A political party for womens equality Sandi Toksvig

I am so excited to be here.

Everything in America
is so much bigger than in Europe.

Look at me – I am huge!

(Laughter)

It’s fantastic!

And TED Talks – TED Talks
are where everybody has great ideas.

So the question is: Where do
those great ideas come from?

Well, it’s a little bit of debate,

but it’s generally reckoned
that the average person –

that’s me –

has about 50,000 thoughts a day.

Which is a lot,

until you realize that 95 percent of them

are the same ones you had the day before.

(Laughter)

And a lot of mine are really boring, OK?

I think things like,

“Oh! I know – I must clean the floor.

Oh! I forgot to walk the dog.”

My most popular:

“Don’t eat that cookie.”

(Laughter)

So, 95 percent repetition.

That leaves us with just a five percent
window of opportunity each day

to actually think something new.

And some of my new thoughts are useless.

The other day I was watching
some sports on television,

and I was trying to decide
why I just don’t engage with it.

Some of it I find curious.

This is odd.

(Laughter)

Do you think it would be
worth being that flexible

just to be able to see
your heel at that angle?

(Laughter)

And here’s the thing:

I’m never going to be able
to relate to that,

because I’m never going
to be able to do it, OK?

Well, not twice, anyway.

(Laughter)

But I’ll tell you the truth.

The truth is I have never been
any good at sport, OK?

I’ve reached that wonderful age
when all my friends say,

“Oh, I wish I was as fit
as I was when I was 18.”

And I always feel rather smug then.

(Laughter)

I’m exactly as fit as I was when I –

(Laughter)

(Applause)

I couldn’t run then. I’m certainly
not going to do it now.

(Laughter)

So then I had my new idea:

Why not engage people like me in sport?

I think what the world needs now

is the Olympics for people
with zero athletic ability.

(Laughter)

Oh, it would be so much more fun.

We’d have three basic rules, OK?

Obviously no drugs;
no corruption, no skills.

(Laughter)

It would be –

No, it’s a terrible idea.

And I also know why I don’t engage
with sport when I watch it on television.

It’s because probably 97 percent of it
is about men running

and men kicking things,

men trying to look
neatly packaged in Lycra.

There is –

(Laughter)

Not always successfully.

There is –

(Laughter)

There is so little
female sport on television,

that a young woman watching
might be forgiven for thinking,

and how can I put this nicely,

that the male member
is the very lever you need

to get yourself off the couch
and onto a sports ground.

(Laughter)

The inequalities in sport
are breathtaking.

So this is what happens to me:

I have a brand new idea,

and immediately I come back to an old one.

The fact is, there is not now,

nor has there ever been
in the whole of history,

a single country in the world
where women have equality with men.

Not one.

196 countries,

it hasn’t happened
in the whole of evolution.

So, here is a picture of evolution.

(Laughter)

We women are not even in it!

(Laughter)

It’s a wonder men have been able
to evolve quite so brilliantly.

So –

(Laughter)

It bugs me, and I know
I should do something about it.

But I’m busy, OK?

I have a full-on career,

I’ve got three kids,
I’ve got an elderly mom.

In fact, if I’m honest with you,

one of the reasons I came out here

is because TED Talks said
I could have 15 minutes to myself,

and I never have that much time –

(Laughter)

(Applause)

So I’m busy.

And anyway, I already had a go
at changing the world.

Here’s the thing, OK?

Everybody has inside themselves
what I call an “activation button.”

It’s the button that gets
pressed when you think,

“I must do something about this.”

It gets pressed for all sorts of reasons.

Maybe you face some kind of inequality,

or you’ve come across
an injustice of some kind,

sometimes an illness strikes,

or you’re born in some way disadvantaged,

or perhaps underprivileged.

So I was born gay, OK?

I’ve always known,

I don’t think my family
were the least bit surprised.

Here is a picture of me aged four.

