个白人男子报警

并不够荒谬,

但如果那个白人男子
不问就试图抚摸她的头发,

或者他
在骑独轮车时正在制作燕麦牛奶,

或者 也许他只是
在会议上谈论每个人。

(笑声)

我们都去过那里,对吧?

说真的,我们都去过那里。

至此,二级完成。

但它伴随着一个警告:

简单地扭转
不公正的潮流并不是正义。

那是复仇,
那不是我们的使命,

那是一个不同的游戏,
所以我们升级到三级

,目标
是改变行动,

也称为“报警
不是你唯一的选择

OMG,你怎么了 人们!”

(掌声)

我需要暂停游戏
来提醒我们结构。

主体
对从事某种活动的目标采取行动。

“白人妇女因
黑人房地产投资者

检查自己的财产而报警。”

“加利福尼亚西夫韦
呼吁警察对黑人妇女

向无家可归者捐赠食物。”

“黄金俱乐部两次就
黑人女性打得太慢而报警。”

在所有这些情况下
,主题通常是白人

,目标通常是黑人

,活动无所不包,

从坐在星巴克

到使用错误类型的烧烤

到打盹

,再到上班路上“激动”地走路

,我 就叫“走路上班”吧。

(笑声)

而且,我个人最喜欢的是,

不阻止他的狗撞她的狗,

这显然是狗警察的案例,

而不是人警察的案例。

所有这些活动加起来就是生活。

我们的存在被
解释为犯罪。

现在,这是
演示文稿中的必要时刻,我不得不说,

并非一切都与种族有关。

犯罪是一回事,应该报告,

但问问自己,我们是否需要武装
人员出现并解决这种情况,

因为当他们出现在我面前时,情况

就不同了。

我们知道警察

对黑人使用武力的次数多于对白人使用武力

,我们正在了解
911 呼叫在这方面的作用。

多亏
了警务公平中心的初步研究,

我们了解到在一些城市,

警察和市民之间的大部分互动

是由于 911 呼叫,

而不是警察发起的拦截,

而大多数暴力
是使用武力 警察对公民,

是对这些呼吁的回应。

此外,当那些
响应电话的警察使用武力时,

在白人人口比例

也增加的地区,

也就是高档化,

也就是独轮车和燕麦牛奶,

也就是当烧烤贝基感到受到威胁时,


在我的生活中对我构成了威胁。 自己的邻居,

这迫使我和像

我这样的人自律。

我们让自己安静下来,我们在蛋壳上行走,

我们可能会在

我们能找到的最亮的灯光下把车停在路边,

这样我们的谋杀

可能会被摄像机清晰地捕捉到

,我们这样做是因为我们生活在

一个白人
人们太容易动用致命武力

来确保自己的舒适。

(掌声

) 加州

Safeway 不仅仅因为
黑人妇女向无家可归者捐赠食物而报警。

他们命令武装的、
不负责任的人对付她。

他们实质上是发起了一次无人机袭击。

这是武器化的不适

,它并不新鲜。

从 1877 年到 1950 年,

美国至少有 4,400 起记录在案的
针对黑人的种族恐怖私刑

他们也有头条新闻。

“牧师 T.A. 艾伦因组织当地佃农而
在密西西比州埃尔南多被处以私刑

。”

“奥利弗·摩尔
在北卡罗来纳州埃奇科姆县被处以私刑,

因为他吓坏了一个白人女孩。”

“内森·伯德在
得克萨斯州鹿岭附近被处以私刑,

因为他拒绝将他的儿子
交给暴徒。”

我们需要改变行动,

无论行动是“私刑”

还是“报警”。

现在我已经缩短
了两者之间的距离,

让我们回到我们的游戏,
回到我们的使命。

我们在第三级的目标
是改变行动。

那么,如果加利福尼亚西夫韦没有

“呼吁警察向黑人妇女
捐赠食物给无家可归者”

,那该怎么办?

感谢远比将
执法人员带到现场便宜得多。

(掌声)

或者,

他们可以把他们本来会浪费的食物
给她,

提高他们的公民信誉。

或者,那个给
八岁黑人女孩报警的白人女人,

她本可以
从那个黑人小女孩那里买下所有的存货,

支持一个小生意。

那个
为黑人房地产投资者报警的白人女人,

我们都会过得更好
,警察同意,

如果她只是无视他
,只管她自己该死的事情。

(笑声)

管好自己该死的事
是一个极好的选择,极好的选择。

更频繁地选择它。

第三级已完成,
但还有一个最终奖励级别

,目标是包容。

我们还看到过这样的头条新闻:

“有权有势的男人
在访问他办公室的年轻女性面前自慰

。”


权势的人做出多么奇怪的选择。

他可以采取许多其他行动。

(笑声)

喜欢,比如,“听”,

“导师”,

“受启发,开始合资,
现在大家都发财了”。

(笑声)

我现在想生活在那个
人人有钱的世界里,

但由于他的错误选择,
我们都生活在一个更贫穷的世界里。

不一定要这样。

这个文字游戏提醒我,
白人至上是有结构的,

厌女症

也是如此,所有
系统性的权力滥用也是如此。

结构使它们具有系统性。

我要在这里的

人们看到这个结构,

它的力量在哪里

,更重要
的是看到

我们这些人的人性成为
这个结构的目标。

我在这里是因为我被爱
、被投资、被保护和幸运,

因为我上了正确的学校,
我是半成名的,大部分时间都很快乐,

每天冥想两次

,然而,

我在恐惧中四处走动,

因为我知道有人
将我视为威胁

可能会威胁到我的生命

,我很累。

我厌倦了背负

别人恐惧的无形负担,

我们中的许多人都是,

而且我们不应该这样做,

因为我们可以改变这一点,

因为我们可以改变行动
,改变故事

,改变

系统 允许这些故事发生。

系统只是
我们都相信的集体故事。

当我们改变它们时,

我们
为我们所有人写了一个更好的现实。

我要求

我们用我们的权力来选择。

我要求我们升级。

谢谢你。

我是巴拉通德·拉菲克·瑟斯顿。

(掌声)