I look cute,

but inside I genuinely believed
that I looked like Clint Eastwood.

(Laughter)

So my activation button
was pressed when I had my kids –

three wonderful kids,
born to my then-partner.

Now here’s the thing:
I work on television in Britain.

By the time they were born,
I was already hosting my own shows

and working in the public eye.

I love what I do,

but I love my kids more.

And I didn’t want them
to grow up with a secret.

1994, when my son, my youngest was born,

there was not, as far as I was aware,

a single out, gay woman
in British public life.

I don’t think secrets are a good thing.

I think they are a cancer of the soul.

So I decided to come out.

Everybody warned me
that I would never work again,

but I decided it was
absolutely worth the risk.

Well, it was hell.

In Britain, we have a particularly vicious
section of the right-wing press,

and they went nuts.

And their hatred stirred up
the less stable elements of society,

and we got death threats –

enough death threats
that I had to take the kids into hiding,

and we had to have police protection.

And I promise you there were
many moments in the still of the night

when I was terrified by what I had done.

Eventually the dust settled.

Against all expectation
I carried on working,

and my kids were and continue
to be absolutely fantastic.

I remember when my son was six,
he had a friend over to play.

They were in the next room;
I could hear them chatting.

The friend said to my son,
“What’s it like having two mums?”

I was a little anxious to hear,
so I leant in to hear and my son said,

“It’s fantastic,
because if one of them’s sick,

you’ve still got another one
to cook for you.”

(Laughter)

So my activation button
for gay equality was pressed,

and along with many, many others,

I campaigned for years for gay rights,

and in particular, the right to marry
the person that I love.

In the end, we succeeded.

And in 2014, on the day
that the law was changed,

I married my wife,
who I love very much, indeed.

(Applause)

We didn’t do it in a quiet way –
we did it on the stage

at the Royal Festival Hall in London.

It was a great event.

The hall seats two-and-a-half
thousand people.

We invited 150 family and friends,
then I let it be known to the public:

anybody who wanted to come and celebrate,
please come and join us.

It would be free to anybody
who wanted to come.

Two-and-half thousand people turned up.

(Applause)

Every kind of person you can imagine:

gays, straights, rabbis,
nuns, married people,

black, white – the whole
of humanity was there.

And I remember standing
on that stage thinking, “How fantastic.

Job done.

Love triumphs.

Law changed.”

And I –

(Applause)

And I genuinely thought
my activation days were over, OK?

So every year in that same hall,

I host a fantastic concert to celebrate
International Women’s Day.

We gather the world’s only
all-female orchestra,

we play fantastic music by forgotten
or overlooked women composers,

we have amazing conductors –

it’s Marin Alsop there
from Baltimore conducting,

Petula Clark singing –

and I give a lecture on women’s history.

I love to gather inspirational stories
from the past and pass them on.

Too often, I think history’s what I call
the Mount Rushmore model.

It looks majestic, but the women
have been entirely left out of it.

And I was giving a talk in 2015
about the suffragettes –

I’m sure you know those magnificent
women who fought so hard

for the right for women
in Britain to vote.

And their slogan was: “Deeds, not words.”

And boy, they succeeded,

because women did indeed
get the vote in 1928.

So I’m giving this talk about this,

and as I’m talking, what I realized is:

this was not a history
lecture I was giving;

this was not something
where the job was done.

This was something where
there was so much left to do.

Nowhere in the world, for example,

do women have equal representation
in positions of power.

OK, let’s take a very quick look
at the top 100 companies

in the London Stock Exchange in 2016.

Top 100 companies:
How many women running them?

Seven. OK. Seven.
That’s all right, I suppose.

Until you realize that 17
are run by men called “John.”

(Laughter)

There are more men called John
running FTSE 100 companies –

(Laughter)

than there are women.

There are 14 run by men called “Dave.”

(Laughter)

Now, I’m sure Dave and John
are doing a bang-up job.

(Laughter)

OK. Why does it matter?

Well, it’s that pesky business
of the gender pay gap.

Nowhere in the world
do women earn the same as men.

And that is never going to change

unless we have more women
at the top in the boardroom.

We have plenty of laws;

the Equal Pay Act in Britain
was passed in 1975.

Nevertheless, there are still
many, many women

who, from early November
until the end of the year,

by comparison to their male colleagues,

are effectively working for free.

In fact, the World Economic
Forum estimates

that women will finally
get equal pay in …

2133!

Yay!

(Laughter)

That’s a terrible figure.

And here’s the thing:

the day before I came out to give my talk,

the World Economic Forum revised it.

So that’s good, because
that’s a terrible – 2133.

Do you know what they revised it to?

(Laughter)

Yeah, another 53 years, OK?

We are not going to get equal pay

in my grandchildren’s
grandchildren’s lives

under the current system.

And I have waited long enough.

I’ve waited long enough
in my own business.

In 2016 I became the very
first woman on British television

to host a prime-time panel show.

Isn’t that great? Wonderful, I’m thrilled.

But –

(Applause)

But 2016! The first!

Television’s been around for 80 years!

(Laughter)

It may be television’s not so important,

but it’s kind of symptomatic, isn’t it?

2016, the UN were looking
for a brand new ambassador

to represent women’s empowerment
and gender equality,

and who did they choose?

Wonder Woman.

Yes, they chose a cartoon, OK?

(Laughter)

Because no woman was up to the job.

The representation of women
in positions of power is shockingly low.

It’s true in Congress, and it’s certainly
true in the British Parliament.

In 2015, the number of men
elected to the Parliament that year

was greater than the total number of women

who have ever been members of Parliament.

And why does it matter?

Here’s the thing:
if they’re not at the table –

literally, in Britain, at that table
helping to make the laws –

do not be surprised if the female
perspective is overlooked.

It’s a great role model for young people
to see a woman in charge.

In 2016, Britain got its second
female Prime Minister;

Theresa May came to power.

The day she came to power
she was challenged:

just do one thing.

Do one thing in the first
100 days that you’re in office

to try and improve
lives for women in Britain.

And what did she do? Nothing.

Nothing.

Because she’s much too busy
cleaning up the mess the boys made.

Even having a female leader,

they always find something better to do

than to sort out the pesky
issue of inequality.

So I keep talking about equality
like it matters. Does it?

Well, let’s take a very quick look
at the STEM industries, OK?

So science, technology,
engineering and mathematics.

Pretty much important in every
single aspect of our daily lives.

There is the thickest and most incredibly
well-documented glass ceiling

in the STEM industries.

What if the cure for cancer

or the answer the global warming

lies in the head of a young female
scientist who fails to progress?

So I thought all these things,

and I knew I had to do “Deeds, not words.”

And I spoke to my wonderful friend,

brilliant journalist
Catherine Mayer in Britain,

and we rather foolishly –

and I suspect there was wine involved –

(Laughter)

We decided to found
a brand new political party.

Because here’s the critical thing:

the one place women and men
are absolutely equal is at the ballot box.

We had no idea what we were doing,

we didn’t know how complicated
it was to start a political party.

I thought, “It can’t be that difficult,
men have been doing it for years.”

(Laughter)

So we started by calling it
“The Women’s Equality Party.”

And straightaway people said to me,

“Why did you call it that?”

I said, “I don’t know,
I just thought we’d be clear.”

(Laughter)

I didn’t want what we were doing
to be a secret, you know? I just –

(Laughter)

Some people said, “You can’t call it that!
It’s much too feminist!”

Ooh! Scary word! Ahh!

I can’t tell you how many times
I’ve heard somebody say,

“I’m not a feminist, but …”

And I always think
if there’s a “but” in the sentence,

it can’t all be roses in the garden.

And then I started getting asked
the hilarious question,

“Are you all going to burn your bras?”

Yes! Because bras are famously
made of flammable material.

(Laughter)

That’s why all women spark when they walk.

(Laughter)

Here’s quick history sidebar for you:

no woman ever burnt her bra in the ’60s.

It’s a story made up by a journalist.

Thank goodness journalism
has improved since then.

So –

(Laughter)

I announced what we were going
to do in a broadcast interview,

and straightaway,
the emails started coming.

First hundreds,
then thousands and thousands,

from every age group: from the very young
to women in their ’90s,

to hundreds of wonderful men.

People wrote and said,
“Please, can I help?

Please, can I visit you
at party headquarters?”

We didn’t have a headquarters –
we didn’t have a party!

We didn’t have anything.

All we had was a wonderful,
tight group of fabulous friends

trying to answer emails
pretty much 24-7 in our pajamas.

We were all busy.

Many of us had careers,
many of us had children,

but we did what women do,
and we shared the work.

And almost instantly, we agreed
on certain fundamental things.

First thing: we want to be
the only political party in the world

whose main aim was
to no longer need to exist.

That’s a fantastic idea.

We wanted to be the only political party
with no particular political leaning.

We wanted people from the left,
from the right, from the middle,

every age group.

Because the whole point
was to work with a simple agenda:

let’s get equality
in every aspect of our lives,

and when we’re finished,

let’s go home and get
the other chores done.

(Laughter)

And we wanted to change
how politics is conducted.

I don’t know if you have this,

but in Britain we have
two major political parties.

They’re the dinosaurs of politics.

And how they speak to each other
is shameful and poisonous.

I’m sure you’ve never had
that kind of name-calling –

(Laughter)

And lying here.

Wouldn’t it be great
if just one politician said,

“Do you know, my opponent has a point.

Let’s see if we can’t work together
and get the job done.”

(Applause)

And let’s get more women
into politics, OK?

Let’s immediately get
more women into politics

by being the only political party
to offer free childcare to our candidates,

so they can get out of the house
and start campaigning.

(Applause)

Within 10 months,

we had more than 70 branches
of our party across the UK.

We stood candidates for election
in London, Scotland and Wales

in May 2016.

One in 20 people voted
for our candidate for London Mayor.

And when the men in the race
saw how many votes we were attracting,

wonder of wonders,

they began to talk about the need
to tackle gender equality.

(Applause)

You know, I’ve been promised
change since I was a child.

It was always coming:

women were going to stand
shoulder to shoulder with men.

All I got were empty promises
and disappointment –

enough disappointment
to found a political party.

But here is my new idea for today –
this is my five percent, OK?

And this one is really good.

The fact is, this is not enough.

It is not enough to found one political
party for equality in a single country.

What we need is a seismic change
in the global political landscape.

And the wonderful thing
about the model we have created

is that it would work anywhere.

It would work in America,

it would work in Australia,
it would work in India.

It’s like we’ve made the perfect recipe:
anybody can cook it,

and it’s good for everybody.

And we want to give it away.

If you want to know what we did,
we’re giving it away.

Can you imagine if we could mobilize
millions of women across the world

to say, “That’s enough!”
to the traditional battles of politics?

To say, “Stop the bickering,
let’s get the work done.”

We could literally change the world.

And I want that.

(Applause)

I want …

(Applause)

I want that for our daughters,

and I want it for our sons.

Because the fact is:
equality is better for everyone.

Come on people, let’s activate!
Let’s change the world!

I know we can do it, and it wants doing!

(Applause)

我很高兴来到这里。

美国
的一切都比欧洲大得多。

看看我——我是巨大的!

(笑声

) 太棒了!

还有 TED 演讲——TED 演讲
是每个人都有好主意的地方。

所以问题是:
这些伟大的想法从何而来?

嗯,这有点争论,

但一般
认为普通人——

也就是我——

每天有大约 50,000 个想法。

这很多,

直到您意识到其中 95%

与您前一天拥有的相同。

(笑声)

我的很多东西真的很无聊,好吗?

我想,

“哦!我知道——我必须打扫地板。

哦!我忘了遛狗。”

我最受欢迎的:

“不要吃那个饼干。”

(笑声)

所以,95% 的重复。

这让我们每天只有 5%
的机会窗口

来实际思考新事物。

我的一些新想法毫无用处。

前几天我
在电视上看一些体育节目

,我试图决定
为什么我不参与其中。

其中一些我觉得很好奇。

这很奇怪。

(笑声)

你认为

为了能
在那个角度看到你的脚后跟而变得那么灵活值得吗?

(笑声

) 事情是这样的:

我永远无法
与之相关,

因为我永远
也做不到,好吗?

好吧,反正不是两次。

(笑声)

但我会告诉你真相。

事实是我从来
都不擅长运动,好吗?

当我所有的朋友都说:

“哦,我希望我能像 18 岁时一样健康
。”

那时我总是觉得很自鸣得意。

(笑声)

我和以前一样健康——

(笑声)

(掌声)

那时我跑不动了。 我现在肯定
不会这样做。

(笑声)

于是我有了新的想法:

为什么不让像我这样的人参与体育运动呢?

我认为世界现在需要的

是为
运动能力为零的人举办的奥运会。

(笑声)

哦,那会更有趣。

我们有三个基本规则,好吗?

显然没有药物;
没有腐败,没有技能。

(笑声

) 那会是——

不,这是个糟糕的主意。

而且我也知道为什么
我在电视上看体育时不参与体育运动。

这是因为大概 97%
是关于男人跑步

和男人踢东西,

男人试图看起来
整齐地用莱卡包装。

有——

(笑声)

不总是成功的。

有——

(笑声)

电视上的女性运动太少了

,一个年轻的女人在看电视时
可能会思考

,我怎么能说得好

,男性成员
正是你摆脱困境所需要的杠杆

沙发
和运动场。

(笑声)

运动中的不平等
是惊人的。

所以这就是发生在我身上的事情:

我有了一个全新的想法,

然后我马上又回到了旧的想法。

事实是,现在世界上

没有一个国家
,整个历史上也没有

一个
国家男女平等。

不是一个。

196个国家,

在整个进化过程中都没有发生过。

所以,这是一张进化图。

(笑声)

我们女人根本不在其中!

(笑声)

人类能够
如此出色地进化真是一个奇迹。

所以——

(笑声)

这让我很烦恼,我知道
我应该做点什么。

但是我很忙,好吗?

我有一个完整的职业生涯,

我有三个孩子,
我有一个年迈的妈妈。

事实上,老实说,

我来这里的原因之一

是因为 TED Talks 说
我可以有 15 分钟的时间给自己,

而我从来没有那么多时间——

(笑声)

(掌声)

所以我' 米忙。

无论如何,我已经尝试
过改变世界。

事情是这样的,好吗?

每个人的内心都有
一个我称之为“激活按钮”的东西。

当你想,

“我必须为此做点什么”时,它就会被按下。

它因各种原因而受到压力。

也许你面临某种不平等,

或者你遇到
了某种不公正,

有时会生病,

或者你生来就处于不利地位,

或者可能处于弱势地位。

所以我生来是同性恋,好吗?

我一直都知道,

我认为我的家人一点也不
感到惊讶。

这是我四岁时的照片。

我看起来很可爱,

但内心深处我真的
相信我看起来像克林特伊斯特伍德。

(笑声)

所以
当我有了孩子时,我的激活按钮被按下了——

三个很棒的孩子,
是我当时的伴侣所生的。

事情是这样的:
我在英国从事电视工作。

当他们出生时,
我已经在主持自己的节目

并在公众视野中工作。

我爱我所做的,

但我更爱我的孩子。

而且我不希望他们
在一个秘密中长大。

1994 年,当我最小的儿子

出生时,据我所知,英国公共生活中还没有

一个单身的同性恋
女性。

我不认为秘密是一件好事。

我认为他们是灵魂的癌症。

所以我决定出来。

每个人都警告我
,我永远不会再工作了,

但我认为这是
绝对值得冒险的。

嗯,这是地狱。

在英国,我们有一个特别
恶毒的右翼媒体

,他们发疯了。

他们的仇恨激起
了社会不稳定因素

,我们收到了死亡威胁——

足够多的死亡威胁
,我不得不把孩子们藏起来

,我们必须得到警察的保护。

我向你保证
,在夜深人静的

时候,有很多时候我被自己的所作所为吓坏了。

最终尘埃落定。

出乎所有人的意料,
我继续工作

,我的孩子们过去和现在
都非常棒。

我记得我儿子六岁的时候,
他有一个朋友过来玩。

他们在隔壁房间。
我能听到他们在聊天。

朋友对我儿子说:
“有两个妈妈是什么感觉?”

我有点急于听,
所以我靠过去听,我儿子说,

“这太棒了,
因为如果他们中的一个生病了,

你还有另一个
给你做饭。”

(笑声)

于是我按下
了同性恋平等的启动按钮,

和许多很多其他人一起,

多年来我一直在争取同性恋权利

,尤其是与
我所爱的人结婚的权利。

最后,我们成功了。

2014年,在
法律修改的那一天,

我娶了
我非常爱的妻子,真的。

(掌声)

我们没有安静地做——
我们是

在伦敦皇家节日音乐厅的舞台上做的。

这是一个伟大的事件。

大厅可容纳
两千人。

我们邀请了 150 位家人和朋友,
然后我让公众知道:

任何想来庆祝的人,
请来加入我们。

任何想来的人都可以免费
参加。

两千五万人出现了。

(掌声)

你能想象到的每一种人:

同性恋、异性恋、拉比、
修女、已婚人士、

黑人、白人——
全人类都在那里。

我记得
站在那个舞台上想,“太棒了。

工作完成了。

爱情胜利了。

法律改变了。”

我——

(掌声)

我真的以为
我的激活日结束了,好吗?

所以每年在同一个大厅里,

我都会举办一场精彩的音乐会来庆祝
国际妇女节。

我们聚集了世界上唯一的
全女性管弦乐队,

我们演奏被遗忘
或被忽视的女性作曲家的美妙音乐,

我们有出色的指挥家

——巴尔的摩的马林·阿尔索普
指挥,

佩图拉·克拉克(Petula Clark)演唱

——我还做了一场关于女性历史的讲座。

我喜欢
收集过去的励志故事并将它们传递下去。

很多时候,我认为历史就是我所说
的拉什莫尔山模式。

它看起来很雄伟,但女性
完全被排除在外。

我在 2015 年发表了
关于妇女参政的演讲——

我相信你知道那些为英国女性投票权
而奋斗的伟大女性

他们的口号是:“行,而不是言”。

天哪,他们成功了,

因为女性确实
在 1928 年获得了投票权。

所以我正在谈论这个问题

,当我在谈论这个问题时,我意识到:

这不是我正在做的历史
讲座;而是我正在做的历史讲座。

这不是
完成工作的地方。

这是
有很多事情要做的事情。

例如,世界上没有任何地方的

女性在权力职位上享有平等的代表
权。

好的,让我们快速浏览一下

2016 年伦敦证券交易所的

100 强公司。 100 强公司:
有多少女性经营它们?

七。 行。 七。
没关系,我想。

直到你意识到这 17 家
是由名叫“约翰”的人经营的。

(笑声)

经营富时 100 指数公司的男性

多于女性。

有 14 个由名为“戴夫”的男人经营。

(笑声)

现在,我确信戴夫和约翰
正在做一个很棒的工作。

(笑声)

好的。 为什么这有关系?

嗯,这是令人讨厌
的性别薪酬差距。

世界上没有任何地方
女性的收入与男性相同。

除非董事会中有更多女性
担任高层,否则这种情况永远不会改变。

我们有很多法律;

英国于 1975 年通过了《同工同酬法》

尽管如此

,从 11 月初
到年底

,与男性同事相比,

仍有许多女性实际上是在免费工作。

事实上,世界经济
论坛估计

,女性最终将
在……

2133 年获得同工同酬!

耶!

(笑声)

这是一个可怕的数字。

事情是这样的:

在我出来发表演讲的前一天

,世界经济论坛对其进行了修改。

所以这很好,因为
那太糟糕了——

2133。你知道他们把它改成什么吗?

(笑声)

是啊,再过53年,好吗? 在现行制度下,

我们不会

在我孙子
孙女的生活中获得同工同酬

而且我已经等得够久了。

我在自己的生意上已经等得够久了

2016 年,我成为
英国电视上第一位

主持黄金时段小组节目的女性。

那不是很棒吗? 太棒了,我很兴奋。

但是——

(掌声)

但是2016! 首先!

电视已经存在 80 年了!

(笑声

) 电视可能不那么重要,

但它是一种症状,不是吗?

2016年,联合国正在
寻找一位全新的大使

来代表女性赋权
和性别平等

,他们选择了谁?

神奇女侠。

是的,他们选择了卡通片,好吗?

(笑声)

因为没有女人能胜任这份工作。

女性担任权力职位的比例低得惊人。

国会
如此,英国议会亦然。

In 2015, the number of men
elected to the Parliament that year

was greater than the total number of women

who have ever been members of Parliament.

为什么这很重要?

事情是这样的:
如果她们不在谈判桌旁——

从字面上看,在英国,在
帮助制定法律的那张桌子旁——

如果女性
视角被忽视,不要感到惊讶。

对于年轻人来说,看到一位女性负责人是一个很好的榜样

2016年,英国迎来第二位
女首相;

特蕾莎·梅上台。

在她上台的那天,她受到了
挑战:

只做一件事。

在你上任的前 100 天内做一件事,

尝试改善
英国女性的生活。

她做了什么? 没有什么。

没有什么。

因为她太忙
于收拾男孩们造成的烂摊子了。

即使有一位女性领导,

他们也总能找到

比解决令人讨厌
的不平等问题更好的事情。

所以我一直在谈论平等,
因为它很重要。 可以?

好吧,让我们快速了解
一下 STEM 行业,好吗?

所以科学、技术、
工程和数学。

在我们日常生活的各个方面都非常重要
。 在 STEM 行业中

有最厚、最令人难以置信
的有据可查的玻璃天花板

如果癌症的治愈方法

或全球变暖的答案

掌握在一位没有进步的年轻女科学家的头上
怎么办?

所以我想到了所有这些事情

,我知道我必须做“行动,而不是言语”。

我在英国和我的好朋友、

才华横溢的记者
凯瑟琳·梅耶(Catherine Mayer)进行了交谈,

我们相当愚蠢

——我怀疑这其中涉及到葡萄酒——

(笑声)

我们决定建立
一个全新的政党。

因为这是关键:

男女绝对平等的地方就是投票箱。

我们不知道我们在做什么,

我们不
知道建立一个政党有多复杂。

我想,“这不可能那么难,
男人已经做了很多年了。”

(笑声)

所以我们开始称它为
“女性平等党”。

人们直接对我说,

“你为什么这么称呼它?”

我说:“我不知道,
我只是以为我们会很清楚。”

(笑声)

我不想让我们的
所作所为成为秘密,你知道吗? 我只是——

(笑声)

有人说,“你不能这么说!
这太女权主义了!”

哦! 可怕的词! 啊!

我无法告诉你
我听过多少次有人说,

“我不是女权主义者,但是……”

而且我一直认为,
如果句子中有“但是”,

那不可能都是玫瑰 在花园里。

然后我开始
被问到一个有趣的问题,

“你们都要烧掉你的胸罩吗?”

是的! 因为胸罩是
由易燃材料制成的。

(笑声)

这就是为什么所有女人走路时都会发光的原因。

(笑声)

这里有一个简短的历史侧边栏:

60 年代没有女人烧过她的胸罩。

这是一个记者编造的故事。

谢天谢地,
从那以后,新闻业有所改善。

所以——

(笑声)


在一次广播采访中宣布了我们将要做什么,

然后马上
就开始收到电子邮件。

先是成百上千,
然后是成百上千,

从各个年龄段:从非常年轻的
到 90 多岁的女性,

再到数百名优秀的男人。

人们写信说:
“拜托,我能帮忙吗?

拜托,我可以
去党部拜访你吗?”

我们没有总部——
我们没有派对!

我们什么都没有。

我们所拥有的只是一群美妙而
紧密的好朋友,他们

试图
穿着睡衣每天 24-7 小时回复电子邮件。

我们都很忙。

我们中的许多人都有事业,
我们中的许多人都有孩子,

但我们做了女性所做的事情
,我们分享了工作。

几乎立刻,我们
就某些基本问题达成了一致。

第一件事:我们想成为
世界上唯一一个

其主要目标
是不再需要存在的政党。

这是一个绝妙的主意。

我们想成为唯一
没有特别政治倾向的政党。

我们想要从左派
、右派、中间派、

每个年龄段的人。

因为重点
是制定一个简单的议程:


我们在生活的各个方面实现平等

,当我们完成后,

让我们回家
完成其他家务。

(笑声

) 我们想
改变政治的运作方式。

我不知道你有没有这个,

但在英国,我们有
两个主要政党。

他们是政治的恐龙。

他们互相交谈的方式
是可耻和有毒的。

我敢肯定你从来没有受到过
这种辱骂——

(笑声

) 躺在这里。

如果只有一位政客说:

“你知道吗,我的对手有一个观点。

让我们看看我们是否能
一起努力完成工作。”

(掌声

)让更多女性参与
政治,好吗?

让我们

通过成为唯一
为我们的候选人提供免费托儿服务的政党,立即让更多女性参与政治,

这样她们就可以
走出家门开始竞选。

(掌声)

10个月内,

我们党在英国有70多个支部。

我们在 2016 年 5 月
成为伦敦、苏格兰和威尔士的候选人。每

20 人中就有 1 人投票
支持我们的伦敦市长候选人。

当参加比赛的男性
看到我们吸引了多少选票时,

惊叹不已,

他们开始谈论
解决性别平等问题的必要性。

(掌声)

你知道,我从小就被承诺
改变。

它总是来的:

女人将
与男人并肩站立。

我得到的只是空洞的承诺
和失望——

足以让
我建立一个政党的失望。

但这是我今天的新想法——
这是我的百分之五,好吗?

而且这个真的很好。

事实是,这还不够。

在一个国家建立一个平等的政党是不够的。

我们需要的是全球政治格局发生翻天覆地的变化

我们创建的模型的美妙之

处在于它可以在任何地方工作。

它会在美国起作用,

它会在澳大利亚起作用,
它会在印度起作用。

就像我们制作了完美的食谱:
任何人都可以烹饪,

而且对每个人都有好处。

我们想放弃它。

如果你想知道我们做了什么,
我们正在放弃它。

你能想象如果我们能动员
全世界数百万女性

说,“够了!”
传统的政治斗争?

说,“停止争吵,
让我们完成工作。”

我们可以从字面上改变世界。

我想要那个。

(掌声)

我想要……

(掌声)

我想要给我们的女儿,

也想要给我们的儿子。

因为事实是:
平等对每个人都更好。

来人,让我们激活!
让我们改变世界!

我知道我们可以做到,而且它想要做到!

(掌声)